Hi,
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been sitting on a backend patch for probably most of
the year, that greatly improves the quality of positional/fixed
dither -- against GIMP 2.0.x. I was hoping to find time to get
a GIMP 2.1.x build working and forward-port the patch, but that
Alan Horkan wrote:
Some people have difficulty dealing with the connotations of the term The
GIMP. I wont go into details again about why some people have issues
with the name, some even finding it offensive.
I still find it baffling that people would get upset about something
so lighthearted
Hi Alan,
I don't think it is a good idea to change the project name.
So you kind of answered to yourself...
It is a good sign that the gimp has improved so much that people are only
left with the name to complain about :)
I don't complain about the name.
I think it would be a fair
Ah, it's worse than I remembered, since the
patch is actually against GIMP 1.2! But I'm
compiling up GIMP 2.0.x now and so hope to have time to
port this to 2.0 today, and from there hopefully it's
only a short hop to 2.1.x (but I can't test that).
--Adam
hi,
lets schedule the changing of the name TheGIMP to Boondoggle right after
it is announced that you can change the name of photoshop to something
less hyped and media driven also.
carol
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have to ask why reject such patches?
Because IMO the name is important. If we allow the name to be changed
easily, our users will not any longer know what software they are
using. Contributors will be lost because they will look for the Foo
project
i have a question for you; you don't need to answer it to anyone but
yourself. what does the word gimp mean to you and where ever could you
have come up with this meaning?
when i hear the word gimp, i get a chuckle from a media image that some
pack of film geniuses inbedded into our collective
Adam D. Moss wrote:
Ah, it's worse than I remembered, since the
patch is actually against GIMP 1.2! But I'm
compiling up GIMP 2.0.x now and so hope to have time to
port this to 2.0 today, and from there hopefully it's
only a short hop to 2.1.x (but I can't test that).
Why can't you test 2.1 (or
Hi,
Joseph Heled [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note/Disclaimer: I am *not* suggesting adding this feature into
gimp. And please don't tell me I am doing something wrong or stupid
or degrading gimp in any way or form.
I like many of the splash screens submitted, so I select a random one
at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-12-12 at 1719.26 +0100):
If a project as big as Mozilla Firefox allows it name to be changed, why
would it be an issue for the gimp?
There was another project called Firebird, so there was a good reason
to change it.
I think Firefox option was from one point of view,
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Why can't you test 2.1 (or 2.2pre, rather)?
I thought GIMP 2.2 required GTK = 2.4.
On a decent distro
I'm not on a decent distro. :)
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss . ,,^^ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foxbox.org/ co:3
___
He all GIMP developers out there,
I'm new to this list and therefore lets introduce myself first. As a
Software developer I'm working for about 2 years now with Java/C/C++ and
other languages like XML/XSLT. My expirence with C/C++ is about medium and
I know a little about Linux/UNIX
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:05:46 +0100
Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have to ask why reject such patches?
Because IMO the name is important. If we allow the name to be
changed easily, our users will not any longer know what
Hi,
Adam D. Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Submitted as bug 161113. I've given it the usual selection
of tests and I'm confident that it doesn't introduce any major
bugs...
It's in CVS now.
I'll see if I can move my tree to 2.2pre tonight, though I
suspect that the patch in that bug
The word itself is inappropriate for software if you're trying
to feed it to the unwashed masses. I said this when GIMP was chosen as
a name back when it moved from Motif to GTK
A correction...
GIMP was called GIMP long before the move from Motif to GTK.
The first public release (0.53 IIRC) was
Hi,
Michael J. Hammel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote:
I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being
used. And I am all happy to ignore the very few people who are so
narrow-minded as to having a problem with the name.
Note/Disclaimer: I am *not* suggesting adding this feature into gimp. And
please don't tell me I am doing something wrong or stupid or degrading gimp in
any way or form.
I like many of the splash screens submitted, so I select a random one at
startup. If you wish to do the same,
- create a
Would it be too much of a compromise to just drop the P at the end?
GNU Image Manipulator
instead of
GNU Image Manipulation Program
?
Of course I would suggest planning and waiting until a major version change to
change it.
_-T
Sven Neumann wrote:
Please do file your bug report as soon as possible. We might even
still sneak it into 2.2 if you are confident that your changes don't
introduce any major bugs.
Submitted as bug 161113. I've given it the usual selection
of tests and I'm confident that it doesn't introduce any
Hi,
Henry Roeland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He all GIMP developers out there,
I'm new to this list and therefore lets introduce myself first. As a
Software developer I'm working for about 2 years now with Java/C/C++
and other languages like XML/XSLT. My expirence with C/C++ is about
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 11:05, Sven Neumann wrote:
I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being
used. And I am all happy to ignore the very few people who are so
narrow-minded as to having a problem with the name.
While I agree with most of what you've said in response
Hi and welcome!
There are people in better position to answer you on this!
But I am just quite happy to see a mail like this - I myself just go
around proposing weird features, and eventually finding and fixing a
minor bug. Lots of fun, either way.
So...bugzilla is the way to deliver bug
22 matches
Mail list logo