Hi,
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 11:49 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> what is the purpose of a toggle that says "Background"?
There is no toggle that says "Background" in the options of this tool.
That's why I will not try to answer the rest of your mail. You would
better look at the tool options again a
Hi David!
> As far as I know, foreground and background are still objectively
different from the computer's point of view and our point of view; they have
different characteristics. A background tends to
> be less detailed than a foreground; also, the definition of background is
further muddied
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:27:19PM +0200, Gerald Friedland wrote:
>
> I do not quite understand your problems. I am an aloof developer who
> has serious problems to understand user's problems. Please help me
> out, maybe I am misunderstanding something? So please do not get me
> wrong here.
>
he
.. I replied to the wrong address again; argh.On 6/24/06, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/06, Gerald Friedland <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do not quite understand your problems. I am an aloof developer whohas serious problems to understand user's problems. Please help me
out, may
> I guessed from what Sven said, inverting the image colors first might
help, and I was right.
> I made my second try by:
>
> * Inverting the image
> * Selecting the entire image in the initial 'lasso' pass.
> * Disabling 'Contiguous'
> * Setting L,a,b sensitivity to 0,707,555 respectively. (a,b w
... AARRGH.
Accidentally sent this to Sven instead of the list!
Sorry Sven.On 6/23/06, David Gowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The tool only does foreground extraction (hence its name). There's no
toggle that would turn it into a background extraction tool.
Makes sense, actually -- the characteri
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 15:36 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> i really tried to use siox this weekend. it is so confusing, i have no
> idea what to expect from it or if what happened to me was a bug.
>
> the default is foreground extraction. i wanted it to background extract
> and toggled this tool
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 00:08 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> Anyway, my main argument is that it would be more consistent with the
> other tools: the other selection tools, the transform tools and the
> zoom tool only consider the state of the modifiers before the first
> click. Subsequent cha
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 12:09 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
> It looks like there is a bug in the SIOX tool/gui that causes it to
> return to the foreground setting unexpectedly, until the Control key
> is first pressed, then it works as expected.
That's not a bug. You cannot mark background unle
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:09:24PM +0930, David Gowers wrote:
> On 6/22/06, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >http://carol.gimp.org/bikeshed/images/screenshot-2006-06-21.png
>
well, i did not use the tool on that image. that image is my desktop
and what is wrong with some of the thir
On 6/22/06, Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://carol.gimp.org/bikeshed/images/screenshot-2006-06-21.png
Okay.
It looks like there is a bug in the SIOX tool/gui that causes it
to return to the foreground setting unexpectedly, until the Control key
is first pressed, then it works as expe
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:36:53PM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
>
> also, the tooltips are popping up some freaking huge tool tips. it is
> the long help that is in the script-fu? i think it was some of the
> third party scripts i have installed that were doing this -- i did not
> find it at all h
Carol Spears wrote:
> it would not stay toggled and it seemed to be blind to the colors no
> matter what values i gave it. it only selected what i selected which, i
> could have used quickmask for and it would have been a lot less toggling
> and such.
>
> is the tool broken or are my expectation
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 12:08:34AM +0200, Rapha?l Quinet wrote:
>
> Anyway, my main argument is that it would be more consistent with the
> other tools: the other selection tools, the transform tools and the
> zoom tool only consider the state of the modifiers before the first
> click. Subsequent
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:45:55 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 21:22 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> > [...] However, for
> > greater consistency with other tools I think that it would be better
> > to consider the state of the modifiers _before_ the first click
>
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 21:22 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> Here is a proposal for improving the messages that are shown in the
> status bar. Such messages would be very useful for describing some
> hidden features of the paint tools (bug #124040) but also for the
> other tools.
>
> Basically
Here is a proposal for improving the messages that are shown in the
status bar. Such messages would be very useful for describing some
hidden features of the paint tools (bug #124040) but also for the
other tools.
Basically, I followed this approach: anything that causes a tool to
change its beha
17 matches
Mail list logo
