Andrew,
I'm not a regular listener, but this is a great podcast -- well done! I
recommend others give it a listen.
Josh
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 at 1:00:56 PM UTC-5 Russell Seitz wrote:
> The comparison of Ice 911 and Make Sunsets in your podcast is entirely
> deserved.
>
> On
altitudes and amounts, safety protocols,
consultations, permits, funding, etc.?
Josh Horton
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 at 8:07:48 PM UTC-5 Russell Seitz wrote:
> Luke, Make Sunsets has tweeted invoking "trade secrets ' in denying
> simple requests to quantify how much
Hi Luke,
Can you provide more information about your launches--locations, flight
descriptions, release altitudes and amounts, safety protocols,
consultations, permits, funding, etc.?
Josh Horton
On Friday, December 2, 2022 at 12:14:16 PM UTC-5 lu...@lukeiseman.com wrote:
> I wanted to
.com/document/d/1rByAkb7rBO8f5lMCKUcMqJPlaFuhftNi/edit
>
> I don't know of any documents from the OSTP or the USGCRP on the proposed
> research program that have been publicly shared.
>
> Best,
> Ron Baiman (HPAC OSTP response drafting committee)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 202
and research
governance? I assume it was the latter, but if it was the former can
someone please pass along any relevant documents? Thanks.
Josh Horton
On Saturday, September 10, 2022 at 2:14:25 AM UTC-4 Sev Clarke wrote:
> My submission was:
>
> *THREE CLIMATE SOLUTIONS*
>
>
&g
into some of the perspectives behind
the proposal.
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
Thanks for flagging Andrew.
I'd also point those who are interested toward the guest blog we wrote for
C2G -
https://www.c2g2.net/solar-geoengineering-compensation-and-parametric-insurance-insights-from-the-pacific/
Among other things, we attempt to connect a number of different arguments
://climatestrategies.wordpress.com/2019/05/15/solar-geoengineering-governance-and-parametric-insurance/
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to geoengineerin
Hi everyone,
For what it's worth, my quick two cents on all this:
- I tend to agree with Anna-Maria and others that this decision is not
so much an endorsement of geoengineering research as it is a recognition of
the need for more of it, in the context of a general reaffirmation of
right now.*
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send ema
,
with discussions ranging widely along with personal opinions on some
topics.
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to geoengineering+unsubscr
together on the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and both
represent Cumberland.
It just so happens that MacBeth is a member of Rhode Island Against
Chemtrails and Geoengineering
https://www.facebook.com/groups/RhodeIslandAgainstChemtrails/members/
Josh Horton
On Monday, March 23, 2015 at 10:10:27 AM
Clive Hamilton recently stated in a NYT op-ed that If there is such a
thing as a right-wing technology, geoengineering is it.
I submit that this is a gross oversimplification (or worse), and suggest
that the following piece by a senior fellow at R Street (as in, Republican
Party) is at least
Jesse, thanks for posting the Svoboda and Irvine article as well as all
four commentaries (including mine!).
The question of intent may be misplaced here, because the standard for
international liability is usually strict, no-fault liability, which would
almost certainly apply to SRM in
.*
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering
It's finally out and here's what it says about geoengineering:
http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/WGIAR5-SPM_Approved27Sep2013.pdf
Methods that aim to deliberately alter the climate system to counter
climate change, termed geoengineering, have been proposed. Limited evidence
Bill,
Here are some very high-altitude observations on the Russian POV from a
poster I presented last year. The takeaway is that there is serious
tension between Russian interest in geoengineering and the desire to take
advantage of economic opportunities created by climate change. There is
clear
that this would be workable in practice. Much more research needs to be
done on this aspect of SRM.
Josh Horton
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 12:36:02 PM UTC-4, Ken Caldeira wrote:
We do not want to be in a situation where a solar geoengineering system is
used to enable continued
Potential GE applications ...?
from the Daily Telegraph:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/weather/10268455/Weather-could-be-controlled-using-lasers.html?utm_source=bufferutm_campaign=Bufferutm_content=buffer2eb6autm_medium=twitter
Weather could be controlled using lasersScientists are
is talking about?
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
I think most of us will regard this as a very good development:
http://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/dumping-of-iron-into-sea-off-haida-gwaii-suspended-amid-acrimony-1.229839
Dumping of iron into sea off Haida Gwaii suspended amid acrimony
*Judith Lavoie*
from my blog that lays out the essentials as I understand them.
Josh Horton (http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/)
New London Protocol Proposal to Regulate Marine Geoengineering
Australia, Nigeria, and South Korea have jointly proposed
amendmentshttp://www.smh.com.au/environment/water
? Does the ETC Group just know what's best for them? That would
be rich indeed.
Josh Horton
On Saturday, April 27, 2013 3:55:13 PM UTC-4, Greg Rau wrote:
Or could the SRM crowd offer some solutions? Drop the iron out of the sky
(planes, rockets, balloons etc, launched from secure land sites
Even more to the point, see this
(http://www.scribd.com/doc/131811730/China-and-the-blunt-temptations-of-geoengineering-the-role-of-solar-radiation-management-in-China’s-strategic-response-to-climate-change)
current draft article on China and geoengineering:
Some Western scholars have
Curiously, no mention of possible NASA involvement in SRM--seems a bit more
obvious...
Josh
http://www.project-syndicate.org/online-commentary/nasa-geo-engineering-to-prevent-climate-change-by-jim-hartung
Can NASA Stop Global
I'm pretty sure the authors didn't intend this article as an endorsement of
social authoritarianism, but that seems to be the conclusion reached here
...
Josh Horton
http://www.science20.com/news_articles/geoengineering_committee_time_get_totalitarian-104431
Geoengineering By Committee? Time
Hi all,
The Executive Secretary of IOC-UNESCO and others have weighed in on ocean
fertilization, including the Haida experiment. Nothing really new here,
but gives a sense of their position.
Josh Horton
http://climate-l.iisd.org/guest-articles/climate-change-and-geoengineering-ocean
to perform other activities, if the
price is right. - G
From: Josh Horton joshuah...@gmail.com javascript:
Reply-To: joshuah...@gmail.com javascript:
joshuah...@gmail.comjavascript:
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2013 9:52 AM
To: geoengineering geoengi...@googlegroups.com javascript
that runs through the end of January:
http://americancarbonregistry.org/carbon-accounting/carbon-capture-and-storage-in-oil-and-gas-reservoirs
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To view
I wonder if Pachauri's comments signal something about the IPCC's work on
geoengineering for AR5. In 2009, he said At some point we will have to
cross over and start sucking some of those [greenhouse] gases out of the
As someone pointed out to me, this survey was conducted just before Fukushima,
so it's a good bet that opinions on geoengineering have become more hostile, at
least for now.
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To view
events that people should be feeding in
to?
A
On Oct 19, 2012 4:48 PM, Josh Horton joshuah...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
There are several inaccuracies in this report, but from this and other
sources it *looks like* things will remain much as they were before.
ETC Group and its allies
I'm no fan of Guardian reporting on GE, but note that this story is a year
old (published 10/6/11).
Josh
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:44:09 PM UTC-4, andrewjlockley wrote:
Posters note: The Guardian has forgotten to take its medicine again.
Apparently David K, Ken C and John S are about
and observations?
Josh Horton
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:48:14 PM UTC-4, Mike MacCracken wrote:
Initial reactions to the abstract:
While many of the geoengineering approaches might be said to be
unconventional (even though virtually all imitate some natural or existing
phenomenon
-election?).
Josh
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Friday, September 28, 2012 5:25:18 AM UTC-4, andrewjlockley wrote:
http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/about/science/activities/climate_change/ger/ger.aspx
GOVERNMENT VIEW ON GEO
in the world, so
publicly stating this position could open up a lot of political space for
useful engagement and help create breathing room for small-scale
experiments and field tests.
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group
.
Josh Horton
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 2:52:25 AM UTC-4, andrewjlockley wrote:
Dan Kahan seeks prepublication comments of the folloing paper (abs
below): http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1981907#
This is the 3rd or 4th study I've seen (including my own) which found
or even description of
geoengineering--it speaks of adding materials to the atmosphere. I think
Mercer/Keith/Sharp gives a better indication of current attitudes toward
geoengineering, both concern about deployment and support for research.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http
are portraying the SPICE debacle.
That's not to say that EPSRC IP rules strike the right balance, or that
patents should even be permissible when it comes to SRM, only that the IP
regime itself does not appear to be responsible for the cancellation.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
Did anyone on the list attend this EGU ESAS methane session? If not, has
anyone seen relevant coverage or picked up any related information? I know
this topic is of great interest to many group members, myself included.
Josh Horton
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 7:17:10 AM UTC-4, andrewjlockley
Fair enough, but I don't know of any researchers in this field (as
represented by those on this list) who propose to play God or make
deployment decisions about geoengineering. Scientists and engineers
propose to develop different options for managing risk, and leave it to
accountable
Here's the new CBD regulatory report to supplement Jesse's list:
http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-16/information/sbstta-16-inf-29-en.pdf
Josh
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:12:53 AM UTC-4, Jesse Reynolds wrote:
Returning from a holiday weekend, there's a bundle of stuff at my
more reason to
question the claims put forward by AMEG, and perhaps for AMEG to reconsider
its approach.
Josh Horton
On Sunday, March 18, 2012 7:59:29 AM UTC-4, Andrew Lockley wrote:
This is very damning. I have also asked John several times to clarify the
membership of the group and he
statement--what's the evidence for this?
Josh Horton
On Saturday, March 17, 2012 6:25:22 AM UTC-4, Andrew Lockley wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17400804
Climate 'tech fixes' urged for Arctic methane
By Richard Black Environment correspondent, BBC News
An eminent
connection ... then he was overthrown
in a coup. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-16945764
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://www.unisdr.org/archive/25649
Migration not a matter of choice but survival, says Kiribati President*By
Brigitte Leoni*
*BANGKOK, 15 March 2012* - Following
for deployment.
In addition, rather than speaking of an emerging consensus, it might
be better to say that discussions of geoengineering have attained
greater legitimacy over time.
Josh Horton
On Mar 3, 5:08 am, Andrew Lockley and...@andrewlockley.com wrote:
I strongly believe you should
to articulate his own views on
the subject:
http://thereluctantgeoengineer.blogspot.com/2012/02/ameg.html
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Feb 24, 1:34 pm, Douglas Spence dspenc...@gmail.com wrote:
arctic-news.blogspot.com/2012/02/protecting
This letter is heartening to see, as many of us are very uncomfortable
with the notion of near-term deployment in the Arctic. Did anyone
attend this hearing? I know John Nissen was scheduled to be a
witness. Is this available for viewing online?
Josh Horton
On Feb 23, 11:20 am, Andrew Lockley
legitimate interpretations in this
context, neither one of which is objectively “true.” This key message
and the broader study should remain neutral on this point.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Jan 30, 3:59 am, Ken Caldeira kcalde
://www.climatefrontlines.org/
*
A global forum for indigenous peoples, small islands and vulnerable
communities*
You can read more about this here:
http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org/2012/02/online-discussion-forum-fo...
Josh Horton pointed to this in a posting to this group on Feb 3, referring
continued
support to the work of the
Convention.
Please accept, Madam/Sir, the assurances of my highest consideration.
Ahmed Djoghlaf
Executive Secretary
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
--
You received this message because you
Just a quick note on process - please make sure you use the official
template available at the address below to submit your comments - this
is the only way to ensure they will reach the CBD Secretariat.
http://www.cbd.int/climate/geoengineering/review/
Josh
On Feb 1, 3:33 am, Chris
populations, particularly in Africa, but it is also strategic
for climate chage mitigation,”
said Jean-Luc François, Manager of the agriculture, rural development
and biodiversity
division at the Agence française de développement.
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
in
the models? Couldn't modelers include mixed mitigation/
geoengineering scenarios as a routine feature of such studies, to make
it harder for critics to misrepresent things? After all, almost no
one is arguing for intervention without emissions cuts.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http
From Reuters ...
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/12/us-molecule-climate-idUSTRE80B1U820120112
New molecule could help cool planet
By Nina Chestney
LONDON | Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:02pm EST
(Reuters) - A new molecule has been detected in the earth's atmosphere
which could help produce a
to consider this process, not jump to conclusions
and be open to the idea that new observations may significantly change
what we understand about our world.
None of this means methane plumes aren't a serious problem, but their
comments hardly support near-term Arctic deployment.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton
sense
of prudence to act - and sooner rather than later.
Nathan
On Dec 18, 6:30 pm, Josh Horton joshuahorton...@gmail.com wrote:
Nathan, John, et al.,
One aspect of the methane issue bothers me in particular: is there
evidence indicating a significant increase in the rate of methane
to any conclusions. Maybe you have information I
have overlooked?
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Dec 18, 4:06 pm, Nathan Currier natcurr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, John list –
Until now, my view has generally been that we should try like
, accelerating sea-ice retreat, etc.? Is this
just something for us to monitor closely going forward, or should we
be seriously concerned about what this portends for the near future?
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
might say “What does
it mean for world trade?” and killer whales will be able to travel
[between the two].
“We should be trying to reduce the rate at which the planet warms. We
aren’t going to be able to stop it, that’s for sure. All we are going
to be able to do is slow it down.”
Josh Horton
to offset the effects of increased greenhouse
gases). Extrapolating from cloud-seeding during the Beijing Olympics
to the threat of unilateral SRM deployment is a pretty big leap.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Nov 21, 2:37 pm, rongretlar
On a related note, here's the UK government response to the HOME
letter mentioned in Nature, which amounts to a pretty thorough
rejection of ETC Group.
http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Helena-Paul-1.pdf
Josh Horton
On Nov 17, 2:15 pm, Rau, Greg r...@llnl.gov
Ron,
I agree with your assessment, this report is a solid handbook for
policymakers that lays out the basic issues without oversimplifying
them. The five geoengineering scenarios (No Geoengineering, Safe
CDR Only, Technology Transformation, Insurance Policy, Needed Soon)
are a useful way to map
with that of nuclear war.*
Commensurate with nuclear war? This statement is simply ridiculous.
ETC Group is trying to equate geoengineering technologies with WMDs,
but here we see this argument taken to its logical, patently absurd
conclusion. This is embarrassing.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton
Hi everyone,
Whatever your views, it was only a matter of time ...
(John Bellamy Foster is editor of the socialist Monthly Review)
http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2011/foster291011.html
Capitalism and Environmental Catastrophe
by John Bellamy Foster
John Bellamy Foster and Fred Magdoff at
proponent, therefore, the news would be
good insofar as some initial costs of deployment would appear to
decrease over time.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
On Oct 22, 11:30 am, Hawkins, Dave dhawk...@nrdc.org wrote:
My comment is not an argument against doing SRM research
stick.
I also think it's smart of HOME to repost this article by Romm rather
than offer original content and commentary, as the credibility of HOME
is questionable at best.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Oct 8, 7:00 pm, Andrew Lockley
Apparently EuroChar has been underway since the beginning of this
year. I had not previously run across it.
Josh
http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER=FP7_PROJ_ENACTION=DDOC=1CAT=PROJQUERY=0132e028e623:102a:252b68b1RCN=97271
Project description
In the context of climate change mitigation,
silent on next steps. Do you know if the BPC or any Task
Force members plan to engage with key players such as OSTP,
congressional staff, etc.? It would be a shame to miss this
opportunity.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
--
You received
?) effects of offsets. If carbon markets are off
the table, how else do you propose to achieve large-scale deployment
of these various technologies?
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Sep 28, 11:49 pm, Ning Zeng z...@atmos.umd.edu wrote:
Ron
I'm no climate scientist, but seems like a bit of a stretch ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/sep/02/giant-balloon-and-hosepipe-geoengineering
A balloon and hosepipe as the answer to climate change? It's just pie
in the sky
Increasingly bizarre attempts at geo-engineering simply
One more thing ... I question the use of the acronym
SAG (Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering), less because
geoengineering is a contested term than because the word sag has
obvious negative connotations. Instead, I suggest using the more
neutral SAI (Stratospheric Aerosol Injections).
Josh
system as well as internationally. Here's a Reuters
article with more details:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/22/australia-carbon-idUSL3E7JI4ID20110822
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
--
You received this message because you
, then this form of climate
engineering is much less problematic than you contend, at least from
the procedural justice point of view.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Aug 16, 10:44 pm, Michael Hayes voglerl...@gmail.com wrote:
Please allow me a few
in between? Obviously, the answer to this
question also affects the question of Climate101 membership.
These are some tricky issues, but I think it's better to raise them at
the outset and reach some form of consensus rather than gloss them
over and hope they never become real impediments.
Josh Horton
as an attempt at obfuscation, and
this is an important political consideration. It also tends to
obscure the unique nature of the geoengineering enterprise as a
deliberate attempt to intervene in the climate system, something which
should not be overlooked.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
On Aug 5
the utility bill in every
apartment house 10 to 20 percent frees cash that can be spent to
increase economic growth.
Josh Horton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com
solutions.
Small island developing states, and representative organizations such
as the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), ought to be at the
forefront of diplomatic efforts to jump-start research into
geoengineering.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com
David,
Thanks for making this available. Note some earlier public opinion
focus group work on geoengineering done by UK NERC -
http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering-dialogue-final-report.pdf.
This contains some very interesting results, particularly on the moral
hazard issue.
Josh
On IPSO, BBC suggests that the report supports certain types of
geoengineering, but the long version of the summary report, which is
all that has been released, talks only of significantly increased
measures for mitigation of atmospheric CO2 (p. 8) (http://
Robert,
Setting aside SRM for the moment, have you ever revisited the wedges
paper to incorporate the full suite of potential CDR strategies? This
strikes me as an obvious way to broaden the wedge concept. I imagine
this has already been done one way or another
Josh Horton
joshuahorton
Several interesting points have been raised:
1. Ken describes several basic ETC positions. From what I can tell,
there is one additional underlying premise: modern capitalism, built
on science and technology, is responsible for the climate crisis,
therefore, the modern rationalist worldview is
The UNFCCC Executive Secretary has raised the possibility of negative
emissions ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/05/global-warming-suck-greenhouse-gases?intcmp=122
Global warming crisis may mean world has to suck greenhouse gases from
air
As Bonn talks begin, UN climate chief
/gas, coal, and power plants do not neatly
overlap, so if fracking comes at the expense of CCS, we could see
conflicting interests within the broader resource extraction industry.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
On Jun 2, 1:10 pm, Stephen Salter s.sal...@ed.ac.uk wrote:
Mike
We could
that Biorecro
authored the report, so I assume Henrik is intimately familiar with
it.
Josh Horton
On May 24, 1:24 pm, rongretlar...@comcast.net wrote:
Ken, Henrik and list
1. Ken specifically asked about the list's reaction to his final sentence
being questioned by Henrik, which read (adding
Hi Panagiota,
I would be happy to answer some of your questions, unfortunately I'll
be unavailable for the next couple of weeks - please let me know if I
can help out.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
On May 20, 2:18 pm, Panagiota Stathaki pswrite...@yahoo.com wrote:
My name
. The irony, of course, is that the region most sensitive to
global warming, and therefore most likely to benefit from expeditious
geoengineering, is the same region giving rise to some of the most
powerful incentives to acquiesce in, or even hasten, climate change.
Josh Horton
On May 14, 2:09 pm
. It includes several contributions from regular
group participants, including Wil Burns and myself.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To post to this group
also be interested in learning more about the working group
dialog, especially the views of those non-scientists in attendance.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
On May 7, 7:03 pm, rongretlar...@comcast.net wrote:
Prof. Robock (with ccs)
1. There has been a good bit of web traffic
.
http://www.future-agricultures.org/index.php?option=com_docmantask=doc_downloadgid=1091Itemid=510
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To post
these
sociocultural dimensions, which will influence decisions on testing
and deployment.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Apr 25, 12:17 pm, Nathan Currier natcurr...@gmail.com wrote:
The recent bright water discussions are interesting to me partly
I agree, this would be a grave mistake. There would be no surer way
of firing up international political opposition to geoengineering,
mobilizing civil society, encouraging suspicion and hostility, even
dragging in ENMOD. Imagine how China would react! Whether or not the
military has the
the risk of a climate emergency.
Josh Horton
On Apr 18, 11:08 am, Ken Caldeira kcalde...@carnegie.stanford.edu
wrote:
Folks,
There is some discussion in DC about making some small amount of public
funds available to support SRM and CDR research.
In today's funding climate, it is much more likely
Very informative report. I was unaware of the great potential of
coupling biofuel/ethanol production with CCS due to the pure CO2
streams resulting from fermentation. With biofuels on the ropes
again, this may be a useful way to increase their attractiveness.
Josh
On Apr 14, 4:46 pm, Ron
of skepticism is in order.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Apr 8, 3:16 pm, Rau, Greg r...@llnl.gov wrote:
CLIMATE: Barrasso, Bingaman reintroduce CCS prize bill (04/08/2011)
Katie Howell, EE reporter
Sens. John Barrasso and Jeff Bingaman
AP reports on the recent SRMGI conference here:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110403/ap_on_hi_te/eu_the_sunshade_option
Any thoughts or impressions from those of you who might have attended?
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
--
You received
it plays out. Until we do, there's little point
to such pontificating. Much like Asilomar.
Gregory Benford
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Josh Horton joshuahorton...@gmail.comwrote:
AP reports on the recent SRMGI conference here:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110403/ap_on_hi_te
John,
Do you know if these posters will be made available to the public? I
am particularly interested in the second one you mention.
Josh
On Mar 10, 11:38 am, John Latham john.latha...@manchester.ac.uk
wrote:
Hello All,
To answer question posed by John, there are two poster
papers on
: Governance and Technology
Policy (pp. 23-28) - http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41371.pdf
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
On Feb 7, 5:20 pm, Mike MacCracken mmacc...@comcast.net wrote:
Dear Tracy--
I look forward to reading the article. My first thought is that it would
certainly
as part
of a portfolio.
Josh Horton
joshuahorton...@gmail.com
http://geoengineeringpolitics.blogspot.com/
On Jan 25, 10:31 am, Mike MacCracken mmacc...@comcast.net wrote:
From: Henrik Enevoldsen [mailto:h.enevold...@bio.ku.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: A Scientific
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
