Re: [gentoo-dev] Two herds (and four extra?)

2010-07-22 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 21/07/2010 в 13:34 +0200, Jeroen Roovers пишет: This is madness, people. Two herds and four separately mentioned developers? Why don't you join a herd? Go on, it's fun and you don't have to be alone! Jeroen, sometimes I add myself as maintainer at the same time being part of herd for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-util/netbeans: ChangeLog netbeans-6.9-r3.ebuild

2010-07-22 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 22/07/2010 в 14:32 +0200, Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) пишет: Dne 22.7.2010 10:44, Peter Volkov napsal(a): В Срд, 21/07/2010 в 17:18 +0200, Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) пишет: epatch_user() from euitls.eclass so this is undocumented feature? i did not know about this cool feature till

Re: [gentoo-dev] [bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org: [Bug 326991] Testing release of sys-libs/zlib-1.2.5.3 from unofficial sources (???)]

2010-07-06 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 06/07/2010 в 01:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt пишет: Hi folks, does he speak for all of you ? Enrico I don't see why we may need to maintain separate ebuilds for programs with patches scheduled upstream. Submit important patches separately or, better, work with upstream so we'll get

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-06-25 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 24/06/2010 в 16:43 -0400, Olivier Crête пишет: On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 20:59 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: On 04/13/2010 01:25 PM, Peter Volkov wrote: В Втр, 06/04/2010 в 07:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: * It makes zero sense to manually manage ChangeLogs in git[1] Once I had

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-06-25 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 25/06/2010 в 14:19 +0530, Arun Raghavan пишет: On 25 June 2010 14:15, Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: В Чтв, 24/06/2010 в 16:43 -0400, Olivier Crête пишет: [...] Or you could review the changes before pushing (since in git these operations are separate). And live

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs?

2010-06-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 16/06/2010 в 13:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: Trying to move the following bug to upstream: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253862 AFAIR this was never libtool bug, but automake and with recent enough automake (1.10 for sure) everything should just work. -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Does libtool really support parallel make installs?

2010-06-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 16/06/2010 в 17:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Peter Volkov wrote: В Срд, 16/06/2010 в 13:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos пишет: Trying to move the following bug to upstream: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253862 AFAIR this was never libtool bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] LINGUAS handling

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 09/06/2010 в 21:21 +0200, Harald van Dijk пишет: On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:38:03AM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: 1. Do we want all packages to support LINGUAS if possible? It is possible to leave gettext based package without LINGUAS and everything will just work, but I think that it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to use a web interface? phpldapadmin or something The problem with phpldapadmin is that it potentially opens up LDAP to the world. Require everybody to forward connection

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 11/06/2010 в 09:48 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет: On Friday 11 of June 2010 09:24:45 Peter Volkov wrote: В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to use a web interface? phpldapadmin or something

[gentoo-dev] LINGUAS handling

2010-06-09 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. We have LINGUAS support in portage for quite some time now, but how do we handle LINGUAS? It's not as evident as it seems and thus we need some guidelines. So I'll formulate few questions below but first let's look how portage works with LINGUAS. If you know this skip to Questions section

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-07 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 05/06/2010 в 02:00 +0200, Torsten Veller пишет: Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010). All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list. If you were nominated and want to run, you have to accept your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: autotools.eclass eautomake update

2010-05-25 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 25/05/2010 в 12:12 +, Duncan пишет: Peter Volkov posted on Tue, 25 May 2010 11:46:12 +0400 as excerpted: sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.97r2=1.98 Why is required at the end of file list? for makefile_name in {GNUmakefile,{M,m}akefile}.{am,in} ; do

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/tripwire: ChangeLog tripwire-2.4.2.ebuild tripwire-2.4.1.2.ebuild

2010-05-20 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. Guys, please, cleanup ebuids with version bumps! Also Patrick, if you use this software or at least investigated it during version bump, why it is still maintainer-wanted? Although everything below makes me think that this was blind bump. В Пнд, 17/05/2010 в 18:41 +, Patrick Lauer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-fs/samba/files: samba-init

2010-05-20 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 11/05/2010 в 11:53 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет: start() { + # we can't assume that /var/run/ is persistent, so create dir if needed + [ ! -e /var/run/samba ] mkdir /var/run/samba Why? Is it impossible to create /var/run/samba during src_install? -- Peter.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/ipac-ng

2010-05-09 Thread Peter Volkov
ipac-ng fails to build/work with recent iptables (bug 191582, bug 255086 and bug 307813), suffers from parallel make issue (bug 240744). New version (1.33) crashs on start as reported by many people in upstream mailing lists and elsewhere (bug 310981). -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-arch/rpm - a few questions

2010-05-06 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 06/05/2010 в 00:34 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky пишет: Moreover if I am not mistaken database is not compatible between 4 and 5 so if someone accidentally upgrades...he/she is screwed. That was original reason for masking rpm-5 as far as I know. It was hardmasked because some packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 06/04/2010 в 07:43 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: * It makes zero sense to manually manage ChangeLogs in git[1] Once I had stupid cutpaste mistake and entered wrong credits in ChangeLog. I don't see how to resolve this issue in case ChangeLog's will be generated from git log and until

Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation

2010-04-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 13/04/2010 в 17:18 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: The traditional ChangeLog that is currently employed in gentoo-x86 (and in other projects) is simply an ugly hack The difference between gentoo-x86 ebuild ChangeLogs and ChangeLogs used in other projects is that gentoo-x86 ChangeLog is

Re: [gentoo-dev] How about a monthly bumpday?

2010-03-19 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 10/03/2010 в 05:08 +0100, Sebastian Pipping пишет: How about a monthly bumpday? Good idea, but it should follow our policy to inform maintainers _in advance_: e.g. on first bumpday to work on bumps and notify maintainer about this work by attaching final ebuild to the version bump bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling unknown commands in an ebuild

2010-02-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 07/02/2010 в 21:24 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет: it might also be useful to add a default epatch() to the initial env that would be clobbered when the inherit occurred. epatch() { die you need to inherit eutils.eclass to use epatch ; } After fixing breakage that was introduced by

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upstream tags in metadata.xml (GLEP 46)

2010-02-05 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 04/02/2010 в 22:37 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет: The upstream tags are meant as a way to track information about - id of a hosting or indexing site (automated version bump checks) Does there exist any scripts for this? -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] openssl 1.0.0 quick test

2010-02-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 30/01/2010 в 13:19 +0100, Hanno Böck пишет: - php fails, fix is trivial. I've sent it upstream and it got already applied to upstream svn: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50859 - wvstreams fails, fix also trivial and sent upstream, no reply yet:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Font eclass EAPI update and design

2010-02-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 01/02/2010 в 11:35 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет: As I was reworking the x-modular-r2 eclass I found out that most of the slowdowns for fonts were produced in fonts eclass. Exactly what slowdowns are you talking about? I've reviewed all changes and I don't see any noticeable performance

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Font eclass EAPI update and design

2010-02-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 01/02/2010 в 14:29 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет: 2. if has X ${IUSE//+} use X ; then I'm not sure. With this change should we update all packages depending on font.eclass to have X in IUSE? Nak this specialy allows that you dont have to keep X in iuse. But it does not matter

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: don't define ebeep and epause in eutils in EAPI 3

2010-01-19 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 19/01/2010 в 01:22 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет: On 01/18/2010 03:02 PM, Tiziano Müller wrote: The proper replacement for such interactive notifications when called in pkg_setup is pkg_pretend, which will (hopefully) be available in EAPI 4. Thus I'd keep them around until then. ebeep

[gentoo-dev] new USE_EXPAND variable: XTABLES_ADDONS_MODULES

2010-01-18 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. I'm going to add xtable-addons package to the tree. This is patch-o-matic replacement which allows to extend iptables without touching iptables source itself. Currently package contains 24 modules which I'd like to have USE configurable with USE_EXPAND'ed variable: XTABLES_ADDONS_MODULES

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] layman storage location (again)

2010-01-16 Thread Peter Volkov
The bug you mentioned [253725] is not about layman location, it's only about keepdir line. Why don't we fix that and don't change defaults another time? Such change does more harm for our users then good. В Сбт, 16/01/2010 в 02:55 +0100, Sebastian Pipping пишет: On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-free software in Gentoo

2009-12-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 28/12/2009 в 18:41 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan пишет: I think we can simply follow debian and fedora's lead on this. They have the lawyers, and Well, it's possible but not that simple. To do this it's not enough to compare packages, but files and patches should be compared as well (and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-free software in Gentoo

2009-12-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 29/12/2009 в 00:24 -0500, Vincent Launchbury пишет: File a bug with some ebuilds. It looks like somebody already has. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=266157. I tested the latest ebuild, and it worked fine (see comment #59.) What would have to be done to get it in the main

Re: [gentoo-dev] Versioning of Python scripts

2009-12-22 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 19/12/2009 в 16:24 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis пишет: - Scripts of packages supporting only e.g. Python 2 can be executed (without necessity of using of e.g. python2 /usr/bin/${script}) after activating of e.g. Python 3. - Scripts of packages supporting

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI={3,4} offset-prefix semantics mandatory?

2009-12-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 19:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет: Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix support make the use of that support mandatory or optional? I think no. Without real testing that package works in prefix there is no need to bother and create illusion that it does.

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag(s) for ssl (always USE ssl)

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 09:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller пишет: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Peter Volkov wrote: If package has ssl support use ssl USE flag for that. In case there are alternatives, use openssl/gnutls/nss for upstream _less_ recommended implementation(s). Small problem: If a user

Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require herd/

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 07/12/2009 в 21:20 +0100, Thilo Bangert пишет: Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org said: On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:56 +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: dev-util/cucumber herd missing Fixed, but this is really a bug in metadata.dtd, which specifies !ELEMENT

Re: [gentoo-dev] changes to bzr.eclass

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 15/12/2009 в 10:39 +0100, Ulrich Mueller пишет: bzr.eclass currently uses bzr export for copying from ${DISTDIR}/bzr-src to ${WORKDIR} in src_unpack. Unfortunately, bzr export accesses the remote repository for lightweight checkouts (which are the eclass's default), so it cannot be used

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA is unimportant? (was: gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild)

2009-11-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 09/11/2009 в 01:37 +0100, Vlastimil Babka пишет: I totally agree. And I must say it started with the very first mail of pva. Accusing of not knowing quizzes was totally uncalled for. If you know how to do thing properly what are the reasons avoid doing that? All I heard here is laziness

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA: package.mask policies

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 07/11/2009 в 18:24 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal пишет: * Masking beta... This masks are good if the software release is KNOWN to break previous behaviour or degrade user experience. Otherwise the software should not be masked (its TESTING for purpose, not stable). God no! If we'll start to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 10:05 +0100, Fabian Groffen пишет: On 07-11-2009 17:54:25 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: We could introduce noarch and ~noarch KEYWORDS, add noarch to the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct unstable users to add ~noarch to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 07/11/2009 в 12:49 -0800, Zac Medico пишет: Peter Volkov wrote: We could introduce noarch and ~noarch KEYWORDS, add noarch to the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct unstable users to add ~noarch to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. Looks like this will not work

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет: patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46 Log: Bump file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/foremost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup Index: foremost-1.5.6.ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/desklet-Mouse: - New directory

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 09:40 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет: On Sunday 08 November 2009 08:35:10 Joe Sapp wrote: Samuli Suominen wrote: Joe Sapp (nixphoeni) wrote: nixphoeni09/10/27 11:21:25 Log: Directory /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-plugins/desklet-Mouse added to the repository

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/foremost: ChangeLog foremost-1.5.6.ebuild

2009-11-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет: And because I'm a lazy I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix it instead Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your responsibility? Sorry but it's your job. Also it's nice to see how

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-07 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 06/11/2009 в 14:07 -0800, Zac Medico пишет: Fabian Groffen wrote: On 06-11-2009 19:48:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote: In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark Java packages

[gentoo-dev] client/server consistency: USE flags / split packages

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and possibly extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary distros do or do we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some packages are split other use client, server or minimal USE flag(s). Back in 2006 similar problem was

Re: [gentoo-dev] client/server consistency: USE flags / split packages

2009-11-04 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 04/11/2009 в 17:34 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет: Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 18:44 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov: So are there any good reasons to split packages? In environments with a staging server and binary packages, yes. Currently you either have to script your staging server

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite (part 1): KDE3-only applications that won't build when KDE4 is installed

2009-10-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 16/10/2009 в 23:09 +0300, Samuli Suominen пишет: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (16 Oct 2009) # Fails to build with KDE4 installed wrt bug #277427. # Masked for removal in 30 days. net-news/eventwatcher kde-misc/kisdnwatch ... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279823

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE=qa-test

2009-10-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 14/10/2009 в 22:12 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет: On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200 Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote: Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this topic? A week isn't old. ;) I'll add it once the flu and homework let up for a minute.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-cpp/eigen: eigen-2.0.6.ebuild ChangeLog

2009-09-26 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 26/09/2009 в 00:18 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет: patrick 09/09/26 00:18:02 Log: Bump to 2.0.6, fixes #286462 (Portage version: 2.2_rc41/cvs/Linux x86_64) 1.1 dev-cpp/eigen/eigen-2.0.6.ebuild file :

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] net-misc/l7-filter removal

2009-06-17 Thread Peter Volkov
This package is hard masked now finally. Another reference to count: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274341 В Втр, 28/04/2009 в 17:24 +1000, Daniel Black пишет: This package relies on disabling of essential package management features (collision-protection) to achieve installation. It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/OpenRC from init.d scripts (summary of debate and plans from bug 270646)

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 08/06/2009 в 20:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет: i dont see how that is relevant. we only care about Gentoo here. plus, the test is: if /sbin/functions.sh exists, it's baselayout-1 (which no one else outside of Gentoo will be using), otherwise it's openrc. once we toss

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/OpenRC from init.d scripts (summary of debate and plans from bug 270646)

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Volkov
problems with this. В Птн, 12/06/2009 в 14:53 +0400, Peter Volkov пишет: Is there any problem with /etc/openrc-version? I don't think this is necessary any more. -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 14/05/2009 в 03:32 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет: Project maintainer-wanted = Mart, I think that it's good idea to create such project but with a different goals. I think currently maintainer-wanted alias is missed by most developers: new packages are assigned there

Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 08/04/2009 в 16:36 +0200, Jeroen Roovers пишет: On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:11:02 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет: i think it's better to develop an emerge --info package It already exists. But regretfully it does

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-04-13 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 09/04/2009 в 15:32 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: Please provide a list of packages that use custom configure scripts, that currently work with econf (including all the weird things it already passes), that would break with this change and whose ebuilds are using econf. I have yet to see

Re: [gentoo-dev] `paludis --info' is not like `emerge --info'

2009-04-06 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет: i think it's better to develop an emerge --info package It already exists. But regretfully it does not provide useful output even about the package's USE flags so I suspect it was implemented for different purposes. -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-www category

2009-04-05 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 09:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller пишет: Is the following a reasonable scheme? net-www/adobesvg - www-plugins/adobesvg This one probably should be removed from the tree: http://www.adobe.com/svg/eol.html net-www/gnash- www-plugins/gnash

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-03-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 16/03/2009 в 20:47 +, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: * Am I to take it src_test is to remain in its current worthless state? Is it possible in EAPI 3 make src_test failures not fatal? Something like make die() non fatal inside src_test. Package manager if it sees die() inside src_test should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gems.eclass review

2009-03-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 12/03/2009 в 21:02 +0100, Alex Legler пишет: http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.txt http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.diff You have: EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_prepare src_configure src_compile src_install I'm not sure here. Is it safe to export src_prepare

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tcl/Tk multi-slot testing

2009-03-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 13/03/2009 в 19:09 +0100, Federico Ferri пишет: btw, on a different topic: the number of bugs on tcltk (8.5) has lowered a bit. maybe it's time to unmask it and have package maintainers fix the outdated apps? A number of packages depend on itcl which does not builds with 8.5. It is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing manitainer

2009-03-10 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/03/2009 в 22:54 +0100, Rémi Cardona пишет: Le 08/03/2009 21:38, Tomáš Chvátal a écrit : net-misc/mDNSResponder How about dropping this one in favor of avahi? Or am I missing something obvious? Are they completely interchangeable? Last time (well, the only time) I built samba

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 2

2009-03-03 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 02/03/2009 в 13:01 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen пишет: On Monday 02 March 2009 08:24:35 Torsten Veller wrote: Could you just use dosed here? dosed needs to die. Why? -- Peter. signature.asc Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью

Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives

2009-02-28 Thread Peter Volkov
EAPI inside ebuild is the best solution. If we really have to put it inside filename, keep it out of extension, like 2) b) suggests. -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)

2009-02-28 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 24/02/2009 в 16:14 +0200, Serkan Kaba пишет: lucene-contrib eclass in java-experimental [1] sets EAPI to 1 to use slot deps. And I think that's a valid usage. 1: http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/browser/java-experimental/eclass/lucene-contrib.eclass It's better (the only way...)

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: fox.eclass update

2009-02-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 08/02/2009 в 23:06 +0100, Matti Bickel пишет: +# could probably be lower +WANT_AUTOCONF=latest +WANT_AUTOMAKE=latest These are defaults. You don't need to specify them. + eautomake || die automake error eautomake dies on its own. You don't need || die here. -- Peter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of cp -i to prevent overwriting upstream files

2009-01-21 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 20/01/2009 в 21:04 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет: So do you think: a) cp -i is fine No, interactivity is bad. b) this function should be added to eutils c) keep it restricted to java eclasses I don't remember/know any other cases where this function can be useful. So I think it's better

Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPEND definition in docs differ from official PMS specs

2009-01-18 Thread Peter Volkov
Marius Mauch schrieb: It's strongly recommended to set both explicitly FYI, I've opened bug to add repoman check for this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255358 /me also had feeling that it's good idea to rely on implicit RDEPEND and since it's not true, it's better to warn developers

Re: [gentoo-dev] Detecting Baselayout2/openrc - no-symlink profiles leading to breakage

2009-01-18 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 18/01/2009 в 00:52 +0100, Friedrich Oslage пишет: Robin H. Johnson schrieb: I'm raising this as an extension of bug 253076, but also because I see the potential for danger. As a long term solution, can we just consume an inode and have some file like /etc/baselayout2? What

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: go-mono.eclass

2009-01-17 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi Peter. NO_MONO_DEPEND=( dev-lang/mono dev-dotnet/libgdiplus dev-dotnet/gluezilla ) Just curious. What are the reasons to use array here? go-mono_src_install () { emake -j1 DESTDIR=${D} install || die install failed Is parallel make broken everywhere? :O This

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2009-01-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 14/01/2009 в 20:24 -0800, Donnie Berkholz пишет: On 11:05 Mon 12 Jan , AllenJB wrote: In my opinion the cvs commit log and the ChangeLog serve 2 different purposes. The cvs log is for developers while the ChangeLog is for users. While the cvs log will likely just want to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-misc/anki: anki-0.9.9.5.ebuild metadata.xml ChangeLog

2009-01-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 15/01/2009 в 09:12 +0100, Christian Faulhammer пишет: Heath Caldwell (hncaldwell) hncaldw...@gentoo.org: + flag name=latex + Enable support for LaTeX + /flag You only have to add flags to metadata.xml, that are not in use.desc... I asked on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: package.mask

2009-01-12 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 11/01/2009 в 10:31 +0100, Benedikt Böhm пишет: On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:56:52AM +0100, Friedrich Oslage wrote: - - you forgot the ChangeLog entry `cvs log` is the changelog, i don't see why i should add a changelog entry. There is the same reason as for ChangeLogs for ebuilds.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86 commit in app-forensics/memdump: memdump-1.0.1.ebuild ChangeLog

2009-01-06 Thread Peter Volkov
Daniel, answering you in this mail... Yes, probably sometimes we have to discuss basic things in this mailing list but since developers do this basic errors we have to. Technical problems in our portage tree are perfectly valid for this mailing list. В Пнд, 05/01/2009 в 13:55 +0530, Nirbheek

Re: [gentoo-dev] [v4] Planning for automatic assignment computation of bugs

2009-01-06 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 04/01/2009 в 18:57 +0100, Robert Buchholz пишет: On Sunday 04 January 2009, Mike Auty wrote: Jeroen Roovers wrote: The order (first maintainer as assignee or first maintainer/herd as assignee) is open to discussion and I think this is the proper forum to have that discussion.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: gzip-dict

2008-12-19 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 17/12/2008 в 16:34 -0800, Donnie Berkholz пишет: Is that some huge package that takes an unreasonable amount of time to build or space to install? Probably in this case it takes reasonable amount of time... If not, this doesn't seem like a very meaningful choice to me. Well, your

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: gzip-dict

2008-12-19 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 19/12/2008 в 14:45 +, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: If it reads (and presumably uncompresses) all of them at startup anyway, what's the point in compressing them at all? It makes size smaller: both index and data files are text files so compression is very effective. All distributions I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: gzip-dict

2008-12-19 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 19/12/2008 в 17:06 +, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: But disk space is cheap. How big are the dictionaries? The vim dictionaries are around half a meg uncompressed, and if you're looking to save a meg or two in disk space on the kind of system that includes dictionaries then you're doing

[gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: gzip-dict

2008-12-16 Thread Peter Volkov
Hello. Some time ago I've modified stardict.eclass and added optional possibility based on 'gzip' USE flag to compress index and dict data files. But I realized too late that I need to document this USE flag somewhere, and since it'll do similar things for all stardict-* dictionaries (heh, more

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: gzip-dict

2008-12-16 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 16/12/2008 в 19:27 +, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: What's the point of having this as an option at all? Is it really something that affects the end user in any way? The reason is that this feature requires additional dependency on app-text/dictd package (to compress dictionary data dictzip

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automatic filing of stable requests

2008-12-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 14/12/2008 в 05:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет: Now what do people think about extending metadata.xml so that you could have these bugs filed automatically when there are no open bugs? Is it possible to specify delay when stabilization bug should be opened? Some packages I want to go

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS

2008-12-05 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 05/12/2008 в 08:23 +0100, Rémi Cardona пишет: Le 05/12/2008 05:33, Joe Peterson a écrit : How about PORTAGE_JOBS to go along with PORTAGE_OVERLAY, PORTAGE_NICENESS, etc. While this part of the thread has a lot of bikeshedding potential, Joe's name sounds more consistent with what

Re: [gentoo-dev] debug/release builds extensions/clarification proposal

2008-12-01 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 01/12/2008 в 06:16 +0100, Maciej Mrozowski пишет: Currently handling debug/release builds is incoherent and misleading to say the least. We have got in Gentoo: All that parts do their separate and quite a different work so I can't say that it's incoherent (by idea at least). The

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 14:50 +0100, Tobias Scherbaum пишет: In most (nearly all?) cases a HOMEPAGE change does also affect older versions. Does someone have an example where older versions stay at an old homepage and newer versions moved to a new homepage? Yes. This is quite a common case when

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 16:10 +0100, Santiago M. Mola пишет: per-package eclasses [1]. That way, it would be easy to avoid duplication of not only HOMEPAGE but also SRC_URI, LICENSE, or any other part of an ebuild. Having per-package eclasses (PPE) just to set common HOMEPAGE is definitely

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 17:09 +0200, Serkan Kaba пишет: Peter Volkov yazmış: Also sometimes it's useful to have different HOMEPAGE for different versions. And in general, Diego. What are you trying to improve with this change? The original intention was to separate common information from

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Saving package emerge output (einfo, elog, ewarn, etc.) somewhere official

2008-11-30 Thread Peter Volkov
Seems that we already have everything you dreamed about: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3chap=1#doc_chap4 Take a look at PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM. It even can send that messages by mail :) HTH, -- Peter. В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 09:25 -0700, Joe Peterson пишет: Bottom line

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 16:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:50:17 +0300 Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 16:10 +0100, Santiago M. Mola пишет: per-package eclasses [1]. That way, it would be easy to avoid duplication of not only HOMEPAGE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-30 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 30/11/2008 в 16:59 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет: On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:13:34 -0500 Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [proposal] I know it's not directly related to stabilization, but lately people have been removing the only keyworded package for the mips arch, under the excuse that's

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-util/netbeans: ChangeLog netbeans-6.5-r1.ebuild netbeans-6.5.ebuild

2008-11-22 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 22/11/2008 в 18:11 +, Miroslav Sulc (fordfrog) пишет: fordfrog08/11/22 18:11:25 Added:netbeans-6.5-r1.ebuild Log: netbeans compiles fine even with JDK 1.6 so I dropped the restriction on JDK, also commons-fileupload linking fixed Index:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grab

2008-11-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 16/11/2008 в 21:13 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue пишет: here is a list of packages gnome herd would like to get rid of since no-one seem to take care of them and users are not so verbose about it either: * app-text/ggv https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223427 Upstream there was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remember: workarounds don't warrant RESO FIXED!

2008-11-17 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 16/11/2008 в 15:33 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет: - FEATURES=test failures; And what we are supposed to do if upstream states that tests are not supposed to be ran on users systems and exists for package development only? For

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-11 Thread Peter Volkov
Why it's so hard not to delete ebuilds from the tree? Also it was already discussed that if maintainer wishes he/she could drop some keywords from old ebuild, e.g. if you have more recent version of package stabilized on arch, just drop arch keyword from the old ebuild. В Пнд, 10/11/2008 в 20:21

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEFAULT_* proposal

2008-11-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Сбт, 08/11/2008 в 17:20 -0500, Thomas Anderson пишет: This is a reposting of a call for discussion on DEFAULT_* variables. The original discussion was at [1]. How does this proposal answers concerns raised during last discussion? I did my best and reread all the discussions and both

Re: [gentoo-dev] DEFAULT_* proposal

2008-11-09 Thread Peter Volkov
Well for myself I found compromise. Although in both proposals as I see you've omitted part where you'll discuss how you are going to implement this feature, implementing this feature as eclass addresses most of my concerns, since: 1. ebuild's syntax does not change 2. people will have to inherit

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Add RESTRICT=distcc capability

2008-11-03 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 02/11/2008 в 12:11 -0700, Gordon Malm пишет: You can cry abuse all you want. You FAIL to offer any alternatives or solutions. I'll ask again, how do you detect that you are compiling code destined to be run in-kernel from within gcc without checking for the __KERNEL__ macro? I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-lang/python: ChangeLog python-2.6.ebuild python-2.5.2-r6.ebuild

2008-10-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Срд, 15/10/2008 в 20:51 +0100, Steve Long пишет: for ((i=0;i10;i++)); do echo /usr/share/doc/${P}/examples /dev/null; real 11.25 real 9.24 So that's what, on the order of 20 microseconds faster for each iteration? Or ~18%. (You shouldn't use the first iteration in

Re: [gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND?

2008-10-14 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 13/10/2008 в 14:34 -0500, Jeremy Olexa пишет: On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Sachau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some packages, because they could be removed? If yes, which ones? Or should we leave the system

Re: [gentoo-dev] Projects without a homepage, and valid contents of HOMEPAGE (per bug 239268)

2008-10-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 06/10/2008 в 15:59 +0200, Robert Buchholz пишет: On Sunday 05 October 2008, Thilo Bangert wrote: HOMEPAGE=http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/; Why not use our package site for this, i.e. HOMEPAGE=http://packages.gentoo.org/package/${CAT}/${PN}; This is not homepage.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Usage of econf with an additional || die

2008-09-30 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 28/09/2008 в 20:24 +0200, Thomas Sachau пишет: I see many ebuild that still use econf || die, also econf should die by itself. Are there any specific reasons for this? Some cases where econf does not die also it fails? Or some other reason for this? This || die is redundant.

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 do* functions die

2008-09-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 08/09/2008 в 23:34 +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto пишет: So we're talking about adding the following to EAPI-2: While it's not too late. Can we make dobin, doman and other do* functions finally die in EAPI=2? I've reviewed discussions on -dev [1],[2] and bug 138792 [3] and seems that

Re: [gentoo-dev] FHS compliant KDE install and multi-version support

2008-09-08 Thread Peter Volkov
В Вск, 07/09/2008 в 15:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh пишет: On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:24:55 +0400 Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any case as FHS and /usr/kde/version installations should set differently SLOT seems that new portage feature is required... May be portage should allow

<    1   2   3   >