On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
>> Something I noticed, maybe because I'm using the unstable
>> kernel instead of the stable 2036 one, deltree doesn't work
>> anymore.
>
> Simple: If you only use WIN /S then you can use the
> stable 2036 or stable 2038 kernel. The latter is on
>
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> Hi :-)
>
> > Realistically, someone should make a clone of Windows 3.1.
> > This makes more sense than making freedos unstable.
>
> Unstable is only needed for 386 enh mode or wfworkgroups.
>
> > Windows 3.1 isn't that heavy
>
> Depends... On
Hi :-)
> I got Windows 3.1 running on Freedos using win /s,
> the Msdos 6.2x himem.sys and the MSDOS 6.2x emm386.exe.
> I also found out that share from freedos needs to be
> loaded low.
I think WIN /S will even work with the freedos versions
of HIMEM or HIMEMX, maybe even with JEMM386 as well.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Adam Norton wrote:
> * Calmira for GUI or someone could write a Program Manager for GUI like
> Windows 3.x. Personally, I like the style of Windows 3.x over the
> Windows 95 style of GUI.
> I can't remember if Win 3.1 had context menus or not and I kind of like
> a
* Calmira for GUI or someone could write a Program Manager for GUI like
Windows 3.x. Personally, I like the style of Windows 3.x over the
Windows 95 style of GUI.
I can't remember if Win 3.1 had context menus or not and I kind of like
a start menu/taskbar but thats not 3.11. If I do this right C
I have a VM with MS DOS 6.22, Windows 3.11, and Win32s available in a
QEMU VM. If you need comparative testing, let me know.
Thanks I am sure I will need lots of testing.
I also need to buy it cause I barely remember how it looked and worked. :)
---
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:03 AM, King InuYasha wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:51 PM, usul wrote:
>
>> "Realistically, someone should make a clone of Windows 3..0/3.11."
>>
>> Call it Janus or Snowball after the code names for Windows 3..0/3.11
>> :)
>>
>> I have been doing research on this a
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:51 PM, usul wrote:
> "Realistically, someone should make a clone of Windows 3..0/3.11."
>
> Call it Janus or Snowball after the code names for Windows 3..0/3.11
> :)
>
> I have been doing research on this and I am considering doing this.
> Since I wanted to make a GUI fo
"Realistically, someone should make a clone of Windows 3..0/3.11."
Call it Janus or Snowball after the code names for Windows 3..0/3.11
:)
I have been doing research on this and I am considering doing this.
Since I wanted to make a GUI for FreeDos. :) Need a break from package
building on the new
I got Windows 3.1 running on Freedos using win /s,
the Msdos 6.2x himem.sys and the MSDOS 6.2x emm386.exe.
I also found out that share from freedos needs to be
loaded low.
Great, it ran. Trouble is, my mouse is on com4 and there
are no windows drivers for a logitech mouse on com4. Argh!
Somethi
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 10:23:44 +0200, I waved a wand and this message
magically appears in front of Eric Auer:
> The EMM386 does, and some DOS extenders / DPMI
> hosts. The problem is that Windows in 386enh
> mode and WfW 3.11 try to "take over" the work
> from EMM386 which uses a complex "what exac
Hi!
> I think I'm using the stable kernel instead of the
> unstable one.
>
> I get an error that says essentially unload the
> protected mode software and try again when windows
> tries to start.
Neither free-EMM386 nor JEMM386 is compatible
with Windows 3.x 386enh mode or WfW 3.11...
You w
I think I'm using the stable kernel instead of the
unstable one.
I get an error that says essentially unload the
protected mode software and try again when windows
tries to start.
Are people taking out the smartdrive stuff or
simply adding a menu entry and if someone wants
windows loading it
13 matches
Mail list logo