maybe you don't execute "git update-server-info " in server.
You can try execute it.
:)
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:14 PM, sudharsan chandrababu
wrote:
> HI all,
>
> Could anyone resolve this problem. Whenever i try to git clone using
> http protocol i am getting the following error:
> warning:
May be You need check your folders' and files' permission.
To see that did you http server permit to access all of your git files.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:32 PM, sudharsan chandrababu
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I really appreciate your immediate response.
>
&g
specially to be done for http accessing.
> When i googled it says the curl version must be 7.15 and above and i
> have the updated curl only. Kindly help.
>
> On Jul 10, 9:03 am, Peter wrote:
>> May be You need check your folders' and files' permission.
>>
:)
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:27 PM, sudharsan chandrababu
wrote:
> I solved the problem myself by pushing to repo using git protocol ,by
> enabling git receive pack.
>
> On Jul 10, 1:20 pm, Peter wrote:
>> For your situation, using Git:// protocol is fine.
>> But Y
You could try to run "git config --global gc.auto 100" on your repo machine
and work machine.
"If the number of loose objects exceeds the value of the gc.auto configuration
variable, then all loose objects are combined into a single pack usinggit
repack -d -l."
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:08 AM,
ou simply remove
the line, it will remove the commit from the history."
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Peter wrote:
> You could try to run "git config --global gc.auto 100" on your repo
> machine and work machine.
>
>
> "If the number of loose objects excee
Hi Dale,
Thanks for the explanation and tips. I'm gonna study the articles this
evening. So perhaps I can find the conclusive answer to my 'problem'.
Kindest regards,
Peter
>
> Here's one explanation:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparse_files#Sparse_files_in
The files that I suspect are all compiled without stripping (debug symbols
present in the file). When I delete all these files the size of my tar-bal
from the original filesystem is nearly the same as the one made from the
git checkout.
So, the quest continues ..
Regards,
Peter
that does this for me
3) Take a look at SVN or Mercurial to see if this could be more suitable
for this specific goal (although I realy would like to stick to Git !)
Many, many thanks for all your help !
Kindest regards,
Peter
Op woensdag 21 augustus 2013 19:44:53 UTC+2 schreef Dale Worley
Dear All,
When I do a git push -r origin master, it display following messages.
fatal: unable to access '
https://git-codecommit.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/v1/repos/WHOPQDTB_TestAutomation/':
error:1408F10B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number
Git Config:
[http]
[https]
Anyone can help me please please. A billion thanks for your help.
On Tuesday, December 18, 2018 at 7:19:58 PM UTC+8, Peter wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> When I do a git push -r origin master, it display following messages.
>
> fatal: unable to access '
> https:
On 3/3/2014 7:40 PM, git-users@googlegroups.com wrote:
Today's Topic Summary
Group: http://groups.google.com/group/git-users/topics
* How to install GitWeb on Windows? <#group_thread_0> [1 Update]
* Git and Multi-Module Maven Projects <#group_thread_1> [3 Updates]
How to install GitWeb on
I am working on a project which required pulling source code into a
subdirectory from a remote repo. Using the following commands
repo init -u -b -m
repo sync -c --no-tags
which I believe are python interfaces to git.
In any case I have this one subdirectory that already has git initialized
3) You have a branch "Branch2" which has been forked from "Branch1"
and accumulated several commits since then, You want to identify the commit
where you made the branch..
git merge-base Branch1 Branch2
-P.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for h
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> I've accepted the warning that you shouldn't rebase a branch unless it
> has never been pushed to a shared repository since it can wreak havoc
> on others who have pulled the branch.
>
For clarity, if you check out a public branch that has
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:31 AM, vfclists wrote:
> Is it possible to push to 2 or more remote repositories at the same
> time?
>
> I only want to mirror the main repository, where most if not all the
> pulls will come from.
It's not clear what you mean by "the same time". If you mean "in the
same
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:22 AM, cdamian wrote:
> I try to find a solution to replace subversion with git in our
> company. One of the requirements we have are extensive checks before a
> commit can land in the main branch of the central server.
Check (or merge, or cherry-pick) your new commits i
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Trans wrote:
> I'm not a bash expert, so I need to ask, who can I "pipe" a message
> into the git tag command? I have a program that will return my latest
> release notes.
>
> $ pom news
> ... message ...
>
> So I want to pipe that into git tag as the tag message
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Trans wrote:
> LOL. Keeping abreast of the latest in XXX via command line. Love
> it. ;-)
The only problem is, it's hard to appreciate porn on the command line.
That's why browsers were invented. :-)
-P.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
I'm a little confused about the multiple packages available for Windows
OS. There may be others, but I currently am only aware of this one.
I have two different eBooks each specify in their installation sections two
different GIT installation packages and I'd like to know if anyone has any
use
uot; holds true?
Again, thank you in advance to everyone who is able to contribute to my
knowledge related to any of the above.
Regards,
Peter.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe fro
ges they have made thus far in
B2 prior to this action. When they are done with their headline, they would
like to sync "B2" with "B" so that "B" would then have all of their changes
too. Is there any way to accomplish this sort of thing in Git? How would
I've got a new developer who I'm concerned might hurt our git repository
(by checking into master for example) if we give him r/w access to our
bitbucket repo. I want him to be able to check in to his branch only and
be able to merge master changes to his branch, but I don't want him to be
abl
get a very much larger tar.gz-file. Size goes up from 16M
to 21M (!?)
Has anyone got a clue ?
Thanks !!!!
PeTer
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it
-files. One made from the source
before committing and pushing, and the second tar, made from the same
source after cloneing and checking-out. I would expect them to be the same
size (apart from small differences due to .gitignore etc). But an 20%
increase is too much !
Regards,
Peter
Op
to be the
same size (apart from small differences due to .gitignore etc). But an 20%
increase is too much !
Regards,
Peter
Op maandag 19 augustus 2013 21:47:15 UTC+2 schreef Philip Oakley:
>
> - Original Message -
>
> *From:* peter boudewijns
> *To:* git-...@g
Hi tombert,
No, not yet. At this moment I'm busy makeing a detailed list from all file-
& directory-sizes before and after git-commit/git-checkout. Thereafter I'll
surely try 'git gc' !
Regards,
Peter
Op dinsdag 20 augustus 2013 09:28:23 UTC+2 schreef tombert:
&
Op maandag 19 augustus 2013 21:10:58 UTC+2 schreef peter boudewijns:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been trying to put my filesystem for a very small busybox-based
> distro into a git-repository. And with succes. The only strange thing I can
> not get my head around is the follow
versions function 100% on the target, so why worry ? But I still would
like to know whats going on
And yes, I also used git gc (--aggressive), but this yields no improvement
at the client side upon cloneing/checking out.
To be continued
Regards,
Peter
> My guess is that the clon
Hi,
I have downloaded the 1.8.4 source code tar file but I am having an issue
getting it to compile. I have tried running a simple make which resulted in:
dmake: Fatal error in reader: Makefile, line 352: Unexpected end of line
seen
Looking at line 352 looks like this:
*GIT-VERSION-FILE: FORCE
Windows 7
Git Bash or Command line, both act the same.
When I change a file and then run *git diff* I get:
C:\workshop\git>git diff
diff --git a/thirdfile.txt b/thirdfile.txt
index 7caac66..f6eb45c 100644
Binary files a/thirdfile.txt and b/thirdfile.txt differ
How do I get it to show the lines t
ical advantages over UTF-8, and it is worse in some
ways. "
http://benlynn.blogspot.com/2011/02/utf-8-good-utf-16-bad_07.html
I never knew that.
On Sunday, October 6, 2013 11:15:44 AM UTC-4, Peter Pitchford wrote:
>
> Windows 7
> Git Bash or Command line, both act the same.
>
>
ise.
Best Regards,
Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on
ected.
Somehow, the *rules* from src/things1/things2/.gitignore have been applied
even though this file will not be checked in.
How can this be??
Should not the rules in src/things1/things2/.gitignore have been *ignored*,
since it's not going to be checked in?
Please advise.
Best Reg
merge, then moving
the files - this works for A, but when I move on to B, the files are
not in ./, so I can't move them. If I read-tree some files, git status/
commit shows them as 'new files' and does not seem to recognize them
as old files with a long history.
Any help would be appreci
On Monday, May 7, 2012 10:09:29 AM UTC-7, Tom Roche wrote:
>
>
> How to just overwrite managed files in an existing directory with the
> latest versions from a remote branch/repo, without merging or
> whack-n-clone? What I mean:
>
> As previously noted
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromg
On 07/17/2014 12:12 AM, Ellick Marquez wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I want to install git on my computer with ubuntu 12.04 but when I put
> the next code "sudo apt-get install git" on my terminal, it shows me
> that the package "git" was removed or it doesn't exist.
>
> Please help me, I really need t
cript.
> Thanks,
>
I don't know uncrustify, how can you tell with uncrustify if code is not
in your preferred code style?
--
Peter van der Does
GPG key: CB317D6E
Site: http://avirtualhome.com
GitHub: https://github.com/petervanderdoes
Twitter: @petervanderdoes
--
You received
On 01/14/2015 11:02 AM, Thomas Ferris Nicolaisen wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 3:47:17 PM UTC+1, Peter van der Does
> wrote:
>
>
> I don't know uncrustify, how can you tell with uncrustify if code is
> not
> in your preferred code style?
>
hell script.
> Thanks,
>
In the file .git/hooks/precommit you run the uncrustify analysis and
depending on the result, you exit the script with 0 if it was ok, and 1
if it was not ok.
If you exit with a 1 the commit will not be done.
--
Peter van der Does
GPG key: CB317D6E
Site: http://avir
gin/bug/bug-1
>From github.com:petervanderdoes/Testing
x [deleted] (none) -> origin/bug/bug-1
$ git branch -r
origin/master
$ git branch
* bug/bug-1
master
The branch bug/bug-1 does still exist on github.
Peter
--
Peter van der Does
GPG key: CB317D6E
Site: http://avir
I found two ways to get the latest tag but what is difference, if there is
a difference?
Solution 1:
git describe --tags $(git rev-list --tags --max-count=1)
Solution 2:
git for-each-ref refs/tags --sort=-authordate --format='%(refname)'
--count=1 | sed 's/^refs\/tags\///'
--
You received thi
velop
SHA1
$git status
Your branch is ahead by x commits
So is there a way to update the SHA in something/develop?
I want to use this in a script, comparing the local branch and remote
branch.
--
Peter van der Does
GPG key: CB317D6E
IRC: Ganseki on irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @petervanderdo
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:59:36 -0400
Rémi Rampin wrote:
> 2012/7/16 Peter van der Does
>
> > If I do git fetch something develop, it ends up in FETCH_HEAD, if I
> > do git fetch something develop:develop you get:
> > ...
> >
>
> Maybe 'git fetch someth
-all | grep ^e | wc -l
26365
real0m5.826s
user0m6.223s
sys 0m0.923s
26365 possibilities on git diff e
--
Peter van der Does
GPG key: CB317D6E
Site: http://avirtualhome.com
GitHub: https://github.com/petervanderdoes
Twitter: @petervanderdoes
--
You received this message becaus
45 matches
Mail list logo
