On 07/19/2012 02:29 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 07/18/2012 05:09 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 07/18/2012 04:27 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Dmit
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, John Dennis wrote:
Rob may have already contacted you with this, but if not we would
like to get more debugging information by have the server log what is
occurring when it processes your requests.
To do this you'll need to turn on the debug flag in the IPA
configuration
Rob may have already contacted you with this, but if not we would like
to get more debugging information by have the server log what is
occurring when it processes your requests.
To do this you'll need to turn on the debug flag in the IPA
configuration file /etc/ipa/default.conf, add a line th
On 07/18/2012 08:59 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 07/17/2012 11:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
8><--
I'm beginning to think this is just the Web UI itself instead of 389
although it is really difficult to tell. I've poured over the deb
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 05:09 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2012 04:27 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 03:45 PM, Stephen
On 07/18/2012 05:09 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 07/18/2012 04:27 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 07/18/2012 03:45 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Joh
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 04:27 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2012 03:45 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, John Dennis wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 02:59 PM, Steph
On 07/18/2012 04:27 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 07/18/2012 03:45 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 07/18/2012 02:59 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Pe
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 03:45 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, John Dennis wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2012 02:59 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Petr Vobornik
wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 11:43 P
On 07/18/2012 03:45 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, John Dennis wrote:
>> On 07/18/2012 02:59 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Petr Vobornik
>>> wrote:
On 07/17/2012 11:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
8><--
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 01:53 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:56 PM, John Dennis wrote:
>>> On 07/17/2012 05:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>>
[ details of performance analysis snipped for brevity ]
>>> I wonder if we shouldn'
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, John Dennis wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 02:59 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Petr Vobornik
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/17/2012 11:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>>
>>> 8><--
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm beginning to think this is just the
On 07/18/2012 02:59 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 07/17/2012 11:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
8><--
I'm beginning to think this is just the Web UI itself instead of 389
although it is really difficult to tell. I've poured over the deb
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 11:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>
> 8><--
>
>
I'm beginning to think this is just the Web UI itself instead of 389
although it is really difficult to tell. I've poured over the debug
logs and didn't see a
On 07/18/2012 01:53 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:56 PM, John Dennis wrote:
>> On 07/17/2012 05:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>>> [ details of performance analysis snipped for brevity ]
>> I wonder if we shouldn't add some timing metrics to our code. As it is it's
>> very
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:56 PM, John Dennis wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 05:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>
>> [ details of performance analysis snipped for brevity ]
>
> I wonder if we shouldn't add some timing metrics to our code. As it is it's
> very hard to know where time is being spent.
>
> When I
On 07/17/2012 11:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
8><--
I'm beginning to think this is just the Web UI itself instead of 389
although it is really difficult to tell. I've poured over the debug
logs and didn't see anything that caused me concern.
It's certainly usable, but I just got really sp
On 07/17/2012 05:43 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> [ details of performance analysis snipped for brevity ]
I wonder if we shouldn't add some timing metrics to our code. As it is
it's very hard to know where time is being spent.
When I wrote the session code I added some timestamps used for manag
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Rob Crittenden
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rich Megginson
wrote:
>
>
> On 07/16/2012 11:48 AM, Step
Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rich Megginson
wrote:
On 07/16/2012 11:48 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson
wrote:
On 07/16/2012 10:19 AM, Ste
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rich Megginson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/16/2012 11:48 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson
wrote:
>
>
> On 07
Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/16/2012 11:48 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson
wrote:
On 07/16/2012 10:19 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Rob Crittenden
wrote:
Stephen
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 12:11 -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> > On 07/16/2012 11:48 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 07/16/2012 10:19 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> >>>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 11:48 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 07/16/2012 10:19 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Rob Crittenden
wrote:
>
On 07/16/2012 11:48 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 07/16/2012 10:19 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Rob Crittenden
wrote:
Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones
wrote:
Hi,
I had hug
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 10:19 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Rob Crittenden
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I had
On 07/16/2012 10:19 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones
wrote:
Hi,
I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flatSounds like you
have an issue somewhere. My normal cpu
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flatSounds like you
>>> have an issue somewhere. My normal cpu use is a few hundre
Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
Hi,
I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flatSounds like you have an issue
somewhere. My normal cpu use is a few hundred mhzbut when "something" goes
wrong such as replication failing that climbs.
On 07/12/2012 06:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 07/12/2012 06:19 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I h
On 07/12/2012 06:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 07/12/2012 06:19 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I h
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 07/12/2012 06:19 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones
>>> wrote:
Hi,
I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flat
On 07/12/2012 06:19 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flatSounds like you
>>> have an issue somewhere. My normal cpu use
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flatSounds like you
>> have an issue somewhere. My normal cpu use is a few hundred mhzbut when
>> "something" goes
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Steven Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flatSounds like you
> have an issue somewhere. My normal cpu use is a few hundred mhzbut when
> "something" goes wrong such as replication failing that climbs...ditto memory
Hi,
I had huge memory issues pre 6.3, now its low and flatSounds like you have
an issue somewhere. My normal cpu use is a few hundred mhzbut when
"something" goes wrong such as replication failing that climbs...ditto memory
use
regards
Steven Jones
Technical Specialist - Linux RH
36 matches
Mail list logo