On 02/10/2013 03:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Montag, 11. Februar 2013, 00:34:19 schrieb Michał Górny:
>
>>>
>>> actually *do* to one's system?
>>
>> Out of curiosity, does portage suggest switching to the new profiles
>> even if it doesn't support its EAPI?
>
> Unfortunately, it seems y
On 02/10/2013 03:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:06:39 -0500
> James Cloos wrote:
>
>>> "AKH" == Andreas K Huettel writes:
>>
>> AKH> To be honest I did not really see the necessity since the "big red
>> AKH> warning" exactly tells you what to do (and even which profile t
Am Montag, 11. Februar 2013, 00:34:19 schrieb Michał Górny:
> >
> > actually *do* to one's system?
>
> Out of curiosity, does portage suggest switching to the new profiles
> even if it doesn't support its EAPI?
Unfortunately, it seems yes. (Feature request?)
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linu
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:06:39 -0500
James Cloos wrote:
> > "AKH" == Andreas K Huettel writes:
>
> AKH> To be honest I did not really see the necessity since the "big red
> AKH> warning" exactly tells you what to do (and even which profile to
> AKH> pick, which would be more complicated in a
> "AKH" == Andreas K Huettel writes:
AKH> To be honest I did not really see the necessity since the "big red
AKH> warning" exactly tells you what to do (and even which profile to
AKH> pick, which would be more complicated in a news item).
But it doesn't tell one why the change was made, what
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 16:02:55 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
> Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:>
>
> > I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
> > (since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
> > one). Moreover,
On 10 February 2013 15:02, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:>
>> I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
>> (since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
>> one). Moreover, the news item is an
On 10 February 2013 23:02, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:>
>> I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
>> (since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
>> one). Moreover, the news item is an
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:59:57 schrieb Patrick Nagel:
>
> Actually, if you could add a note that before switching to the new profile,
> you should update portage if it's old, that would be even more
> user-friendly:
>
Already done, see separate mail...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Li
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:>
> I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
> (since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
> one). Moreover, the news item is another way to assure them that
> everything is not as bad a
Hi,
On 2013-02-10 22:06, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 14:34:14 schrieb Markos Chandras:
new profiles? As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warning from
portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many people
are going to be confused
On 10 February 2013 14:06, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 14:34:14 schrieb Markos Chandras:
>> > > new profiles? As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warning from
>> > > portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many people
>> > > are going to be
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 14:34:14 schrieb Markos Chandras:
> > > new profiles? As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warning from
> > > portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many people
> > > are going to be confused about this.
> >
> > Obviously a news item should
On Feb 10, 2013 8:32 AM, "Ben de Groot" wrote:
>
> On 10 February 2013 10:43, Douglas Freed wrote:
> >> * all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same
way
> >> as
> >> 10.0 was
> >> * all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
> >> * all 10.0 profiles have been d
On 10 February 2013 10:43, Douglas Freed wrote:
>> * all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same way
>> as
>> 10.0 was
>> * all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
>> * all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated
>
> Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be create
> * all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same way
as
> 10.0 was
> * all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
> * all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated
Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be created for the migration to the
new profiles? As a Gentoo user
For your information, in the default/linux tree
* all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same way as
10.0 was
* all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
* all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated
IMHO the waiting time of 1 year decided by Council starts now bef
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:26:38 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Just to keep everyone updated, ...
>
> > FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
> > all with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request
> > developer profile checking).
> >
>
On 01/27/2013 03:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 00:26 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
>> Just to keep everyone updated, ...
>>
>>> FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
>>> all with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you
El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 00:26 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
> Just to keep everyone updated, ...
>
> > FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
> > all with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request
> > developer profile checking).
> >
Just to keep everyone updated, ...
> FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
> all with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request
> developer profile checking).
>
> This means the procedure below is complete up to and including point 5)
> no
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:47:09 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013, 23:20:50 schrieben Sie:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0100
> >
> > "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> > > FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for
> > > now all with status
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013, 23:20:50 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0100
>
> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> > FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for
> > now all with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you
> > request developer profil
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
>
> FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
> all
> with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request developer
> profile checking).
>
> This means the procedure below is comp
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now all
with status "dev" (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request developer
profile checking).
This means the procedure below is complete up to and including point 5) now.
Please consider changing your profile sy
On 18 January 2013 10:51, Michael Weber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 01/12/2013 09:47 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>
>
> 10) add "13" to the selectable Versions in Bugzilla.
> Not that anybody cares, but 10 and 10.1 are in there.
>
> Maybe we could drop these
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/12/2013 09:47 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
10) add "13" to the selectable Versions in Bugzilla.
Not that anybody cares, but 10 and 10.1 are in there.
Maybe we could drop these values (dropping the field might need a
change in the code) to
Thanks for your work mate !
On 14/01/2013 21:24, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
[CC'ing this to core so noone can complain afterwards.]
Since 48h did not lead to any responses positive or negative, I'll start
implementing the procedure as given in the original e-mail (quoted below).
As also said be
[CC'ing this to core so noone can complain afterwards.]
Since 48h did not lead to any responses positive or negative, I'll start
implementing the procedure as given in the original e-mail (quoted below).
As also said below, each arch will get a mail before I touch their profile
tree and after I
Hi everyone,
since Council has approved the creation of a fresh set of EAPI=5 "13.0"
profiles, I would like to volunteer for creating them. The proposed procedure
is outlined below in detail, and I'd be happy for comments.
[If anything below deviates from Council decision, please tell me- not
30 matches
Mail list logo
