Andrei Simion wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I managed to start X:
>
> Xvfb :1.0 -screen 0 10x10x16
>
> So, the display is 1.
>
> Now, I start the Gimp server:
>
> gimp --display 1 --no-interface --batch \('extension-perl-server 0 0 0'\)
>
> and I get this error:
>
> Invalid option "--display"
>
> I tried
Hi,
Andrei Simion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I haven't done that was because there was no X server
> instaled and I presume the user installation can be done only by
> starting Gimp in the graphical interface, am I wright?
A patch to change that would be very much appreciated. But
On Tue, 31 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:48:58 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp server startup [OT]
>
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 17:24:01, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
> > This is inten
> Von: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 17:24:01, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> >
> > > This is intentional - google for "reply to considered harmful".
> >
> > This might have been of concern years ago, before people were u
Here, in a nutshell, are the two sides of the argument:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 03:22:03PM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> It is better to accidentally mail only one person and need to resend to
> the list than it is to accidentally send mail to many people.
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 04:54:31PM +0200,
Irek Słonina wrote:
Andrei Simion wrote:
Hi again,
I managed to start X:
Xvfb :1.0 -screen 0 10x10x16
So, the display is 1.
Now, I start the Gimp server:
gimp --display 1 --no-interface --batch \('extension-perl-server 0 0 0'\)
and I get this error:
Invalid option "--display"
I tried d
Hi,
Andrei Simion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I managed to start X:
>
> Xvfb :1.0 -screen 0 10x10x16
>
> So, the display is 1.
>
> Now, I start the Gimp server:
>
> gimp --display 1 --no-interface
You cannot combine --display and --no-interface. If you don't want any
user interface, then you d
Hi,
Kevin Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It seems this fucntionality exists in other programs but not in the
>> GIMP - i.e.: the ability to apply a palette to an already indexed
>> image, keeping the color numbers.
>>
>> This is easily doable in script, but it could also be done in the
>>
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:05:12AM -0400, Giles wrote:
>
> P.S. "Who the hell is 'Giles?'" I'm lurking with the intention of asking
> for some weird help once I've made sure I'm not going to sound too stupid.
> Suspenseful, isn't it?
>
with me on this list, you will never look too stupid. ask a
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Andrei Simion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I managed to start X:
Xvfb :1.0 -screen 0 10x10x16
So, the display is 1.
Now, I start the Gimp server:
gimp --display 1 --no-interface
You cannot combine --display and --no-interface. If you don't want any
user interfac
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 00:03, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> >It seems this fucntionality exists in other programs but not in
> > the GIMP - i.e.: the ability to apply a palette to an already
> > indexed image, keeping the color numbers.
> >
> >This is easily doable i
Hi,
Andrei Simion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What about setting the DISPLAY environment variable for the perl
>> server (if it really needs a display) ?
>
> You mean a DISPLAY variable in each script?
No, I mean setting DISPLAY in the environment you start GIMP and the
perl-server from.
> W
Andrei Simion wrote:
I managed to start X:
Xvfb :1.0 -screen 0 10x10x16
So, the display is 1.
Now, I start the Gimp server:
gimp --display 1 --no-interface --batch \('extension-perl-server 0 0 0'\)
If the above is all you have done, you have not done what Sven told you
to do. After startin
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2005-06-01 at 1522.03 +0100):
> > > This is intentional - google for "reply to considered harmful".
> > This might have been of concern years ago, before people were used to
> > mailing lists which do set the Reply-to header. Nowadays, I'd say that the
> > opposite is true, s
When implemented correctly, the options of
* reply and
* reply-all
offer a choice between
* sending to the originator and
* sending to the group.
It seems to be implemented correctly to me.
_-T
___
Get Juno Platinum for as low
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 11:47 am, GSR - FR wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2005-06-01 at 1522.03 +0100):
> > > > This is intentional - google for "reply to considered harmful".
> > >
> > > This might have been of concern years ago, before people were used to
> > > mailing lists which do set t
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Andrei Simion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What about setting the DISPLAY environment variable for the perl
server (if it really needs a display) ?
You mean a DISPLAY variable in each script?
No, I mean setting DISPLAY in the environment you start GIMP and the
per
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
Anyway - the person needing this right now is on win32 - Will this
script work in script-fu?
It should work but you will need to change the filename to end in .scm
and change all occurances of 'tiny-fu' in the script to 'script-fu'
(preserving case). You
18 matches
Mail list logo
