well, you're the one who mentioned money.
being somewhat older now i would also very much note the need for a
good circle of friends and community, and a committed life's partner
etc for when you can't take care of yourself (or perhaps make any
money).
believe it or not it's a real possibility. I c
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:53:42PM +0100, MasterRahl wrote:
>> #1: in over all view how does gimp stack up to Photoshop and all of its
>> features, are they compairable? to each other.
>
> I've tried to answer this from a photography point of
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Daniel Smith wrote:
> Alexandre,
> well, design has never really been considered a high paid occupation
> now, has it?
By whom? :) Besides, a lot depends on lifestyle. Living frugally on
$60K vs. living lavishly on $120K turns out to be pretty much the same
thing o
Alexandre,
well, design has never really been considered a high paid occupation
now, has it?
I'm even on this list only because i have a partial interest in
graphics coming from the
ten years i considered myself a "potential designer".
Boy was that a mistaken period. Followed by my equally painful
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 12/15/2012 01:39 AM, Daniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> it also has After Effects, Premiere Pro, etc. Lots of good stuff. For
>> 30 a month?
>>
> You mean, 360 a year? For plenty of stuff I may never use?
As in "I make $60K as a designer and I ain't payin
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> In re mathemagical upscaling, I have been using a plugin called
> "upsize" that seems to give consistently better results than cubic
> interpolation. I don't know who made it or what math it uses; I
> think I got it from the plugin registry s
well you actually download the software.
i haven't tried to run it without a connection.
and yeah the 360 a year is probably only the first year.
but some people like adobe and typekit fonts a lot.
and not having to pay for them takes it down to 310 right there.
there are a lot of other alternative
Oh, and one more thing, I am in no way denigrating gimp by
suggesting an alternative. In fact, if I had enough money, and
i probably will someday soon, I would use gimp in a way that would
turn it into a powerhouse of usefulness that i believe is being completely
ignored by this community, but like
On 12/15/2012 08:46 PM, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 12/15/2012 01:39 AM, Daniel Smith wrote:
>> it also has After Effects, Premiere Pro, etc. Lots of good stuff. For
>> 30 a month?
>>
> You mean, 360 a year? For plenty of stuff I may never use?
I could be wrong but... For stuff that fails if your network
c
On 12/15/2012 01:39 AM, Daniel Smith wrote:
it also has After Effects, Premiere Pro, etc. Lots of good stuff. For
30 a month?
You mean, 360 a year? For plenty of stuff I may never use?
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://m
See this page for "multi-threaded gimp"
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list/2012-October/thread.html
(they attended to the topic of cores during saving, etc.)
I already tried to post once in response to this topic, but i'll try again.
i will always have gimp on my machine, but i worked
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> In re adjustment layers, I may be missing something fundamental but
> I seem to be doing the same thing, more or less, in the GIMP:
Nah. In PS I can insert a "levels" layer. Everything under the layer
is affected by the levels operation. Bu
On 12/14/2012 12:04 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:53:42PM +0100, MasterRahl wrote:
>> #1: in over all view how does gimp stack up to Photoshop and all of its
>> features, are they compairable? to each other.
>
> I've tried to answer this from a photography point of view he
On 12-12-12 04:53 PM, MasterRahl wrote:
I have photoshop, and i have gimp installed, and I dont know much about gimp and
how it is compaired to Photoshop
I want to stop using photoshot and only use gimp, exclusivly.
i have a few questions in general
It would be better if you first answer a qu
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:53:42PM +0100, MasterRahl wrote:
> #1: in over all view how does gimp stack up to Photoshop and all of its
> features, are they compairable? to each other.
I've tried to answer this from a photography point of view here
http://photo.stackexchange.com/a/7691/1943
as fa
Hi all,
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:25:36 +0100
MasterRahl wrote:
> >I don't know, I guess the limit is higher then your computer could
> >offer ;)
> >you're welcome!
>
> I plan on getting a 64 or 128 core amd or intel server, with as much ram as
> posibble aprox 1TB(1024GB) or 2 TB if i happen to f
>I don't know, I guess the limit is higher then your computer could
>offer ;)
>you're welcome!
I plan on getting a 64 or 128 core amd or intel server, with as much ram as
posibble aprox 1TB(1024GB) or 2 TB if i happen to find one.
I I've had computers that support 64GB ram and loading any comput
On 12/12/2012 08:39 PM, devvv wrote:
>> #2: are gimp's tool's brushes filters and ect.. are they as good as
>> photoshop. do they give the same quality output that PS does?
>
> the brushes are great, there are hundreds of them available in the web to
> enhance GIMP. they give you the same quality
>I have photoshop, and i have gimp installed, and I dont know much
>about gimp and how it is compaired to Photoshop
>
>I want to stop using photoshot and only use gimp, exclusivly.
>
>i have a few questions in general
>
>im still figuring out gimp and how to use it like photoshop. so i can
>get bac
I have photoshop, and i have gimp installed, and I dont know much about gimp and
how it is compaired to Photoshop
I want to stop using photoshot and only use gimp, exclusivly.
i have a few questions in general
im still figuring out gimp and how to use it like photoshop. so i can get back
to doin
20 matches
Mail list logo
