On 10 February 2013 10:43, Douglas Freed dwfr...@mtu.edu wrote:
* all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same way
as
10.0 was
* all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
* all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated
Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be
On Feb 10, 2013 8:32 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10 February 2013 10:43, Douglas Freed dwfr...@mtu.edu wrote:
* all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same
way
as
10.0 was
* all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
* all 10.0
On 10 February 2013 14:06, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 14:34:14 schrieb Markos Chandras:
new profiles? As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warning from
portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many people
are
Hi,
On 2013-02-10 22:06, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 14:34:14 schrieb Markos Chandras:
new profiles? As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warning from
portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many people
are going to be confused about this.
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:
I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
(since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
one). Moreover, the news item is another way to assure them that
everything is not as bad as
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:59:57 schrieb Patrick Nagel:
Actually, if you could add a note that before switching to the new profile,
you should update portage if it's old, that would be even more
user-friendly:
Already done, see separate mail...
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux
On 10 February 2013 23:02, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:
I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
(since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
one). Moreover, the
On 10 February 2013 15:02, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:
I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
(since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
one). Moreover, the
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 16:02:55 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
Am Sonntag, 10. Februar 2013, 15:15:43 schrieb Markos Chandras:
I suspect most people are interested in understanding what changed
(since deprecation means that the new thing is better than the old
one). Moreover, the news
AKH == Andreas K Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org writes:
AKH To be honest I did not really see the necessity since the big red
AKH warning exactly tells you what to do (and even which profile to
AKH pick, which would be more complicated in a news item).
But it doesn't tell one why the change was
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:06:39 -0500
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
AKH == Andreas K Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org writes:
AKH To be honest I did not really see the necessity since the big red
AKH warning exactly tells you what to do (and even which profile to
AKH pick, which would be
Am Montag, 11. Februar 2013, 00:34:19 schrieb Michał Górny:
actually *do* to one's system?
Out of curiosity, does portage suggest switching to the new profiles
even if it doesn't support its EAPI?
Unfortunately, it seems yes. (Feature request?)
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux
On 02/10/2013 03:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:06:39 -0500
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
AKH == Andreas K Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org writes:
AKH To be honest I did not really see the necessity since the big red
AKH warning exactly tells you what to do (and even
On 02/10/2013 03:45 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Montag, 11. Februar 2013, 00:34:19 schrieb Michał Górny:
actually *do* to one's system?
Out of curiosity, does portage suggest switching to the new profiles
even if it doesn't support its EAPI?
Unfortunately, it seems yes. (Feature
For your information, in the default/linux tree
* all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same way as
10.0 was
* all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
* all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated
IMHO the waiting time of 1 year decided by Council starts now
* all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same way
as
10.0 was
* all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
* all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated
Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be created for the migration to the
new profiles? As a Gentoo user who
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:26:38 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Just to keep everyone updated, ...
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
all with status dev (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request
developer profile
El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 00:26 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
Just to keep everyone updated, ...
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
all with status dev (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request
developer profile checking).
This
On 01/27/2013 03:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El dom, 27-01-2013 a las 00:26 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
Just to keep everyone updated, ...
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
all with status dev (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request
Just to keep everyone updated, ...
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
all with status dev (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request
developer profile checking).
This means the procedure below is complete up to and including point 5)
now.
Thanks for your work mate !
On 14/01/2013 21:24, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
[CC'ing this to core so noone can complain afterwards.]
Since 48h did not lead to any responses positive or negative, I'll start
implementing the procedure as given in the original e-mail (quoted below).
As also said
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/12/2013 09:47 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
10) add 13 to the selectable Versions in Bugzilla.
Not that anybody cares, but 10 and 10.1 are in there.
Maybe we could drop these values (dropping the field might need a
change in the code) to
On 18 January 2013 10:51, Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/12/2013 09:47 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
10) add 13 to the selectable Versions in Bugzilla.
Not that anybody cares, but 10 and 10.1 are in there.
Maybe we could drop
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now all
with status dev (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request developer
profile checking).
This means the procedure below is complete up to and including point 5) now.
Please consider changing your profile
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for now
all
with status dev (i.e. repoman includes them only when you request developer
profile checking).
This means the procedure
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013, 23:20:50 schrieben Sie:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc, for
now all with status dev (i.e. repoman includes them only when you
request
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:47:09 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Freitag, 18. Januar 2013, 23:20:50 schrieben Sie:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:37:10 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
FYI, the new 13.0 profiles are now all available in profiles.desc,
[CC'ing this to core so noone can complain afterwards.]
Since 48h did not lead to any responses positive or negative, I'll start
implementing the procedure as given in the original e-mail (quoted below).
As also said below, each arch will get a mail before I touch their profile
tree and after
Hi everyone,
since Council has approved the creation of a fresh set of EAPI=5 13.0
profiles, I would like to volunteer for creating them. The proposed procedure
is outlined below in detail, and I'd be happy for comments.
[If anything below deviates from Council decision, please tell me- not
29 matches
Mail list logo
