On Tue 11 Aug 2009 04:06, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
There are two reasons why it is more heavyweight: because we haven't
spent huge amounts of time/money automating our infrastructure and
putting it behind a pretty web UI, but more importantly because we pay
more attention to the
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 08:04 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Aug 7, 2009, at 2:17 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
I would oppose to a podling with no code base and no @apache.org
names
in the list of initial
On Aug 10, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Upayavira wrote:
The creation of a podling is heavyweight. Very heavy compared to
registering a project with Sourceforge, GitHub or GoogleCode.
Because of
the effort involved in the creation of a podling, it is natural that
the
Incubator PMC wants some
On Fri 07 Aug 2009 23:52, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
I was imagining a bunch of unknown people coming up with a vague idea
for a project, and no code...to that would seem too risky to warrant
dedicating resources to a podling.
Now, if mentors were enthusiastic about
A code base is not required, but highly recommended. It is hard to
bootstrap a community from scratch. Having something readily available
makes a project more tangible, and can attract more contributors with
more ease. Conversely, a too mature codebase can be a hindrance to a
project as well,
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 07:55, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hey,
I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've been
wanting to do for a while now. I have list of initial committers and a
technical
architecture proposal, but no actual code yet.
Moreover, in
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:09:49AM +0200, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 07:55, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
Moreover, in order to provide a seed to grow and ground discussions on
technical levels, the ASF incubation rules require the podlings to join the
incubation
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:05:46AM +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
A code base is not required, but highly recommended. It is hard to bootstrap a
community from scratch. Having something readily available makes a project
more tangible, and can attract more contributors with more ease.
I'm not
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
...I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've been
wanting to do for a while now. I have list of initial committers and a
technical
architecture proposal, but no actual code yet
I would oppose
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:24, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:09:49AM +0200, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 07:55, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
Moreover, in order to provide a seed to grow and ground discussions on
technical levels, the
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
...I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've been
wanting to do for a while now. I have list of initial committers and a
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
...I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've been
wanting to do for a while now. I have list of initial committers
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
I would oppose to a podling with no code base and no @apache.org names
in the list of initial committers - the chances of morphing that into
a working Apache project would seem to slim to me.
I agree, and with
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
...I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've
been
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
...I am thinking about making an incubation proposal for a project I've been
wanting to do for a while now. I have list of initial committers
On Aug 7, 2009, at 2:17 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
I would oppose to a podling with no code base and no @apache.org
names
in the list of initial committers - the chances of morphing that into
a working Apache
Noah Slater wrote:
I checked the incubation rules, but couldn't find any mention of this rule.
Our
hopes were that we could start from scratch as a podling, and grow the code
along with the community. Is this going to be possible?
It's not mentioned because there is no such rule. Draw up
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Niall
Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...I would oppose to a podling with no code base and no @apache.org names
in the list of initial committers - the chances of
On Aug 7, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Niall
Pembertonniall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bertrand
Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...I would oppose to a podling with no code base and no
@apache.org names
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:26:45AM -0700, Ralph Goers wrote:
I agree. If unknown people can generate enough interest from mentors to get
them to volunteer why stop them. OTOH, I would suggest that mentors should be
extra cautious in accepting and particularly watchful as the project starts.
20 matches
Mail list logo
