On 2008-12-22, 01:28 GMT, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> This is not an option as I use different MUAs. Claws-Mail seems
> to handle it like expected, while Apple Mail doesn't.
> Thunderbird's too bloated IMO, especially on OS X where it
> feels slow and non-native (even worse than Gtk, so I'd e
Am 22.12.2008 um 00:12 schrieb Matej Cepl:
Get a mail client which complies with RFC 2369 -- just from the
top my head -- Thunderbird does with
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/4455
This is not an option as I use different MUAs. Claws-Mail seems to
handle it like expected,
On 2008-12-21, 11:43 GMT, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> PS: Could we have a Reply-To:? I was used to just always add
> gajim-devel@gajim.org to the To: as it's never there, but as
> you saw lately, that can cause quite some confusion (private
> mail answered publically because of that habit etc.
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Well, you definitely take a point with release often. But let's call it
> 0.12.0.1, ok? And announce that a fix for the disconnections is being
> investigated.
release name with 4 numbers are for svn. What's the problem with 0.12.1,
it's a bugfix release, as 0.12.2 wil
Am 21.12.2008 um 14:16 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
Where is it said that "[I] always insisted that only [you] got the bug
and the bug reports [you] received were bogus."
I never said you didn't got any complaints, just that *I* never got.
And
I never talked about the bugreports you got ... But m
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
>> That said, I don't remeber having said that, and that doesn't prevent
>> you to fix that.
>
> You did it in the mail before. You said you only have heard from me
> about the problem, that I had bug reports from others is something you
> ignored.
Where is it said that
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> That's not another personal attack, no, of course.
How is stating that you said a personal attack?
> That said, I don't remeber having said that, and that doesn't prevent
> you to fix that.
You did it in the mail before. You said you only have heard from me
about the
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> I told you I got bug reports, but you always insisted that only I got
> the bug and the bug reports I received were bogus.
That's not another personal attack, no, of course.
That said, I don't remeber having said that, and that doesn't prevent
you to fix that.
>> Have
Am 21.12.2008 um 12:53 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
If one dev get all complaints and don't forward them to bug tracker, I
don't see how we could go forward ...
I told you I got bug reports, but you always insisted that only I got
the bug and the bug reports I received were bogus.
Have you ti
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 21.12.2008 um 12:36 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
>
>> I think you should read ticket, and test 0.12 branch. There is a missing
>> import so sending file is just not possible.
>
> Hm, maybe they're using trunk then. I'll have a look.
in trunk ping timout is still 20sec
Am 21.12.2008 um 12:36 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
I think you should read ticket, and test 0.12 branch. There is a
missing
import so sending file is just not possible.
Hm, maybe they're using trunk then. I'll have a look.
And please, stop saying that only a few people are affected by this
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 21.12.2008 um 12:07 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
>
>> You think more people are affected by this 30s timeout than by
>> filetranfer? Really? I think more people use FT than are on a slow
>> connection.
>
> Yes, definitely. You don't send files all the time. Besides, wh
Am 21.12.2008 um 12:07 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
You think more people are affected by this 30s timeout than by
filetranfer? Really? I think more people use FT than are on a slow
connection.
Yes, definitely. You don't send files all the time. Besides, which
problem with file transfers? I hav
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 21.12.2008 um 11:42 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
>
>> I won't put oil on fire, just to tell that after private dicussion,
>> there is indeed a problem with TCP timout, it lasts more than 10 minutes.
>
> That is because Gajim doesn't call setsockopt().
>
>> So tests ar
Am 21.12.2008 um 11:42 schrieb Yann Leboulanger:
I won't put oil on fire, just to tell that after private dicussion,
there is indeed a problem with TCP timout, it lasts more than 10
minutes.
That is because Gajim doesn't call setsockopt().
So tests are needed to improve that. But 0.12.1 sh
I won't put oil on fire, just to tell that after private dicussion,
there is indeed a problem with TCP timout, it lasts more than 10 minutes.
So tests are needed to improve that. But 0.12.1 should be released
before that to fix filetransfer I think.
Any objection to release 0.12.1 now?
--
Yann
Guys,
releasing after so much time means a lot of pressure. Since all guys here
want the best for Gajim I think that (a) there is no need to argue so much
about stuff, just let it be for a while and a .1 will come and fix
regressions and (b) let everyone take some days off relax and see what's the
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> As it's not possiblt to have private mail, let's continue here.
>
> Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> > Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> >
> >> Jonathan Schleifer a écrit :
> > It's not. It's just that I want to show you that it's not true that
> > this is only affecting GPRS user
As it's not possiblt to have private mail, let's continue here.
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Yann Leboulanger wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Schleifer a écrit :
> It's not. It's just that I want to show you that it's not true that
> this is only affecting GPRS users.
thousands of people uses svn version a
Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> Jonathan Schleifer a écrit :
> > Here's a mail where OpenBSD states why they won't commit 0.12 into
> > their ports tree.
>
> Thanks for the news.
>
> > So much for "This is not a issue for users not using GPRS", Yann.
>
> This is not a personal attack, no, of course.
20 matches
Mail list logo
