I see the Van Gogh filter is still in gimp, even in the last git and i fear to
see it even in next 2.8
I think nobody use it, also because would be close to the impossible do
something definite with it:
not only is not clear for what is for, but even after reading its help page,
remain
I think that You are wrong. Did You asked to all GIMP users before saying that
something is not useful and nobody uses it?
I haven't been asked. Please, don't say that nobody uses it, because You don't
know it. Also, It could be filters (scripts) that uses this filter, and They
would be
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 14:30 +0100, Ofnuts wrote:
[...]
Consider the amateur photographer and Gimp
beginner who wants to add some sharpening of a picture. What filter to
use? Sharpen? Unsharp mask? NL? Why does Gimp offers the three? What are
the differences? That's a bit of a culture
On 11/14/2010 04:53 PM, Liam R E Quin wrote:
Consider the amateur photographer and Gimp
beginner who wants to add some sharpening of a picture. What filter to
use? Sharpen? Unsharp mask? NL? Why does Gimp offers the three? What are
the differences? That's a bit of a culture shock when one
On 11/15/10 19:01, Ofnuts wrote:
There was a project gathering usage statistics on an earlier version
of Gimp, maybe they have some data on that?
Or make the filers crash when used and see if anyone complains:-) :-)
I did that a long time ago to clean up a disk full of obsolete
On 11/15/2010 07:53 PM, g...@catking.net wrote:
On 11/15/10 19:01, Ofnuts wrote:
There was a project gathering usage statistics on an earlier version
of Gimp, maybe they have some data on that?
Or make the filers crash when used and see if anyone complains:-)
:-)
I did that a long
Hi all,
On 13.11.2010 18:13, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 11/13/2010 05:48 PM, photocomix wrote:
The never used van gogh filter is in gimp from 1996 and survived all debates
and clean up till now
You can't know for sure that no one uses this plug-in in some script
somewhere, and if we don't
On 14.11.2010 01:21, Bill Skaggs wrote:
Here is a better reason, maybe. It is a good thing if people can learn
to use Gimp by experimenting. When features are included for which
experimenting leads only to confusion, and never to anything useful,
users are discouraged from experimenting.
On 11/14/2010 11:44 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
On 14.11.2010 01:21, Bill Skaggs wrote:
Here is a better reason, maybe. It is a good thing if people can learn
to use Gimp by experimenting. When features are included for which
experimenting leads only to confusion, and never to
If something
helps us fulfil our product vision, we will keep it in GIMP 3.0. If it
doesn't, we will remove it. This particularly applies to things that are
part of our plug-in API (like other plug-ins and libgimp* APIs) that we
can't remove after GIMP 3.0 has been released.
/ Martin
--
The only thing that matters when it comes to deciding what to include
and what not to include in GIMP is our product vision. If something
helps us fulfil our product vision, we will keep it in GIMP 3.0. If it
doesn't, we will remove it. / Martin
that for what doesn't fit in the GIMP
On 11/13/2010 05:48 PM, photocomix wrote:
The only thing that matters when it comes to deciding what to include
and what not to include in GIMP is our product vision. If something
helps us fulfil our product vision, we will keep it in GIMP 3.0. If it
doesn't, we will remove it. / Martin
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
You can't know for sure that no one uses this plug-in in some script
somewhere, and if we don't have a good reason to break our plug-in API,
we don't do it. Impatience is not a good reason :)
Here is a better reason,
On 11/14/2010 01:21 AM, Bill Skaggs wrote:
In my opinion, there are two plug-ins that have this property: the
Van Gogh filter (which
has absolutely nothing to do with Van Gogh), and the so-called NL
Filter.
The NL filter is a different matter. The human factors are abysmal. It
should be
On 11/12/2010 09:21 AM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
What are the requirements for good enough to be included in GIMP 3.0?
The only thing that matters when it comes to deciding what to include
and what not to include in GIMP is our product vision. If something
helps us fulfil our product vision,
I see the Van Gogh filter is still in gimp, even in the last git and i fear to
see it even in next 2.8
I think nobody use it, also because would be close to the impossible do
something definite with it:
not only is not clear for what is for, but even after reading its help page,
remain
On 11/12/2010 01:59 AM, photocomix wrote:
I see the Van Gogh filter is still in gimp, even in the last git and i fear
to see it even in next 2.8
I think nobody use it, also because would be close to the impossible do
something definite with it:
not only is not clear for what is for, but
17 matches
Mail list logo
