Hi Joao
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
as far as filters are concerned, I'd strongly, and that means __strongly__,
suggest you to use keyboard shrotcuts to get to your filters.
This is definitely important. I'm working on it. It takes time to
peter sikking wrote:
the only thing I would change is to swap the order of Grain merge and
Grain extract. simply because it is explained as a workflow in that
order in the manual.
I would also like to see a dynamically updated list at the top of the list
that shows the last 3-5 used
Hi vabijou,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:21 AM, vabijou2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
peter sikking wrote:
the only thing I would change is to swap the order of Grain merge and
Grain extract. simply because it is explained as a workflow in that
order in the manual.
I would also like to see a
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, David Gowers wrote:
I am such a user, and I say: This is a change I do not want, it would
reduce my working speed further.
This is because of the way recently-accessed lists work -- the most
recent is at the top. This means unless I am constantly selecting
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, David Gowers wrote:
Hi vabijou,
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:21 AM, vabijou2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
peter sikking wrote:
the only thing I would change is to swap the order of Grain merge and
Grain extract. simply because it is explained as a workflow in that
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng
setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes?
Or mapping to a USB HID device's action. E.g. using Griffin
PowerMate's wheel to scroll through modes
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng
setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes?
Or mapping to a USB HID device's action. E.g. using Griffin
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 05:07 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng
setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes?
Or mapping to a USB HID device's
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 05:07 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
As for layer combination modes...Martin, is there any clean way of allowiyng
setting keyboard shortcuts to layer combiantion modes?
Or mapping to a USB HID device's action. E.g. using Griffin
PowerMate's wheel to scroll
Martin Nordholts wrote:
One have to differentiate between mathematical similarities of the
blending formulas and the effect the modes have on the colours we
perceive. From this point of view Multiply pairs better when Screen than
with Divide.
Actually from this point of view Divide and
Martin Nordholts wrote:
Martin Nordholts wrote:
After doing the rearrangements we end up with the following groups.
Things to note is that Addition does not have a counterpart, and that
Divide is a bit of an outsider in its group when looking at the blending
formulas. If no one objects,
David Gowers wrote:
I'm assuming that the separate layer modes will eventually separate
into their own files for reasons of speed, in which case this is
trivial to implement; request LAB color as the input format, apply
normal blending to A and B channels,
leave L channel unchanged from dest.
David Gowers wrote:
I have ported almost all (only Soft light pending) layer modes to a GEGL
operation. It is yet unclear if this will be eventually used or if it
will more serve as a reference implementation, but in any case would
improvements to how Color behaves best be written against this
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gowers wrote:
I'm assuming that the separate layer modes will eventually separate
into their own files for reasons of speed, in which case this is
I meant separate operations, here.
trivial to implement;
Martin wrote:
The layer mode combo box contains groups of layer modes. I fail to see
the logic behind the current grouping and instead propose a new
grouping. The new groups are:
* Different alpha compositing methods
* Modes that always gives a brighter result
* Modes that always give a
peter sikking wrote:
Martin wrote:
The darker and lighter modes have been internally sorted based on how
much they tend to affect the image, see end of mail.
is it then a coincidence you got implicitly almost every of
these groups labelled up by their first item (Lighten, Darken,
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
peter sikking wrote:
Martin wrote:
The darker and lighter modes have been internally sorted based on how
much they tend to affect the image, see end of mail.
is it then a coincidence you got implicitly almost
David Gowers wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I didn't understand why you grouped them with Difference
(even given your explanation of 'can produce completely different
colors'); I would have grouped them with Overlay, since
Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote:
there are 2 more generic categories Symmetrical and Asymmetrical
To know that a mode is asymmetrical is useful, because then swapping layers
positions open new options
Maybe is possible prefix a symbol as a double arrow to the Symmetrical modes
Names?
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Gowers wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I didn't understand why you grouped them with Difference
(even given your explanation of 'can produce
David Gowers wrote:
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One have to differentiate between mathematical similarities of the
blending formulas and the effect the modes have on the colours we
perceive. From this point of view Multiply pairs better when
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Martin Nordholts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand what you mean now. We are not doing the same kind of paring
though. You are pairing layer modes that are cancelling each other out
while I am paring layer modes that give opposite effects on lightness.
22 matches
Mail list logo
