jEsuSdA wrote:
My question is why and when Gimp will include LAYER GROUPS or FOLDERS
(more useful)?
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86337 for the current situation.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Alpár Jüttner wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 20:52 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 12:47 -0700, Federico Alcantara wrote:
Hi
I am interested in knowning if Gimp is written in
C/C++, and which tools are needed to compile, debug,
and test it?
What about downloading it and
Akkana Peck wrote:
Maybe that's the intent -- to set up a gauntlet that weeds out any
potential participants who might be lazy or thin skinned. If so, no
problem. But if you actually want lots of new participants, then how
other people perceive the project matters.
I don't think more
Michael Schumacher wrote:
We do have a list etiquette at http://www.gimp.org/mail_lists.html. I'd like
to suggest that it is moved above the mailing lists, maybe it will be read
more often then.
I recently submitted a patch to the gimp-web list addressing this page. I added
a link to the
Sven Neumann wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier if you could quickly zoom in (and back out again
to the previous zoom level) without having to open a new view for this?
In the SVN version you can already revert to previous zoom level. What's
the point of doing this in a separate window?
Sorry for
deep links to the binaries from the website.
If anyone has any issues with this proposal please raise them here. If I don't
get any replies to this post I'll presume there are no objections. :)
Regards,
David Marrs
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp
Sven Neumann wrote:
In my opinion we should stick to this rule. It would make a lot of sense
to make it easier for the user to locate our recommendations for binary
packages. If user agent detection helps to remove one or two clicks,
then I am fine with that. But if there's a download button
Nancy Parsons wrote:
Essentially, we want to be able to provide our users a free basic image
manipulation application that does what they need it to do, without
overwhelming them with additional functionality of GIMP.
Are we talking quite a specific application here like crop and resize
peter sikking wrote:
We do imagine that a set of website graphics pieces gets _produced_
on a single canvas, and when everything works well together
graphically, with a single 'cutting mask' all pieces are cut out
and saved in the right web format, in a single action.
I don't see how this
peter sikking wrote:
can you tell me what you mean with manual work needs to be done?
that can help us with our work.
Well the most common case is simply selecting a slither of an area to be tiled
as a background image. Sometimes you have to hide a foreground layer before
making the
Akkana Peck wrote:
I might have misunderstood this step (I definitely don't follow the
comment about PS not letting you edit -- maybe that's a PS issue)
but it sounds like if you did a Paste as New in gimp, you wouldn't
need to create a new canvas or figure out any dimensions.
Oh yeah. Thanks
peter sikking wrote:
interesting to see Compare compressed images against original, would
it be enough to see the compressed one and balance that against the size
and what your customer expects?
I usually do comparisons when I'm trying to get the best image quality out of
jpegs. There seems to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither is chosing the appropriate format specific the web so save
for the web concept is misleading. It should be select best
compression format or so.
I have no argument with this. If we can do away with a separate dialogue
altogether, so much the better.
It
peter sikking wrote:
interesting to see Compare compressed images against original, would
it be enough to see the compressed one and balance that against the size
and what your customer expects?
As an experiment at work I decided to work on just the one image when saving
for web and found
Clicking inside the cropped region also implements the action. It's actually a
feature I'm not sure I like because it deviates from the rectangle tool's
implementation of the same action - to hide the handles. Well, I don't know if
that's what the implementation is technically but that's what
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Von: David Marrs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clicking inside the cropped region also implements the action. It's
actually a feature I'm not sure I like because it deviates from the
rectangle tool's implementation of the same action - to hide the handles.
Well, I don't know
Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
Am i thinking in a way that could possibly be implemented? or is the
word extensible remotely applicable to my idea?
So what you're talking about here is a graphical interface to the API that a
user can use to build his own extensions? Essentially, it's a graphical
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
I understand. It's clear that everyone's preference may vary on this
subject:
-Photoshop users will ask for floating windows nested in a container window.
They ask for an MDI structure because that's what they know, but I suspect
they'll be happy with any
Rob Antonishen wrote:
I think that all of the channel use cases should be examined before
deciding how these should act.
My own experience with channels is limited to:
1) Image decomposition for masking/converting to greyscale
2) Saved selections
...
Sven mentioned other uses, like spot
gimp-developer-boun...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi all !
This is a long post, replying to many previous posts, and adding some parts
from IRC chats, and some even from discussions with Gimp developers.
...
I have a degree of sympathy with this post although it seems to go to
the
Alexandre wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:13 AM, David Marrs wrote:
As for customisability? I think that it's probably underestimated. Take
the example of me spending half an hour or more on google this evening
trying to work out how to enable menu tear-offs in Gnome. As far as I
can
gimp-developer-boun...@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu wrote:
Therefore I'd still
consider the non-destructive crop feature at least a usability
enhancement. At least personally I would assume that the crop tool of a
professional tool like Gimp would offer this option as well. (Not sure
whether PS
22 matches
Mail list logo
