Re: Cleaning /var/db/portsnap/files/, how?

2010-10-04 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 08:17:02 -0400, Jerry wrote: > You say po-tah-toes, he says po-tay-toes, who cares? I say Kartoffel, you say name server, who cares? :-) > Were you > completely baffled by what he was trying to convey? At the very least, > you could have attempted to answer his question befo

Re: Cleaning /var/db/portsnap/files/, how?

2010-10-04 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:01:24 +0200, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > On several FreeBSD boxes "performing portsnap fetch" updating the ports > on a regular basis, folder /var/db/portsnap/files/ gets filled over > time. Sorry for not answering your question, but allow me a little sidenote regarding the

Re: Cleaning /var/db/portsnap/files/, how?

2010-10-04 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:59:50 +0100 RW articulated: > There shouldn't be any need to do that, they are supposed to be > deleted automatically. I have 22371, if you have much more than that > you probably should remove the contents of /var/db/portsnap/ and do > another fetch. I have 22339 files on

Cleaning /var/db/portsnap/files/, how?

2010-10-04 Thread O. Hartmann
On several FreeBSD boxes "performing portsnap fetch" updating the ports on a regular basis, folder /var/db/portsnap/files/ gets filled over time. I was wondering if there is not an elegant, sophisticated way cleaning up those files not needed anymore. Please shed light onto my

Re: Cleaning /var/db/portsnap/files/, how?

2010-10-04 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:24:18 +0200 Polytropon articulated: > On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:01:24 +0200, "O. Hartmann" > wrote: > > On several FreeBSD boxes "performing portsnap fetch" updating the > > ports on a regular basis, folder /var/db/portsnap/files/ gets > > filled over time. > > Sorry for not

Re: Cleaning /var/db/portsnap/files/, how?

2010-10-04 Thread RW
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 12:01:24 +0200 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > On several FreeBSD boxes "performing portsnap fetch" updating the > ports on a regular basis, folder /var/db/portsnap/files/ gets filled > over time. I was wondering if there is not an elegant, sophisticated

Re: Cleaning /var/db/portsnap/files/, how?

2010-10-04 Thread RW
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 08:22:58 -0400 Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:59:50 +0100 > RW articulated: > > > There shouldn't be any need to do that, they are supposed to be > > deleted automatically. I have 22371, if you have much more than that > > you probably should remove the contents of /var

Re: Cleaning up after attack?

2010-02-15 Thread Erik Norgaard
On 15/02/10 11:13, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote: Hi. I have an up-to-date FreeBSD 7.2 box that has been compromised. Someone aparently got in to an account with certain admin priveleges and has been sending spam. I disabled the account, shut off my MTA and used pf to block all traffic to port 2

Cleaning up after attack?

2010-02-15 Thread Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum
Hi. I have an up-to-date FreeBSD 7.2 box that has been compromised. Someone aparently got in to an account with certain admin priveleges and has been sending spam. I disabled the account, shut off my MTA and used pf to block all traffic to port 25 out for good measure. How do i analyse what mi

Re: src.conf and cleaning up of base?

2009-08-25 Thread b. f.
the commands above, and then do a separate cleaning of the base system, using the timestamps as a guide. Here find(1) is your friend. I usually use something like: find /bin /sbin /lib /libexec /rescue /usr/bin /usr/sbin /usr/include /usr/lib /usr/lib32 \ /usr/libdata /usr/libexec /usr/share ! -

src.conf and cleaning up of base?

2009-08-25 Thread Henrik Hudson
Hello List, I enabled a few WITHOUT_ options in src.conf. However, the binaries for that still exists after a installworld. Is there an automatic way to "clean up" the base install? For example, I did a minimal install of 8.0-BETA2, csup'ed down -CURRENT and set WITHOUT_RCMDS in src.conf . Howeve

Re: Cleaning email

2009-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Aug 7, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Olivier Nicole wrote: reading around the FAQ for FreeBSD mailing list, I see that the mailing list server does some message cleaning (converting HTML to text, etc). I don't want just any solution, that works more or less, but the very well tested solution us

Cleaning email

2009-08-07 Thread Olivier Nicole
Hi, reading around the FAQ for FreeBSD mailing list, I see that the mailing list server does some message cleaning (converting HTML to text, etc). >From reading the list, it does a very good job and I would not mind using the same facility for my own mail if only I knew what is being used.

Re: Cleaning up multiplicates in elf ldconfig path

2009-03-31 Thread Parv
in message <200903302145.48743.mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net>, wrote Mel Flynn thusly... > > On Sunday 29 March 2009 16:39:15 Parv wrote: > > I am on FreeBSD/i386 6.4-STABLE (around Mar 1, 2009). I failed > > to find a solution to the (cosmetic) problem of ldconfig path > > having

Re: Cleaning up multiplicates in elf ldconfig path

2009-03-30 Thread Mel Flynn
On Sunday 29 March 2009 16:39:15 Parv wrote: > I am on FreeBSD/i386 6.4-STABLE (around Mar 1, 2009). I failed to > find a solution to the (cosmetic) problem of ldconfig path having > duplicate directories (dmesg output wrapped for this email) ... I've been running without /usr/X11R6 symlink for a

Re: Cleaning up multiplicates in elf ldconfig path

2009-03-30 Thread Parv
in message <20090329143915.ga1...@holstein.holy.cow>, wrote Parv thusly... > ... > I failed to find a solution to the (cosmetic) problem of ldconfig > path having duplicate directories ... > I suppose I could stick in /etc/rc.conf this ... > > ldconfig_paths="/usr/lib/compat /usr/local/lib > /us

Cleaning up multiplicates in elf ldconfig path

2009-03-29 Thread Parv
I am on FreeBSD/i386 6.4-STABLE (around Mar 1, 2009). I failed to find a solution to the (cosmetic) problem of ldconfig path having duplicate directories (dmesg output wrapped for this email) ... ELF ldconfig path: /lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat \ /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib \ /misc/local/

Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine

2008-07-28 Thread Roland Smith
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:23:04PM +0100, Chris Hastie wrote: > I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to make sure I > don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the best > way to remove all data from the hard drive? Remove the harddive and move a

Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine

2008-07-28 Thread Wojciech Puchar
don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the best way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if this removes the OS along the way, but ideally I would like to be able to do what ever I do from an SSH session. If there's no alternative I can arange KVMo

Re: Cleaning data off a remote machine

2008-07-28 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Jul 28, 2008, at 11:23, Chris Hastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to make sure I don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the best way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if this

Cleaning data off a remote machine

2008-07-28 Thread Chris Hastie
I'm about to give up a FreeBSD dedicated server and would like to make sure I don't inadvertantly leave any bits of sensitive data on it. What is the best way to remove all data from the hard drive? I have no problem if this removes the OS along the way, but ideally I would like to be able to do wh

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-19 Thread David Kelly
I can't remember the error, but doing the rm via the -exec keyword, that's never failed, and cleaning out the work directories, that absolutely cleans stuff up quickly. Not sure how deep the buffers are for wildcard expansion but apparently deep enough to do the above simpler. I use tc

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-19 Thread Chuck Robey
/usr/ports -type d -name work -exec rm -rf {} \; I've had the -delete fail from time to time, I can't remember the error, but doing the rm via the -exec keyword, that's never failed, and cleaning out the work directories, that absolutely cleans stuff up quickly. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATU

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-19 Thread Bruce Cran
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I thought of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after the compilation is finished. This should be much faster and

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-19 Thread David Kelly
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:34:24AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >>Even though it will take quite a bit longer you should just do a > >>"make distclean" in /usr/ports that way anything you hand modified > >>will be retained (also you might want to consider keeping a local > >>cvs repository if t

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-19 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Jerry McAllister wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:31:05PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Dollansky wrote: after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I thought of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one af

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:31:05PM -0500, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I > > thought of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after >

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-19 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:23:05AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I thought > of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after the > compilation is finished. Your better bet is to move your /usr/ports to your lar

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-18 Thread Erich Dollansky
re and associated make targets and environment variables. I do this ones in a while but never noticed or did not understand the use of WRKDIRPREFIX. The other thing in the ports collection that tends to take up space is the distfiles directory. If you want to delete it wholesale then go ahead

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-18 Thread John Nielsen
h" all of the work directories are created under /usr/scratch/usr/ports// instead of under /usr/ports directly. Whenever I feel like cleaning up I can just "rm -r /usr/scratch/usr/ports" without losing anything. See "man ports" for more information on the port build

RE: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-18 Thread Brent Jones
> after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, > I thought > of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after the > compilation is finished. I, like many, just use the "portsclean" utility to periodically tidy things up, or after manual ports builds if you forget

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-18 Thread Brian
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I thought of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after the compilation is finished. This should be much faster and

Re: rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-18 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I > thought of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after > the compilation is finished. > > This should be much faster and also should do some

rough method of cleaning the ports tree

2007-12-18 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, after noticing how large my ports tree grows while compiling, I thought of simply deleting it and do a CVSup to get a new one after the compilation is finished. This should be much faster and also should do some kind o defragmentation. I simply cannot believe that the huge ports tree wil

cleaning uploads

2007-05-02 Thread jekillen
Hello again: Does anyone on this list know of a system or software bundle that can be used with php to clean uploaded files. Specifically, embedded php or shell scripts, shell escape chars, viruses, executable code in image files, anything that might be hazardous in any file that might be capable

Re: cleaning old files

2007-03-08 Thread Bill Moran
In response to "Zbigniew Szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > Somehow in the process of upgrading PHP from 5.16 to 5.2.1 I got a few > 5.1.6 extenstions which were not deleted. When I issue pkg_info -Ix php5, > I get: > > php5-ctype-5.1.6The ctype shared extension for php > php5-ctype-

cleaning old files

2007-03-07 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello, Somehow in the process of upgrading PHP from 5.16 to 5.2.1 I got a few 5.1.6 extenstions which were not deleted. When I issue pkg_info -Ix php5, I get: php5-ctype-5.1.6The ctype shared extension for php php5-ctype-5.1.6_2 The ctype shared extension for php php5-dom-5.1.6 The dom

Re: cleaning out log files? [top-posting corrected]

2006-11-26 Thread Robert Huff
Oliver Iberien writes: > It turns out there was a core dump I had not noticed. I had the > idea of running ls -SlhR /var/ > /.../var_contents.txt and > looking for anything huge. Try this instead: du /var | sort -nr | head -n 25 | sendmail

Re: cleaning out log files?

2006-11-26 Thread RW
On Sunday 26 November 2006 19:21, Oliver Iberien wrote: > Thank you! I knew something like that had to exist. > > It turns out there was a core dump I had not noticed. I had the idea of > running ls -SlhR /var/ > /.../var_contents.txt and looking for anything > huge. > FreeBSD has some useful peri

Re: cleaning out log files? [top-posting corrected]

2006-11-26 Thread Oliver Iberien
On Sunday 26 November 2006 10:54, you wrote: > Check "/etc/newsyslog.conf" > All log-files you like to have rotated, should be mentioned there. > > System owned logs are in there per default. > > "du -k /var" will tell you where your space is being "consumed". > Maybe your "/var/mail/root" is growi

Re: cleaning out log files?

2006-11-26 Thread Oliver Iberien
Thank you! I knew something like that had to exist. It turns out there was a core dump I had not noticed. I had the idea of running ls -SlhR /var/ > /.../var_contents.txt and looking for anything huge. Oliver On Sunday 26 November 2006 10:54, you wrote: > Check "/etc/newsyslog.conf" > All log-

Re: cleaning out log files?

2006-11-26 Thread Armin Arh
Check "/etc/newsyslog.conf" All log-files you like to have rotated, should be mentioned there. System owned logs are in there per default. "du -k /var" will tell you where your space is being "consumed". Maybe your "/var/mail/root" is growing... How big is your /var anyway? Armin -- PUBBOX Pos

Re: cleaning out log files?

2006-11-26 Thread RW
On Sunday 26 November 2006 18:37, Oliver Iberien wrote: > I've noticed that my /var partition, on a machine being used as a desktop, > is about 80% full and would like to know what in it can safely be deleted, > or if there is some accepted way to trim log files down with a cron job, > etc. Thanks!

Re: cleaning out log files?

2006-11-26 Thread Lane Holcombe
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:37, Oliver Iberien wrote: > I've noticed that my /var partition, on a machine being used as a desktop, > is about 80% full and would like to know what in it can safely be deleted, > or if there is some accepted way to trim log files down with a cron job, > etc. Thanks!

cleaning out log files?

2006-11-26 Thread Oliver Iberien
I've noticed that my /var partition, on a machine being used as a desktop, is about 80% full and would like to know what in it can safely be deleted, or if there is some accepted way to trim log files down with a cron job, etc. Thanks! Oliver ___ free

Adesklets issue - cleaning up the installation

2006-08-28 Thread Viswas Nair
I had installed adesklets and everything was working fine until adesklets crashed with a TK_GUI related error. I couln't find out where the problem was so I make deinstalled it and tried to build it again. It simply wouldnt work. The build completes but when I run the installation program (-i opti

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-21 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:57:44PM -0400, John Nielsen wrote: > Quoting Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Gang, > > > > A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K > > on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid having > > to buy a DOS/Win platf

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-21 Thread Gary Kline
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:24:31AM +1000, Rowdy wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > > Gang, > > > > A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K > > on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid having > > to buy a DOS/Win platform. I've had both W2K and FBSD

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-21 Thread Mike Jeays
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 13:41 -0700, Gary Kline wrote: > On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:21:23PM -0500, Charles Howse wrote: > > > > On May 20, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > > > > Gang, > > > > > > A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K > > > on the drive) may be

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-21 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:21:23PM -0500, Charles Howse wrote: > > On May 20, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > > Gang, > > > > A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K > > on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid having > > to buy a DO

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-21 Thread Derek Ragona
Download the utility to low-level format the drive from the drive makers website. -Derek At 06:46 PM 5/20/2006, Gary Kline wrote: Gang, A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid hav

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-20 Thread John Nielsen
Quoting Gary Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Gang, A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid having to buy a DOS/Win platform. I've had both W2K and FBSD or Ubuntu on this one mach

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-20 Thread Rowdy
Gary Kline wrote: Gang, A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid having to buy a DOS/Win platform. I've had both W2K and FBSD or Ubuntu on this one machine. For various reaso

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-20 Thread Charles Howse
On May 20, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Gary Kline wrote: Gang, A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid having to buy a DOS/Win platform. I've had both W2K and FBSD or Ubuntu on this

Re: cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-20 Thread Gerard Seibert
Gary Kline wrote: > Gang, > > A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K > on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid having > to buy a DOS/Win platform. I've had both W2K and FBSD or Ubuntu > on this one machine. For various reas

cleaning off unix/linux????

2006-05-20 Thread Gary Kline
Gang, A 40G drive that I thought was bad (when trying to install W2K on the drive) may be entirely good. I am trying to avoid having to buy a DOS/Win platform. I've had both W2K and FBSD or Ubuntu on this one machine. For various reasons I need one DOS ma

Cleaning-up stale PID files on reboot

2005-11-25 Thread RW
I start mlnet, the daemon part of mldonkey, from it's local rc.d script on bootup. If mlnet isn't shutdown properly, it leaves behind a pid file that prevents the daemon running until I notice and manually delete the file. What's the best way to deal with this? I was wondering if there is some

Re: cleaning DVD+RW on Plextor PX-716a

2005-05-07 Thread Marc Fonvieille
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:18:40PM +0600, Ilia Chipitsine wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > do I need to clean RW disk before writing ? > No. You should be able to "rewrite" on a DVD+RW without any blacking operation. > why it says errors to me: > > design# burncd -f /dev/acd0 format dwd+rw > burncd: fo

cleaning DVD+RW on Plextor PX-716a

2005-05-07 Thread Ilia Chipitsine
Dear Sirs, do I need to clean RW disk before writing ? why it says errors to me: design# burncd -f /dev/acd0 format dwd+rw burncd: format media type invalid: Unknown error: 0 Cheers, Ilia Chipitsine ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://li

Re: Cleaning /tmp on boot

2005-02-24 Thread Lars Kristiansen
Lowell Gilbert skrev: "Lars Kristiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alternatively, is there something similar to tmpfs from Linux available on FreeBSD? I've heard about mfs but it statically allocates memory from the VM, I'd prefer if allocation was done only as needed on demand. Found

Re: Cleaning /tmp on boot

2005-02-24 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Lars Kristiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Alternatively, is there something similar to tmpfs from Linux > > available on FreeBSD? I've heard about mfs but it statically > > allocates memory from the VM, I'd prefer if allocation was done only > > as needed on demand. > > Found these: > h

Re: Cleaning /tmp on boot

2005-02-24 Thread Lars Kristiansen
> Alternatively, is there something similar to tmpfs from Linux > available on FreeBSD? I've heard about mfs but it statically > allocates memory from the VM, I'd prefer if allocation was done only > as needed on demand. Found these: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41E01905.3040200 http://doc

Re: Cleaning /tmp on boot

2005-02-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2005-02-24 14:49, Nelis Lamprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:42:17 +, Paul Richards ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> Is there an easy way to have FreeBSD (RELEASE-5.3) clean /tmp on boot >> by means of setting a flag or something in /etc/rc.conf? I'd like to >>

Re: Cleaning /tmp on boot

2005-02-24 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:42:17PM +, Paul Richards wrote: > Is there an easy way to have FreeBSD (RELEASE-5.3) clean /tmp on boot > by means of setting a flag or something in /etc/rc.conf? I'd like to > check before I start manually hacking up my boot scripts to get this > done. Add: cl

Re: Cleaning /tmp on boot

2005-02-24 Thread Nelis Lamprecht
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:42:17 +, Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Is there an easy way to have FreeBSD (RELEASE-5.3) clean /tmp on boot > by means of setting a flag or something in /etc/rc.conf? I'd like to > check before I start manually hacking up my boot scripts to get this >

Cleaning /tmp on boot

2005-02-24 Thread Paul Richards
Hi, Is there an easy way to have FreeBSD (RELEASE-5.3) clean /tmp on boot by means of setting a flag or something in /etc/rc.conf? I'd like to check before I start manually hacking up my boot scripts to get this done. Alternatively, is there something similar to tmpfs from Linux available on Free

RE: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-02-07 Thread Matt LaPlante
Plante > Subject: Re: Cleaning Out Ports? > > > There's still one missing part to it that gentoo's portage has. In > addition to the standard database of installed packages, emerge keeps > track > of every single package that you explicitly installed in a file called &

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-02-01 Thread RW
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 08:04, Christopher Illies wrote: > Have a look at /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_cutleaves. It is a script that > detects and removes orphaned dependencies. Just bear in mind that some of the leaves will be required for building other ports. Whilst they can be safely removed

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-02-01 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
* David J. Weller-Fahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-01 08:24 +0100]: > * Matt LaPlante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-01 02:36 +0100]: > Attached is my script, and my conf file. Unfortunately, my script got stripped. Here's the script with a txt extension. Regards, -- dave [ please don't CC me ]

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-02-01 Thread Loren M. Lang
t; 110 8th Street > > Troy, NY 12180 > > Phone: (518) 276-2275 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > www.cat.rpi.edu > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Pat Maddox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:55 PM > &

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-02-01 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 01:31 am, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 31 Jan Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > If sysutils/pkg_cutleaves isn't right, please provide good detail > > why. > > What's the benefir over using "portsclean -D" or "portsclean -CDPP" > Works like a charm. (see man portsclean). Ports

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-02-01 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
On 31 Jan Michael C. Shultz wrote: > If sysutils/pkg_cutleaves isn't right, please provide good detail why. What's the benefir over using "portsclean -D" or "portsclean -CDPP" Works like a charm. (see man portsclean). -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-02-01 Thread Christopher Illies
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:32:41PM -0500, Matt LaPlante wrote: > > I know the ports system is designed to install dependencies automatically, > but how does one go about removing them? Say one large package installs > several dependencies, but then later on that package is removed...and now > we'

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
* Matt LaPlante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-01 02:36 +0100]: > I know the ports system is designed to install dependencies > automatically, but how does one go about removing them? Say one large > package installs several dependencies, but then later on that package > is removed...and now we're l

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Monday 31 January 2005 06:35 pm, Matt LaPlante wrote: > This looks like what I'm after, thank you! > After you try it, if sysutils/pkg_cutleaves doesn't meet your requirements please let me know. I can add exactly what you asked for to sysutils/portmanager. I don't want to add features that

RE: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread Matt LaPlante
This looks like what I'm after, thank you! > -Original Message- > From: Michael C. Shultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 9:23 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: Matt LaPlante > Subject: Re: Cleaning Out Ports? > > On Mo

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread Nathan Wheeler
I think portsclean does that. I can't remember how though. Its in the portupgrade package. Nathan - Original Message - From: "Matt LaPlante" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Pat Maddox'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread Michael C. Shultz
tion Technologies > RPI/CAT, CII 8015 > 110 8th Street > Troy, NY 12180 > Phone: (518) 276-2275 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.cat.rpi.edu > > > -Original Message- > > From: Pat Maddox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:55 PM > >

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread Pat Maddox
OTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:55 PM > > To: Matt LaPlante > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Cleaning Out Ports? > > > > If you try to remove a package that has child dependencies, then it'll > > let you know. You'

RE: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread Matt LaPlante
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:55 PM > To: Matt LaPlante > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Cleaning Out Ports? > > If you try to remove a package that has child dependencies, then it'll > let you know. You'll have to use the -f flag

Re: Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread Pat Maddox
If you try to remove a package that has child dependencies, then it'll let you know. You'll have to use the -f flag to force it to delete the package, despite there being any dependencies. If you want to delete a package along with all its dependencies, you can use the -r flag. Use pkgdb -F to f

Cleaning Out Ports?

2005-01-31 Thread Matt LaPlante
I know the ports system is designed to install dependencies automatically, but how does one go about removing them? Say one large package installs several dependencies, but then later on that package is removed...and now we're left with several orphaned packages. Is there a way to either detect,

Re: Cleaning port config options

2004-12-14 Thread Joshua Lokken
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:38:17 -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was installing the mail/dspam port and the selection of options > appeared for configuration, then after selecting, the configuration > stopped with an error that I had selected too many back-end options. I > did

Re: Cleaning port config options

2004-12-13 Thread Dan Kilbourne
Robert Fitzpatrick extolled: > On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 11:00, Miguel Mendez wrote: > > Can there possibly be anything else not getting cleaned up? > > -- > Robert > Did you look in /var/db/ports/ ? There may be something in there that is missed by make rmconfig -- ___ Dan __

Re: Cleaning port config options

2004-12-13 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 11:00, Miguel Mendez wrote: > > I was installing the mail/dspam port and the selection of options > > appeared for configuration, then after selecting, the configuration > > stopped with an error that I had selected too many back-end options. I > > did 'make distclean' and 'ma

Re: Cleaning port config options

2004-12-13 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was installing the mail/dspam port and the selection of options > appeared for configuration, then after selecting, the configuration > stopped with an error that I had selected too many back-end options. I > did 'make distclean' and 'make clean',

Re: Cleaning port config options

2004-12-13 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:38:17 -0500 Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I was installing the mail/dspam port and the selection of options > appeared for configuration, then after selecting, the configuration > stopped with an error that I had selected too many back-end options. I >

Cleaning port config options

2004-12-13 Thread Robert Fitzpatrick
I was installing the mail/dspam port and the selection of options appeared for configuration, then after selecting, the configuration stopped with an error that I had selected too many back-end options. I did 'make distclean' and 'make clean', but the options list will not appear again for me to al

Fall Cleaning

2004-09-01 Thread Michael Krause
our Fall cleaning! See pictures on our website at http://www.northwestofficenetwork.com [1]Send Mail To [EMAIL PROTECTED] to unsubscribe. References 1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: cleaning

2003-10-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:55:21AM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > Rogue Spider wrote: > > >is there a freebsd equivalent to scandisk and > >diskdefrag so that i can clean the drive it says on > >start up that the dir are fragmented but after that i > >am unsertain. > > > > > > If

Re: cleaning

2003-10-22 Thread Jens Rehsack
Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: Rogue Spider wrote: is there a freebsd equivalent to scandisk and diskdefrag so that i can clean the drive it says on start up that the dir are fragmented but after that i am unsertain. If there is "fragmentation", it is cleaned up in the boot process (for 4.x)

RE: cleaning

2003-10-22 Thread Jason Lavigne
My understanding is FreeBSD is self cleaning, not like Windows. cheers Jay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rogue Spider Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cleaning is there a freebsd equivalent to

Re: cleaning

2003-10-22 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Rogue Spider wrote: is there a freebsd equivalent to scandisk and diskdefrag so that i can clean the drive it says on start up that the dir are fragmented but after that i am unsertain. If there is "fragmentation", it is cleaned up in the boot process (for 4.x) or done in the background after b

cleaning

2003-10-22 Thread Rogue Spider
is there a freebsd equivalent to scandisk and diskdefrag so that i can clean the drive it says on start up that the dir are fragmented but after that i am unsertain. = No Hope in the future Look To the past to find redimsioun. __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo!

Spring cleaning - hardware give-away for Seth Henry

2003-10-15 Thread Lee Murfin
Need the cit224/keyboard you have listed. I'm in Toronto Canada and can give you my fedex #. and some $$$ for your troubles. Would appreciate a relply. Sincerely, Lee Murfin, Service Division Cycom 1-3500 Pharmacy Ave. Scarborough (Toronto), Ontario Canada M1W 2T6 416-494-5040 ___

Re: Cleaning Postfix queue (was: Qmail on FBSD is flooding)

2003-07-18 Thread jan.muenther
Hello, > I just came to think of if there might be a similar script for Postfix to > clean and/or check the mail queue? To check the mail queue simply run /usr/bin/mailq. To delete a mail from the queue, run 'postsuper -d queue_id', the ID being the ID value you got from mailq. 'postsuper -d

Cleaning Postfix queue (was: Qmail on FBSD is flooding)

2003-07-18 Thread Johan Paul
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote: > Hi, > Please run qmail-qstat and check the qmail queue. There is a simple shell > script to clean the queue. Hi all, I just came to think of if there might be a similar script for Postfix to clean and/or check the mail queue? Regards, Johan Pa

Spring cleaning giveaway - UPDATE

2003-06-05 Thread J. Seth Henry
I managed to get rid of some of my surplus gear, but not all. I had a fellow claim the serial terminal, and some of the K6 CPU's, but never got back to me with an address. If you still want these items, let me know. I had someone else looking for a K6 CPU, but my emails have been bouncing. Right

Re: Spring cleaning update

2003-06-02 Thread Jeremy Gaddis
J. Seth Henry writes: Wow - most of the stuff in the list was claimed in a half hour. Anyway, the following items are remaining: [snip] You could always put what you have left up for auction on eBay and donate the proceeds to The FreeBSD Project. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Spring cleaning update

2003-06-02 Thread J. Seth Henry
Wow - most of the stuff in the list was claimed in a half hour. Anyway, the following items are remaining: 1) tray of 4 AMD K6-2 266 CPU's 2) AMD K6-3+ mobile processor with heatsink/fan. Not sure if it works 3) Compaq RAM module for 386LTE 4) 4x 1Mb 30-pin SIMMs I've decided to roll the Paralan

  1   2   >