+1.
Colm.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
+1 binding as well.
On 2015-01-10 07:07, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
From the conversation with
On 01/10/2015 01:18 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
This still only has 3 committers.
How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't
see that there has been a realistic answer to this question.
This has been discussed by the (proposed) mentors along with the
community
+1 binding as well.
On 2015-01-10 07:07, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
From the conversation with Marko, he intended to submit this as a formal vote,
but didn't use the regular voting template.
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
On 01/10/2015 01:18 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
This still only has 3 committers...
...We do not, however, feel that it is a barrier to entering incubation -
merely something
to be addressed during incubation...
I agree with
Hello,
TinkerPop Apache Incubator would start off with the minimal number of required
initial committers to get the project underway. These are the individuals who
spend most of the time with TinkerPop and are the ones who will be doing all
heavy lifting to migrate over to ASF. Once we have
Hello,
TinkerPop3 is a complete re-write of TinkerPop2 and TP3 does not depend on TP2
in any way. TP3 was started November 2013 (1+ year ago). We have CLAs for every
TP3 contributor. We do not have CLAs for every TP2 contributor.
We are primarily interested in moving forward first with
On Saturday, January 10, 2015, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
+0 then
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au
javascript:;
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
This still only has 3
On Jan 9, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
This still only has 3 committers.
How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see
that there has been a realistic answer to this
Looks good but there is one part that wasn't clear to me.
In this proposal, the TinkerPop2 repos appear in the initial source
listing as well, but are not in the submission plan.
Is TinkerPop2 also part of the proposal? Is there is risk in it being a
burden on the project? Conversly, if it
This still only has 3 committers.
How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see
that there has been a realistic answer to this question.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone,
Over the last 2 weeks,
On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
This still only has 3 committers.
How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't see
that there has been a realistic answer to this question.
It is part of the incubation process to help
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 9, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
From the conversation with Marko, he intended to submit this as a formal
vote, but didn't use the regular voting template.
Voting will remain open until at least January 15, 2015 18:00
+0 then
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2015, at 6:18 am, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
This still only has 3 committers.
How is the project going to function with such a small group? I don't
see that there has
Enthusiastically +1 to welcome TinkerPop to the Incubator.
On 01/09/2015 11:35 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello everyone,
Over the last 2 weeks, TinkerPop's proposal has been worked on with
support from:
* David Nalley (champion)
* Rich Bowen (mentor)
* Hadrian Zbarcea (mentor)
* Daniel Gruno
+1
From the conversation with Marko, he intended to submit this as a
formal vote, but didn't use the regular voting template.
Voting will remain open until at least January 15, 2015 18:00 ET.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On 01/09/2015 11:35 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello everyone,
Over the last 2
I followed the thread and tried to stay away, because there's a lot of
potential for noise.
If the IPMC were to take a vote on the tinkerpop proposal today it would
not pass. At the very least it's incomplete. Engaging in a conversation
on this list to finalize it is, imho, not the most
Hello,
Apologies for the noise on the list. We have a champion and Dave is working to
select mentors he think are best for TinkerPop.
After that, we will iterate on the proposal and the submit it for approval.
Thank you,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Dec 30, 2014, at 10:14 AM, Hadrian
On 30 December 2014 at 18:32, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
It is and was not noise if you got something useful for the proposalwe
have this list to discuss things.
After that, we will iterate on the proposal and the submit it for approval.
Looking very much
]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 13:39
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I am puzzled by the TinkerPop proposal identifying 3
On Dec 29, 2014 12:35 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Here is how TinkerPop current runs it TinkerPop-Contributors.
1. If you are a vendor, you get one engineer from your
organization to be on TinkerPop-Contributors who speaks on behalf of your
Thank you for the clarification.
-Original Message-
From: Marko Rodriguez [mailto:okramma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 09:34
To: general@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework
Hello,
Here is how
On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
My name is Marko A. Rodriguez and am a co-founder of TinkerPop
(http://tinkerpop.com). There has been positive pressure on us (both
internally and externally) to move TinkerPop to The Apache Foundation.
This email contains our proposal and
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Lets start small and grow is the philosophy behind the 3 initial
committers.
Cool?
Only barely. And the only real way to make it work is if in the very first
few days to weeks of incubation you bring in a
[mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 12:21
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework
Sure. You need three minimum. But you need three minimum active people at
nearly *any* given time.
With only three to choose from that can
-- with reply below --
From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:mar...@rectangular.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 13:39
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil
Hi, Marko,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote:
There has been positive pressure on us (both
internally and externally) to move TinkerPop to The Apache Foundation.
While skimming the Incubator's commits list this morning, I saw some that some
changes
Hello,
I had read somewhere that you needed 3 people at minimum for the PPMC. I ran
the names (Marko,Stephen,James) by our TinkerPop-Contributors list and there
was no pushback.
Moving forward, if someone does provide sustained, beneficial work to
TinkerPop, they are more than welcome to get
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving all of
our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular, our GitHub
presence and our public user-mailing list (i.e. tech support mailing list). I
have articulated our concerns in the freshly
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
our GitHub presence and our public user-mailing list (i.e. tech support
mailing list). I have
On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
our GitHub presence and our public user-mailing list
membership who, over time, tweak the rules).
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Marko Rodriguez [mailto:okramma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 8:16 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org; jfarr...@apache.org
Cc: Sam Ruby
Subject: Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache
To clarify on Daniel's comments this does not mean that pull requests
cannot be merged
You can have Infra set up ASF integration with GitHub such that pull
requests trigger emails to your projects dev list, those emails contain
instructions on how to pull and merge the request into your local ASF
...@apache.org
Cc: Sam Ruby
Subject: Re: [Proposal] TinkerPop: A Graph Computing Framework
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving all of
our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular, our GitHub
presence and our public user-mailing list (i.e. tech
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
our GitHub
+1
Hi Marko,
Thanks for your proposal. I followed and used tinkerpop for a long time
and it is indeed a brilliant open source project. I think I understand
the motivation to move the project governance to the ASF and it makes
sense. I volunteer to be a mentor, should the project be accepted
I am excited to see this proposal come to the incubator.
You can count me in for one of the mentor slots.
On Wed Dec 17 2014 at 3:27:17 PM Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Hi Marko,
Thanks for your proposal. I followed and used tinkerpop for a long time
and it is indeed a
+1
Thanks for the proposal. In Apache Falcon we use Blueprints. I am happy to
see TinkerPop moving to ASF. Let me know if you need a mentor.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
My name is Marko A. Rodriguez and am a co-founder of TinkerPop (
Not surprisingly, there is already some positive feedback. If you don't
already have a champion in mind, I'd be happy to help in that role as well.
Hadrian
On 12/17/2014 03:26 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
+1
Hi Marko,
Thanks for your proposal. I followed and used tinkerpop for a long
time
I'm pretty excited to see this as well. I'll help any way I can.
Phil
This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
Not surprisingly, there is already some positive feedback. If you don't
already have a
As one of Giraph devs I really like the idea of having TinkerPop in ASF.
A few questions/points:
* could you please post the proposal to:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TinkerPop Proposal
(let me know your wiki ID if you don't have enough karma)
* do you guys have a
Hello Roman,
First off, thank you everyone for your positive reception. I have been sending
over your comments to our contributors mailing list to give everyone a stoke.
As one of Giraph devs I really like the idea of having TinkerPop in ASF.
Excellent. Note that we have Gremlin working over
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Roman,
A few questions/points:
* could you please post the proposal to:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TinkerPop Proposal
(let me know your wiki ID if you don't have enough karma)
I just
Hi Marko,
Take a look at the incubator guide [1] for submitting proposals, in
particular the section explaining the role of the champion [2] and
mentors [3]. You already have 2 ASF members who offered to help as
champions and more than 3 three who offered to mentor. If you have
somebody in
No way, Marko! This is AWESOME!!
As many people had mentioned before, you need Champion who is Apache member
and mentors who are member of Incubator PMCs.
And please do follow the format of the proposal as Hadrian mentioned in his
reply.
So excited!
- Henry
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM,
Hello everyone,
I have put the proposal on the wiki page.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TinkerPopProposal
As requested by Roman, I updated the Affiliations section. Note that I would
love to tweak more but there is a 1 minute turn around time when I hit
'preview' or 'save
Hey Marko
Thank you for posting the proposal to the wiki. The proposal has the
requested infra for issues, wiki, mailing lists, and scm all still at
github. These sections will have to be edited to bring everything over to
ASF hardware. Please take a look at other proposals listed for an idea and
This is awesome.
I'd be happy to help in any way I can.
-Taylor
On Dec 17, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My name is Marko A. Rodriguez and am a co-founder of TinkerPop
(http://tinkerpop.com). There has been positive pressure on us (both
This is very good news. +1
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 7:14 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is awesome.
I'd be happy to help in any way I can.
-Taylor
On Dec 17, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Marko Rodriguez okramma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
My name is Marko A. Rodriguez and
49 matches
Mail list logo
