Hi there,
Of course every option has its pros and its cons. I'm not going to extend
myself more, as I gave my oppinion and others theirs.
A thing that I've seen in your reply about the time:
hi, use ardour to change tempo in a song. ardour can do that as time master
and hydrogen as transport
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Carles Perarnau wrote:
My view is to stick with the UNIX philosophy: a set of simple tools which do
just what they're intended to, and then are put together with pipes (jack)
when needed.
UNIX philosophy barely works for GUI applications. Admit it :)
There
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
I've actually been a little torn on this issue... whether to go in a
monolithic, all-in-one direction -- or to go in a more modular direction.
There is demand for two things:
1) DSSI or LV2 drum sampler to use with tools like
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Carles Perarnau wrote:
Hi there,
My humble opinion is that it should remain as a drum machine. Obviously a
very powerful drum machine and so, but nothing more, nothing less.
By the way, when applications mature, they don't necessarily become
bloated pieces
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Sometimes all you have to do is just not use features you need :)
Talk about freudian slip :)
Alexandre
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
My view is to stick with the UNIX philosophy: a set of simple tools which do
just what they're intended to, and then are put together with pipes (jack)
when needed.
UNIX philosophy barely works for GUI applications. Admit it :)
This is
2009/10/21 Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Carles Perarnau wrote:
My view is to stick with the UNIX philosophy: a set of simple tools which
do
just what they're intended to, and then are put together with pipes
(jack)
when needed.
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Carles Perarnau wrote:
Summarizing: I like it as it is (well, with a better gui), you prefer it
different? perfect, it's your oppinion. By no means I'm going to try to
impose my thoughts to anyone, just share them.
Yes, let's try to keep this attitude. :-) Guys,
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Here's a stab at my answer... could use some refining:
Hydrogen is music-making software tool that allows an individual
musician to create, revise, and control a musical composition in
real-time, even as part of a performance. It provides the musician
with a
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Sebastian Moors wrote:
Hydrogen is a multi-platform music workbench. It's interface is
streamlined and easy-to-use even for musicians which are not computer
[snip]
Thanks!
I hope that as many people as possible share their vision with us. Maybe
we
Gabriel M. Beddingfield schrieb:
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Sebastian Moors wrote:
Hydrogen is a multi-platform music workbench. It's interface is
streamlined and easy-to-use even for musicians which are not computer
[snip]
Thanks!
I hope that as many people as
Am Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:35:24 -0500 (CDT)
schrieb Gabriel M. Beddingfield gabr...@teuton.org:
All:
Attached is the promised feature list. If you'd like to add stuff... let
me know, BUT:
Now that we have all our pet features out of our system, let's hammer out
a _vision_ for what we
Hi there,
My humble opinion is that it should remain as a drum machine. Obviously a
very powerful drum machine and so, but nothing more, nothing less.
My view is to stick with the UNIX philosophy: a set of simple tools which do
just what they're intended to, and then are put together with pipes
As a user I agree with Carles:
My humble opinion is that it should remain as a drum machine
I think it would be best, if you guys are really up for it, to make *additional
*machines that can all be linked. So make a sampler with a midi piano
roll, but do it as a separate entity that can be
Am Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:11:24 +0200
schrieb Carles Perarnau pedroarna...@gmail.com:
Hi there,
My humble opinion is that it should remain as a drum machine. Obviously a
very powerful drum machine and so, but nothing more, nothing less.
My view is to stick with the UNIX philosophy: a set of
Hi guys,
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Carles Perarnau wrote:
My view is to stick with the UNIX philosophy: a set of simple tools
which do just what they're intended to, and then are put together with
pipes (jack) when needed.
I've actually been a little torn on this issue... whether to go in a
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
All:
Attached is the promised feature list. If you'd like to add stuff...
let me know, BUT:
Now that we have all our pet features out of our system, let's hammer
out a _vision_ for what we want in the future. (...as Alexandre wisely
advised.)
A
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Dave Allan wrote:
My vision for Hydrogen is very simple, and it does most of what I need
right now: I want to be able to drive Hydrogen from a set of electronic
triggers, and I want to model the sounds that come from an acoustic kit
as accurately as possible.
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Dave Allan wrote:
My vision for Hydrogen is very simple, and it does most of what I need
right now: I want to be able to drive Hydrogen from a set of electronic
triggers, and I want to model the sounds that come from an acoustic
19 matches
Mail list logo
