Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am running a Red Hat 9.0 system that currently has GIMP 1.2.3
installed on it. I'd like to check out 2.0 and have been trying to
figure out how to get it together. I haven't compiled much large,
involved software yet so I am
packages/tar balls to download and install but no joy.
Anyone have a solution?
Thanks,
Barton
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Owen wrote:
On Mon, 03 May 2004 16:52:52 -0700
Barton Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
checking for aa_printf in -laa... no
configure: WARNING: *** AA plug-in will not be built (AA library
not found) ***
...
checking for libgtkhtml-2.0 = 2.0.0... Package libgtkhtml-2.0
was not found in
the pkg
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do have another question, re: the Perl plugin though. When
trying to compile it it says that it can't find gimp when it
tries to run the test program:
checking for GIMP - version = 2.0.0... no
*** Could not run GIMP test program
for FC1
meant that there would be a smooth install and was planning on
making an FC1 partition on my HDD.
What are people's experiences re: GIMP 2.x and FC1? Is it the
same nightmare of rebuilding gtk2? Or is it better than rh 9?
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Barton
John Dietsch wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Barton Bosch wrote:
Should I take it that installing the new GIMP on FC1 is not
significantly easier than on rh 9 (shrike)?
It is the same.
What are people's experiences re: GIMP 2.x and FC1? Is it the
same nightmare of rebuilding gtk2
the 64 bit version is for x86-64 :)
Yeah ok, thanks for sorting that out.
Barton
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
an image. The desired result
being the avoidance of any blurring from the software not being able
to map the scaled image pixel for pixel.
Is this accurate? Does any of it actually show up on the screen or
would it only apply to printed images?
Thanks,
Barton
I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened
with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting.
Should the operations be performed in the order above or would it be
better to scale-save as 50% qual jpg-unsharp mask-save as 100%
qual jpg?
Thanks,
Barton
Carol Spears wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 02:07:43PM -0700, Barton Bosch wrote:
I have some 1200 dpi scans that need to be scaled down, sharpened
with unsharp mask and then saved as jpgs at ~50% quality setting.
i am curious for the reason for saving at the 50% quality setting.
fiddling
and
pull them around with the mouse similar to the UI for the path tool.
Thanks,
Barton
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 06:44, Carol Spears wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:44:52PM -0800, Barton Bosch wrote:
What are the best ways to take an image of a straight line and
bend it into an s-curve with The GIMP? I have tried the
perspective and shear
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Huh, I tried the Iwarp filter but it seems to be broken (GIMP 2.0.4
from the FC2 rpm).
It showed the layer in the preview window but regardless of any
changes in parameters it didn't alter the image at all. Did I miss
something
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Barton Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're probably way ahead of me on this but wouldn't a larger preview
window and an expanded UI (e.g., like the path tool) be great with
Iwarp? Maybe implementing it as a tool rather than a filter would be
in order as well?
Sure
. Is there a way to preserve the
multiple layers so tha when I come back to the project I can edit the
individual layers? Thanks in advance.
Try saving in .xcf format, it should save most Gimp relevant items
along with your image data.
Barton
___
Gimp-user
deleted?
Thanks,
Barton
--
All experience hath shown that even under the best forms of
government those entrusted with power have in time and by slow
operations perverted power to tyranny, and it would seem that the
best means of preventing this would be, insofar as practicable, to
enlighten
Owen Cook wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Barton Bosch wrote:
cut
So, two main questions: 1) is there a way to compile atk and
fontconfig in parallel to the already installed rpms (as the gimp
2.2.6 was) and then pass a configure option or edit a script to have
gimp use the new versions?; and, 2
:. Then click
the up and down arrows or enter a number into the field directly.
Also, check:
http://docs.gimp.org/en/ch02s04s12.html
Peace,
Barton
--
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities -- Voltaire
___
Gimp-user
?
Thanks,
Barton
--
Concern for man himself and his fate must always be the chief
interest of all technical endeavors In order that the creations
of our mind shall be a blessing and not a curse to mankind. Never
forget this in the midst of your diagrams and equations. --
Albert Einstein
19 matches
Mail list logo
