On Sunday 14 September 2003 01:07, Carol Spears wrote:
> what is the difference between these two things?
i'm not sure either, though i have thought that gap might be 'easier' to
run without gimp on machines that have limited resources, maybe i'm
wrong, i have no idea of the technologies involve
sam ende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> cinepaint doesn't seem to have any of the functions gap has ? i fact i
> haven't been able to discern what functions it does have that gimp
> doesn't, so i'm not sure why one would want to merge ?
I say again: support for 16(48)-bit images!
Gimp will read
sam ende wrote:
On Sunday 14 September 2003 01:07, Carol Spears wrote:
what is the difference between these two things?
i'm not sure either, though i have thought that gap might be 'easier' to
run without gimp on machines that have limited resources, maybe i'm
wrong, i have no idea of th
David Burren wrote:
sam ende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cinepaint doesn't seem to have any of the functions gap has ? i fact i
haven't been able to discern what functions it does have that gimp
doesn't, so i'm not sure why one would want to merge ?
I say again: support for 16(48)-bit ima
Carol Spears wrote:
> what is the difference between these two things?
Filmgimp (now Cinepaint) is a branch of the gimp. That is, it's a
complete image processing application. The framemanager (perhaps
what you're thinking of) is a plug-in for that application. GAP
is a plug-in for unstable gimp,
Hi,
> For you to suggest today that the problem was me not communicating enough
> shows real cheek. The person out of the loop is you. You have admitted you
> have no clue what happened to Film Gimp in 2000 when it was killed or in
> 2002 when it was resurrected, but that doesn't stop you from pub
On Sunday 14 September 2003 12:55, David Burren wrote:
> sam ende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > cinepaint doesn't seem to have any of the functions gap has ? i fact
> > i haven't been able to discern what functions it does have that gimp
> > doesn't, so i'm not sure why one would want to merge ?
>
On Sunday 14 September 2003 14:37, Carol Spears wrote:
> well, lets work on gap then.
it's not a bad program, not much available documantation wise which has
its plus and minus points, i discover you can do things it was probably
never intended for but otoh finding i'm doing things in ways tota
