-0.10/xine
probably SVG for skins soon if not already, etc).
As a conclusion, if you used BMP for your lightweight player, you
probably want audacious, if you don't want to try a more different
thing.
Hope this clears things up.
--
With regards,
Mart Raudsepp
Project manager of wxMUD - http
at least a week ago... but I'm living in a utopian land.
--
With regards,
Mart Raudsepp
Project manager of wxMUD - http://wxmud.sourceforge.net/
Developer of wxWidgets- http://www.wxwidgets.org/
GTK+ port maintainer of OMGUI - http://www.omgui.org/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 00:53 +0200, foser wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 00:43 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Delaying GNOME-2.14 for non-GNOME packages using gtk2 USE flag is mildly
funny to me, too.
These two things are not related, 2.14 is not delayed whatsoever.
Jakub's call was just to get
on xorg.fd.org wiki.
A couple more RCs, and release in about a month
if all goes well?
--
With regards,
Mart Raudsepp
Project manager of wxMUD - http://wxmud.sourceforge.net/
Developer of wxWidgets- http://www.wxwidgets.org/
GTK+ port maintainer of OMGUI - http://www.omgui.org
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 21:22 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote:
Wow nice addiction to our team.
I am pondering which addiction do you mean here :/
Congrats Mart and keep up with good work.
Thanks!
--
Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
a new
thread when wanting to discuss about that.
Note that I'm on devaway for up to a week from this moment, just getting
an actual discussion going on this topic meanwhile as promised at
council meeting.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:48 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite intentional
and currently desired.
This is fundamentally broken as a concept.
Adding an overlay
time and double-check on
maintainers if they really did their job right.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
.
In separate threads:
* Slot operator support
* dohard being deprecated
Did I miss anything?
I'm not even sure anymore where to find a list of items that is current
for what's on the table for EAPI-3 right now...
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org
to
cover some of the above with new syntax?
Perhaps some forward thinking is sensible here to not end up with having
to deprecate the := and :* syntax soon after its introduction.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
On N, 2009-04-09 at 11:30 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 05:25 +0300 schrieb Mart Raudsepp:
Hello,
This thread is for any discussion about the slot operator support item
in EAPI-3 draft.
The premise is good what := and :* allow for, but I'm concerned
).
that's a bit complicated with not having texlive installed anywhere
yet...
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On N, 2009-04-09 at 15:37 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:12:02 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is quite irresponsible to enable that by default for the FULL user
base, given the state of the tree in regards to it
Which is why we are not talking about
to unpack --if-compressed. That seems backwards.
Still a bit unsure about the default non-argument case choice.
* RDEPEND-DEPEND
yes
* DIE-ON-FAILURE
whatever
* NONFATAL
whatever
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:11:15 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
* ECONF-OPTIONS
query
--disable-dependency-tracking has other implications than it being
allowed to be passed to ./configure or not - such as dependency
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:11:15 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
* SLOT-OPERATOR-DEPS
An outstanding problem to me as a package maintainer is the lack of
means to know which slot the PM actually picked for the package
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:58 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:56:56 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
If a parallel install is overwriting things on / whilst a package is
compiling, things are already horribly broken regardless of this
switch. PMS explicitly
from expat 1.95 to 2.0 was a walk in the park compared to this.
An important difference to note here is that expat case (sorry) was hit
by everyone, but xcb problem will be hit only by people who have enabled
USE=xcb on certain packages or globally, and that is not the default.
--
Mart Raudsepp
packages of quality easily available to the user
base until other projects and developers are able to take over.
Discuss! :)
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 20:47 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Hello,
Hey,
I have had this project in my mind for a while, so it's about time to
get it out there, as to see if feedback finds it a good one - and if
that is so, if there are people who want to make it happen
On N, 2009-05-14 at 14:02 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2009 03:32:12 Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Hello,
I have had this project in my mind for a while, so it's about time to
[..]
I think there is no need for this project. Developers can always browse
bugzilla and pick
of this directly applies to the subject at hand, because
while we're talking new versions of packages already in-tree here, the
subject at hand is packages that aren't in-tree in any form yet.
Sorry, still felt like replying with my view on Gentoo vs dist-upgraded
distros :)
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 19:24 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2009.05.14 01:32, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Hello,
[snip]
Project maintainer-wanted
=
Abstract:
There are currently quite some package requests (over
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 12:08 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 03:32:12 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
Project maintainer-wanted
=
Abstract:
There are currently quite some package requests (over 3000) languishing
on bugzilla waiting
of
time
to QA then they essentially have become a maintainer and the package
is
no-longer maintainer-wanted.
The maintainer-wanted team would effectively aggregate those people
together, so that the end result would be better quality, quicker
response times and so on.
--
Mart Raudsepp
when they get the chance?
Like it or not, LQ is the first place where a newcomer goes.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On K, 2009-05-20 at 11:36 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
The maintainer-wanted team owns that foo package then, which is why
having a different mail alias than the existing one for new package
requests that aren't in gentoo tree yet would be a good idea.
Ok, I
On N, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Чтв, 14/05/2009 в 03:32 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет:
Project maintainer-wanted
=
Mart, I think that it's good idea to create such project but with a
different goals. I think currently maintainer-wanted alias
On K, 2009-05-20 at 00:55 +, Duncan wrote:
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org posted
1242777068.30374.30.ca...@localhost, excerpted below, on Wed, 20 May 2009
02:51:08 +0300:
It is about getting popular packages (based on various metrics) into the
official tree for easy access
currently are? So that everyone won't need to look up by
themselves or guess the global description.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On K, 2009-06-03 at 21:02 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which
can be converted, that'd be 10.
USE network Enable networking support
USE
On E, 2009-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
People I nominate:
* leio / mraudsepp, because he's done a really good job protecting the
distro's interests
I accept
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
and don't need to be looked up with what is actually meant when
they are being referred to in short names.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is the preliminary meeting agenda.
I acknowledge that agenda, or something.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, never count on common sense. Elected people rarely have any.
If they do during the election, it disappears after taking their
position. I think the vast majority of people here have seen that over
the years.
My $0.02 worth.
Dale
:-) :-)
Regards,
Ferris
--
Mart Raudsepp
this is a call for testing that, as combinatory
CFLAGS enabling -fomit-frame-pointer is your reasoning here.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
don't get the correct and desired things enabled for
their desktop environment of choice.
So for the 3 prefix-linux profiles that's using 2008.0 now, you can feel
safe and simply change the parents to point at 10.0.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http
Hello,
See attached news item for consideration.
Suggestions on how to improve it, including the text section, very
welcome.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
Title: Upgrade to GNOME 2.26
Author: Gentoo Gnome Team gn
On T, 2009-10-06 at 02:11 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Hello,
See attached news item for consideration.
Suggestions on how to improve it, including the text section, very
welcome.
Attached is a tweaked version with wording fixes from dabbott and author
as me instead of team, as I understood
to look for a metadata/news with my setup, so I can't
verify on my end everything is working right to proceed with this..
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
of quicker
stabilization of package I maintain myself I try to state in the
STABLEREQ bug why the quicker stabilization.
Is it stated in any documentation that 30 days is a policy?
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
considered harmful?
On some non-desktop systems perhaps, yes.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
not
checking issues with it by default.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
poppler-cairo probably instead), poppler-qt3, poppler-qt4 and
poppler-utils.
I don't believe we should selectively cripple one GUI toolkit with not
having proper printing support out of the box on a desktop profile,
while others do, just because maintainers are lazy.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
requirement by cups. It doesn't need poppler-glib, so
utils and bindings being a separate package, as it always was before,
would nicely solve it.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
) Profit.
Obviously I doubt to have time to work on it personally. I hope the guys
pushing for adding even more subprofiles can pick up this idea and
implement it, if discussion gives consensus this is a good way forward.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http
Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
I suggest reading my comments...
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
I suggest reading my comments...
Unless I
of
globally.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
other guys already did though.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:16 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:40:00PM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp:
Instead I think we should be improving eselect profile to support
multiple inheriting /etc/make.profile
is unable to set more than 30
or so days into the future.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
always install them, they are just not that big compared to the include
files that get always installed too. But embedded guys can easily delete
all of /usr/include, but typelibs (containing the introspection data)
may be necessary at runtime.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
comparison)
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio
On N, 2007-09-27 at 17:08 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 13:15 Wed 26 Sep , Mart Raudsepp (leio) wrote:
mv ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py \
${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py-2.0
mv ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir
On P, 2007-09-30 at 22:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 02:42 Mon 01 Oct , Mart Raudsepp (leio) wrote:
1.1 app-text/gnome-doc-utils/gnome-doc-utils-0.12.0.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-text/gnome-doc-utils/gnome-doc-utils
of stories that start with when I was
your age?
Or... My first computer had 4K RAM...
Damn, mine had 48K
Welcome Mike!
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
off my hands before I get sunk into
work.
Many many thanks for pushing wxGTK forwards while I'm occupied with
work, gnome stuff... and procrastinating
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description
/mp4live
Any reason to not use something like mp3enc flag instead at that point?
mp3 USE flag is already global, and appears to mean mp3 decoding, so how
about a general mp3 encoding USE flag? I guess merging decoding and
encoding behind the same USE flag might be an option too.
--
Mart Raudsepp
smoothed
out, I guess).
I have just added a local visibility flag for paludis and that's also my
candidate for the global one, but better names are welcome.
Why not enable it by default and unconditionally (other than GCC version
being used supporting it) in this specific case?
--
Mart Raudsepp
that perfectly fits
their needs? If yes, why not slot it as is designed?
Regards,
Mart Raudsepp
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
blue sky ideas how to improve something like this to a
lot more packages, including all hosted on GNOME mirrors and available
from gnomefiles.org lists (we have parse-able data available from them)
and more, but nothing has materialized as of yet.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL
-sapi-r2, php5-sapi-r3, tla,
webapp-apache, xfree
Missing from that list is kernel and gst-plugins.
wxlib also.
Do I need to be adding deprecation notice somewhere? I didn't see
anything in some of the listed above eclasses
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog
bar COPYING baz
dodoc ${DOCS}
Well, this DOCS deal is coming through gnome2.eclass, and that's how all
of the packages using that eclass are supposed to install DOCS.
I suppose we could also add a QA warning into the eclass for COPYING?
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is the perfect solution in my opinion, given
unlimited maintainer time and such. In real world that might be too hard
to maintain if upstream doesn't go along, but not in all cases (depends
on how much time the maintainer has, how complex the build system is,
etc).
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not
roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can.
coreutils and linux-headers come to my mind out of system packages right
now. I'm sure more dragons await me.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http
against in overlays and time wastes continuously in the future.
Oh and net-tools has not distributed anything in .tar.lzma, so this has
nothing to do with following upstream in any shape or form in this case.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org
) that used it
as was expected from python_mod_optimize is now broken for ROOT != /
by installing them into ${ROOT}/${ROOT}/ ?
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
of benefits to gain from it.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On R, 2008-05-30 at 22:37 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 May 2008 00:31:22 +0300
Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On R, 2008-05-30 at 20:20 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 21:13:32 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Talk to the upstream
an update, it gives the impression nothing has
been done, which I don't want to believe. I'd appreciate an update - not
necessarily as part of the council agenda, but perhaps just per mail,
with any discussions if any is necessary during the meeting.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL
.
Thanks, I accept.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it by patching the Makefile.in or
configure that you forgot to patch when you patched Makefile.am or
configure.{in,ac}.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
effort, so I haven't put much effort into putting it into
writing. But maybe someone interested wants to chat on IRC on the topic.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
or not...
Maybe this gives some ideas to someone to write a proper QA script, or
point us all to an already existing almighty script or tool that does
just that.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description
On P, 2008-07-27 at 18:20 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2008-07-26 02:56:24 Mart Raudsepp napisał(a):
On L, 2008-07-26 at 03:39 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Fortunately, the majority of ebuilds/packages are honoring LDFLAGS. Of
course it's kinda difficult
).
Q: Are there any other use-cases you have and actively use?
No.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
/make.conf or any
other place. FEATURES=test is the thing that can be modified for this.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, the
reason could be modified to tell things broke and what the tracking bug
is, or unmasked if it works fine with other packages.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
that, especially with recent versions of gtk-doc, but
some do want it. Use INSTALL_MASK if you don't want developer API docs
is the current stance.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description
approach as a start would also mean
touching many GNOME packages (build-depends on gtk-doc if eautoreconf is
involved), and I'd rather not risk that at the moment. It would also
heavily disrupts the moving of the new version ebuilds from overlay to
portage tree.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
is fixed (which I read are
already fixed).
I can not understand why this is dragged on. It was a bug, it is fixed.
The sky is not falling and EAPI-2 is not broken - there was a bug in the
implementation that is fixed.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 15:40 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Втр, 01/07/2008 в 05:05 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет:
Over a year or two ago, it was communicated that it supposedly a policy
that USE=static
Well, I don't have web-reference at hand now, but there was a thread in
gentoo-dev
believe the primary reason is for release LiveCD's.
They ship with evolution-exchange, and that requires
evolution/evolution-data-server to be built with USE=kerberos
They don't do /etc/portage business, so it's a global USE flag to get
things like GRP packages to work right.
Regards,
--
Mart
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:22 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
Michael Hammer wrote:
* Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081031 15:53]:
If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap.
++
I was also wondering
categorized themselves
like GNOME has.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
packages, or I'm just allowed to remove it but should really apply a
common sense as usual and you don't want to go into details in this
document?
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description
seriously, and
mostly just go by DT_NEEDED entries in ELF files on ELF systems instead
of all of the listed ones in .la ones, as even if a solution for
upstream libtool is figured out, we'd still have old installed .la files
around that include indirect libraries.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
On K, 2008-11-12 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote:
On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
I heavily object to having any such function introduced or used or
equivalent .la removals conducted without a good rationale and
explanation of why this is the approach taken. I
that
shared library, so the toolchain can not safely discard anything, even
if you just have one application using some big library, but only using
a small subset of its functionality.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
.
Could you please expand on what the actual problem is for reference,
having never seen them fail myself or hear any fail for others?
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On P, 2008-12-07 at 12:03 +, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
vapier 08/12/07 12:03:34
Modified: libxml2-2.7.2-r1.ebuild
ChangeLog entires are mandatory without any exceptions for
stabilizations. Don't touch packages I co-maintain without a ChangeLog
entry if it's not a
~x86-fbsd
+KEYWORDS=alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 sh sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd
IUSE=
RDEPEND==dev-libs/glib-2.4
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
is more likely to be quicker.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
in their suitable
category (glchess is a cool board game, etc)..
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, can keep using it.
Developers also deal with categories, but that's easy enough to keep
going as is.
Less radical, less controversial, better viability to actually get done.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
team need all these working good so we could take those. I think
empathy is already co-maintained by us as an official GNOME module.
We wouldn't mind co-maintenance of the telepathy stuff with other teams
or people.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http
importantly users still want to use \; for find -exec ending on their
command line and their very own scripts.
And who knows how many shell scripts shipped by packages use the
escaping method.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 19:29 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 21 February 2009 19:00:19 Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 18:55 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 21 February 2009 18:38:55 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:27:10 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote
1 - 100 of 399 matches
Mail list logo
