> > we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4.
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283
>
> Might you perhaps find time to finish this task anytime soon?
I have submitted a patch which hopefully will be close to what you are
expecting.
"It is amazing
Hi,
> we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4.
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283
Might you perhaps find time to finish this task anytime soon?
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berke
I feel bad for not updating this project but I have been experiencing
difficulty getting my CVS to compile owing to some glib-2.0 problems (I
have version 2.10.3 but for some reason 'configure' fails to recognize
this and the test program fails to compile if I use the
--disable-glibtest switch). I
I feel bad for not updating this project but I have been experiencing
difficulty getting my CVS to compile owing to some glib-2.0 problems (I
have version 2.10.3 but for some reason 'configure' fails to recognize
this and the test program fails to compile if I use the
--disable-glibtest switch). I
I feel bad for not updating this project but I have been experiencing
difficulty getting my CVS to compile owing to some glib-2.0 problems (I
have version 2.10.3 but for some reason 'configure' fails to recognize
this and the test program fails to compile if I use the
--disable-glibtest switch). I
Hi,
we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283
Come on, guys, this is almost done. Someone just needs to pick up the
patch from Saulgoode
(http://flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com/GIMP/Bugzilla/patch-script-fu-new-blurbs)
and port jus
Hi,
I'm talking about http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283
There hasn't been any further progress on this, we are still waiting for
a patch that can be applied to CVS. This is really getting urgent now
since we want to go into string freeze soon.
This thread has pointers to patches a
Hi,
I have opened a bug-report for this and I would like to point out that
we should not wait too much longer with this. We should give the
translators enough time to deal with the new strings.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283
Sven
_
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Even if I didn't completely screw it up, I imagine there will be some
> discussion. I have many doubts about my wording myself. Some issues as
> I see them:
> 2. In a couple of places I employed the term "selection frame" in
> order to differentiate
My apologies for my preceding post which merely quoted Michael
Natterer; I was using a new mail editor and it apparently expects me
to only TAB between header fields.
Quoting Michael Natterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Unfortunatel not. You apparently diffed between modified scripts from
2.3 and
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 01:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and
> > marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status
> > bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't
Quoting Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and
marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status
bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't happened for Script-Fu yet, even
though the script procedure blurbs are s
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 11:59 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> The switch over to Tiny-Fu will result in a certain amount of
> incompatibilities anyway so it might be a good time to reconsider.
We are most likely not going to do the switch to Tiny-Fu until those
incompatibilities have been sorted o
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:16:33 +0200
> From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: gimp-devel
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:16 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> Plugins have both a short summary description ("blurb") be and a longer
> more descriptive help. It might be worth making things consistent and
> doing the same for scripts.
As I already explained, we can't easily do that without brea
I agree that it would be desirable to have the help descriptions be
more informative but I will focus on the one-line blurbs for now. I am
working on the "g"s now.
After I have finished the one-liners, I will look into having
Script-fu parse the help text into a 1-line "text" and a multi-li
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> > That's nice, but the task is to come up with a short string that must
> > fit into a single line and is oriented towards the user, not towards a
> > script programmer. The string will be visible in the status bar when
> > browsing the menus. Something
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 01:17 -0400, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> Is there a particular need for these blurbs to be short one liners other than
> making things easier for the translaters?
Yes, they need to fit into the statusbar and should follow the same
style that plug-ins use for the blurb.
> On
Sven Neumann wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 15:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The registration blurb for 3dTruchet script:
_"This script generates a repeating pattern of
Truchet tiles (which are randomly oriented
quadrants of a circle). The arcs of the tiles
are given a 3-D effect using a gr
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:02 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
> > initially set the generated image to "clean". It seems unnecessary to
> > prompt for "save" when closing an unmodified logo; the logo can easily
> > be regenerated with the same values by re-running the script.
>
> I've considered thi
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 05:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For what it's worth, I did examine the plug-ins but they have two
> "blurb" strings available (one for the status line and one for the
> plugin's Help dialog) whereas Script-fus seem to only have the one. I
> had mistakenly a
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:34:52 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review
>
> initially set the generated image to "clean&qu
Sven Neumann stated:
I am afraid that you misunderstood the task that I am asking you to do.
For what it's worth, I did examine the plug-ins but they have two
"blurb" strings available (one for the status line and one for the
plugin's Help dialog) whereas Script-fus seem to only have the o
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 15:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I estimate that I am about 15% finished on this task and that it will
> take me another two weeks to complete. Would this be sufficient for
> your scheduling needs?
That would be sufficient but I am afraid that you misunderstoo
I estimate that I am about 15% finished on this task and that it will
take me another two weeks to complete. Would this be sufficient for
your scheduling needs?
At the end of this message is a sample change of the registration for
the "3dTruchet.scm" script. I do not know if there is anothe
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would be willing to spend some time on this; although I am
> unfamiliar with what the previous work on other plugins was about. In
> particular, I do not know what "marked them for translation" means (if
> this is referring
I would be willing to spend some time on this; although I am
unfamiliar with what the previous work on other plugins was about. In
particular, I do not know what "marked them for translation" means (if
this is referring to some type of foreign language translation then I
am most likely a po
Hi,
a while ago we went over all plug-ins, reviewed the procedure blurbs and
marked them for translation. The blurbs are shown in the image status
bar and as menu tooltips. This hasn't happened for Script-Fu yet, even
though the script procedure blurbs are shown in the status bar as well.
Thus, we
28 matches
Mail list logo
