Flammie Pirinen wrote:
2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta:
I honestly thought that the changes I made were better from an
accessibility standpoint. I guess I was wrong.
Not really.
So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to
Aarons's reference. [...] Check
On 11/25/05, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
25.11.2005, 0:58:28, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:49:23 +0100 Diego 'Flameeyes' Petteno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi everybody, a little question that I'd like to be answered (so that | we can make it a sort of rule). | How should
Hi,
twisted-cvs is a live cvs ebuild that is completely useless since it is
checking out a module that no longer exists (upstream switched to svn
long ago). I plan to remove it next sunday (yes, that's less than the
usual week, but the ebuild doesn't even finish src_unpack, so...).
--
Marien.
Curtis Napier wrote:
gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
possible.
IE5 for mac contains unfixed security issues which won't be
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:49:23 +0100 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi everybody, a little question that I'd like to be answered (so that
| we can make it a sort of rule).
| How should manpages that are generated be managed?
|
| The common sense and
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:14 +, kang wrote:
Now people can also use NCSA Mosaic. It's valid as long as you can run
it. But a browser with vulns, unsupported by the vendor, with a broken
CSS, I think you do not have to support it. Well of course, if you like
it just do it ;)
Hmmm.. I think
On 25-11-2005 12:14:53 +, kang wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
possible.
IE5 for
On Thursday 24 November 2005 22:42, lnxg33k wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:49:18 +0100 Filip Bartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I want have Gentoo in e-shop with Linux distributions. I find, that
| Gentoo is under GNU/GPL. Must I distribute in e-shop sources of
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 19:34 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 03:44 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:15:52PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
OK. I've been looking at some of these
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 14:49 -0600, lnxg33k wrote:
A few posts here have mentioned Catalyst and its respective documentation. I
remember tossing out some bugs about the docs and was told they were old and
being redone. A quick google seems to bring up some dated stuff. Anyway, are
those docs up
[Background]
The way perl modules are currently created using the perl-module eclass,
man3 files are generated in duplication of the current pod docs. This
leads to both a waste of disk space (anyone working with a perl module
first thinks to perldoc it - not man it), and more importantly
Patrick Lauer wrote:
Some usability issues:
The top right textlinks are too dark and quite small. They aren't easily
readable and don't present themselves as clickable items (especially
with the dotted line below them they look like random text)
Hm, the don't present themselves as clickable
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +, kang wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as
possible.
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:14:53PM +, kang wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should
render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on
the mac is still a valid browser and will be
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:56:14PM +, kang wrote:
Harald van Dijk wrote:
Even with its bugs, it's one of best browsers for MacOS 8.1, which I
still use. But if you can suggest a better one, please do.
You might want to try iCab or opera. Well, I'd suggest you to run linux
on it
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 22:51 +0100, Francesco R. wrote:
my apologies for the mess with this release of MySQL 5.0.16 and for the
one will come with the dev-db/mysql-4.1.15-r1 ebuild
I'm confused. MySQL 5 seems to have been available on ~amd64 for quite
sometime. I've already converted my
Albert Hopkins wrote:
Now all-of-the-sudden MySQL 5 is marked -amd64 so now I must downgrade.
Is this intentional?
read the changelog, it says:
24 Nov 2005; Jory A. Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mysql-5.0.15.ebuild,
mysql-5.0.16-r3.ebuild:
version 5 does not work on clean install
--
Simon
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 17:32 +0100, Simon Stelling wrote:
version 5 does not work on clean install
A very descriptive changelog... Any idea what does not work means? .
Seems to work pretty well here.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
man pages can't be considered optional (despite what RMS says). They're
not fancy extra HTML API documentation, they're core, so they don't get
a USE flag.
(not advocating a USE flag bug...) what about when the man pages are a
duplication of the native documentation?
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 17:32 +0100, Simon Stelling wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
Now all-of-the-sudden MySQL 5 is marked -amd64 so now I must downgrade.
Is this intentional?
read the changelog, it says:
24 Nov 2005; Jory A. Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mysql-5.0.15.ebuild,
On Friday 25 November 2005 08:58, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Of course, if FEATURES were in the USE expand list, you could use
! features_noman ? ( ) ...
All the way up until FEATURES=noman is changed to FEATURES=man...
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Albert Hopkins wrote:
Is there a guide or something on how to downgrade from version 5 to 4?
I'm assuming that I can't just point 4 to my database files and expect
them to work.
Also why did it take so long to determine that 5 does not work? I've
been running 5 on amd64 systems since 21
Problem fixed, going to readd ~amd64 now, sync again in 30 min.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 10:51 -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Or you can just unmask it locally and stop whining.
I think users have a valid reason to be concerned about this, but if
that is the developer's intention (to unmask it locally) then may I
suggest this information be provided somehow to
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:49:23 +0100 Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi everybody, a little question that I'd like to be answered (so that
| we can make it a sort of rule).
| How should
Herbie Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 17:32 +0100, Simon Stelling wrote:
version 5 does not work on clean install
A very descriptive changelog... Any idea what does not work means? .
Seems to work pretty well here.
same here.
anyway, a dev-db/mysql-5 in
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:24:44AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 19:34 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 08:54:41AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 03:44 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:15:52PM -0500,
Jason Stubbs posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 01:52:17 +0900:
All the way up until FEATURES=noman is changed to FEATURES=man...
LOL! I knew a guy that had the /reverse/ of that operation done!
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
Every nonfree
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:43:23 -0500 Michael Cummings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
|man pages can't be considered optional (despite what RMS says).
|They're
| not fancy extra HTML API documentation, they're core, so they don't
| get a USE flag.
|
| (not advocating a
Hi all,
I plan to release a new version of net-dialup/ppp that will add support
for the pppd net module found in
sys-apps/baselayout-/baselayout-1.12.0_pre11.
This version, however, cannot work with the old /etc/init.d/net.ppp0,
hence I plan to die in pkg_setup with following messages:
*
On 2005-11-25 15:46, kang wrote:
This whole thing give me some idea. Now, it changes the design a bit and
probably no one will listen, but, what if thoses purple boxes where to
be replaced by the bottom link stuff ;)
The bottom links which are hard to see or notice (cause they're at the
Ingo Bormuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-11-25 15:46, kang wrote:
This whole thing give me some idea. Now, it changes the design a bit and
probably no one will listen, but, what if thoses purple boxes where to
be replaced by the bottom link stuff ;)
The bottom links which are
Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:39:43 -0600
R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc.
Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail
under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:04:32 +0100
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you rather have now the ability to create multi-hash digests and
Manifests with the result of a short and mid-term larger portage tree
(in the long term the format will be phased out hopefully) or rather
wait for
On Saturday 26 November 2005 11:12, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:04:32 +0100
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you rather have now the ability to create multi-hash digests and
Manifests with the result of a short and mid-term larger portage tree
(in the long term
If no one steps up to maintain it, luabind will be removed from the tree in 2
weeks. It has not had an upstream release since 2003 and is broken with
newer versions of boost, =1.32. Nothing in the tree deps on it, so there
shouldn't be any problems with its removal.
Thanks,
Mark
Robert wrote:
Hey, for some reason I cannot seem to install arts (KDE).
Try asking that on the gentooo-user list, it has nothing to do with
portage development.
Marius
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for 2.0.53 so am
thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out and let the arch teams
mark it stable when they're ready (or stick with 2.0.51.22-r3 if it pleaseth
them).
We should put out a 2.0.54_pre1 out soon after
On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for 2.0.53 so
am thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out and let the arch
teams mark it stable
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:51 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for 2.0.53 so
am thinking that we should probably
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 21:00 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:05:57 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Programs such as revdep-rebuild, verify-rdepend would be able to make
| immediate use. A little bit of a longer term goal is to see portage
| gain the ability to
[ Apologies if two of these show up. I kinda, uh, broke Exim
slightly... ]
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:41:19 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 21:00 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| How will that work for packages that have a runtime dependency upon
| a text file
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 22:02 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:41:19 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 21:00 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| How will that work for packages that have a runtime dependency upon
| a text file supplied by a
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:49:50 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Yeah that's what we want, We intend to create tools that leave systems
| broken. You want to be the first tester? Please take your spin of
| things off of this and look at it for what it is. Your not going to
| use a feature
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:10 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:49:50 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Yeah that's what we want, We intend to create tools that leave systems
| broken. You want to be the first tester? Please take your spin of
| things off of this and
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:53 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:48:41 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What the hell are you talking about? No tools have even been
| created yet. Nobody builds tools before the framework is in place. The
| ability to make use of
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as
| easy to allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real' runtime dependency
| value as appropriate rather than forcing an incorrect
| auto-generated list onto
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:30:15 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony Gorecki wrote:
On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 23:12, Zac Medico wrote:
I wouldn't mind having a feature like this. I would provide a way
for
automatic unmasking tools to keep their changes separate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as
| easy to allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real' runtime dependency
| value as
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:42:14 -0500 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Why introduce a feature which is crippled? It would be almost as
| | easy to allow ebuilds to mess with their 'real'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:42:14 -0500 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:00:07 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| wrote:
| | Why introduce a feature which is crippled?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:01:15 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for
2.0.53 so am thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out
and let the arch teams mark it stable when they're ready (or stick
with
On Saturday 26 November 2005 11:07, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:01:15 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only other new thing in trunk that I know of is logging but
there's still a question mark over the ordering of messages... Can
that be resolved soon?
On Saturday 26 November 2005 02:05, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:51 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote:
* post_sync action hook (.53/.54 )
* VDB prevention of single byte NULL entries being created. ( .54 )
Doable for .54.
Yeah
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:15 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
[snip stuff]
Need to head to bed now. Will respond to other parts tomorrow.
A little bit of a longer term goal is to see portage gain
the ability to request to only use RRDEPEND entries to be used for
depgraph creation for use with
55 matches
Mail list logo
