In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> >> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The BBC's iPlayer streaming service is to end
> >> downloads for users who watch on desktop or laptop computers.
> >>
> >> Programmes will still be available to download on tablets and phones
> >> via the mobile iPlayer
In article
,
David Woodhouse wrote:
> Hm? My reading of that is just that they're just going to stop building
> the native applications for Windows and MacOS, which they believe were
> the only way to download programmes on those platforms.
> The web site will still work for streaming (and
usual
suspects!"
Thanks.
Jim
In article <5b26407015...@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim web
> That makes me wonder if some items like 'Click' may be gippable in
> decent HD rather than the SD on DVB-T2. If so, handy at times.
> Jim
--
Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~ww
In article <3a4acfb6-304d-c48c-8af3-c54bf1ae0...@macfh.co.uk>, MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> > You need NTFS for it to work for bigger files than 4 GB
> No he doesn't! As he has already stated, he uses Linux which has a
> choice of different possible file systems, and he is only using
In article <5b5737ed-dcd3-4ca9-a77e-4f7eb9c30...@mikegregory.net>,
Michael Gregory wrote:
> FYI, BBC Parliament is HD on satellite... not upscaled.
Thanks. Useful to know. May be examples where that helps. Although the
drawback is seeing some of our politicians in even more hideous detail.
In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> On 21/01/2024 11:51, Jim web wrote:
> >
> > Question: Should simply giving the pid as m001vxvk rather than
> > m001vkll cause gip to get the full-length version? Or is that not
> > sufficient? As yet I've always
In article <70cc91a8-cb60-42e8-9f4d-0b0b005b8...@gmx.com>, iz
wrote:
> > On 20 Jan 2024, at 11:16, Jim web wrote:
> >
> > This *also* was ended part-way though the sitting. So I checked the
> > webpage and that states the duration is over 3 hours. Yet what I g
In article <2e076214-aa04-da58-d253-26b497e64...@macfh.co.uk>, MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> > Playing either file is fine ... for what it contains. Just that the
> > following section of the sitting seems not to be present.
> Sorry, there was such a break between setting the test
In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> oad it as a test, and have just noticed that it finished around
> 1330hrs. It downloaded successfully as "Select Committees Horizon IT
> Scandal Inquiry.mp4" 3.09GB, 1:33:18 long, 1280x720x50 and random
> seeking within the file seems to play
In article <798a68e4-3fb7-4416-b9cf-31ca1e9b3...@writeme.com>, David
Taylor wrote:
> BTW: all but one of my 20+ Linux systems all have a FAT/FAT32 partition
> on their boot disc
Beats me. I only use 5 at present. :-) IIRC The RO box I use also has a
FAT partition to aid booting. Doesn't
In article , David
Taylor wrote:
[snip]
> Jim,
> It's not the FAT/FAT32 file size limit?
Erm. I'm using Linux. No FAT involved here.(1) And so far as I know the BBC
aren't bonkers enough to use FAT for their iPlayer store, etc!
And I've downloaded bigger files in the past.
Doesn't explain the
Puzzled by this item for the following reasons:
I watched the broadcast on the BBC Parliament (DVB-T2) channel and that
ended before the 'second half' of the panel sitting. However I downloaded a
copy using gip on the 16th.
This *also* was ended part-way though the sitting. So I checked the
In article <0e7c66ab-afe7-57fa-5234-808c2a97b...@timelords.org.uk>, fred.d
wrote:
> If you liked Fortran, then you should have tried PASCAL. Sure it needed
> some extensions but it was simple and it was very hard to write bad
> code.
I find it easy to write terrible code. Comes naturally. I just
In article <809b079f-cc32-2027-f825-520c77614...@macfh.co.uk>, MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> On 28/03/2023 15:51, Jim web wrote:
> >
> Sorry to hear about your wife, commiserations to you both.
> > In article , MacFH
> > - C E Macfarlane - News wrote:
&
In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> > Might as well be sure, so what happens when you type: python
> > --version
> >
> > If that comes up with 3.7 as desired, what do you get for: pip
> > --help
It gives me Python 2.7.17
However if I look in usr/lib/ I can see
In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> On 27/03/2023 10:44, Jim web wrote:
> Glad to see you're still alive and kicking. I'd noticed your absence in
> another place and was a little worried for you.
Warning for the sensitive. Much of the following is even more OT. :-)
In article <1fc5118b-7da9-e243-3a5a-3b1198f8f...@errichel.co.uk>, Budge
wrote:
> So what I am using is not much help. I am surprised that you have not
> upgraded though. 3.10 was introduced in 2021. What OS are you using?
> Regards, Alastair.
Do you mean 3.6 for the Python that my machine
This is OT but I'm hoping some here will be using yt-dlp and can help!
The version of yt-dlip I've been using has been upped to the current one.
This now refuses to work unless I also go to Python 3.7 so I have installed
the basics of that... I think. However...
Now when I try to run it is fails
Sorry for asking here but my usenet feed isn't currently working and
someone here may know the answers.
I've been using VLC to record DVB-T2 stations into .ts files. I've noticed
a 'freeview' stream which I think is an extended guide. So I've recorded a
short section and been looking at it, which
"Wombledumb" also seems to have had an impact yesterday on other
programmes going AWOL.
I wanted to get the "Why Buildings Collapse" which was listed yesterday on
the BBC shedules for after the balls. But too many balls it seems means it
didn't get TX'd. Result is that the iPlayer had a page for
Is it possible to use yt-dlp to fetch video files of programmes from
Channel 4's 'on demand'/'All 4' service? I'd like if I can to get copies of
their 'Time Team' episodes, but can't see how to do it. A URL I tried
didn't work, so either this isn't possible or I didn't find the correct
URL. Or
In article <5f9d21ff-9029-2096-b4c4-ff35b74f0...@macfh.co.uk>,
MacFH - C E Macfarlane - News wrote:
> * The lists and their intended use are:
> Full HD TV - A new one similar to the next, which I've just created
> after discovering here that these downloads are available, so I haven't
In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> On 20/04/2022 12:27, Jim web wrote:
> > In article , MacFH -
> > C E Macfarlane - News wrote:
> >>
> >> I can understand that this might happen if the PIDs are the same, but
> >> it's not my experience
In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane - News wrote:
> On 18/04/2022 14:26, Jim web wrote:
> >
> > I may be missing the point. But for ages now whenever I fetch a radio
> > programme I get the 'podcast' version. I've assumed this was the norm,
> > nowdays.
> I can und
In article <87k0bmv9gk@ixod.org>, Mark Carroll wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2022, MacFH wrote:
> >
> > How can I make GiP find these 'podcast' versions as well as or instead
> > of the 'normal' downloads which are no longer being made available?
> https://github.com/get-iplayer/get_iplayer says,
In article <1986979950.112684.1630871945...@office.mailbox.org>,
Dave Lambley wrote:
> A wirelessly connected stereo pair is possible (at least according to a
> marketing director),
> https://www.theregister.com/2014/01/14/imagination_caskeid_wifi_audio_synchronization/
I'm pretty sure a
In article <6fdea109-32df-a8e2-a4ca-e23ba8fb7...@errichel.co.uk>, Budge
wrote:
> Hi and many thanks to Geoff and all who have replied including those who
> have PM'd me as they have together improved my perspective of options.
> The several questions and points raised are most helpful.
I'd
In article <20210425122922.1e96c...@andrew.woodwards.com>, Andrew
wrote:
> Searching for "formula" on the iPlayer website finds eight matches. All
> of them except for the above one were only broadcast via the BBC sport
> webpage. Maybe that is why they don't show up?
I tend to find programmes
Is it actually a virus?
I ask because I don't use Windows or Macs, and only use RISC OS for emails
or news.
Haven't clicked the link on principle - but since I doubt any
Linux/Windows/Mac virus would run on RO so I wonder if it is something
else.
Jim
--
Electronics
On 01 Nov, w...@audiomisc.co.uk wrote:
> In article <79eb3d328942aa81b1d5c6affef94...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk>,
> Jeremy Nicoll - ml gip wrote:
> > On 2020-10-30 17:36, Jim Lesurf wrote:
> > Did you try specifying alternate CDNs?
> That's my next experiment. cf below...
[snip]
Yes. :-) I've
In article <79eb3d328942aa81b1d5c6affef94...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk>,
Jeremy
Nicoll - ml gip wrote:
> On 2020-10-30 17:36, Jim Lesurf wrote:
> > This morning when I tried to fetch some items the download rate was
> > much slower than usual. i.e. about a 1/10th what is normal. In effect,
> > the
In article
,
Geoff Smith wrote:
> This works for me :
> cd /usr/local/bin/
> sudo mv youtube-dl youtube-dl.$(date +%Y%m%d)
> sudo wget https://yt-dl.org/downloads/latest/youtube-dl -O
> /usr/local/bin/youtube-dl
> sudo chmod a+rx /usr/local/bin/youtube-dl
I just used
wget
In article , Budge
wrote:
> By way of a footnote in my search I found some beautiful videos of Bach
> Cantatas from the J.S. Bach Foundation which I was able to watch on TV
> with audio through fibre to my amplifier/speaker system. So pleased was
> I that I thought I would go for a video
In article <23d53a18-a768-4b45-8b96-5710e1070...@gmail.com>,
VeniVidiVideo
wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2020, at 12:20 PM, Jim web wrote:
> > I've never looked at uploading anything for YT. The question in my
> > mind is as follows:
> >
> > Yes, it generally offers a ra
In article <20200922151233.ga11...@firedrake.org>, Roger Bell_West
wrote:
> Use youtube-dl -x and it will automatically get the version with the
> least-lossy available audio, strip off the extraneous video, and leave
> you with a file that is just the audio stream. (Not always m4a;
> sometimes
In article
,
Chris Brady wrote:
> However bearing in mind the increasing left wing PC bias of the Beeb, so
> many Brit classic comedy programmes have had the tag ' shortened' in the
> metadata. This nonsense started in about 2019. Why?
You seem to be trying to get your 'answer' in before
In article , Dave Liquorice
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 11:14:48 +0100, CJB wrote:
> > Then there are VPN services - free v.v. paid for. If the Beeb offered
> > such then folks would surely pay to watch or listen from overseas.
> Trouble is the BBC does not hold hold the rights to world wide
>
In article
,
CJB wrote:
> I would love to hear the programmes made by such pioneers as Charles
> Parker, A.L.Lloyd, Ewan MacColl, Michael Mason, Charles Chilton, Alan
> Lomax, and many others. But their works have all been consigned to the
> 'dusty archives' never to be heard again - that is
In article <77065296-bede-4f1c-a6a2-f774c580b...@gmail.com>,
VeniVidiVideo
wrote:
> Boy, the hypocrisy here is stunning. The BBC allows time-limited
> downloads, but does NOT allow downloads without an expiration date.
> Every single license payer here is violating BBC's terms of service by
>
In article
,
Geoff Smith wrote:
> Bravo, Jon.
> Giving Americans freebies at our Licence payers' expense is disgraceful.
> "Grab" = "Steal".
FWIW I'm also unhappy when people use get-iplayer for purposes like this.
Not only because it means some people are making use of what the rest of us
In article
, Dave
Widgery wrote:
> Hi
> I am looking at possibly moving our two notebooks over to linux, I used
> to be a Unix system Manager (although 15 years ago and very rusty) so I
> am not too worried which flavour. but my wife struggles with windows
> these days so I need something that
In article , Owen
Smith
wrote:
> That's Matrix H, which is the most over complicated matrix encoding quad
> ever used. It was impossible to decode at all accurately with 1970s
> analogue electronics, and is still extremely difficult with modern
> computers. The BBC were definitely mistaken in
In article <993917186.81920.1588531696...@office.mailbox.org>, Dave
Lambley wrote:
> I imagine you could do a better job of decoding it than was ever
> possible in 1977.
Possibly, although I suspect that what got encoded and into what listeners
had might haveoften been changed by other
In article <67d27056-575a-461a-bfe3-a17cd9198...@cantab.net>, Owen
Smith
wrote:
> That's it, it was originally broadcast in Matrix HJ. As you say, not
> clear if the rebroadcast is matrix encoded but unless they've
> re-mastered it in some way it probably is.
> My friend develops his own matrix
In article <586ac7e6c4...@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim web
wrote:
> Please tell us the PID as I'm curious about this and would be interested
> in investigating it.
FWIW I did a search and the only item I hit was
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04vdykh
which is stated to be unavaila
In article <7bed5daa-b0de-4041-bb94-c90d162c8...@cantab.net>, Owen
Smith
wrote:
> I have some friends looking for a Radio 4 Extra broadcast that is
> quadraphonic matrix encoded. They want to download it to decode the quad
> with software.
They should have no problem downloading the matrix
In article <22822d75-3c45-4482-9cdc-da91b2f12...@cantab.net>, Owen
Smith
wrote:
> I tried the forums some years back. I found dinky's rules and
> application of them so strict that I felt it wasn't a place anyone could
> contribute anything. It was just a place for reporting get_iplayer bugs
> or
In article <1725855064.17870.1586711881...@office.mailbox.org>, Dave
Lambley wrote:
> I was not aware that there even was web forum, but I am painfully aware
> how forums can become unpleasant. The one Discourse forum I am on
> however is remarkably non-toxic.
I just use two Forums (Fora?).
In article <9f18e854-4035-0b6a-3d8e-46ba2a449...@squarepenguin.co.uk>,
SquarePenguin wrote:
> I made the forum in the first place so get_iplayer could reach a
> different audience than found here. So maybe this isn't the best place
> to ask :-) But figured you folks had had your hats in the
In article , Dave Liquorice
wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:53:16 +0100, Jim web wrote:
> > But with digital LPCM transfers they should just 'pass the parcel' and
> > deliver at the end of the chain what got put in at the start.
> Assuming the clocks at each end are lock
In article <20200401095041.ga4...@mooli.org.uk>, Peter Corlett
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:12:26AM +0100, Jim web wrote: [...]
> > I'm now wondering if a cheap 'crystal detector' and a DVM might do the
> > job given an input filter... It would at least show up burst
In article , Budge
wrote:
> Hi Graham, Many thanks for the reminders. No microwave in use anywhere
> within 100m at the time. Cannot be sure about all the rest but I am
> working on turning off the 2.4GHz wifi and keeping only 5GHz in this
> building. Have to start somewhere!
I do have an
In article <43658eb7-b06b-2c56-4c71-58bb8be22...@errichel.co.uk>, Budge
wrote:
> Further examination of symptoms suggests that the noise seems to be
> interference, either with Bluetooth headphone directly or through the
> Bluetooth transmitter. I suspect possible source of interference might
>
In article <2ba46893-ed2c-78c5-c502-89c02ad20...@errichel.co.uk>, Budge
wrote:
> Hi Jim, Many thanks for the reply. Leaving aside the bluetooth for a
> moment how should I make sense of the different attenuation options?
> Should I put all in the chain to max except the headphones and attenuate
In article <277a5cfb-07d2-6b24-aabe-21f1ed76d...@errichel.co.uk>, Budge
wrote:
> This is an OT but I hope Jim Web or others with knowledge can give me
> some guidance in sorting out a noise issue:
> I am having some problems with very unpleasant and loud clicks when
> pla
As a quick check I tried again to fetch the relevant 'Sky an Night' episode
last night. I was then intending to try alternatives based on previous
postings here.
With exactly the same default settings as I'd used earlier... it worked
fine!
Hooray!... but puzzled.
So I guess that the programme's
In article <6682de94-957d-ee10-3645-22f4d6597...@macfh.co.uk>, MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane wrote:
> Hi Jim ...
> On 30/12/2019 17:34, Jim web wrote:
> > I'm having a problem with getting the most recent 'Sky at Night'
> > programme
> >
> > https://www.bbc.co.uk/
I'm having a problem with getting the most recent 'Sky at Night' programme
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00042l2
I'm using the same method as for earlier programs, In essence as below
%s --tvmode=dvfhd --no-tag --pid %s --force --ffmpeg %s --output %s\n
(That's taked from the 'C' in my
In article <1UTVq9Sl0j.2MSaZ0zHvD6@fairstead16>, Don Grunbaum
wrote:
> No, Ralph, I didn't request the AD version, but that's what I got by
> default.
> From what I can see on the iPlayer website, only audiodescribed versions
> are available. Playing using VLC doesn't play the AD.
I'm not sure
In article <113575b3-3dac-ba08-eb2b-b0c099b63...@zoho.com>, RS
wrote:
> On 04/12/2019 15:42, Jim web wrote:
> > In article <581d19c687...@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim web
> > Alas, this just gives me the same 96k. Even when the info contains the
> > following as per
In article <581d19c687...@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim web
wrote:
> In article <603b6aab-a35b-ecc6-e34b-ed0e72b51...@zoho.com>, RS
> wrote:
> > You can use a list of modes in order of preference.
> > --radiomode=dafhigh,dafstd,dafmed
Alas, this just gives me the same 96
In article <603b6aab-a35b-ecc6-e34b-ed0e72b51...@zoho.com>, RS
wrote:
> You can use a list of modes in order of preference.
> --radiomode=dafhigh,dafstd,dafmed
Thanks.
That's probably the best approach from my POV as it means I can use the
same radio settings for R3/4 and WS and get the best
Here are some examples of the info for some recent programmes on WS that
illustrate the odd variations. Question is what the best strategy might be
for mode settings to always get the best available quality?
As a personal choice I tend to prefer podcast version *if* the sound
quality is as high
In article <33d41029-e8b7-f5e5-2424-3b4f2f7d2...@macfh.co.uk>, MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane wrote:
> Please see below ...
[snip]
> However, like you, I'm beginning to get concerned at the moving
> deck-chairs because it usually means that something good disappears and
> what we're left with is not
In article
, CJB
wrote:
> What is the default - all I use is --type=radio for all radio downloads.
> CJB
I've been looking at the fetchable 'info' for randomly chosen recent WS
items and some seem to not go above 'med' levels whilst others go to
'high'. So the quality offerred seems to vary, but
In article
,
Andy Wedge wrote:
> >I'm getting a lot of "403 Forbidden" playlist errors today in get_iplayer.
> It's a known issue. See https://github.com/get-iplayer/get_iplayer/wiki/issues
Thanks for that! I got the error this morning and was about to report it!
:-)
Jim
--
Electronics
I thought this had already been dealt with. The primary source for the DH,
etc, IIUC, is
https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/aboutthebbc/entries/adef1e89-66e4-4387-ba19-e2942a3d090a?ns_source=twitter_linkname=corporate_campaign=about_the_bbc_mchannel=social
I may be mistaken, but...
I've emailed BBC
In article <4619fdba-1240-4b63-b6bc-47184774f...@cantab.net>, Owen
Smith
wrote:
> It is only the iOS and Android apps that are going, to force people to
> use the much derided BBC Sounds app instead. The iPlayer web site is
> staying, so get_iplayer will likely be unaffected.
I suspect something
In article
, CJB
wrote:
> Wonder what'll we do now ... ??
> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7429429/BBC-bosses-scrap-iPlayer-Radio-focus-Sounds-app-despite-complaints.html
Read an actual newspaper, and ignore the Daily B00lox? [1]
TBH I realised *many* years ago that anything in the
In article ,
Jeremy
Nicoll - ml gip wrote:
> On 2019-09-04 14:46, Jim web wrote:
> > A give-away is to look at 7:30pm on Monday. Here in Scotland that was
> > the programme about travelling the Scottish Lochs. I've not yet found
> > a schedule which includes this.
>
In article <7da31d6e-1c5d-3501-22bf-bc979197b...@jls-radio.com>, James
Scholes wrote:
> This URL successfully takes me to the BBC One Scotland HD schedule for
> Tuesday September 3rd:
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/schedules/p013blmc/yesterday
That's interesting because I tried 'yesterday', etc a
In article ,
James Scholes wrote:
> Here's the full list (although not all PIDs are guaranteed to have an
> associated schedule). You can add the "/today" suffix after the PID if
> you want, and you'll get the expected result. But the URL goes to the
> same place with or without it.
>
In article , James
Scholes wrote:
> Here's the full list (although not all PIDs are guaranteed to have an
> associated schedule). You can add the "/today" suffix after the PID if
> you want, and you'll get the expected result. But the URL goes to the
> same place with or without it.
[big snip]
In article <648b0d0a-008d-f1f0-1ed9-e8b30816d...@zoho.com>, RS
wrote:
> It may be Firefox that is responsible.
May be. If so a PITA for many people.
> I get similar behaviour running Firefox under kubuntu if I select Change
> location at the top right or bottom left. At the top of the page
In article <417177043.421469.1567597295...@mail2.virginmedia.com>,
mccarthy kevin wrote:
> How about these for TV URLs?
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/guide/bbcone
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/guide/bbctwo
> https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/guide/bbcfour
Thanks. Yes. I'd also just
In the last day or two I've seen a problem crop up (again) which I've seen
in the past. Then it went away after a while, but is now back and is a
PITA.
My habit is to look though the schedules by setting up a 'home' page for my
browser than includes links to the various channels for 'today' and
In brief because this is OT:
Yes. However the snag I discovered is that 'rules' here is a plural. i.e.
there is more than one 'standard' (sic) mixdown set of ratios. The problem
then is to ensure the *chosen* standard for given material is communicated
and used for a mixdown. Otherwise the
Yes, understood about the DVB-T2. I tend to get the stream with a USB
'dongle' RX then play with VLC, and one of the things I wonder about is how
it is mixing down to stereo.[1] I recall some years ago some Proms where
the mode transmitted kept changing during the concert and hopped about
between
In article <57d50a493f...@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim web
> Can't pin the date down exactly, but around the start of July the rate
> dropped from 320 to 128. I'll try asking, but any reply depends on a
> 'pass the parcel' at the BBC, so no idea when I'll get a response or how
> helpfu
In article <20190719102617.gb20...@bytemark.barnyard.co.uk>,
David Cantrell wrote:
> If that was a problem for me I'd schedule it to update automatically at
> oh dark thirty in the morning when I was asleep and didn't care how long
> it took.
One of the reasons I use GIP is to fetch items
In article , Budge
wrote:
> Just noticed this after pid when getting Men of Rock... No idea what it
> means or why it is there. Is it because I have signed up for iPlayer
> and my address is known or something more sinister? Budge
I've never 'signed up' and also have seen some examples of the
In article <8840651f-35f4-eb50-baf1-c8deab5f9...@jls-radio.com>,
James Scholes wrote:
> On 17/07/2019 at 6:11 pm, MacFH - C E Macfarlane wrote:
> > checking back I find that everything I've downloaded in almost-HD
> > since 1/1/2019 is at 128kbps audio or less
> Which is exactly what I was
On 17 Jul, w...@audiomisc.co.uk wrote:
> I hadn't noticed a change as none of it recently has been music, but I
> will now also check what I've been fetching recently.
Can't pin the date down exactly, but around the start of July the rate
dropped from 320 to 128. I'll try asking, but any reply
In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane wrote:
> Unless anyone has anything more definite, such as a statement from the
> BBC, that suggests to me "cock-up" rather than "change of policy".
> Perhaps someone in a position to do so so may care to contact the BBC to
> enquire/complain. An obvious
In article <9e149f35-ac18-8321-525a-5fb0a4bec...@gmail.com>, Nick Payne
wrote:
> But I still think the command line is easier:
FWIW for some items - gip and ffmpeg being the main examples - I prefer to
fetch and make/put them in my 'user' space, not as system installs. Makes
it easier for me to
In article , Nick Payne
wrote:
> Using the PPA and apt will only install the needed dependencies. You're
> far more likely to be "spraying things you don't actually need into your
> install" by trying to do it manually. And apt will give you an exact
> list of the additional packages that need to
In article <57c692e511...@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim web
wrote:
> Well, simply following the first advice and adding the libxml2-dev
> package (the non -dev already being present) didn't work. So I'm trying
> to establish which packages I *do* need (or not). Partly so I
> understan
In article , Alan C.
Foster wrote:
> > Install the PPA from here
> >
> >
> > https://launchpad.net/~jon-hedgerows/+archive/ubuntu/get-iplayer
> >
> > I've been doing that in Linux Mint for years. It gets updated
> > automatically by the Mint update manager when appropriate.
> Jim,
> Why don't
Following up one of my own emails. I've looked at
https://github.com/get-iplayer/get_iplayer/wiki/unix
and that says:
"For example, to install the packages for get_iplayer in Debian 9+/Ubuntu
18.04+/Mint 19+:
apt install libwww-perl liblwp-protocol-https-perl libmojolicious-perl
In article <20190619103730.gb28...@bytemark.barnyard.co.uk>, David
Cantrell wrote:
> libxml2 is a C library that the perl code wants to use. libxml2-dev is
> the headers for that C library so that the perl code knows how to link
> it.
> You'll need both of those in addition to the perl code.
In article , MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane wrote:
> AFAICR, LibXML is a dependency of XML::Simple, and, as you suggest, on
> Ubuntu systems you install a module using apt-get. I setup and
> configure Ubuntu using a bash script, and its module list contains
> libxml2 and libxml2-dev, so most probably
In article <1891565781.18066301.1553583068...@mail.yahoo.com>, S Byers
wrote:
> Re: top and tail adverts.
> Surely advertising is against the BBC Charter - in tne UK anyway.
As Mark has said, it tends to 'promote' "BBC Sounds" and/or give some
"extended stuff" from the main programme. Usually
In article , RS
wrote:
> Why do you need to use get_iplayer? Click the link in your email.
> Click the link to the episode you want to download. Click Download.
> Select Higher quality or Lower quality. Choose where to download it.
> If you really want to use get_iplayer
> get_iplayer --pid
In article <20190317163236.7034d...@roadkill.i.lucanops.net>, Nick
wrote:
> The audio is a total of 67.2MB, if you're still stuck shall I just email
> the files to you?
Not email, please! 8-]
I'd be grateful if you could let me have the 'sound radio' files via the
'drag and drop' form on this
In article ,
Jeremy
Nicoll - ml gip wrote:
> On 2019-03-17 14:08, Jim web wrote:
> > FWIW I did try looking at the source code for one of the BBC pages
> > involved here. But couldn't see any sign of a pattern that I
> > recognised as an actual pid. :-/
> For a piece
In article <33f7505c-e4f8-c368-82a6-3195f34b0...@macfh.co.uk>, MacFH - C
E
Macfarlane wrote:
[snip]
> FTR, in case it may be helpful in spotting a pattern, it was ...
> perl C:\Programs\GetIPlayer\get_iplayer.pl --pid p06ks6fd
> ... that worked.
> Undeniably a tedious chore, but
In article <20190316150052.5a6da...@roadkill.i.lucanops.net>,
wrote:
> $ get_iplayer.294 http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/steamtrains/7318.shtml
I've tried the above via calling gip followed by the url of the relevant
page (i.e. just changing the number before the ".shtml" to suit).
On two
In article <20f5b421-e006-d0dd-78f9-7c8f66c06...@zoho.com>, RS
wrote:
> On 16/03/2019 16:51, Jim web wrote:
> >
> > I do have some ancient versions of gip on one machine here. So I'll
> > experiment. Question of "how old", etc, I guess. From the above I
In article <5c8d479f.30849.24093...@peter.kirk.isauk.biz>, Peter S Kirk
wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2019 at 12:42, Jim web Jim web wrote:
> > (Prompted by some Tv programmes on 'Hornby' :-) )
> James May?
> Hornby scrapping all the old dies had me ranting, they should have
&g
In article <20190316150052.5a6da...@roadkill.i.lucanops.net>,
wrote:
> I'm not an expert, but what you said made me try something:
> $ get_iplayer.294 http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/steamtrains/7318.shtml
> ... INFO: Trying pid:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/steamtrains/7318.shtml using type:
1 - 100 of 317 matches
Mail list logo
