http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39883 >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Nov 25 23:36:16 2007]:
> OK, I've done this and I think there is a clue here.
Everything here looks consistent with memory leaks or other memory
errors (buffer overwriting).
-jason
__
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39883 >
Jason Short:
> [Jacob Nevins:]
> > There is a fair amount of error reportage on the client's stderr. This
> > seems to be disappointingly normal for this Linux system -- there are
> > some errors that show up for every X program -- but perhap
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39837 >
Ok.
First of all, the described behavior then is different from the 2.0.9
version. There it was that if you crossed the limit once (more than 13
cities) you got one unhappy citizen. But if you crossed the limit again
(26 cities), nothing happ
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39722 >
I'm going to commit a fix for this (why not) but I'd like more details.
What platform are you using?
Are you really saying that GINT_TO_POINTER is not reversible for
negative numbers on your platform? If that's the case we need to audit
a
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39907 >
BeOS compilation works fine (just remove -lm in the makefile in
./dependendies/tolua)
in the Terminal run configure with options
--prefix= prefered place to install --with-gnu-ld --enable-client=sdl
--disable-gtktest --without-x LDFLAGS and P
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39909 >
"Sir, the diplomat is waiting for your command"
"Sir, the spy is waiting for your command"
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39541 >
The fuzzy process correctly caught the spy text change, but the diplomat was
too different. Hand built the fuzzy translations.
Committed S2_1 revision 14056.
Index: po/cs.po
=
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39895 >
During the lull preparing 2.1.1 -- this won't interfere with that.
Committed S2_2 revision 14054.
Committed trunk revision 14055.
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39901 >
Hello!
Essentially this in Fedora bug. If you checkout the sources
from SVN and do all configuring it compiles.
The problem is in compartibility of configure script
and the Fedora autotools.
The same source code builds in Ubuntu even without
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39901 >
> [wsimpson - Sun Nov 25 00:40:20 2007]:
> That's not accurate. Only when you wish to restrict the file mode mask.
> Without looking hard at this code, I don't see any reason we'd want to
> restrict the mask. That's not traditional.
>
> Is
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39895 >
Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> The patch that introduced it did not mention it, and none of the
> references to it that I could find, in the code and in your patch,
> said anything about what it was or what it was supposed to do. It is
> quite hope
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39900 >
There must be a language barrier here, or you didn't read the relevant
problem report.
(1) The buttons (in this dialog) are phrased as a desired user action.
"Select", "Display", "Update", etc.
(2) The user doesn't want to Open the city, th
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39901 >
Please use the email interface, your comments were not sent to the list.
> Not really, it's more of a security thing.
>
> Quote from one of our kernel guys: "The problem is that without a mode
> being passed, the kernel uses whatever the st
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39901 >
William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Is this a Fedora only kind of thing?
>
So, I did a bit of Googling, and there are a number of other reports about
Fedora and this new requirement As a long-time BSD contributor, one of
the things that anno
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39900 >
> Just renamed from "Popup" (PR#23078). Nobody complained (or otherwise
> commented) during the standard review period There's another similar
> button elsewhere named "Update City". Would that be better here?
"Update" and "Update Ci
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39900 >
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
> I thought we agreed that only clearly broken strings in S_1 were to be
> touched...
>
Go back and read the report. The old "_Popup" interfered with other _P. Also,
this was the only place in the code that a butto
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39866 >
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
> What is the "x11 client"?
>
gui-xaw. Yes, yes, I know that GTK and SDL can use x11, but Project Athena
widgets are the native interface
___
Freeciv-dev mailing lis
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39895 >
On Nov 25, 2007 1:49 AM, William Allen Simpson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> > What is VISION_SITE_RUIN?
> >
> The value I reserved (several patches ago) for the civ3-like ruin left
> behind after a city is destroyed.
Don't feel too well tonight, so I'll wait about 12 hrs from now before
tagging 2.1.1.
Use the time you're given wisely. ;)
~Daniel
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39906 >
On IRC a number of errors were reported in compiling gui-sdl on beos
with gcc 2.95.
This patch should fix the problems in the gui-sdl code.
Most errors are simply caused by declaring variables mid-function. This
is supported in C99 but s
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39905 >
Two places in the client/ code define variables midway through functions.
This can break older compilers unnecessarily and has been reported on
IRC today as a problem when compiling on beos.
This patch fixes it - for 2.1, should apply to 2
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39904 >
One place in log.c uses strdup instead of mystrdup.
Patch for 2.1, probably applies to 2.2 and trunk also.
-jason
Index: utility/log.c
===
--- utility/log.c (revision 14048)
+
22 matches
Mail list logo
