City Ranch wrote:
> No matter the size of the photo in height and width and kb I end up with the
> same problem when I am finished outlining an image in the photo. When I double
> click on my first anchor for the marching ants I get a double line from the
> left to the right side in the middle of
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:10 PM, City Ranch wrote:
> Version:1.0 StartHTML:000168 EndHTML:002241 StartFragment:000471
> EndFragment:002224
>
> gimp 2.6.6
>
> Laptop
>
> Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 1 (build 6001)
>
> 1.60 gigahertz Intel Core Duo
> 64 kilobyte primary m
> "Joao" == Joao S O Bueno Calligaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joao> I do not understand your point
I wasn't trying to make a point, just trying to figure out how things
work.
Joao> A path is an independent image element - It does not "show" in the
Joao> final rendering of the images at
> Von: Alex Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> OK, but this brings up the larger question - I thought the whole point
> of layers was that every element of the image would live in one layer
> and the image could be manipulated that way. I guess I saw it as being
> like a train - to be on the train, y
On Monday 06 February 2006 10:36 am, Alex Feldman wrote:
> > "Carol" == Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Carol> layers and paths are two different things. the dance floor
> and Carol> the dance steps, perhaps. the dance steps are not
> limited by the Carol> location the same way p
> "Carol" == Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carol> layers and paths are two different things. the dance floor and
Carol> the dance steps, perhaps. the dance steps are not limited by the
Carol> location the same way paths are not limited to a single layer.
OK, but this brings up th
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 08:03:19PM -0700, Alex Feldman wrote:
>
> But it seems as if the paths don't just live in one layer. Isn't
> normally the case than when you do something (like create a path), you
> do it in the active layer, and then you can not only toggle visibility
> of whatever you cr
OK, this began as a question about paths, but now I think it combines paths
with layers.
With the help of eye-cons in the paths dialog, I can work on one path at
a time, and have the other ones invisible until I want to see them all.
Great.
But it seems as if the paths don't just live in one lay
Whooops, sorry about that last one. I hate it when that happens.
V>In picture's toolbar click Dialogs>Paths and you should see paths you've
V>created.
Great, thanks.
> "Simon" == Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> I suggest reading
Simon> http://docs.gimp.org/en/ch07s06.htm
> "Vytautas" == Vytautas P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vytautas> In picture's toolbar click Dialogs>Paths and you should see
Vytautas> paths you've created.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley
Alex Feldman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am trying to learn the Gimp, mostly from the book, Grokking the
> Gimp. It has been pretty useful so far, even if my copy, and the
> online copy, is a trifle out of date. I am using 2.2.8 in FC3.
>
> That is, it was useful until I got to section 3.4, T
In picture's toolbar click Dialogs>Paths and you should see paths you've
created.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 06:17:19 +0200, Alex Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
So to begin with I draw a Bezier path with the path tool, and save the
file. Then I reopen it, and no path. I mucked around looki
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 09:17:19PM -0700, Alex Feldman wrote:
>
> That is, it was useful until I got to section 3.4, The Paths Dialog.
> Now nothing seems to work.
>
the pathtool is probably the most changed tool since gimp-1.2.
personally, i would have a difficult time writing how to use the new
Hi,
Gert Cuykens wrote:
> how do you remove the bubbles ? i can add as many bubbles as i want
> but i cant remove them
Set the tool in "Edit" mode in the options, and then Shift-click
will delete the nodes. Keep an eye on the status bar while using
the path tool, it gives you useful suggestions f
14 matches
Mail list logo
