Hi Everyone,
So GWN was a littel early, but I did announce my intentions on -core on
Friday, that I would be speeding mcummings back through the recruitment
process. As you all know, mcummings has been _the_ perl man for gentoo
for years now. He basically started the perl team and developed the
og is in CVS, please see:
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20051115.txt?root=gentoo&rev=1.1&view=markup
Thanks,
Seemant Kulleen
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Dear All,
It gives me great pleasure to introduce to you Christel Dahlskjaer, the
newest member of the Gentoo Staff. Christel joins our User Relations
project [1] to help bring it back up to speed (it has languished for a
little while). She basically wowed a bunch of us in the past few weeks
wi
1. http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/user-relations/index.xml
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Dear All,
I've attached the council meeting logs thanks to my proxy dsd. I have
updated the council project page to add them there and to add a summary
of the events. I suppose when that thar www refreshes itself on the
internets, the new content will show up.
Meanwhile...enjoy :)
Thanks,
Se
Hi All,
Consider this both a rant and a GLEP pre-proposal. When we created the
idea of herds back in the day, there was a clear distinction between a
herd and a team (and a project). Over time, those definitions have
become blurry. I would like emphasise:
A herd is a group of like *packages*
> Is there a reason for this besides the definitions not falling into
> place as they should? I'm not seeing a benefit from this to be honest.
> People refer to teams as herds a lot of the time. It has become a
> statement over time that people understand. I'm not sure why we want to
> try and c
Hi All,
Just to let you know: ipkg-utils' last rites have been postponed
indefinitely. James Rowe and I will be maintaining it from here on in.
Thanks James!
Thanks all,
Seemant
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 18:04 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Hi,
> solar has requested an account on overlays.gentoo.org for the embedded
> overlay for you.
> Your password: DX7wnSe40Y
>
> Kind regards,
> Stefan
>
Was the list the intended recipient of this?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing li
First of all, I'm not sure why devrel was involved in a technical
decision without actually having all the interested parties there, but
aside from that, when Gentoo developers become a bunch of 5 year olds?
What is this absolute nonsense of "you don't like my toy, you can't have
your toy" going o
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> You're suggesting jakub maybe shouldn't even be a Gentoo dev because he
> *doesn't* give one unofficial overlay special treatment over another?
The jave "unofficial" overlay is well on its way to becoming an official
and officially hosted
Also, just so I'm clear on my stance on this:
I don't care one whit about whether those keywords are used in bugzilla
or not. Keywords are a way to help bugzilla users use bugzilla. As for
perceptions about it -- as long sunrise is clear on their pages that
they are absolutely not official as of
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 18:07 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:11:15AM -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
> > > You're suggesting jakub maybe shouldn't even be a Gentoo dev because he
> &g
I've been thinking about Solar's email. I believe Solar is actually
very correct in his assessment.
I think I'll recant my initial statement about devrel. To KingTaco and
the gang: my apologies, you guys did the right thing at the time.
Thanks,
Seemant
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Paul,
Congratulations! What did you and your wife name him? When exactly was
he born, etc?
Give us details!!
:)
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I'd like to nominate:
SpanKY/vapier
azarah
solar
Kugelfang
Mr_Bones_
dsd_
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ther. This project needs some leadership, as
the events of the past few months show fairly clearly.
Thanks for listening,
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
le. Not ad hominem or any sort of
emotional crap -- just the facts, please.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
l "I'm taking
toys, because I don't like them" way, without actually raising any
issues that he was against, other than a nebulous concern about QA.
Show me at least that concern being concrete and we have a starting
place.
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 04:06 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:50:31 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Show me at least that concern being concrete and we have a
> | starting place.
>
> -!- [Users #gentoo-sunrise]
> -!- @
OK wait, on your servers, are you actually planning to *use* any of the
ebuilds in Sunrise's overlay?
If not, how is it a concern? I personally don't use any of them, and my
system is running perfectly fine.
Let's not forget that nobody is shoving Sunrise down anyone's thro
rd feelings on
> my part.
It's an exchange of ideas, there shouldn't be hard feelings on anyone's
part.
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
ebuilds, what makes you think four
> people can?
I think, again, people are not looking at Sunrise as a training ground.
It's better to start teaching people QA, and doing so in an active
rather than a passive medium. Again, I haven't yet seen a reason to
kill Sunrise.
--
Seeman
at problem.
You've claimed several times that you just try to stick to technical, so
please put a stop to the "look, but it's *them* doing it, how can you
trust those people?" bullshit already.
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
questions I asked that you completely
removed from your reply. Please answer those as well.
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
please explain how you came to see
sunrise as the wrong solution to that problem.
Note, that nowhere did I aske what the right solution is. Please be so
kind as to actually *read* what others are saying to you, instead of
presuming.
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Thanks for the nomination SpanKY :) I'll decline this time around, to
make room for fresh minds.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
/guessing?
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
;m curious about is the council -- the council posts to -dev
before and after every meeting (and puts meeting logs up on the website
within days of a meeting). I suppose the webpage itself could be
updated, but I'm unsure what else the council can do. Perhaps you have
some ideas?
Thanks!
--
d,
however, only 5 people were nominated. Thus, they formed the new board:
I present to you, then, the new Board of Trustees:
Chris Gianelloni (wolf31o2)
Grant Goodyear (g2boojum)
Stuart Herbert (stuart)
Seemant Kulleen (seemant)
Renat Lumpau (rl03)
We will schedule the first Board Meeting for
There wasn't a vote, since the number of nominations equalled the number
of candidates. There was a thread on gentoo-core mailing list with the
nominees, and the movement seemed to be toward simply accepting the
nominees as trustees.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
can rile up the people to rise up and demand
this, or something, you'll definitely impress with me :)
--
Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Foundation / Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
n are you going to get over
it? All he did was try and redirect where complaints should go. Stop
being such a drama queen, jeez.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Trustee, Gentoo Foundation
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Congratulations to the new council. I hope for a lot of progress this
year outta you guys :)
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Trustee, Gentoo Foundation
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Do we really need to mire it in
bureaucracy? I'm honestly asking.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Trustee, Gentoo Foundation
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
rring to Ciaran here), and then something against the things that
are solved with that, and on and on ad nauseum. And quite honestly, at
this point, it is nauseating. Get over yourselves.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Trustee, Gentoo Foundation
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
t (and a lot more
closed). For starters, there would actually be a leadership situation
in place. You can argue that Gentoo *began* its life as a business, but
the past three years have been far removed from that paradigm.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
, in my opinion.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
iling alias,
the herds.xml list and the project page to make WilliamH officially the
Team Lead for the project. If anyone is interested in helping him out
please feel free to email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:48 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
>
> > Geo-IP
>
> Can you please leave this one, it's rather useful :)
What's its use? Furthermore, does its used get decreased through the
employment of g-cpan to install it?
Thanks,
-
x27;s statement.
I think it's perfectly fine to think about pruning/thinning out Gentoo
to its core, but first we have to actually decide what its core actually
is. Hint: majority architectures are *not*. Gentoo, at heart, is a
meta-distribution, and all that that implies.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
;Mar-Say" place is in
Freedomia. So welcome to our newest Freedom-man.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
s do what they do because, at its root, that's what they *want* to
do -- that's how they exercise their own empowerment. Feel free to join
in the fray and exercise your own :)
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
authored by me will be treated the same way. (No, I never signed a
copyright transfer to the project)
So long, thanks for all the fish.
And, remember. Give the kids in the back something to do and they will
stop bickering.
--
begin .signature
.. signature ..
end
--- END
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
. At that
> point there was no qmerge either)
>
FEATURES="nodoc noinfo noman" should solve at least some of those
issues, I should think.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
time :) Finally, thanks to all those who stepped up as nominees.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
or, I suppose).
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
drive us back home, I'm not kidding!
And give me some of that popcorn.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Wow, this retirement f*cks me up some, I have to say. I'll give you a
better send off on the planet blogs, because for now I'm still reeling
from the news.
I'll miss you, that's for sure.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
like Office Space, only it isn't as funny. I'll play the bald
Indian guy though.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
stop being ridiculous, Council: if you're not going to actually
listen to the people who voted for you without talking down to them,
then, er, why exactly, did you run?
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
l sign your
> emails with [EMAIL PROTECTED], which i personally find at least as
> annoying as you find klie^WSPF.
Silly silly, and it doesn't belong on the list. Please don't be part of
the problem.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Kurt,
Thanks for expressing your reasons properly on the list and in the text
file on your d.g.o home. It's certainly gone a long way to my own
understanding of your reasoning.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Saleem & Gnome Team,
I think it's high time this was done. My suggestion would be to
publicise this *beyond* just the gentoo-dev list. I would put this on
-user and in the forums (and one of you should probably blog before the
fact as well).
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gen
e) mails arrived at different times. I saw
responses before the parent message in a few sub-threads, today. Enough
with the bashing (there's an irony to your own stuart bashing above),
already.
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Betelgeuse,
I'll take sqlite if you and I can co-maintain it.
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
I was amazed this morning when I clicked on a bug link in my email, and
then clicked over to the browser. The bug page had (gasp!) *already
loaded*!! That's amazing, I've never seen our bugzilla do that ever.
Thanks infra, corey and GNi
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
*where* gentoo
needs help. We need help to maintain stuff already in the tree, so start
at maintainer-needed or drill into some specific teams (gnome, pam,
kerberos, kde, bsd, samba, mail, web-apps, there's a list of herds
somewhere).
Spread the word!
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Welcome on board, Marijn, I'm looking forward to doing the gnucash bumps
with you soon :)
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 14:08 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> However, for several reasons this is not yet feasible, and furthermore
Just for the sake of completeness can you outline those reasons?
Thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
changes?
I only have experience with cvs and svn, not git or bzr or any of the
other stuff that's out there, so I honestly do not know what their
models and workflows are. So from my own uneducated stance, svn
wouldn't be a workflow issue at all for most things, no?
Thanks,
--
Seemant
and most apropos
response in this entire thread. I can only echo your feelings on it
(and I would hope that those who've interacted with me know that).
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
grade cycle wouldn't change much in functionality based on
config, which is pretty good (ie, backwards compatibility). In this
case, I'm not sure legacy is all that bad, simply because it's
expressive and concise and easily understood :)
thanks,
--
Seemant Kulleen
Developer, Gent
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 07:32 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> I'm also curious as to why people should be expected to assign
> copyright to a group that is known for licence violations and removing
> attribution from documents. How does this protect anything?
Yeah, you cry foul when people paint you
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 20:02 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> How useful is the X use flag in gkrellm? Just thinking if it would be
> better to just remove the use flag and always build that code.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
Back in the day, when gkrellm2 first came out, they had this option of
buildin
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 12:03 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> portage has been doing the right thing with $D in pkg_* functions and IMAGE
> is
> just an annoying nuance that most people screw up
>
> so in your pkg_* functions, use $D, not $IMAGE, to refer to the temporary
> install
> -mike
Good t
OK, you three. Knock it off. Right now. This is exactly the sort of
utter nonsense that we've been talking about viz. what's going on on
this mailing list.
There is no excuse to be an asshole, Stephen, because in doing so (even
as a retaliation) renders your own point null and void. It's one th
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 16:38 +, George Prowse wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:44:37 + George Prowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > You miss the point. This was not the first time a resignation stunt had
> > been pulled by that developer, and previously ano
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 18:40 +0100, Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
> >
> So why don't you start rewriting, refactoring and improving the portage
> source? It definitely doesn't make sense to create a competing package
> management system.
How is this useful, honestly? Ciaran's exercising his streng
Both of you please stop this thread right here. It's getting nobody
anywhere.
Thanks,
seemant
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Alexandre,
Good luck in your new life. My only comment is that I think you copped
out by not submitting your proposals for any sort of peer review. You
succumbed to the possibility (that you seem to think is more of a
probability -- you may be right, I don't know) that it would not be
receive
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 03:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> what is the problem as you see it ? the nice thing about having a ~/.config/
> is that it's a directory that can obviously be added to backups or sync
> programs for keeping $HOME the same across multiple machines ... you dont
> have to
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 03:21 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Well, if it's reached the "take drastic action" stage (which, let's
> face it, it has at this point), why not go and fix the tree? It's a
> better solution than breaking it, and anyone who moans now isn't going
> to get any sympathy from a
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 15:38 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
> Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
> > take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a li
So, maybe this is a boneheadedly obvious thing, but having just spoken
with Daniel about this, I'll just summarise my findings.
I, for one, was always using alsa-driver for my new Dell laptop. As it
turns out, Dan has the identical laptop, but he's always been using the
in-kernel driver. I alway
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 03:07 +0530, Anant Narayanan wrote:
> Sure it's not ideal and I acknowledge that. But portage is tied very
> closely to Gentoo for historical reasons, and it is not reasonable to
> expect an alternate package manager to replace it (not in the near
> future atleast).
Hi
> I fail to understand why the portage developers would refuse to
> accept a patch that actually improves something (without causing
> major regressions i.e.). If they do refuse such a patch (for
> political reasons), then we have a serious problem. However, based on
> past experience with
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 20:42 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote:
>
> i don't think that personal issues should be taken into account when it
> comes to choosing a new official package manager for gentoo.
It's relevant in that people have to work with the developers of the
package manager. Unlike most
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:22 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Paludis is a package manager, not a distribution. And no, the GPL does
> not mean there's nothing to lose -- the Zynot fork did a fair bit of
> damage to Gentoo, and no-one wants a repeat of that mess...
Only in terms of morale. In fact
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 23:41 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > In which case your Paludis fork of Gentoo will take off like a
> Please, pretty please with sugar atop: Stop this FUD about forking
> Gentoo. Paludis is not a fork of Gentoo, it's new package manager. The
> relation between Portage and
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 14:53 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> Correct, because the only way Ciaran can prove beyond doubt that his Paludis
> is a viable option is to see hundreds, nay millions, of people using it. I'm
> quite sure that he won't achieve that goal by bleating in here as frequent
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 20:16 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:02:28 +0200
> "Christopher Covington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The first condition you list is a sort of nativism that I for one
> > would expect not to find in a successful copyleft project created on
> > the
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 23:39 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > That's uncalled for. There's no need to get nasty.
>
> I applaud your intent, but feel it would have far more effect on the
> atmosphere if applied to a few of your devs, rather than use
What the fuck is this spamming about?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
All,
Please except my apologies for the strong language in my initial
response to this. I've been informed that Samir is the real deal and
not just a marketing droid.
The things that set me off were:
1. Cross posting the same message to a bunch of different mailing lists
2. The HTML formatting
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 09:16 +0100, Charlie Shepherd wrote:
> On 04/04/07, Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please except my apologies
>
> I don't know about excepting them. I might accept them though. :)
Nice catch. My language skills are degrading
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:29 +0200, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> Why not simply allow trustees to veto a council decision ? This does
> not give trustees enough power to be a second council, but would
> permit them to stop something that they believe will damage Gentoo.
> This is very little red tape IMH
You suck for leaving before me.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 13:39 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
> You might be overreacting a little here. To bring you up to speed
> vapier actually filed the original bug for this after I first noticed
> one of these atoms creeping into the tree while doing pre release atom
> compare testing for portage-util
Hi Danny,
> Look at it from my POV. I only knew about the alsa version at first.
> I knew it was removed already. Then i learned about mplayer. Ok... i can
> live with that as long as nothing else in there. Then I learned about
> transcode and I asked my fellow Council members to cut it.
I'm no
On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 19:31 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> It seems that every time I open my email client, somebody out there is
> trying to say that by the Council using the powers afforded to them that
> somehow they're conspiring to take down Gentoo. Yeah... because that's
> just what the
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 00:30 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> In my eyes it was a policy issue. Tree-wide policies have to pass the
> council in one form or the other. So why shouldn't Council care here?
My argument is not that Council should not care. My question is: what's
the big urgency to rush
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:33 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> sys-apps/915resolution superseed this package and support 855 configurations.
>
> Please upgrade your configuration to sys-apps/915resolution.
>
> Comments/suggestions can be entered at bug#159586.
>
> Package will be maske
Is the council planning on replacing the two missing members (Flameeyes
and Kloeri)?
Thanks,
Seemant
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 20:18 -0700, Mike Doty wrote:
> uberlord replaced flameeyes the month after he left.
duh @ me, sorry about that.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 23:49 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Oh I see, when it's
> stuff *you* care about, it's development. Cool.
That's sort of the point, isn't it? Developers are here mostly to
scratch their own respective itches -- so, by necessity, we talk about
stuff we care about.
signature.a
FWIW, I like this idea a lot. A lot of devs would rather just read the
good stuff happening in -dev and discard the other 85%. I vote yes.
Thanks,
Seemant
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 13:50 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> On Sunday, 08. July 2007 13:04:24 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> > What about moving Gentoo stuff to `GPLv3 or later'?
>
> I'm strongly opposed to the "or later" part for the simple reason that
> this implicates we will agree with stuf
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 16:46 +0200, Dominique Michel wrote:
> I personally think at gpl-3 is better as gpl-2 because GPLv3 will block
> tivoization. Tivoization means computers (called “appliances”) contain
> GPL-covered software that you can't change, because the appliance shuts down
> if
> it de
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 20:07 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Unless there are third party repositories shipping their own
> from-scratch ebuilds... In which case, afaics there's nothing to stop
> *them* from going GPL-3 if they think there's a reason to do so. Unless
> the Foundation somehow claims
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
