Hi,
Nathan Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2.3 is a development version with no API guarantees whatsoever. The
>> API is constantly changing and noone should be developing any
>> plug-ins for it.
>
> If you have such a closed Gimp Club attitude, why make developer
> releases at all? After
On 8/26/05, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> 1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
> >
> > 2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I suppose. And also,
> > change the list of links of types to a dro
Hi,
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whoever wants to give it a try, the ChangeLogs will be a useful
> resource. At the moment, almost everyone is listed as "author". If
> in doubt, just keep it that way.
Perhaps I should add that I don't expect a lot of changes at all.
There are proba
Hi,
michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wasn't sure if I should attempt the task or not, and was kinda
> hoping someone else would take the task (because I'm fiddling with
> some other things in POV-Ray and Perl, among other things). But I
> believe I could attempt this, if you can poi
On 8/26/05, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gimp/authors.xml?view=markup
> > >
> > > I am now looking for a volunteer to go over authors.xml and check
> > > what roles a
On 8/26/05, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gimp/authors.xml?view=markup
> >
> > I am now looking for a volunteer to go over authors.xml and check
> > what roles apply to the people listed there. Perhap
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gimp/authors.xml?view=markup
> >
> > I am now looking for a volunteer to go over authors.xml and check
> > what roles apply to the people listed there. Perhaps also check that
> > no
Hi,
Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gimp/authors.xml?view=markup
>
> I am now looking for a volunteer to go over authors.xml and check
> what roles apply to the people listed there. Perhaps also check that
> noone important is missing (last time we did tha
Hi,
michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
>
> 2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I suppose. And also,
> change the list of links of types to a drop down box, maybe? (Dunno.)
2.3 is a development version with no A
On 8/26/05, Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As promised on IRC, my suggestions for the registry. Originally sent to
> the maintainer of the registry.
Sounds awesome.
> 1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I
As promised on IRC, my suggestions for the registry. Originally sent to
the maintainer of the registry.
Original Message
Subject: Some suggestions for the plug-in registry
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:13:58 +0200
From: Michael Schumacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I'd like to propos
11 matches
Mail list logo
