Kathi,
if I request a single type, the response seems better:
http://bolegweb.geof.unizg.hr:2017/geoserver/ows?service=wfs=2.0.0=describeFeaturetype=proplant:obs_all
I think you have some app-schema types in there. Did any of them specify
the WFS schema in schemaURI?
If look at
Possibly a Tomcat 8 difference in behaviour? Not sure why it'd only show in
that one request type though.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
Hi Ben,
URL:
http://bolegweb.geof.unizg.hr:2017/geoserver/ows?service=wfs=2.0.0=describeFeaturetype
:)
Kathi
On 08.08.2017 23:17, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
Kathi,
I cannot reproduce this on master with topp:states. What is your
GeoServer version, and do you have a URL that reproduces
On 09/08/17 04:52, Gavin Medley wrote:
I have the data for siteName and iersDOMESNumber in Table1 and the data for
monumentDescription and heightOfTheMonument in Table2. Can I use a single
XML mapping file to map those two tables to the elements of
siteIdentification?
No, there is a one-to-one
Kathi,
I cannot reproduce this on master with topp:states. What is your
GeoServer version, and do you have a URL that reproduces this behaviour
for one of the release sample layers?
For example:
http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs?service=WFS=2.0.0=DescribeFeatureType=topp:states=gml32
The
Hi,
The VT process does remove very small (<1 pixel) features from the results.
There were some other people who noticed that you might need to create your
own tileset definition in GWC if you are using MB clients (otherwise your
tiles will appear to be "too generalized"). I think they
Hi all,
I am faced with a problem. I am mapping a database of site logs to
GeodesyML through Geoserver App Schema. I am trying to minimize the number
of new views and tables I need to make in the database so I was wondering
if it is possible to use a single mapping file to map multiple views or
Hi all,
I'm serving a Geotiff through a standard Geotiff source image warehouse.here
the gdalinfo output :
Driver: GTiff/GeoTIFFFiles: example.tifSize is 12420, 9986Coordinate System
is:PROJCS["NTF (Paris) / Lambert zone II", GEOGCS["NTF (Paris)",
I am trying to install ECW extension in geoserver in Centos 6. I had followed
the instruction from here
https://halukapaydin.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/install-geoserver-with-ecw-support-on-centos-7-0-1406-64-bit/
As given in the link, I got this output
ECW …..
JP2ECW …
When i type gdalinfo
Hi Cliff,
please keep the mailing list cc-ed in your replies so anyone with similar
problems can check the discussion or any other dev/user can chime in with
additional suggestions.
Did you manually created those files or did you just let the ImagePyramid
plugin automatically create them when
Hi,
I've been running into problems with the WFS Schema Location returned in
DescribeFeatureType.
I've configured GeoServer to return the official xsd, most requests
(capabilities, get feature) provide this:
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/wfs/2.0
Hi Cliff,
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Cliff Lau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some problem about publishing imagepyramid with GeoServer.
>
Did you check this documentation to see if you skipped something needed?
Hi List
I have upgraded my test Geoserver cluster to 2.11.2 on Windows 2012 with Java
8u144 (32bit) and Tomcat 8.5.16 (32bit) behind an Apache load balancer. My two
Geoserver cluster works showing the web interface, layer previews and various
capability documents for web services. However,
Hello,
I have some problem about publishing imagepyramid with GeoServer.
I built my pyramid imagery with GDAL from QGIS and i filled in properties
file for all different levels.
When I came to GeoServer and created a layer for the imagepyramid then the
preview image became just black.
14 matches
Mail list logo