covax wrote:
what might be wrong?
for a start i think you meant [EMAIL PROTECTED] not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ;-)
try there instead - or you might try the xalan-user list.
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
here's a fix which works for me
Jon Stevens wrote:
Here is the little test program:
import java.io.*;
import java.lang.*;
import java.util.*;
import org.jdom.*;
import org.jdom.input.*;
import org.jdom.output.*;
public class Test
{
public static void main (String[] args)
{
On Wednesday, June 6, 2001, at 09:41 PM, David S. wrote:
Hello
hi david.
1. Is there something in the httpd.conf file which will empower filename
suffixes?
2. How do I start the admin server?
i guess that these two are really apache server questions and for good
answers you'd be better
On Friday, June 8, 2001, at 01:44 PM, Sean Legassick wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The other being a potential
regression in reflection/security found in Scarab. I say potential
regression as I don't know yet if it is a security hole that has been
On Wednesday, July 4, 2001, at 05:19 AM, Ian Kallen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My unsolicited opinion: projects focused on the manipulation and
purveyance of
data as XML could/should belong in the xml.apache.org project while
implementations of Java technologies associate with Jakarta.
On Monday, July 16, 2001, at 10:33 PM, Jon Stevens wrote:
on 7/16/01 1:24 PM, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when i ping i get that
cvs.apache.org is 64.208.42.41
jakarta.apache.org is 64.208.42.42
Update your DNS entries...
i'm using my ISP's DNS so i guess
On Monday, July 16, 2001, at 05:26 AM, Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
Can someone confirm that our new CVS host (yay!) has the following
characteristerics ;)
DSA key fingerprint is 79:7c:cb:6a:44:47:b2:ef:5c:66:28:d7:40:0d:b1:f9.
cvs.apache.org,64.208.42.42
can somebody confirm that the RSA1
On Thursday, October 18, 2001, at 07:48 AM, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
So you (Jakarta) rejected Jboss. I didn't know that. How incredibly smart
of you. Think about the synergies between Tomcat and Jboss!!! Wow!
Incredible.
rejecting jboss was probably good (in the long term) for everybody.
jboss
On Thursday, October 18, 2001, at 08:18 AM, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
Coming to the issues raised in Jon's document and
elsewhere on this thread, I must tell you that this
has been a closed-source project so far with no
external developer community to speak of. It is still
being actively
On Tuesday, October 16, 2001, at 07:03 PM, Clark Richey wrote:
I am trying to connect Tomcat 4.0 to IIS with little luck. Can anyone
point
me to some documentation on how to do this or provide me with
instructions?
the help you need can best be found on the tomcat-user list.
- robert
On Tuesday, December 11, 2001, at 03:19 PM, lloyd wrote:
In my opinion, if you haven't contributed anything, then you are
just leeching off the hard work of the many individuals behind the
Jakarta project
What does one's relative standing in the Jakarta project have to do with
how you
i've been making changes to some commons sub projects and came across some
source files with (what i call) the short form of the license eg.
* Copyright (C) The Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved.
*
* This software is published under the terms of the Apache Software
License
i'd just like to point out that i didn't write that bit of code (but
neither did i correct it).
personally speaking, i'm not going to risk having patches vetoed because i
try to correct the original author's coding style.
any committer who has the time and energy to fight is very welcome to
i find jakarta-site2.html a little bit confusing. so - as requested on the
page - i'm providing some feedback :)
i think i find it confusing since it's aimed at answering several
questions all in one page. maybe it'd be better to organize it as a base
page with separate pages for each of
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:00 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:50, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i find jakarta-site2.html a little bit confusing. so - as requested on
the
page - i'm providing some feedback :)
i think i find it confusing since it's aimed at answering
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 12:07 AM, Peter Donald wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 10:17, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 10:00 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 07:50, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i find jakarta-site2.html a little bit confusing. so
i've created a patch for jakarta-site2.xml which i hope should make things
a little clearer. i've made the headers for the instructions about
creating web pages for a project using anakia into subsections rather than
sections and grouped them together under a single section. i've moved the
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 07:06 PM, Randy Speh wrote:
Is there something wrong with the online CVS
Repositories today? I've been having trouble
accessing the commons directories.
thanks for the warning, randy. (i've tried it and i can't connect either.)
FYI i've always thought that
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 10:27 PM, Ted Husted wrote:
If you would like to send the XML the page to me, Robert, and I will
post it as an alternative page, and we can whiteboard it for a day or
two, as we did on the New Product Proposal page, before talking it live
and direct :)
On Monday, February 25, 2002, at 06:46 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On 2/25/02 1:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Thanks for voting.
Thanks Ben, Jim and Dirk-Willem for coming up with such a good process and
carrying it out...
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 08:22 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've created a patch for jakarta-site2.xml which i hope should make
things a little clearer. i've made the headers for the instructions about
creating web pages for a project using anakia into subsections rather
than sections
On Friday, March 22, 2002, at 01:09 PM, Danny Angus wrote:
snip
And in the interests of providing construtive criticism I'll propose --
A proposals section of the site, into which anyone with karma can commit
any submissions and from which documents can be promoted by lazy concensus
of all
the right place to ask questions about tomcat is on the tomcat user list
(see http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html).
on the other hand, i have a strong feeling that this is really a more
general question about jsp's (rather than tomcat) and so you might get a
quicker solution to your
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html has a broken url (to a tomcat
user list archive). attached is a patch.
- robert
Index: xdocs/site/mail2.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail2.xml,v
retrieving
hi austin
i believe that this question would be better directed at the tomcat user
list.
please read http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
- robert
On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 08:24 PM, Austin Gonyou wrote:
Is there a recommended way of rotating the mod_jk log? TIA.
--
Austin
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 09:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
snip
I'm +1, but I really want to discuss Costin's idea making a subproject
around OJB that allows other db-related projects to 'join' as peers in the
subproject.
From my point of view, having it open like that, and not just
(sorry i wanted to delete this rather than send it)
- robert
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 10:18 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 09:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
snip
I'm +1, but I really want to discuss Costin's idea making a subproject
around OJB
On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 04:31 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Rob Oxspring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So is it worth bothering with each month? Feedback wanted! :)
Great job!
+1
thanks for persevering!
I second Pier's suggestion to peer-review here and send the
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 11:02 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 17:59, robert burrell donkin wrote:
the existing list of mailing lists doesn't include some of the newer
turbine lists.
this patch for jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail2.xml adds them.
Would you like access
hi Rajan
(if you haven't found it already) you might like to read
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
and
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/guidelines.html
to give you an idea of the way that jakarta works.
i'd say that the best way to start to contribute to the jakarta community
i suppose that really this should be a matter for the jakarta pmc. i have
a feeling that the apache members are very strong about the contents of
public cvs since it exposes them to (possible criminal) liability. how far
should things be allowed to go in the sandbox?
- robert
On Thursday,
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 03:51 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
snip
I would preffer that all portlet-related technology would be in the same
project and community, with JSP/struts/cocoon specific areas. Maybe an
commons-like project.
+1 (providing that andrew's reservations about pluto
(here's some bits and pieces from the commons.)
Jakarta Commons
===
The major subject for debate this month was the organization of the
mailing lists (again):
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-devm=104376872026090w=2
Jexl
Jexl was promoted from the Sandbox to
On Friday, February 14, 2003, at 12:26 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Charles Burdick wrote:
Selection criteria aside, I nominate Morgan for the PMC.
Now that I think of it, let me just skim through the
Jakarta-Announcements archive from various points last year.
- Danny Angus
- Peter Carlson
- Morgan
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 11:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Yesterday I received the Jakarta Monthly Newsletter. Interesting as
always,
until I got to the section on PMC nominations. There, I suddenly found my
name listed as elected to the Jakarta PMC. This came as a complete
hi ceki
wouldn't it be less confusing to have a separate vote for mark?
while i'm thinking about it, is general or pmc the right place for votes
of this kind?
- robert
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 09:15 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 19:26 13.02.2003 -0500, you wrote:
Charles Burdick
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 10:25 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hi Robert,
I think Mark's nomination follows the sprit set by Sam's initial note.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-generalm=104275438831116w=2
As such, I don't see a need for a separate vote.
my reasoning was purely
the following committers have passed the PMC nomination vote proposed by
sam ruby:
- Danny Angus
- Peter Carlson
- Morgan Delagrange
- Ceki Gülcü
- Dmitri Plotnikov
- Phillip Rhodes
- James Strachan
- Jason van Zyl
- Ted Husted
- Rod Waldhoff
i'm sending this to let you all
On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 09:13 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the following committers have passed the PMC nomination vote proposed by
sam ruby:
- Danny Angus
- Peter Carlson
- Morgan Delagrange
- Ceki Gülcü
- Dmitri Plotnikov
- Phillip Rhodes
- James
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 07:33 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
I'd like to join the bandwagon. I would like karma and permission to
advertise major Tapestry releases on the Jakarta main page.
it's not within my power to grant you karma but if you do add a news item
about tapestry to
please submit a patch for the vendor page :)
- robert
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 08:24 PM, Gary Gwin wrote:
Friends,
We would like to be considered for a complete solution provider listing:
company name/website: Cafeacute;soft
IMHO it's quite a bit more involved that preparing a old-style release.
i'm currently preparing a revised release procedure document for commons.
this will contain detailed instructions on how i mirrored the recent
releases i cut.
- robert
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 02:38 AM, Andrew C.
this page contains more detailed advice about setting up the mirroring:
http://cvs.apache.org/~bodewig/mirror.html
- robert
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 03:59 AM, Kurt Schrader wrote:
Google says:
http://www.apache.org/dev/mirrors.html
-Kurt
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
maybe we could change 'SubProjects' (which is more to do with internal
organization at apache) to something more positive like 'Jakarta Is'. that
would make it easier for projects who want to retain an association with
jakarta to keep their listing.
- robert
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at
i think that licensing would be the right list to ask on.
i believe that XDoclet would now have to be incubated (rather than going
straight into jakarta). i think that one of the functions of the
incubation process would be to give definite answers on these kinds of
questions.
- robert
On
committed. many thanks.
- robert
On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 03:20 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that there's typo (webbaster - webmaster)
at xdocs/site/news.xml and created a patch (zipped).
Please apply this.
Sincerely,
--
Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 11:14 PM, Danny Angus wrote:
Andy wrote:
I'd like to propose that Howard Lewis Ship be given jakarta-site
access and
I hereby nominate him for the Jakarta PMC.
+1 to both.
+1 to both
- robert
-
To
i quite like the idea of adding a table giving introductions for related
projects but i know some other people think that the welcome page is too
big already.
opinions, anybody?
- robert
On Saturday, May 24, 2003, at 01:29 PM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi, Robert and all.
applied. many
On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 10:14 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
Andy proposed:
I would like to nominate Tetsuya Kitahata to be a Jakarta committer with
rights to jakarta-general.
Given that Tetsuya is doing so much to publicise Jakarta in the Far East
and has been maintaining Japanese translations of
it's about time for people to start thinking about the jakarta newsletter.
once again, it will be collated on the wiki. you can find it at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaNewsletterDrafts/Issue9
i was the guest editor for issue 8 and (if no one else steps up) i'd be
willing
AFAIK (hopefully someone will correct me if i'm wrong) EL is an
implementation of a standard (JSP2.0 expression language) whereas JEXL is
an extended version of the language with velocity-inspired features.
- robert
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 11:58 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
Someone cares
PROTECTED])
wrote:
Is there a target date for completion?
-Mark
- Original Message -
From: robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:28 AM
Subject: Jakarta Newsletter Issue 9
it's about time for people to start thinking
Jun 2003 18:28:59 +0100
(Subject: Jakarta Newsletter Issue 9)
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's about time for people to start thinking about the jakarta
newsletter.
once again, it will be collated on the wiki. you can find it at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi
)
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's about time for people to start thinking about the jakarta
newsletter.
once again, it will be collated on the wiki. you can find it at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaNewsletterDrafts/Issue9
i was the guest editor for issue
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
On 7/7/03 2:09 PM, robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XMLBeans feels (to me) like a jakarta component but if xml are happy to
manage it, i'd say that it'd probably work out easier that way. there
isn'
t any reason why
burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 01:14 PM, Robert Simpson wrote:
snip
I am surprised there isn't more interest in a common
internationalization
framework within Jakarta
jakarta came round to having two pages for mail subscriptions after having
years of regular problems with people joining the lists who had no idea
about how to behave. the pages are user unfriendly but the old solution
(ie publically and vocally humiliating posters on list) was worse (since
it
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 02:15 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Thank you for the comment, Robert.
TO tell the truth, my original motivation to arise this
issue was concering to the upcoming newsletter.
I published the final Jakarta Newsletter in early
this month and I found I made some
i like the logo. (unless someone beats me to it) i'll add a news item as
well.
if someone could let us know when sessions are available, then we can
change to a logo with 'sessions-now-available' byline and probably post
something to announcements as well. (it'd be cool if someone involved
ken
i don't suppose that you've got a few word-of-wisdom about ApacheCon that
you'd like to contribute (so they can be put in the news section and
posted to announcement) have you?
- robert
On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 09:05 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
hi otis
IIRC the current policy is that any jakarta committer who wants access to
the site module will be granted it on request. i'd like to encourage
people to take an active interest in maintaining and improving the site so
i'd hope that you'll ask for jakarta-site karma. since you're a pmc
hi todd
it's hard to diagnose this kind of thing without more details (it's
possible that your connection or the server was slow when you tried to
connect) but here's something you might try: first checkout the module and
then update to the particular version you require.
- robert
On
will all jakarta committers please ensure that there apache.org email
account is set up so that it forwards mail to an account that they
read. this is very easy to configure - just log on to cvs.apache.org
using ssh and then edit the .forward file. (one way to do this is to
use vi.
type
vi
(we've done some talking on the pmc list and turbineers have discussed
this in the past but since it's not really confidential i'm starting
this thread to give everyone a chance to participate.)
some information about Turbine-JCS:
* JCS has no release
* other apache products depend on JCS
*
On 30 Nov 2003, at 20:41, robert burrell donkin wrote:
sorry, missed one and probably
[ ] leave JCS within turbine
[ ] JCS to apache commons
[ ] JCS to jakarta commons
[ ] JCS to jakarta top level
[ ] JCS to incubator
[ ] something else (please specify)...
ps
before i get flamed (once again
On 1 Dec 2003, at 05:11, Scott Eade wrote:
snip
Without knowing too much, should perhaps JCS to db top level and
JCS to db commons also be considered options?
definitely :)
Of the available options below I have selected jakarta commons more by
excluding the other options than because of some
On 1 Dec 2003, at 09:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I agree to Henri JCS could need more publicity!
luckily enough it's apache newsletter time!
i know from personal experience that writing up something for the
newsletter really does generate interest. JCS sounds like something
that people would
IMHO the incubator is having some political difficulties at the moment
and (from my experience of projects being incubated) it doesn't really
help with gathering more developers.
having read the thread so far, here's my feelings:
1. i feel strongly that JCS should not continue as a turbine
On 4 Dec 2003, at 19:28, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
(i'm a little inclined towards db but) i'd support a proposal from the
JCS team for a future in either db or jakarta (along the lines
outlined
above). guys - have you come to any opinions about what's
On 4 Dec 2003, at 08:17, Daniel Rall wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
[I like Turbineers. :-) ]
I am one of them, and I did some discussion about JCS @ ApacheCon
with
Martin Poeschl (who seems to do the odd fix to JCS because he uses
it in
Torque),
On 5 Dec 2003, at 09:10, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 20:43, Daniel Rall wrote:
Given Robert's description of his experience with the Incubator, I'm
for the
Jakarta Commons to gather some community (direct drop rather than
sandbox
route), with the goal of an eventual
On 4 Dec 2003, at 22:35, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
snip
From a Jakarta PMC perspective, I think that we should cease to support
Sub-sub-projects with the exception of commons.*
i think that it depends on what's meant by sub-sub-projects :)
i'm happy for a single sub-project to create many
On 8 Dec 2003, at 11:10, Christopher Lenz wrote:
Am 08.12.2003 um 09:03 schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
Can anybody with a better memory for commons than I have recap why the
httpclient traffic list has been split off? Did the httpclient
developers want a list of their own or have the developers for the
for a 1.0 release inside
turbine-jcs and we make the transition into a Jakarta project with
this
1.0 release (which would IMHO a fine reason to do so).
Regards
Henning
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 17:16, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 5 Dec 2003, at 09:10, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote
On 8 Dec 2003, at 21:07, Costin Manolache wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Costin Manolache wrote:
Or even better - since jakarta has a single PMC, it could also have
a single
list of committers ( most of them in the single PMC ).
Each PMC member can vote about any jakarta issue
On 8 Dec 2003, at 04:20, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Then maybe
instead of breaking it on code-base, we could break it on concept:
jakarta-bugs
jakarta-announce
jakarta-dev
jakarta-pmc
jakarta-ideas
jakarta-site
or something. I'm assuming it'll be too noisy, but it is a logical
question to ask based
, 2003-12-09 at 13:13, robert burrell donkin wrote:
in this case, i'd say we'll need sufficient volunteers from the
jakarta
pmc to ensure oversight during this period. it'd probably be good if
they were turbineers and if at least one had recent experience of
release management.
anyone willing to step
On 12 Dec 2003, at 09:28, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 21:07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi henning
you don't need to be a committer to act as a mentor. from what i've
heard, i'd say that you'd be an ideal candidate :)
Hi,
thanks. :-)
I'm willing to subscribe to JCS
On 13 Dec 2003, at 22:22, Martin Poeschl wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 12 Dec 2003, at 09:28, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 21:07, robert burrell donkin wrote:
hi henning
you don't need to be a committer to act as a mentor. from what i've
heard, i'd say
On 13 Feb 2004, at 06:05, RK wrote:
Iam new in writing apache modules, can anybody tell me where can i get
the
documentation regarding development of Apache modules in C++
this list is general at the jakarta project (within apache). you're
asking for information about the httpd project. for
i've now discovered that news from jakarta is being disseminated to a
wider audience. this is a good thing but a bit unexpected (at least to
me). this raises the issue that we do not - at the moment - have
permanent urls for our news stories. they go into news.xml which is
then archived. this
On 24 Feb 2004, at 16:06, Tom Copeland wrote:
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 17:28, Danny Angus wrote:
If its not too patronising of me I'd like to propose vote of thanks
to Sam as outgoing chair,
+n, where n = 1
+n!
(that's a factorial sign rather than an exclamation mark ;)
- robert
i've just committed the reorganization i proposed last week. i've moved
all the news documents into the news subdirectory and all now have
date-related names (so no renaming should be necessary and therefore
the urls will be permanent). the html versions of the old pages now
redirect to the
On 25 Feb 2004, at 13:33, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Feb 24, 2004, at 5:08 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've just committed the reorganization i proposed last week. i've
moved all the news documents into the news subdirectory and all now
have date-related names (so no renaming should
On 26 Feb 2004, at 19:42, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
probably getting apache to do temporary redirects from those urls
You do know that /www/jakarta.apache.org/.htaccess is in CVS, right?
i do now :)
thanks
- robert
-
To
do the gump team plan to continue to use the jakarta announcement
mailing list or will they be creating a new list?
- robert
On 26 Feb 2004, at 22:30, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- The Apache Gump Project will now oversee the development and
we'd then risk people losing long term urls. probably getting apache to
do temporary redirects from those urls would be ok, though. of course,
i'd be interested to know what other people think on this before
actually doing anything about it...
- robert
On 26 Feb 2004, at 12:56, Marcus Sundman
On 27 Feb 2004, at 12:19, Marcus Sundman wrote:
Would it be possible to have symlinks like
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/news-latest.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news/elsewhere-latest.html
that would point to the latest news?
we'd then risk people losing long term urls. probably
the generated html does not contain an explicit license just a
copyright. am i right in thinking that now it would be better to
publish them under the apache license 2?
also, am i right in thinking that all the source documentation should
have license notices added?
- robert
it seems to me that the javadocs are distributed just like everything
else in the release. so, it seems to me that we need to alter our
builds so that the apache license 2 is included. we could do this by
setting the license as a header or footer (or something) in the javadoc
build.
anyone
On 1 Mar 2004, at 12:15, Marcus Sundman wrote:
I think the best solution would be to have one page with news N days
old, and
then have a completely separate news archive where news are
categorized by
month/year/whatever. The former could have news from both Jakarta and
elsewhere on the same page,
i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out
there on this. i like the idea of modifying the .vsl file and i'd be
inclined to add both formulations. maybe this would be a good question
to raise on community...
- robert
On 1 Mar 2004, at 17:25, Christopher Lenz wrote:
On 2 Mar 2004, at 02:06, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Quoting Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:24:02 +
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i've had a quick google and i'm not sure that there's a consensus out
there on this. i like the idea of modifying the .vsl file and i'd
On 2 Mar 2004, at 20:21, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:08:42 +
robert burrell donkin wrote:
the .vsl template should definitely be altered to include the
boilerplate (as a comment) but i think that it'd be good to think
about
including a meta and/or link tags as well.
I
On 1 Mar 2004, at 12:15, Marcus Sundman wrote:
snip
maybe it'd be cool to have a complete latest-first index of all news
stories in the news index page. that way, not only would it be a
useful
resource but also it'd be a fixed page for people to book mark.
Yes.
(Well, it would be cool in the
at the moment, we have a section on the jakarta navigation bar that's
titled 'Translated (Web)'. i've been wondering whether it might be
better to rename this to something like 'Community Resources
(Unofficial)'. this would make it clear that (though we're very
grateful for these sites), they
On 11 Mar 2004, at 12:47, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:32:31 +0100
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
snip
Depends on what you consider a sister resource.
At least, I guess robert is considering planetapache
would be one of them :)
On 19 Mar 2004, at 08:50, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Mar 2004, at 12:47, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:32:31 +0100
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
snip
Depends
On 1 Apr 2004, at 21:44, Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
I assume the website is about to be updated with this information? I
tried
to email [EMAIL PROTECTED], but typically, heh, the
recipients
mail server was down or unreachable ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Send a note to the struts-dev list, they're
in the light of the recent debate over on licensing about the inability
for java folks to take their jakarta fix in the usual packaged/ported
*nix fashion, i thought i might add links to a couple of well-known
downstream distributors of packages and ports to the resources
(unofficial) section:
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
