On Wednesday 26 September 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Certainly the GIMP developers could have kludged the code to
incorporate 16-bit or higher bit-depths; and it would not have taken
nearly as long to do so. But the solution would be only temporary --
the ultimate necessity to have a
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Greg wrote:
--- gimp_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...[GIMP] does not have an interface that makes for an easy user
transition from the industry PS standard it is not a tool that is
ready for adoption by high quality image makers.
I would disagree with
On Friday 17 August 2007, Olivier Lecarme wrote:
I'm using a Debian Sid distribution, regularly updated. I have the
gimp-2.2 Debian package, last modification on 2007-07-13:
% ls -l =gimp-2.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3,0M 2007-07-13 19:26 /usr/bin/gimp-2.2*
I have also gimp-2.3.19, installed
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007, Chris Mohler wrote:
On 8/7/07, Bhavin Suthar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone tell me the truth behind this? Does this also mean
that if you write text on image (like your jpeg Canon photos)
then they
On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 08:38 -0400, John R. Culleton wrote:
I would add that Ubuntu is user friendly only when you live within its
boundaries. For serious work I prefer Slackware, even with the
absence of some Gnome libraries (and the Gnome
On Sunday 08 July 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Sunday 08 July 2007 12:07:55 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 07:48 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
I just want to make clear that people who are accustomed to be
positively helpful deserve encouragement and others, not of
On Monday 09 July 2007, Alex Feldman wrote:
Hi Brendan,
David, it's just not worth it. The powers on this list are frighteningly
short-sighted when it comes to discussions like you are proposing. Even
though a large chunk of the list feels differently, they will moderate
you eventually
On Sunday 24 June 2007, John Meyer wrote:
somebody actually puts together some numbers we're going to continue to
scratch our heads as to why the GIMP is not as well accepted as we think
it should be.
I won't be scratching my head and wondering. I know why. Just a chunk of the
mailing list
On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Rachael H. wrote:
Same here. I read that article and felt like they were bashing the
Gimp. I did download Krista to see how it worked. I ended up
uninstalling since it ran pretty slow. Seems like everything for KDE
With Krita, what's exciting is how fast it
On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Eric P wrote:
I really get peeved by these types of articles. GIMP is GIMP. Krita is
Krita. CinePaint is CinePaint. Each is a tool. Use the right tool for
the job. There are lots of hammers. Some are good for some projects.
Others are good for other
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Jozef Legeny wrote:
I'm using 2.3.18 (and i was using the development version since 2.3.9
) and the only time gimp crashed was when i had 256MB ram and tried to
manipulate huge (a 80MB xcf file is quite huge) images. However this
isn't as much a gimp problem as
On Monday 18 June 2007, Simon Budig wrote:
Brendan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Jozef Legeny wrote:
I'm using 2.3.18 (and i was using the development version since 2.3.9
) and the only time gimp crashed was when i had 256MB ram and tried to
manipulate huge
On Thursday 21 December 2006 23:51, Robert Smits wrote:
Oh wait, Geoffrey says Get over it. Everybody with an opinion or
actual relevent facts, forget it. Geoffrey said so.
If you'll check the bloody archives, you'll see this same subject has
been discussed ad nauseam more then once.
On Friday 22 December 2006 02:44, jim wrote:
Eric P wrote:
I'm lazy, and I don't feel like reading this entire thread (it seems to
show up on a regular basis on the list).
Were any new, constructive insights brought up? Anyone care to summarize
this thread on this exhausting topic?
On Thursday 21 December 2006 21:06, Tom Williams wrote:
Brendan wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time
On Monday 18 December 2006 19:52, lists wrote:
Carter castor wrote:
This goes right to the heart of my biggest complaint about GIMP
though: its name. I don't understand why the developers would put so
much time and hard work into creating a program as professional as
GIMP and then name
Speaking about Gimpression, it could be taken as a copy of the MS
Expression at the time being. I think it is a great name, but people
tend to exaggerate when it comes to stealing.
What? No. Gimpression would NOT be confused with that. I think it's a great
name.
On Friday 15 December 2006 17:06, D. Jones wrote:
I am trying to run both versions of the Gimp in
Windows XP SP2. The 2.2 version runs with no
problems, but the the 2.3 version indicates upon
running that it is unable to locate libgimp-2.0-0.dll
or libgimpui-2.0-0.dll. I set in environment
On Sunday 29 October 2006 14:18, Stephan Hegel wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Not if you use the wrapper script that is suggested by the release notes
and has already been mentioned here.
Yes, I've posted a little wrapper by myself - you haven't read the whole
thread carefully, have you ?
On Friday 29 September 2006 14:05, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 06:54 -0600, Roland Hordos wrote:
While all other credible opensource projects are gaining ground in a
professional IT setting, the GIMP is being held back because of the
instant derogatory impact of the
On Friday 29 September 2006 15:10, Geoffrey wrote:
I've also not heard anyone use the term gimp in the way you indicate in
a very long time. And I don't believe that's because people are more
politically correct these days. I think it's a term that just isn't
used in this way any longer.
On Friday 25 August 2006 19:04, Ben Conley wrote:
I am trying to build the latest development version of Gimp, but can't
figure out how to build it. I am using WinXP, I have Visual Studio 2005,
and know absolutely nothing about C (I'm a python guy). Please help!
You might want to read up on
On Thursday 13 April 2006 06:59, hpv wrote:
Is there a known solution for this or is it yet another reason why someone
needs to come up with a replacement for gimp quickly before me and the rest
of the Linux users switch back to mac or windows because gtk/gnome is
destroying our desktop?
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 13:23, Allan Haverholm wrote:
CMYK, CMYK,CMYK.
's all it needs.
No, don't worry about that. Krita has that now.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
On Saturday 11 March 2006 18:39, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Saturday 11 March 2006 17:00, Michael Schumacher wrote:
wayne wrote:
http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/03/07/1813207
Saw the above article on Newsforge.
Well, it shows that the author doesn't read the
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 06:01, Manish Singh wrote:
Scratched an itch, and caused tons of confusion in a community.
Horrible.
Oh well, it's done. Bitching now isn't helping, so why not try to resolve the
situation?
___
Gimp-user mailing list
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 04:48 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:36:27PM +0100, qeldroma wrote:
i've got a bad digital camera and want to work over the results. Bad in
this case means, that i've got good resolution and good results
concerning the light, but a bad
27 matches
Mail list logo
