urage anyone who would like to leave a
message of condolence to do so there.
Risker/Anne
On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 05:21, Željko Blaće wrote:
> Hey Folx -
> I am new to the list and relatively new to organizing in this spectrum and
> context. My work is mainly in bringing queer, but also fe
Noting that the discussion has now closed with the video being removed.
Risker/Anne
On 29 October 2017 at 14:50, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> It would be nice to have some women weighing on this debate:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abortion#RfC_reg
I had the opportunity to meet Monika at Wikimania, and poked just a little
bit at this project. It looks really interesting! Thanks Monika for
telling us about it.
Risker/Anne
On 9 August 2017 at 10:56, Monika Sengul-Jones <jones.mon...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello all -
>
> I'm M
is...well, factless, until you can show us some facts.
Risker/Anne
[1] List of people who have current and valid confidentiality agreements:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Access_to_nonpublic_information_policy/Noticeboard
On 7 August 2017 at 14:11, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So
on the ability to
fight such harassment, especially when they seem so absurd. Simply put,
it's factless allegation, or what certain sectors of the American public
have come to term "fake news". Please retract your statement.
Risker/Anne
On 7 August 2017 at 08:21, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com
escription in the Wikipedia article to which the term is currently linked
in the "affiliation" parameter.
Risker/Anne
On 19 July 2017 at 19:34, Marie Earley <eir...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone look at this for me?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Women%27s_Eq
start reciprocating.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=so=revision=42599094=42598962
On 26 April 2017 at 13:27, Jessy D. King <jessy.d.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm new to this list, this is my first post.
>
> If Wikipedia is a boy's club, Wi
This may be of interest to some members of this list.
Risker/Anne
-- Forwarded message --
From: Asaf Bartov <abar...@wikimedia.org>
Date: 17 March 2017 at 01:06
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Announcing the Hardware donation program
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <
On 12 February 2017 at 17:22, Jonathan Cardy <werespielchequ...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Risker,
>
> Clearly not everyone would opt into it if there was an option to do so. Do
> you object to the idea of developing an option to opt in to email filtering?
>
&
y the list owners themselves already, but the
contents are usually far more confidential than would be appropriate for a
moderator without the same level of access as the list itself.
I do like the idea of being able to block emails from certain accounts or
to only accept them from certain accounts
. They are,
however, required, to archive all pages, so they should be somewhere - not
necessarily easy to find, but somewhere within the US government sites.
Risker/Anne
(Who lives in Canada, which does not have the same applicable legislation
as exists in the US to require the federal government to retain
of saying that, at least
up until 2008, it was generally assumed that all RFA candidates were male
unless they had disclosed otherwise.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
60%. Sometimes the reason was
absurd, but more often it was a justified concern (e.g., absence of
reliable sources for key facts or notability) that was just not addressed.
Only a very small percentage (under 5% as I recall) had the PROD tag
removed and then someone took the article to AfD.
Risker
ot closely associated with behavioural
change. It's only a step above "create a policy". What works is regular
reinforcement when behaviour lapses, and empowerment of people to reinforce
the desired behaviour.
Risker/Anne
On 3 May 2016 at 15:04, WereSpielChequers <werespielch
.
Risker
On 24 February 2016 at 22:20, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> What I don't understand is if administrators like Risker and Mike Peel are
> so concerned about civility on Wikipedia that they object to Keliana's
> swearing, why aren't they the people that are mak
been written by
roughly 95% of the active editorship. I'm relatively certain if I'd
written exactly the same piece, they would have published it - but if you
did, Slowking, it would not have seen the light of day.
Risker/Anne
On 24 February 2016 at 13:59, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com>
it would have been published if written by
any male editor, though Rob could tell us otherwise - but even if they did
publish it, the reaction would have been infinitely more severe if not for
the name of the author.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
On 22 February 2016 at 13:06, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Risker, if your high school student are that benign, perhaps I will move
> to Canada.
>
>
:-) Even though it's a big urban centre that takes the word
"multicultural" to a whole new level,
place to work. Keilana's actions have
encouraged people to make it less so.
Risker/Anne
On 22 February 2016 at 12:46, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Risker, the double standard is that several individuals dropped f-bombs
> on the page, but only the woman got tsked. Talk page
that people who used to be in the "let's make this a more
pleasant and positive place to do our work" have gone over to the other
side.
Risker
On 21 February 2016 at 19:38, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Risker, I want to be clear:
>
> It's not that I
I dunno, Ryan. The last time someone called me a badass, it was very
definitely meant as an insult cloaked as a compliment. I would not subject
any article subject to such an adjective.
RIsker/Anne
On 21 February 2016 at 19:12, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb
uot; is a good
thing.
Risker
On 21 February 2016 at 18:19, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> >"Badass" isn't a compliment.
>
> And "cunt" is a friendly term of camaraderie in British English.
> Apparently I just don't have a good command of the
Is it a double standard? If that page hadn't been written by Keilana,
would it have been published as is?
Perhaps you're right, it *is* a double standard. Just not quite the one
some think it would be.
Risker/Anne
On 21 February 2016 at 08:31, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Op
Sharing with this list.
Risker
-- Forwarded message --
From: Siko Bouterse <sboute...@wikimedia.org>
Date: 11 February 2016 at 20:24
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Another goodbye
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Dear friends and colleague
While I believe that the issues raised in the changes in the Board of
Trustees are important and worthy of attention for many reasons, it does
not appear to me that there are issues specific to (or particularly
relevant to) the gender gap, except in a very, very peripheral way.
Risker/Anne
On 26
:-) I am beginning to wonder if being a straight, cis, monogamous married
woman puts me into a microscopic minority on Wikimedia projects. :-)
Risker
On 24 November 2015 at 13:16, Keilana <keilanaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Fae,
>
> Opabinia regalis and I both ident
in pretty much the same way, using
essentially standardized formats.
Risker/Anne
On 6 November 2015 at 06:16, Marie Earley <eir...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> As much as I like to see an event like this happening, and the Women in
> Science event, I'm left wondering why there are no si
ey don't belong...like Commons and
Wikipedia. Joe Jobs can sometimes have more than one target.
Risker/Anne
On 22 October 2015 at 12:37, Sarah (SV) <slimvir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> WSC, the evidence as to who posted the porn images was, I would say,
> conclusive. We nevertheless ended up with
such activities is more likely to
result in those individuals leaving the project entirely rather than making
great decisions (other than the obvious "this is stupid, ban them all so I
can get back to my categorization"). In fact, I suspect that a jury system
made up of conscripted jurors wou
egular classes on Skype for any Wikipedian who wants to sign up.
>
This should go at the Idea Lab. In fact, I think it has before. It would
fit into one of the hypothetical "strategies" that the WMF is bandying
about right now, although in fairness they've been bandying it about for a
idn't know how to get or read the evidence;
> Also they could be given the sort of training that UK magistrates go on.
> Question to Risker, what sort of training do they currently undertake?
>
>
In theory, the community selects as arbitrators individuals whom it
believs have al
ontributors who have no taste for the drama.
Risker
On 22 October 2015 at 16:10, Daniel and Elizabeth Case <
danc...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> >We have to do something. Suggestion: women coming before the committee
> could require that certain >committee members not partici
made
some interesting proposals in another thread that have the chance to
develop some momentum if nurtured carefully. This...well, that's an awful
lot of money.
Risker/Anne
On 22 October 2015 at 19:08, Carol Moore dc <carolmoor...@verizon.net>
wrote:
> It seems like every time I ask this q
://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Advocacy/Citations_on_Harassment_and_Behavioral_Issues
There's this belief that either the WMF or Arbcom can control the behaviour
of people on every one of Wikipedia's 20 million pages. It isn't gonna
happen no matter what.
Risker/Anne
You linked to a discussion on the ideas lab which you stated included 26
people speaking out against sexual harassment. Most of those people are not
indeffed or sanctioned in any way. Many of them are administrators or hold
other permissions.
Risker
On 29 September 2015 at 08:25, Neotarf <n
or sanctioned, let alone indeffed. Please stop spreading such nasty memes.
It is hurtful.
Risker
On 28 September 2015 at 20:20, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Risker: "I have a simple question to ask: How many people in this thread
> have publicly or privately requested
e
that one of the shortcuts is [[WP:SUICIDE]].
I have removed that as a "Main article" because it's not really about
harassment.
Risker/Anne
On 26 September 2015 at 11:52, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Carol Moore, I believe that link is about suicide threats. Did you mea
attention on the people who have
control of the money and persuade them this is something more important
than...I don't know, whether notifications are flagged using one tag or
two...
Risker/Anne
On 26 September 2015 at 16:29, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> rupert,
> i and carol hav
Community Advocacy team) to
cover the entire world.
Risker/Anne
On 26 September 2015 at 13:59, Carol Moore dc <carolmoor...@verizon.net>
wrote:
> I was referring to threats to kill someone that clearly come from a known
> Wikipedia handle or editor, or, as in my case, a person who i
their real name, and can
provide them with enough information to get a warrant if it's needed (e.g.,
IP addresses, links to the threat itself - which will normally have been
suppressed, etc). And it is rare for police to take email threats
seriously - Gamergate should be enough of an example there.
the utterings of someone this
mentally imbalanced to show that there is a gender gap *anywhere*, let
alone here. This guy was a powder keg, and he was striking out at anyone
whom he believed had caused him harm. I do not believe that his actions
were motivated by sexism.
Risker/Anne
On 27 August 2015 at 03
for
their dedication and devotion to making the world a better place for women
in the technology industry - whether as casual users, content contributors,
developers, or in any other role.
Risker/Anne
On 4 August 2015 at 10:29, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
They did great work. Assumedly more
attendance.
There was a post event survey of participants so there may be some
publicity as to what the participants thought of it.
Another correspondent was kind enough to link me to the basic materials
for the workshop, which of course the Ada Initiative has given in other
settings.
Risker/Anne
On 24
in saying whether they felt they came away from
the session with new tools or skills that they feel will be useful?
I'm going to be honest, the silence about this well-supported experiment
has me very curious.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
set, I've always been
pleasantly surprised at how non-marginalized older Wikimedians are - I
found less age bias at Wikimedia events than I have in almost all other
similar events.
I do encourage those who can attend events, whether local, national or
international, to do so.
Risker/Anne
, but those invitations are much more narrowly focused and
the potential invitees have been communicated with much more directly.
Perhaps Valerie or someone else directly involved in the seminar can advise
if all the seats are full and, if not, how many more applicants they are
seeking.
Risker/Anne
the opposes
are in any of these elections for me as well.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_elections_2015/Post_mortem
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences
of the Board of Trustees have
stepped down in the past because of the time commitment expectations
(including several full weekends a year, a retreat, attendance at
Wikimania, and participation in online/teleconference meetings).
Risker/Anne
On 6 June 2015 at 15:48, Carol Moore dc carolmoor
behaviour is very much
unappreciated, I'm not sure the legal systems of most democratic countries
will be able to solve it.
Risker/Anne
On 27 May 2015 at 00:21, Neotarf neot...@gmail.com wrote:
This might also be a good time to mention the conversation about
harassment on the recent Inspire grant
you might be a good candidate for any of the roles
currently open for election. Women have been important participants in all
of these roles, and it would be good to keep it that way. Women from
outside of North America/Europe would add even more to the diversity of
these groups.
Risker/Anne
On 20
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gregory Varnum gregory.var...@gmail.com
Date: 20 April 2015 at 18:59
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Nominations being accepted for 2015 Wikimedia
Foundation elections
To: Wikimedia developers wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org
Greetings,
I am pleased to
that there will be
some editor retention out of this one.
Much to my surprise, I realised that this was the largest Wiki*edia event I
had attended outside of Wikimania. It bodes well for both the Canadian
editing community, and for the narrowing of the gender gap.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
Wikilove in every edit
summary, which I find really creepy.
Risker/Anne
On 5 February 2015 at 05:04, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Well Jonathan, thanks for doing that! I am not an administrator, so I
couldn't do those things you mentioned, but I often think that in some
cases I wish I could
.
RIsker/ANne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On 16 January 2015 at 17:13, Heather Walls hwa...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Whatever else cis is, it's not a scientific term. It's a buzzword that
sounds scientific because it derives from the Latin, but in fact it's a
coined
should
seriously consider participating actively in these elections[1] and the
annual review of current stewards [2] that happens concurrently.
Risker/Anne
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/Elections_2015
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/Confirm/2015
Just copy-pasting this from another thread on Wikimedia-L, where similar
events are happening in relation to members of that list:
I think it will be better if most of us can Report the Group.
Yes, please do this. We're also talking with Google about trying to resolve
the issue, but my
an effect in retaining new women
editors as new men editors. But it's not counted as a gender gap activity.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Inspire_Grants_%E2%80%93_Gender_gap_campaign
[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Reimagining_Wikipedia_Mentorship
, and there's a
recognition that some are going to be successful, while others (even if
they look good on paper) are not going to produce results. The key is
ensuring that there is some learning derived from the experiments. Don't
be afraid to try something!
Risker/Anne
articles that don't currently exist.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
load, and am not
particularly interested in going to more venues, but I may be the exception.
Risker/Anne
On 1 January 2015 at 19:49, LB lightbreath...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, Heather! This is what we run into on the WP GGTF every time we
open something up for discussion.
All I wanted
?
Risker/Anne
On 31 December 2014 at 10:31, LB lightbreath...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it simply impossible to start a Wikipedia project that's open to women,
or people who identify as women? (I'm sorry if I don't use the correct
terms, but I haven't kept up with them in recent years.)
I mean
pages of self-identified female editors on our German projects
uses the feminine term for user.) Not quite sure what the result is on
English Wikipedia - is there a list somewhere?
Risker/Anne
On 31 December 2014 at 10:59, LB lightbreath...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I'm brainstorming, but yes
, in addition to the entire canvassing aspect.
There was once a Wikichix mailing list, moderated and very similar to the
one described by Lightbreather. It died a slow death several years ago
because, essentially, nobody really had much to say there, absent the
ability to discuss actual content.
Risker
been posted, Lightbreather; at least I've seen both of them.
Perhaps you've got preferences (either on Mailman or on Gmail) set so that
you don't get copies of your sent mails.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage
On 31 December 2014 at 11:52, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
The below definitely are interesting issues which deserve their own
thread. I kept reading the proposals but had not run into the
implementation very often.
On 12/30/2014 3:24 PM, Risker wrote:
Keep in mind
more obvious because they outnumber us 10
to 1.
Risker/Anne
On 30 December 2014 at 09:57, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
As long as (mostly male) Wikipedia editors are allowed to insult and
harass editors whose edits they oppose for whatever reason Wikipedia cannot
retain women
at human
contact. Today, I wouldn't even get the templates, I bet; there's probably
an edit filter somewhere that will prevent me from making the edit in the
first place. Even if it's right.
Risker/Anne
On 30 December 2014 at 14:55, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
I don't know how it goes
/magazine/2014-the-lives-they-lived.html?module=SearchmabReward=relbias%3Ar_r=1
Risker/Anne
On 29 December 2014 at 17:25, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to that.
My tips are:
1) No talk pages if I can avoid it
2) Other channels (sorry people, but not all revolutions can take
(or a journalist of any
kind, actually).
Oh, the irony. Carol, please don't ask people to put links to opinion
pieces written by banned editors into the Gendergap project. We all get
that you're really very angry right now, but this is not constructive.
Risker
herself may not meet the threshold of notability,
just as Tomlinson himself did not meet the threshold.
Risker/Anne
On 23 December 2014 at 00:45, Neotarf neot...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Samira Salih al-Nuaimi notable?
Just looking for an example of an article about someone notable for only
one event
be arranged.
Risker/anne
On 18 December 2014 at 11:04, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Christina - this sounds very interesting - would you be happy for me to
propose it as a possible topic in the Wikimedia Conference, for which I'm
on the programme committee?
Chris
It's just a reprint of the Slate article.
Risker/Anne
On 16 December 2014 at 11:09, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/12/14/comment-will-editing-disputes-mean-end-wikipedia
--
Sarah Stierch
-
Diverse and engaging consulting
Actually, GorillaWarfare was responding to the subject header. She is an
arbitrator. She is also expressing her opinion about why, as an
arbitrator, she has concerns about this list. I think she's bang on.
And I agree with Chris.
Risker/Anne
On 12 December 2014 at 14:08, Reguyla regu
Kumioko, you can change your gmail preferences to have this list
automatically dump to spam if you're not getting a fast enough response to
your unsubscribe.
Risker
On 12 December 2014 at 14:43, Reguyla regu...@gmail.com wrote:
While I am waiting for the email confirmation disenrolling me from
More likely, it is the fact that none of the moderators happen to be online
right now. If you want to leave the list, as is your stated intention, you
can go to your own Mailman preferences and decide which lists to
unsubscribe without waiting for a moderator.
Risker
On 12 December 2014 at 14
if your objective is not to participate on the list any
further.
It might be useful for the list moderators to consider changing the footer
message to include an unsubscribe link, as is done on several other
Wikimedia-hosted lists.
Risker
On 12 December 2014 at 15:19, regu...@gmail.com regu
of the community to proactively
address these issues.
Again, I think you're caught in the trap of believing Arbcom has more power
and authority than it really has.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https
this method out of proportion to the percentage of women
on the project - and in some ways it is an even greater insult because it's
hard to persuade others that what look like civil words are being used to
convey quite the opposite meaning.
Risker/Anne
user is
gender-specific, such as German, Spanish, etc), even though I've been
openly female for most of my wiki-career. (I realise that it sounds like I
came out as being a woman...when I look back on the earliest years of
enwiki, there was a far less significant gender imbalance.)
Risker/Anne
nosedived, so we may be seeing the effects
of that reflected in the interest in voting, and even in the number and
quality of candidates. Back in the earlier days, there were often 30-40
candidates.
Risker/Anne
On 9 December 2014 at 11:08, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 12/9/2014 9
of it being used in this manner before, although I'd heard and read
the term being used in a lot of other ways - including the validation for
including sex education in the school curriculum.
Risker
On 30 November 2014 at 16:13, Jim Hayes slowki...@gmail.com wrote:
in re: video - addressing the video
. The same is true of many topics of interest to women:
abortion, marriage, gender identity, etc. Let's not simply dump all of
these in the men vs women drawer, please.
Risker/Anne
On 30 November 2014 at 08:12, Kathleen McCook klmcc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, one can see easily how they move from topic
I got one and promptly unsubscribed. I don't do google groups, and every
time someone has invited me to one, I've found they were not to my taste.
Risker/Anne
On 1 December 2014 at 02:08, Alison Cassidy coot...@mac.com wrote:
I didn't get one. Now, I feel cheated! :D
-- Allie
On Nov
Check your spam folder and spam filters - many of us have had problems from
time to time with mailing list posts winding up in spam or junk.
Risker
On 29 November 2014 at 16:05, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
Okay, so this is the last message that I had in my e-mail inbox (it's from
4
of discretionary sanctions
effective at the close of the case, as well. [1] As if that will make any
difference.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_Gap_Task_Force/Proposed_decision#Discretionary_sanctions
On 25 November 2014 at 20:14, LB
permission of those
individuals. Regardless of what any of us think of the specific editor who
is named, it behooves us all to act as we would expect to be treated - and
I'd be pretty ticked if someone published research that included examples
that identified me by name.
Risker/Anne
On 21 November
it, and we're going to group all obscenities together and use it
to slag off the guy we're ticked off with.
This isn't claimed to be journalism, it's claimed to be research, and it
needs to be held to a higher standard. The more I'm reading this, the more
I'm finding it problematic.
Risker/Anne
.
Risker/Anne
On 21 November 2014 16:41, Kevin Gorman kgor...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it's at all fair to characterize the section as an attempt
to rail on Eric. He just happens to have been at the center of the most
recent high profile controversy about the word - which means that quoting
Please moderate or even remove access to this list.
Risker
On 18 November 2014 16:52, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yeah, I don't see how this is at all relevant to the gender gap. Please
moderate the sender.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:27 PM, George Herbert george.herb
-1451625788recno=55resultset=2format=Fnext=html/nffull.htmlbad=error/badfetch.htmlentitytoprecno=55entitycurrecno=55entityreturnTo=brief
Risker/Anne
On 22 October 2014 12:17, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi -
I actually professionally consult with GLAMs (galleries, libraries,
archives
Frankly, I see little value in creating a site whose goal includes
attracting journalists - particularly given the poor quality,
sensationalistic journalism that we've all seen reporting on anything
Wikimedia.
Risker/Anne
On 11 September 2014 18:51, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote
in journalists to get things right.
Risker/Anne
On 11 September 2014 22:31, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Anne,
That's precisely the point. A lot of journalism is badly researched,
because Wikipedia is remarkably opaque to many outside observers. So you
simply end up with people
by the
existence of the block log. Many of our most seriously problematic
sockpuppeting accounts are people who've been blocked for behavioural
reasons - and we waste a huge amount of time trying to keep them off the
site.
Risker/Anne
On 7 July 2014 03:20, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote
On 7 July 2014 09:51, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
While I've barely had a chance to read through proposal and comments, I'd
like to just ask re the below which applies generally right now:
On 7/7/2014 9:35 AM, Risker wrote:
I know what it's like to have my inbox flooded
to one-off vandal accounts).
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
.
Some thoughts.
Risker/Anne
On 6 July 2014 04:51, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
I previously described my experience of being a member of Kevin Spacey's
Trigger Street Labs website
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-June/004388.html
I think part of my shock
to
ever pay attention to her again. I am really hoping you didn't intend that.
And Carol has a point. There are now more men posting to this thread than
there are women. And most of you have missed the point entirely. Heaven
help us from those who see themselves as our saviours.
Risker
On 23
Derric, if I may suggest - the best way to get a mailing list back on topic
is to write to the topic, not to remind people of the rules.
Risker/Anne
On 23 June 2014 11:49, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
I'm sorry Derric, but I think the topic of this thread is the notion
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-06-04/Traffic_report
A thank you to Christine for the Maya Angelou article, and to Sage Ross
(with support from Awadewit) for the Rachel Carson article.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
