Philip, are you saying WebGL is in IE10 proper?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Why don't you feature the Google products that use GWT in the gallery?
http://gwtgallery.appspot.com/
I'm always coming up against the argument that Google doesn't use GWT,
always. It's annoying and I shouldn't have to make that sale and I
wouldn't need to if the gallery featured those products
Here is what I am planning to do to fix issue 6068
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6068
1. Add to BeanMethod.java (package
com.google.web.bindery.autobean.vm.impl;) an TO_ARRAY value
2. Add to JBeanMethod.java
(com.google.web.bindery.autobean.gwt.rebind.model;) an
IsEditorHasDataEditorAchievementDefinitionHandle,
HasRequestContextHasDataEditorAchievementDefinitionHandle {
Removing HasRequestContext fixes the error
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:44 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
How does this actually work
Thanks Thomas, I'm starting to think you know all 6000~ tickets in the
issue tracker from memory. However, I was only pointing it out here,
this is a nice feature to have since this was a 2.2 code base where I
was propagating the RequestContext myself
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Thomas
Since you asked so nicely, I can confirm that changing imports and the
gwt.xml file was all I needed to do to fix 2 large gwt applications.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Chris Ramsdale cramsd...@google.com wrote:
Hey GWTC folks,
We have a GWT SDK 2.3.0.RC1 build that we would love feedback
How does this actually work?
If I implement HasRequestContextT anywhere, the containing request
factory editor driver that is generated no longer compiles, saying
that there is a missing constructor
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
My reaction is that EventBus/SimpleEventBus and friends should be part of this
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
RequestFactory is proving itself useful in non-GWT contexts, so we would
like to give it more independence. Our plan with the GWT 2.3 release is to
I don't think so, this issue started showing up when workingCopy was
added to ListEditorWrapper. If I backtrack to a version before it,
I'm fine. The other thing is I don't seem to have the problem
reported in 6081. Mine has to do with the method toArray() being
called, so there isn't anything
yes, with patch
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1159801/show
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Patrick, did you file an issue about this?
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1159801
sorry, wrong link
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1361802/
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, with patch
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1159801/show
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Patrick, did you
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1159801/show
Introduces an autobean is frozen issue. The problem is that the
workingCopy variable that is introduced doesn't cause autobeans to
be unfrozen. The scenario that I have is pretty simple:
public class XEditor extends composite implements
Ah, never mind, I think the idea is to use this new JSON-RPC support.
This will also solve the issue of accessing from wp7
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Bob, do you mind if I file an issue to formally request this?
At this stage, I have
Thanks Bob, do you mind if I file an issue to formally request this?
At this stage, I have it compiling but unable to parse requests on the server
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
RequestFactoryMagic works on Android, but you'll need to do some build
hacking to get
Anywhere I should start looking? This is JSON and everything but I
want to access GWT services from Android and wp7.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Thanks. The worst thing is, is that I remember seeing this thing a
while back now that you point it out again. That will help for
android and other java based platforms.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
The RequestFactoryMagic type can be used to
This behavior happens outside of GWT too in regular Java. This has
nothing to do with GWT. HashMap does not support null values or keys
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:37 PM, sinelaw jones.noa...@gmail.com wrote:
Problem can be reproduced with four lines of code:
HashMapString,Object
Originally from
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/1b67cfebede416b7/e958579badd4613a?lnk=gstq=pjulien+dvsDataMap#e958579badd4613a
and other posts. I've now reported
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5776
and included
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Nnnnevermind. I think it's too late for me to make this
not-terribly-popular change. It's already more widely adopted than I
realized internally, so I have to assume that's even more true externally. I
can't imagine such a
making it a class instead of an interface means we can't mock it anymore.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
We're making a few breaking changes in 2.1.1 to the new features introduced
in 2.1. (We're not supposed to do that kind of thing, but are hoping to get
is that making sure it remains a trivial class with
only no-ops means you don't need to mock it. Is that a reasonable
assumption?
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
making it a class instead of an interface means we can't mock it anymore.
On Thu, Dec 2
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know since I don't know what your plans are, will just have to
trust you.
That being said, the Activity interface is currently really nice and
it doesn't tie us down to a single class for inheritance.
I have
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Patrick, you're the case in point. Because you don't use the abstract class,
if we change the API later we will break your app.
I guess I don't understand how you're making it better then. I'm
currently working on Android and I
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
One more question for Patrick: would you be better able to use
AbstractActivity if the IsActivity interface were available?
I don't want to speak for anybody else but not to me no. What
AbstractActivity provides is so little that
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:18 AM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Comment by vinays.work:
I am seriously disappointed with the Editor framework. What we need is a
Bean Binding framework much like those that have existed in Swing. You just
associate the bean property with the widget and
I think this is still missing one core feature that makes it unusable.
The problem is still validators. ConstraintViolation cannot be
returned or thrown from our methods which means only the default group
validation can be used.
e.g., let's say we have a UserAccount. Depending if the user has
/RequestFactory_2_1_1
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is still missing one core feature that makes it unusable.
The problem is still validators. ConstraintViolation cannot be
returned or thrown from our methods which means only the default group
I know it is, but the idea to have direct support is that constraint
violations must be translated properly in order to make it back to the
UI, I'm talking mainly about the editor framework here. Currently, a
first pass is done to validate, any constraints are translated and
then the service
with this release. It simply could not have happened without your
participation in design discussions, your patches, and your scrutiny of
patches.
I'd particularly like to thank Thomas Broyer and Patrick Julien, who were
very vocal pioneering adopters of all the new stuff. You found bugs, found
In the case of HandlerManager, you just need to replace it with
EventBus/SimpleEventBus. The interface is nice if you're working with
gin and it's also nice for unit testing. If you don't want to be
bothered too much, just substitute all instances of HandlerManager
with SimpleEventBus and you're
, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
As a follow up this, the internal persist() method isn't called on
these modified entities either.
Chained persistence is explicitly outside the RequestFactory design
because RequestFactory
Not to mention that it's right there, it's in dvsDataMap, the only
problem is that it's sending the copy from the wrong map, that's it.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have any idea on how I could get to the modified sub-entity? I
have no way
Namely this:
violations = validator.validate(entityInstance);
we can't do
violations = validator.validate(entityInstance, SomeGroup.class);
I'm bringing it up, I don't have a solution for this right now but I
feel we should have at least have a way to disable the validator
inside the processor
Simple test case:
User
Office hours
I will get back entity proxies that are represent this information on
the client. If I call edit. The entire tree is now mutable thanks to
the latest fixes.
However, if I update a sub-entity, when I fire this request back to
the server, I have the
at 2:15 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple test case:
User
Office hours
I will get back entity proxies that are represent this information on
the client. If I call edit. The entire tree is now mutable thanks to
the latest fixes.
However, if I update a sub-entity, when I
EditorComposite, it's not clear if you make your own when, or if, you
should add sub-editor values to the collection that backs the
EditorComposite. This burned us big time.
driver.getPath() needs to be exposed somehow, I understand it isn't
exposed here since entities are not mentioned
Should
thank you
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM, b...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Ensure that EntityProxy instances returned from Collections returned
from an editable EntityProxy are editable.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: rjrjr
Found by: pjulien
Please review this at
thanks, I've got the patch already
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:28 AM, b...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
Ensure that EntityProxy instances returned from Collections returned
from
thanks, I've got the patch already
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Proxies reached from getters from a mutable proxy aren't mutable
In the meantime, you can can edit() for the entity
Proxies reached from getters from a mutable proxy aren't mutable
doc for edit:
/**
* Returns a mutable version of the proxy, whose mutations will accumulate in
* this context. Proxies reached via getters on this mutable proxy will also
* be mutable.
*/
T extends EntityProxy T edit(T
Thank you, my editor works now, and on the first try too, I have a
very complex object graph and it just handles' it. GWT has never
been so good.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:52 AM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Revision: 8965
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Wed Oct 6 10:46:19 2010
Log:
Hi Bob,
If you're interested in more use cases for the editor framework,
here's another one for you...
The problem is actually pretty common, the idea is that if you want to
create, or layout, an object in the hierarchy where it technically
isn't, you can't. This happens quite a bit, and when
I believe I've encountered the bug. What I see is on reception, all
the entities proxies are made immutable.
They stay frozen, and finally, when flushing the driver, there is yet
another loop to freeze all the AutoBeans. Nowhere in between were the
beans made mutable. This is necessary because
to serialize them.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
https://jira.springsource.org/browse/ROO-1488
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Bob is in transit today. We're working on a fix.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Patrick Julien pjul
Yes, I know, rc.edit() is called, this is just before the flush,
rc.edit has been called well before this.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:23 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
They stay frozen, and finally, when flushing the driver
And I might add, otherwise the flush would fail, values coming from
the editors directly are fine
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I know, rc.edit() is called, this is just before the flush,
rc.edit has been called well before this.
On Thu, Oct 7
}
}));
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
And I might add, otherwise the flush would fail, values coming from
the editors directly are fine
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I know, rc.edit() is called
never mind,
rc.edit(response); returns a value, and that one is not frozen
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, if I modify to:
�...@override
public String saveTriggered() {
getRequestContext().edit(getValue
. OfficeEditor has one AddressEditor and a
HasDataEditorPhone
so getPath() is currently buggy unless there's a way I can fill in my
own traverseEditor somehow
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still having difficulties even with this syntax, again
Bob,
any suggestions for a work around for the moment?
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
For the editor part, I can see in the generated code for my editor that
public static void traverseEditor(com.*.client.ui.EditorContainer
editor, String prefix
a collection, putting
offices
office
offices.name
office.name
offices.office.name
just doesn't work.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
For the editor part, I can see in the generated code for my editor that
public static void traverseEditor(com
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:32 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
Your feedback has been very helpful in finding out where the weak
points in our APIs and implementations are.
driver.getPath() isn't able to completely scan an editor tree when it
contains CompositeEditor's that, they themselves,
OK, this also works for me, where it breaks down is more collections
So I go back to practice, offices and phones
class Practice { private ListOffice offices; }
class Office { private ListPhone phones; }
practive is unique and has a list of offices
What I get back has all the practice seeded.
);
aren't used. Because of that, it's not able to handle the scenarios
of the inline list that adds or remove items. In this case, a simple
list of phones. This list changes if we create a row and it also
changes if we hit the remove button on a row
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Patrick Julien
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:21 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Any sample somewhere then because I am not getting how to use this
class properly
The FavoritesWidget in the DynaTableRf sample uses ListEditor. See
the uses
into the ||
serverId here is null because it never got into the server, so it throws an NPE.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:21 AM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Any
in SimpleEntityProxyId
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
I have this almost going.
I hit a bug in public
SimpleEntityProxyId.equals
boolean equals(Object o) {
if (!(o instanceof SimpleEntityProxyId?)) {
return false;
}
SimpleEntityProxyId? other
I'm getting used to this editor framework and I like it a lot,
unfortunately, I think I've stumble upon a blocker for me.
EntityProxy's that contain collections are not being filled in. So
you can send up an object graph in one shot in order to save it.
Which is great.
Unfortunately, on
on boss, so instead, you write
getEmployeesFrom(boss).with(managedEmployees).fire(...) if you want that
field.
Perhaps the editor framework is not setting up these with() calls as it
should be?
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting used to this editor
for each editing activity
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a wildcard value? I don't want the all the fields when
listing but when I go in edit details, I do
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
Any
No, it's not just me, anything one level deep doesn't get picked up.
So my offices also have on address and it's not in the getPath() array
either. Even if it was, what's the syntax for sub path elements?
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Getting
...@gmail.com wrote:
the syntax of with() is with(property.subProperty.subSubProperty,
property2.subProperty2.subPropertyProperty2). Bob can answer the question
as to how to make deeply composited editors do the right thing.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote
What does it take exactly?
If I look at dynatblerf sample, there is an AddressEditor in a
PersonEditor and it just seems to work.
I have the same thing, I have a SecuritySettingsEditor inside another
Editor and when I get the EntityProxy back, the security settings
field is always null. What
);
collection.add(value);
}
}
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Even if I put in things manually, let's say
EditorContainerOfficeHandle, HashSetOfficeHandle, OfficeEditor offices;
which is a CompositeEditor
public class
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:41 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
This assumes that the built in persist method works for everyone and
it really, really doesn't. Now we have a serious chicken and egg
problem because our persist
a good way of
doing this
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:41 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
This assumes that the built in persist method works for everyone
Ah sorry, it's the request members of RequestFactory can now inherit
from RequestContext. Will give that a go
If that works, would be pretty sweet
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry, s/rc/rf/
RequestFactory doesn't have create anymore, neither
This actually makes sense to me but if the composite editor is set or
a list, the framework will still be able to construct those types?
You have
CompositeEditorPersonProxy, PersonProxy, NameLabel,
LeafValueEditorPersonProxy {
But if the generic parameter was a collection, wouldn't the
thank you for the clarification, I get it
I don't suppose you have advice for using a mutable CellTable in the
editor framework?
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:34 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
But if the generic parameter was a collection, wouldn't the fact that
it's a leaf editor prevent the
Works for me, and have to say, this is pretty sweet. Also, very nice
touch throwing an exception if an entity crosses request context.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah sorry, it's the request members of RequestFactory can now inherit
from
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:07 PM, BobV b...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
thank you for the clarification, I get it
I'm adding a new adapter class to handle this case, since optional
fields seems like a common thing to see
yeah, CheckBox doesn't work out of the box either because it needs to
implement ValueBase
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for the info
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 30, 6:56 pm, Patrick Julien
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 oct, 18:14, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah, CheckBox doesn't work out of the box either because it needs to
implement ValueBase
Because you try to wrap it in a ValueBoxEditorDecorator?
Yep, I have
Ah, now I know what you're saying, I was trying to wrap this thing in
a decorator, you just need to use it directly since it's an editor
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 oct, 18
The problem is inside in JsonRequestProcessor in the method updatePropertyTypes
It's using entity.getDeclaredFields() which will omit all inherited fields.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Pascal Patry i...@invalidip.com wrote:
I'm currently having 2 issues with
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 oct, 01:17, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, now I know what you're saying, I was trying to wrap this thing in
a decorator, you just need to use it directly since it's an editor
AFAICT, the only thing
Is there a wave or doc somewhere about the editor framework? I'm
looking to see if this can be used to create child un-owned
relationships too
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2
8897 fixes it, thank you
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to migrate to EntityProxyId and all I can get is
java.lang.AssertionError: encodedId required
I can my response from from AbstractRequest.handleResponseText, I do
get the response I
Is there a class that integrates the two? same for check boxes?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
I am trying to migrate to EntityProxyId and all I can get is
java.lang.AssertionError: encodedId required
I can my response from from AbstractRequest.handleResponseText, I do
get the response I expect out of the server, but obviously without any
kind of encoded id in the payload.
I added
It's not very clear to me how EntityProxyId helps us achieve very
simple scenarios.
How do you use this thing when you have pre and post operations to do
in an activity?
If I have an edit scenario, let's say a user with a list of phones,
normally, I would follow something like this:
1. Set the
Hmm, does that mean we would still be stuck using only static methods?
I mean, it's not that far out to introduce a helper class to find
types.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:35 PM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Revision: 8838
Author: rda...@google.com
Date: Wed Sep 22 10:34:59 2010
Log:
Using RequestFactory, we can only call static methods on the server now correct?
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Rajeev Dayal rda...@google.com wrote:
Sorry, I'm not sure what you're referring to here.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, does
What exactly fills in this field currently? This field is always null
for me on the client
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Amit Manjhi amitman...@google.com wrote:
stableId is not a field in the EntityProxy. It is computed when stableId()
is called on an EntityProxy. Does that help?
not yet no, I understand what you're saying but I don't understand the
comments in EntityProxyId that
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Amit Manjhi amitman...@google.com wrote:
The javadoc wording can probably be improved. Comments welcome.
Essentially, what the javadoc wants to capture is specified in the test:
com.google.gwt.requestfactory.client.RequestFactoryTest::testStableId()
Btw,
a reproducible test case?
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Amit Manjhi amitman...@google.com
wrote:
stableId is not a field in the EntityProxy. It is computed when
stableId()
is called on an EntityProxy. Does that help
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
Ah, I noticed that exception in the find method too. I thought I had
introduced the problem, but I think instead I just started using the feature
for the first time.
Patrick, is the exception reliable? Do you have a recipe?
is AbstractProxyEditActivity
we can work around this but I'm still taking the time to expose the
issue here.
That and I'm still not sure how we implement find on our end in the
server with this new mechanism
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010
thanks, it works now
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Konstantin.Scheglov
konstantin.scheg...@gmail.com wrote:
I just noticed that it's there but it fails to load with the error:
Actually, UiBinder is in the menu but it fails with the error message:
Unable to open file
What is the property that is needed to enable this on existing view?
It works on a new file but that's it
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks, it works now
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Konstantin.Scheglov
konstantin.scheg...@gmail.com wrote
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 2:48 pm, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the property that is needed to enable this on existing view?
It works on a new file but that's it
right-click - open with... - Window Builder editor
2010/9/15 Miguel Méndez mmen...@google.com:
Thanks for spotting that Patrick. I'll get the code updated.
no thank you
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Is there another wave than this one that explains how you do find() on
the server using only the stable id? I really don't get how you fill
in that part.
My understanding is that the stable id is generated client side, so we
can't persist it on the server since it will be browser session based.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
For now, via the same static find methods you already provide. As quickly as
we can manage it, via the same service object api already discussed.
I'm sorry if I am slow but how is the stable id alone sufficient to
find whatever
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Amit Manjhi amitman...@google.com wrote:
The stable id encodes the datastore id and the entity-type. If the
RequestFactory find method cannot lookup the datastoreId for a stableId, a
client side exception is thrown.
Ah, there you go, that would do it, thanks
http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-relaunches-instantiations.html
Yeah, you guys released instantiations' gwt designer but honestly,
it's still pretty unusable to me due to the fact that it's
generating/parsing java code instead of UiBinder. Any plans to
release a uibinder
...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 sep, 19:02, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/09/google-relaunches-instan...
Yeah, you guys released instantiations' gwt designer but honestly,
it's still pretty unusable to me due to the fact that it's
generating/parsing java
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Patrick Julien pjul...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, and forgot to mention, that the root problem is of course this:
public String getValue(R object) {
ProxyImpl proxyImpl = (ProxyImpl) object;
return renderer.render(proxyImpl.Tget(property, String.class
) {
final ProxyImpl proxyImpl = (ProxyImpl) object;
return renderer.render(proxyImpl.T get(property, clazz));
}
}
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Pascal Patry i...@invalidip.com wrote:
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 16:16:06 Patrick Julien wrote:
public String getValue
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
