[Looks like every time I post, I kill the list. My apologies; reposting]
On 2009-10-01, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
Let me try to rephrase it... Consider two scenarios (with a particular
OP of CHANNEL-OP-*), left one and right
Quoting Ilya Zakharevich nospam-ab...@ilyaz.org:
Let me try to rephrase it... Consider two scenarios (with a particular
OP of CHANNEL-OP-*), left one and right one:
save-selection + delete-selection
do few FuzzySelects with OP do few FuzzySelects with OP
combine with
On 2009-10-01, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
Let me try to rephrase it... Consider two scenarios (with a particular
OP of CHANNEL-OP-*), left one and right one:
save-selection + delete-selection
do few FuzzySelects with OP
Quoting Ilya Zakharevich nospam-ab...@ilyaz.org:
I'm confused on why gimp-vectors-set-visible() is used. Any hint?
I did that merely so I could watch how the process progressed along
the path. It is not functionally necessary.
And I can't guess reasons why you first do
On 2009-09-30, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
A lot of thanks for helping me understand this problem.
And I can't guess reasons why you first do gimp-selection-none(), then
combine the orig-sel back?
I assumed that you wanted to add
[Repost after a list resurrection]
On 2009-09-15, saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
a Script-fu which does this for Fuzzy selections; the command is added
to the context menu raised by right-clicking on a path in the Paths
[Repost after a list resurrection]
On 2009-09-19, Jason van Gumster ja...@handturkeystudios.com wrote:
Suggestion: Would it be possible as you walk the path, to compare each
pixel to prior and if they are the same to within the threshold
tolerance skip that pixel and proceed to next? My
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote (in part) (on
2009-09-15 at 10:57):
Your script would have to manually traverse the paths. I have written
a Script-fu which does this for Fuzzy selections; the command is
added to the context menu raised by right-clicking on a path in the
Alec Burgess bura...@gmail.com wrote:
Suggestion: Would it be possible as you walk the path, to compare each
pixel to prior and if they are the same to within the threshold
tolerance skip that pixel and proceed to next? My theory being that if
two adjacent pixels on a path are within
Quoting Ilya Zakharevich nospam-ab...@ilyaz.org:
I want to stroke the path with the current tool, with all the
parameters as selected in the tool options. I do not think I can do
it with the PATHs right-mouse-click menu, can I?
As has been stated, this is not possible.
An alternative would
Gah... This is what I get for sending emails prior to drinking coffee.
I just now noticed that you posted this:
(What I see are only choices of Paint tools. What I want is Select
tools, like color select and/or magic wand.)
Obviously my answer isn't gonna cut it then. Sorry about that.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Ilya Zakharevich
nospam-ab...@ilyaz.org wrote:
I want to stroke the path with the current tool, with all the
parameters as selected in the tool options. I do not think I can do
it with the PATHs right-mouse-click menu, can I?
(What I see are only choices of
Ilya Zakharevich nospam-ab...@ilyaz.org wrote:
I want to stroke the path with the current tool, with all the
parameters as selected in the tool options. I do not think I can do
it with the PATHs right-mouse-click menu, can I?
You can. If you choose Stroke Path from the Paths right-click
13 matches
Mail list logo
