Tuomas Kuosmanen schrieb:
> > For the deeper nested pages like http://www.gimp.org/the_gimp_system_reqs.html
> > which are not as often linked I would recommend a redirect.
> We should have those most-often-needed pages there, as they are not
> going to collide with the new structure (I prefer directories too, makes
> stuff more simple to maintain) - The pages would just contain a template
> to "this page is moved to [insert new url here]", once there are no hits
> to them in the logs anymore, we can remove them.
I changed my mind. Why should we remove them? We should integrate all the current
links to fit to the new structure. Speak of: 2 links, one page.
I dont think that this would be too hard to create such a system.
> And I think the best fallback thing to do is to have the "404 Document
> not found" -page be a site map:
This would be a huge improvement. But then... everythings better than a plain 404.
:-))
Christoph
--
http://home.bn-paf.de/smokey/
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
