Hi,
would somebody cry and whine if I check this in:
http://sven.gimp.org/files/lc_new_icons.png
IMHO a little facelift can't hurt and the anchor does fit better with
the Gnome icons.
Salut, Sven
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would somebody cry and whine if I check this in:
>
> http://sven.gimp.org/files/lc_new_icons.png
>
> IMHO a little facelift can't hurt and the anchor does fit better with
> the Gnome icons.
I am not sure. Gimp is a drawing application and th
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 04:05:08PM +0300, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> would somebody cry and whine if I check this in:
>
> http://sven.gimp.org/files/lc_new_icons.png
>
> IMHO a little facelift can't hurt and the anchor does fit better with
> the Gnome icons.
I would whine a bit. I think th
>IMHO a little facelift can't hurt and the anchor does fit better with
>the Gnome icons.
They look nice, but you should change all the Gimp icons then, so GUI is
consistent. Other graphics apps still use B&W only, BTW, and nobody
complains. I guess been able to select which kind of icons is a go
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> >IMHO a little facelift can't hurt and the anchor does fit better with
> >the Gnome icons.
>
> They look nice, but you should change all the Gimp icons then, so GUI is
> consistent. Other graphics apps still use B&W only, BTW, a
After a fresh checkout of gimp, I have no:
./install-sh
./mkinstalldirs
./missing
docs/texinfo.tex
./ABOUT-NLS
These errors pop up when autogen.sh runs automake.
--
-lsm
Hi,
Uh, Gimp users/developers are so conservative ...
> I am not sure. Gimp is a drawing application and thus colors are important
> part of the work being done. I kinda like the fact that the icons in the
> gui are not colored. I dont know, what do others think?
It wasn't the lack of colors th
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Uh, Gimp users/developers are so conservative ...
>
> > I am not sure. Gimp is a drawing application and thus colors are important
> > part of the work being done. I kinda like the fact that the icons in the
> > gui are not colored. I dont know
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 03:01:42AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a gimp perl process that opens a large number
> of windows.
>
> Is there a way to send an instruction to print all
> open windows?
Do you mean "print" = "print on paper" (in which case I'd try file_print
on all images),
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:55:57AM -0400, "Shawn P. Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Of course, a simple gimptool wrapper plus some archiving database (the
> > registry!) might suffice.
> >
>
> It doesn't seem as if Gimp development has the critical mass (read:
> sheer number of modu
> would somebody cry and whine if I check this in:
> http://sven.gimp.org/files/lc_new_icons.png
> IMHO a little facelift can't hurt and the anchor does fit better with
> the Gnome icons.
Very nice!
It is nice to see that work is being done to make the GIMP integrate
well with the rest of t
Hello
Well I know that all of us has a full load of work. I think Svens work is
nice!! (I.e lets go for it). As long as he also makes the anchor icon
which in it's present design sucks (no harm towards you Tigert but it is
clearly not one of your best icons ;-).
Cheeers Olof
--
Olof Kylander
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999, Olof S Kylander wrote:
> Hello
>
> Well I know that all of us has a full load of work. I think Svens work is
> nice!! (I.e lets go for it). As long as he also makes the anchor icon
> which in it's present design sucks (no harm towards you Tigert but it is
> clearly not one
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 04:01:58PM -0400, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> Sven wrote:
> > would somebody cry and whine if I check this in:
> > http://sven.gimp.org/files/lc_new_icons.png IMHO a little
> > facelift can't hurt and the anchor does fit better with the Gnome
> > icons.
>
> Very n
> installing this package, the user would customize the gimp for his special
> needs by adding special functionality
> For example this would like:
> gimp-plugins-artistic (gimppressionist, mosaic, oilify, ...)
> gimp-plugins-webdesign (imagemap, html, animoptimize, ...)
>
On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 08:27:12AM +0300, Mircea Damian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Suggestions? (I patched the source to use the above but I know this is not
> right because it breaks 5.005_03 users)
This is indeed the wrong fix, the perl headers are expected to have a
define for that case.
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 02:48:01PM +0100, Uwe Koloska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So you have to add -lgnomesupport to GTKXMHTML_LIBS behind -lgtkxmhtml.
> -- or you have to upgrade to glibc2 or copy the function yourself from there ...
Both ways are unaccaptable, unless gimp starts to require
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 09:20:15PM +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 1999 at 08:27:12AM +0300, Mircea Damian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >
> > Suggestions? (I patched the source to use the above but I know this is not
> > right because it breaks 5.005_03 users)
>
> This is indeed t
On Sat, 23 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 04:01:58PM -0400, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > Sven wrote:
> > > would somebody cry and whine if I check this in:
> > > http://sven.gimp.org/files/lc_new_icons.png IMHO a little
> > > facelift can't hurt and the anchor
19 matches
Mail list logo
