Hi all,
When trying to build gimp-2.3.3 - I just want to try the new SIOX based
selection
tool - I met the following compile problem:
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/faxg3 faxg3.o g3.o run_tbl.o ../../libgimp/.libs/libgimp-2.0.so
../../libgimpcolor/.libs/libgimpcolor-2.0.so ../../libgimpbase/.libs/
* Robin Bowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-12-05 11:11]:
>
> Can you do me a favour and reply to me, CC'ing the list so I can trace
> my logs and check what happens. Based on previous experience, I would
> expect to receive your mail addressed directly to me, but not to see
> the copy sent to the lis
I have a lot of stillimages from a digicam and want to make a movie like this:
http://pinguin.uni.cc/jerking_flickering_xvid.avi
The quality of this avi-file is not perfect, so I am searching for a way to do
it better. If you look at the motion, it is not a quiet motion, it is jerking
a little
* michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-12-05 12:33]:
>
> Has this happened for everyone else? Is it just this list?
>
no, and it is not the list
>
> You know, it's totally possible the list is smart enough that it's
> configurator/creator knows most people delete duplicate messages
> anyways,
On 8/12/05, Robin Bowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> michael chang wrote:
> >On 8/11/05, Robin Bowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>PS. Is it just me, or are Sven's and Michael's posts not getting to the
> >>list? I'm only getting the copy that is sent directly to me and the copy
> >>to the list is
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Robin Bowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-12-05 08:10]:
I don't necessarily WANT two copies; but I would EXPECT two copies and
the fact that I'm not SEEING two copies leads me to believe that
something is "wrong" or outside my experience.
Does that make sense?
Not fro
Robin Bowes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> As things stand, I'm not getting messages that are being sent to the
> list AND to me - I just get the message sent to me. With all the other
> lists I'm on I get the message sent to the list (which gets filtered
> into the appropriate "list" folder) AND
* Robin Bowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-12-05 08:10]:
>
> I don't necessarily WANT two copies; but I would EXPECT two copies and
> the fact that I'm not SEEING two copies leads me to believe that
> something is "wrong" or outside my experience.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
Not from any post that
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Robin Bowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-12-05 05:51]:
I have filtering code that automatically detects mail from mailing
lists and sorts it into folders and I'm haven't received any messages
from Sven or yourself that were sent to the list. I get the copy sent
to me person
* Robin Bowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-12-05 05:51]:
> I have filtering code that automatically detects mail from mailing
> lists and sorts it into folders and I'm haven't received any messages
> from Sven or yourself that were sent to the list. I get the copy sent
> to me personally, but I would ex
michael chang wrote:
On 8/11/05, Robin Bowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PS. Is it just me, or are Sven's and Michael's posts not getting to the
list? I'm only getting the copy that is sent directly to me and the copy
to the list is not arriving.
It's just you. If you take a look at t
11 matches
Mail list logo