Robert L Krawitz wrote:
If whoever's maintaining the OS X port of the GIMP is reading this,
it's apparently missing a Print plugin.
By: Mark Townsend - marktownsend
Printing from GIMP, OSX
2004-09-26 09:13
I just hope that the answer to this one is not so obvuous that I will be embarassed.
I hav
If whoever's maintaining the OS X port of the GIMP is reading this,
it's apparently missing a Print plugin.
By: Mark Townsend - marktownsend
Printing from GIMP, OSX
2004-09-26 09:13
I just hope that the answer to this one is not so obvuous that I will be embarassed.
I have been using GIMP Print
Daniel Egger wrote:
On Feb 25, 2004, at 11:27 pm, Daniel Rogers wrote:
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=41943040
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmin=1
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmni=320
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmseg=80
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmall=10240
DUH! How could I possibly forget about sysctl. That doesn't
seem t
On Feb 26, 2004, at 5:38 pm, Daniel Rogers wrote:
Who knows? Who cares? but you do need to edit /etc/rc to see any
effect.
Thanks for the explanation. I did just what you told me and
retested, but it doesn't have any positive impact on the
slowness.
Servus,
Daniel
PGP.sig
Description: T
On Feb 25, 2004, at 11:27 pm, Daniel Rogers wrote:
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=41943040
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmin=1
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmni=320
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmseg=80
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmall=10240
DUH! How could I possibly forget about sysctl. That doesn't
seem to work though:
lucy:~
On Feb 25, 2004, at 2:12 PM, Daniel Egger wrote:
On Feb 25, 2004, at 10:11 am, Sven Neumann wrote:
Did you increase the shared memory limit? I am not sure what happens
if it the X server hits the limit but I guess it just silently stops
allocating more shared memory.
Err, I know somewhat how to m
On Feb 25, 2004, at 10:11 am, Sven Neumann wrote:
Did you increase the shared memory limit? I am not sure what happens
if it the X server hits the limit but I guess it just silently stops
allocating more shared memory.
Err, I know somewhat how to mess with POSIX SHM in applications but
how can I c
Hi,
Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Feb 11, 2004, at 10:51 pm, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
>
> > IIRC, didn't early versions of OS X have truly pitiful amounts of
> > shared memory available? Perhaps that is the reason.
>
> So now I recompiled GTK 2.2.4 with SHM and I cannot sense
On Feb 11, 2004, at 10:51 pm, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
IIRC, didn't early versions of OS X have truly pitiful amounts of
shared
memory available? Perhaps that is the reason.
So now I recompiled GTK 2.2.4 with SHM and I cannot sense any
difference in behaviour. However scrolling in gnumeric is
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2004, at 4:06 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> > Daniel recently posted a list of X extensions supported by the Apple
> > X11 server. The MIT-SHM extension was part of this list but today I
> > found that at least in darwinports gtk2 is compiled with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 11, 2004, at 4:06 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Daniel recently posted a list of X extensions supported by the Apple
X11 server. The MIT-SHM extension was part of this list but today I
found that at least in darwinports gtk2 is compiled with the
--dis
Hi,
Daniel recently posted a list of X extensions supported by the Apple
X11 server. The MIT-SHM extension was part of this list but today I
found that at least in darwinports gtk2 is compiled with the
--disable-shm configure option. Does anyone know if fink does this as
well? Is there a particula
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 05:43:00PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
> Meanwhile I've profiled gnumeric while waiting for the scrollwheel
> action to catch up and indeed it seems that the scrolling causes a lot
> of activity both in GTK and the X server with the activity in the X
> server being mostly bli
Hi,
Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I still prefer a decent packagemanagement like the one that
> comes with Debian
Well, darwinports is a decent package management system just like BSD
ports. And from my experience it works better than fink. This is also
what everyone else who tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 6, 2004, at 5:12 pm, Tim Mooney wrote:
I haven't played with OS X enough to know, but does its X server
support
the Render extension? If not, that's probably why GTK+ 2 is slower.
number of extensions:28
Apple-DRI
Apple-WM
BIG-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 6, 2004, at 4:32 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Checking out a cvs repository and typing "configure; make; make
install" doesn't sound too complicated to me.
It is, especially when it doesn't work out-of-the-box.
Also this is equivalently complicated t
In regard to: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp on OS X, Daniel Egger said (at...:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>On Feb 5, 2004, at 10:35 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )>
>wrote:
>
>> It helps to a) avoid antialiasing (small effe
Hi,
Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You will need Darwinports (http://darwinports.opendarwin.org/) but
> > IMO darwinports is an improvement over fink. Of course your
> > mileage may vary.
>
> Too complicated to install, at least I did and since I already had
> fink I didn't care en
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 5, 2004, at 9:26 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
You will need Darwinports (http://darwinports.opendarwin.org/) but IMO
darwinports is an improvement over fink. Of course your mileage may
vary.
Too complicated to install, at least I did and since I alr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 5, 2004, at 10:35 pm, <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )>
wrote:
It helps to a) avoid antialiasing (small effect) b) use x fonts (big
effect).
Thanks for this tip. I'll try installing some high quality X fonts
(which is sort of an Oxymo
Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann )> writes:
> > BTW: In OSX gtk 2 has really sucky rendering performance compared
> > to gtk 1.
>
> The same is true for gtk+ on other X11 platforms (but it's usually
> bearable, but very noticable). The biggest offender is font drawing:
> Xft is a rat
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 06:10:35PM +0100, Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW: In OSX gtk 2 has really sucky rendering performance compared
> to gtk 1.
The same is true for gtk+ on other X11 platforms (but it's usually
bearable, but very noticable). The biggest offender is font drawing:
Hi,
Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Feb 5, 2004, at 7:39 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
>
> > Installing gimp2 should be about as easy nowadays.
>
> Nothing beats:
> fink install gimp
Well, this beats it:
port install gimp2
You will need Darwinports (http://darwinports.opendarwin.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 5, 2004, at 7:39 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
FWIW I'm using GIMP 1.2 under OS X and suspect that there might be
a few freaks who do so, too simply because it's easily to install
if there's fink on the machine.
Installing gimp2 should be about as ea
Hi,
Daniel Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FWIW I'm using GIMP 1.2 under OS X and suspect that there might be
> a few freaks who do so, too simply because it's easily to install
> if there's fink on the machine.
Installing gimp2 should be about as easy nowadays.
> BTW: In OSX gtk 2 has real
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 5, 2004, at 5:20 pm, Sven Neumann wrote:
Are there any numbers you can base this statement on? I don't think
this assumption is correct. Not that it would matter much but I doubt
there are more Win32 GIMP users than Linux GIMP users. I'd also li
26 matches
Mail list logo
