On 22 May 2001 02:09:00 +0200, Branko Collin wrote:
On 21 May 2001, at 17:47, Raphael Quinet wrote:
So in parallel with the discussion about the distribution of plug-ins,
there should be a discussion about how to organize the menus. One
idea that was proposed on this list some time ago
Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And these menus are the most annoying things ever to use. Since it makes
using them really slow, because every time when the menu is adjusted
and new things get hidden or shown, the positions of the menu items
change, and thus Gaussian blur is not
On 23 May 2001 00:43:56 +0200, Christoph Rauch wrote:
We might. But not today. The discussion could go into technical stuff
like how do we do this in php or something.
The more important problem now is: Who is helping out? Who does the
graphics, who the code? Where can we put the stuff?
On 23 May 2001 19:38:48 +0200, Christoph Rauch wrote:
Raphael Quinet schrieb:
That's pretty poor. Why would I want to update my bookmarks?
You need not. gimp.org will happily redirect you to the page you wanted.
Hmmm... This is better than nothing, but if would be nice if there
Tuomas Kuosmanen schrieb:
For the deeper nested pages like http://www.gimp.org/the_gimp_system_reqs.html
which are not as often linked I would recommend a redirect.
We should have those most-often-needed pages there, as they are not
going to collide with the new structure (I prefer
Simon Budig wrote:
Because the benefit from commenting a (well written) tutorial is probably
not worth the additional effort to implement the commenting functionality -
aside from discussions about the right system (Squishdot, Slashcode etc.pp.).
It is hard enough to agree on a system for
On 25 May 2001 10:29:43 -0400, Carol Spears wrote:
I hate when I have to wait for a lot of crap to load when I need help
NOW(!) because someone thought it important for me to know he liked the
tutorial. I prefer to assume that the people who are running the site
already knew that it was a
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
At 20:27 25.05.01 +0200, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-25 at 2113.57 +0300):
[...]
Maybe there should be a separate gimp site for the windows users. The
windows users are so different than the linux users. They don't mind
They are? The gimp is just
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 04:46:21PM +0800, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:28:57AM +0300, Ville Pätsi wrote:
Uhm. Funny enough, right now there is a big discussion in
gnome-webmaster list about wml.
It's not just on gnome-webmaster -- it's raging across a number of
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:50:05AM -0400, Michael Spunt wrote:
I've hacked some lines right now, maybe you (and others) would like to
see it. Unfortunately, my f2s MySQL won't be available until 9:30am GMT,
so I had to test it at home. Anyway, these are the URLs:
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Ingo Luetkebohle wrote:
Tuomas Kuosmanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway. like Christoph said, the all most important thing is to
get the people to do it.
I volunteer to work on the development side.
As for the technical side, I leave that up
Hi folks.
Let me start with a joke.
How do you recognize a Canadian in a crowd?
You step on his foot and he says Oh, I'm sorry...
We're not all _that_ conciliatory, but there is something to the stereotype.
There has been a _lot_ of talk about doing a new website at
www.gimp.org
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 02:11:54PM +0530, Chetan Dhavse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using Gimp 1.1.4(I find this version more stable)
same here.. gimp-1.2 has big stability and memory problems when it
encounters lots of images in succession.
The problem is the programs just hangs after
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Rick Ross wrote:
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
This is not the correct way to subscribe to the mailing-list. To do so,
access the URL:
15 matches
Mail list logo
