Does anyone know of a program that will search a set of MVS data sets
for a member and/or text within a member? I am looking for something
that can run in batch and search a large number of data sets in a
single operation. Does the CBT tape or some other venue have a tool
that will do that?
They're still coming. This is really starting to tick me off.
11th Commandment: Do not tick off a webmaster.
If this isn't fixed - and soon - J B Hunt might find ALL its email going quiet
when its
upstream provider disconnects it for spamming.
Return-Path:
Received: from
The virtual 8304K looks suspicious. normally that means some 24bit code
because there isn't as much usage of EXT (above the line private).
But all my modules are AMODE=31 RMODE=ANY.
Maybe something I could force using LE parameters on the JCL PARM-Statement?!?!?
Michael
Mike
I don't remember the correct terminology but DB2 runs in secondary address
spacespe mode HASN SASN, etc. to other subsystems like CICS. So if you want
to see what is truly going on you might want to cause an abend and go thrugh
the TCBs in the dump.
It was really difficult programming a CICS DB2
Hello group,
I have a SADMP where a SVCDUMP was captured but not yet written to DASD.
How can I extract the SVCDUMP from the SADMP?
Thanks
John
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Please can anyone point me at some sort of cross-reference table regarding
IBM CPU models vs. class/series ranges?
What I'm looking for is some way to know that a 2086 is a z/90 box, or that
a 9672-RC6 is not, etc.And what is a 2066? (never heard of that one
before I'd started this latest
I think you can find this info in any MIPS chart.
9672
7060 - Multiprise 3000
2003 - Multiprise 2000
2064 - z900
2066 - z800
2084 - z990
2086 - z890
2094 - z9 EC
2096 - z9 BC
Marian Gasparovic
IBM Slovakia
On 6/28/06, Compton, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please can anyone point me at
David,
You can use ISPF 3.4 to make any list of data sets and then search all the
members of all data sets using SRCHFOR. This invokes ISRSUPC to search the data
sets, and the results are placed into a list data set.
I'm pretty sure you can run ISRSUPC in batch also, but I don't know the
Compton, John wrote:
Please can anyone point me at some sort of cross-reference table regarding
IBM CPU models vs. class/series ranges?
What I'm looking for is some way to know that a 2086 is a z/90 box, or that
a 9672-RC6 is not, etc.And what is a 2066? (never heard of that one
before
Wrong, z890 has only one model A04 and many capacity settings
Same with z9 EC, which has five models S08, S18, S28, S38, S54 and z9
BC which has two models R07 and S07.
Marian Gasparovic
IBM Slovakia
On 6/28/06, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2086 is z/890, models xy0, where x is 1 to 4, y is 1
-- snip --
use IPCS COPYCAPD. (It took me a while to find the current name, but thanks
to Bob Wright Jim Mulders former verbx dmpwrite made it into IPCS as a
standard command, and we don't even need to think about 31 and 64 bit
versions!)
-- snip -
Thanks Barbara - that was it.
John
Take a look at zPCR (
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/PRS1381 )
As well as being a fine capacity planning tool it contains details of
all the current models
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Marian Gasparovic wrote:
Wrong, z890 has only one model A04 and many capacity settings
Same with z9 EC, which has five models S08, S18, S28, S38, S54 and z9
BC which has two models R07 and S07.
Marian,
I think it is a matter or naming. You said S08 is a model. I said that
704 is a model. It
Radoslaw,
especialy with EC machine it matters a lot, because you can have S38
(four books) model at 704 capacity setting.
Yes, naming is complicated, I just wanted to point out number of
models for each machine type.
If you use 2086-230 everybody knows what it is regardless of proper
naming
Barbara Nitz wrote:
use IPCS COPYCAPD. (It took me a while to find the current name, but thanks to Bob Wright
Jim Mulders former verbx dmpwrite made it into IPCS as a standard command,
and we don't even need to think about 31 and 64 bit versions!)
Jim Mulder's seemingly endless bag o'
His e-mail signature says z/OS System Test. Seems like
it *should* say z/OS Skunkworks Developer. :-)
No. It should say Miracle worker :-)
Barbara
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
Yes, it is downloadable from ShopzSeries
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Duane Weaver
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Perl for zOS
It is included in Ported Tools.
We have installed and run minimal tests (Hello World) and it appears to
work as advertised. Our WebSphere folks will be pleased!
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:53:30 -0600, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a recent note, Tom Marchant said:
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:11:03 -0500
USS is Unformatted System Services, and it has been documented in VTAM
manuals since long before Open Edition was announced. Why
I understood that he's asked to avoid the STC for forked()
/ spawned() UNIX processes. If this is the question, then the
answer is there is no way.
forked() / spawned() UNIX processe run in BPXAS address spaces
and these are STCs started by WLM. This similar to the JES
initiators which are
Barbara Nitz wrote on 06/28/2006 05:24:31 AM:
use IPCS COPYCAPD. (It took me a while to find the current name, but
thanks to Bob Wright Jim Mulders former verbx dmpwrite made it
into IPCS as a standard command, and we don't even need to think
about 31 and 64 bit versions!)
You do, however,
BTW, I do call it USS, but don't like the ambiguity of it.
Not the only ambiguity, I guess. But does it really hurt?
From context it should be pretty clear whether a topic is
about VTAM or about z/OS UNIX, isn't it?
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hunkeler Peter (KIUB 34)
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OMVS SERVICES submit as batch
I understood that he's asked to avoid the STC for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Godfrey
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 10:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Character set conversoin headaches
Correction: That should be CRLF to LF.
Bill
Perhaps I'm
Factoid of questionable value - requests for MIPS tables over the last week:
z9 bc - 118 unique vists - sometimes multiple displays
z9 ec - 18 ditto
(z9 - 54, z890 - 52, z990 - 11, z890 - 6)
Nobody downloaded the disclaimer.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:31:43 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case of
missing current IODF, the IODF chosen by '--' will be more current than
IODF chosen by '++'.
For Skip, yes. Used to be for us also. But since our consolidation
we share IODFs between 5 sysplexes and some smaller
Now that the dinosaurs (Zx90s) are roaming the earth again, is there a
resurgence in interest in learning the old ways?
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
PH: 770 621 3256
If we wait for the moment when everything is ready, we shall never
begin.
? Ivan Turgenev
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:13:15 +0200, Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RESEARCH.FREESERVE.CO.UK wrote:
Factoid of questionable value - requests for MIPS tables over the last
week:
z9 bc - 118 unique vists - sometimes multiple displays
z9 ec - 18 ditto
(z9 - 54, z890 - 52, z990 - 11, z890 - 6)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin
Now that the dinosaurs (Zx90s) are roaming the earth again,
is there a resurgence in interest in learning the old ways?
Apparently not: Steve Comstock http://www.trainersfriend.com has all
but
Hmmm - not sure what you mean by download, but after a previous posting of
yours, I clicked on the disclaimer link last week just for the hell of it.
Didn't read it of course.
Nigel
On 28/6/06 14:13, Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Factoid of questionable value - requests for MIPS tables
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 8:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Curiosity
Now that the dinosaurs (Zx90s) are roaming the earth again,
is there a
That is interesting as well as high schools around here are cranking out
A+ and Network certified people by the gross. Now the glut seems to be in
that market. It proves, again, that it's possible to feed a large system
with fewer bodies than it is to tend the server farm.
Thanks, John.
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:14:34 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:31:43 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In case of
missing current IODF, the IODF chosen by '--' will be more current than
IODF chosen by '++'.
For Skip, yes. Used to be for us also. But
As an aside, it is quite normal in the UNIX world to start long
running work similar to the following:
nohup unix-command ..params.. input.data standard.output.messages
2error.messages
I've not tried this on z/OS to see if it works. And on most current
UNIX
systems, the user is sitting on a X
Right, take the lowest common denominator and make it the standard for
the best OS, instead of the other way around. z/OS is too difficult to
maintain , but when there is a problem you know exactly what has been
applied and how you can remove it.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
In a recent note, McKown, John said:
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:05:14 -0500
Perhaps I'm confused, but I am fairly sure that z/OS UNIX text files are
IBM has done its best to confuse us on this point.
delimited by the x'15' code point. This is not an LF (Line Feed). It is
a NL (New
This will work for scanning a list of pdses:
/* SCANDD REXX EXEC TO SCAN A LIST OF DATASETS */
0001
ARG SRCH
00011009
'EXECIO * DISKR INFILE (STEM DSNS. FINIS'
00012109
ADDRESS ISPEXEC
00013000
DO X = 1 TO DSNS.0
00020009
LLA = LLA
0003
DSNAME= STRIP(DSNS.X)
00040011
I believe there was (is?) a language translation program which operated by
translating the source language into Esperanto and the Esperanto into the
target language. I don't remember what it was called. I also don't know how
well it worked, if at all.
Jon
snip
Maybe Esperanto, by
virtue
Yes, it is the dd command which I am referring to like this -
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/st0 bs=1M
My concern was that the input and output of 1+0 was a very round number
and my memory was telling me that what I had seen in the past was something
that looked more like an actual number of
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:26:45 -0500, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:14:34 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:31:43 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In case of
missing current IODF, the IODF chosen by '--' will be more current
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:49:24 -0400, Jon Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe there was (is?) a language translation program which operated
by translating the source language into Esperanto and the Esperanto
into the target language. I don't remember what it was called. I
also don't know how
I thought the same thing. The idea reminded me of the tourist phrase books in
a Monty Python sketch.
Jon
snip
Sounds like two opportunities for something to be lost in the translation.
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:05:25 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For Skip, yes. Used to be for us also. But since our consolidation
we share IODFs between 5 sysplexes and some smaller monoplexes that
don't share catalogs. So we have 5 IODFs cataloged in all environments
(we maintain
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:26:45 -0500, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:14:34 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:31:43 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In case of
missing current IODF, the IODF chosen by
Still waiting for the code to be written and published but claim they
have good intentions:
Compuware ABEND-AID (JEERS! To Compuware for adding this code into
10.1 apparently a poor kludge to implement the HotKey new function.
ABEND-AID was not previously not on the list till this new function
In a backout, I can see where -- or ++ could be a disadvantage. With a
set rotation, you have far fewer choices, and thus far more likely to
guess the right one.
I, too, prefer to rotate through four (0, 1, 2, 3) and stay in sync with
the SE slots. However, the process seems to be quite robust
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:17:52 -0500, Tom Marchant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And then catalog that new name (that changes sequentially every time)
in about 12 different environments? No thanks... more trouble than
it's worth and too error prone. If the purpose of ++ or -- is to
make sure you can
In a message dated 6/28/2006 9:33:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. - Karl Marx
I think another road to Hell is paved with key 8 CSA. What were they
thinking?
Bill Fairchild
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:31:00 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
In fact I don't understand the problem with 12 environments.
1. You can use common IODF for all the environments. It would be
probably huge, but it is possible.
That is what we do. The issue being discussed is changing the
The best way is by looking into the Log for any kind of IXL message around
the time of the Logrec record. For your example, I think it is IXL012I.
Take RC and RSN and go to book
z/OS MVS Programming: Sysplex Services Reference which contains the
IXLCONN return and reason codes.
Look into the
In a recent note, Knutson, Sam said:
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:32:47 -0400
Compuware ABEND-AID (JEERS! To Compuware for adding this code into
10.1 apparently a poor kludge to implement the HotKey new function.
ABEND-AID was not previously not on the list till this new function was
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:36:58 -0500, Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a backout, I can see where -- or ++ could be a disadvantage. With a
set rotation, you have far fewer choices, and thus far more likely to
guess the right one.
Guessing would have nothing to do with it. It is well
Not from where we sit. We are a vendor and the lack of skills (and
interest, which is what you asked about) has grown inexorably for
more than a decade now. We see it everywhere, vendors and IT shops
alike. It makes our job increasingly difficult. Just to select an
obvious example from the
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/lookat/ will take
you to the IBM Message Lookup page for ZOS.
Daniel McLaughlin
ZOS Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
PH: 770 621 3256
If we wait for the moment when everything is ready, we shall never
begin.
? Ivan Turgenev
Hello all, would one of you kind people please direct me to some good
study materials on SMS routine coding. Thanks in advance.
*
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are
To add to that about the difficulty of finding interested, upcoming
talent, is the rapid approach of mass retirements. Our team of 5 mainframe
systems support personnel is all AARP eligible, and a couple are on the
verge of punching out.
I'm asking just 12 more good working years, will be 55
In a message dated 6/28/2006 6:45:38 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I meant to say is that it's a mystery to me why they chose Unix
System Services for the new name when USS was already a well established
acronym.
BTW, I do call it USS, but don't like the
Have you looked into the IBM Scholars program? They are working with
Universities to generate interest in the mainframe. There does seem to
be a good deal of interest from the schools and from the students, they
just need to know that we are here and aren't going away. Once students
have the
Jon,
Thanks for that. I had considered an approach like this (Rexx is
usually my first response to such tasks), but that kind of iterative
processing in Rexx, plus all the allocation/deallocation, is likely
to be just too slow for the kinds of searches we need to do. I don't
mind if the job
OK...I have spoke with the group that said the problem was fixed and let
them know it was not and they realized it was black listed on the domain.
It has been removed now. Please let me know if you still see the problem.
Sorry about your headaches. I think because I am on the IBM-MAIN list
My hovercraft is full of eels. And what follows. Yes. :)
David
At 10:11 AM 6/28/2006 -0400, you wrote:
I thought the same thing. The idea reminded me of the tourist
phrase books in a Monty Python sketch.
Jon
snip
Sounds like two opportunities for something to be lost in the
David,
If you have PDSMAN, it can scan multiple pds datasets. It will show the
name of the
pds dataset in the heading in case you are concatenating multiple datasets.
That is
one advantage it had over the ISRSUPC utility that IBM provides.
Regards,
John
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:10:11 -0400, Daniel A. McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm asking just 12 more good working years, will be 55 this year.
You lucky Dawg! I am 36, so probably a good 30+ for me!
--
For IBM-MAIN
IPOUPDTE might work for you if you can live with its token scanning.
(Generally, you can scan for anything that might pass as a JCL token.)
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Yea, they could have used System Services for Unix. A much better
acronym. :-))
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/28/2006
07:45:04 AM:
What I meant to say is that it's a mystery to me why they chose Unix
System Services for the new name when USS was already a
Mike,
Hello all, would one of you kind people please direct me to some good
study materials on SMS routine coding. Thanks in advance.
I guess you could start with the DFSMS:Storage Administrators Guide from
IBM.
Regards,
John
When the z came out there was a systems journal that had pictures of the
internal processor card. Anybody have url?
Thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
I have an old (model 1) 2074 and need to add an LPAR. I initially
configured the 2074, and it had just sat there and ran untouched for
many moons. That means I have to go though something of a relearning
curve.
I have used only one of the four possible configuration files.
Question: what
I'm 47 and will be lucky to ever retire.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 888.221.9862
http://www.mainline.com
--
For
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Shein
Not from where we sit. We are a vendor and the lack of
skills (and interest, which is what you asked about) has
grown inexorably for more than a decade now. We see it
everywhere, vendors and IT
with school loans for my daughter I hope I can retire in 25 years at age 85
Bob Lawrence
DBA
Boscov's Dept Stores LLc
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:24 AM
To:
In a message dated 6/28/2006 10:29:08 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When the z came out there was a systems journal that had pictures of the
internal processor card. Anybody have url?
How pretty?
_http://www.research.ibm.com/zseries/_
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:30:49 -0500, Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have an old (model 1) 2074 and need to add an LPAR. I initially
configured the 2074, and it had just sat there and ran untouched for
many moons. That means I have to go though something of a relearning
curve.
I have
That, and looking at existing examples was how we learned.
David
At 11:27 AM 6/28/2006 -0400, you wrote:
Mike,
Hello all, would one of you kind people please direct me to some good
study materials on SMS routine coding. Thanks in advance.
I guess you could start with the DFSMS:Storage
Try Chapter 10 (Defining ACS routines) from the following manual:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/dgt2s230.pdf
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Kington
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:28 AM
To:
63 ditto.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/28/2006
11:32:21 AM:
I'm 47 and will be lucky to ever retire.
Mark D Pace
-
The information contained in this communication (including any
attachments hereto) is confidential
On the other hand, the supply of us old wind breakers may dwindle faster
than the demand.
That puts you in an interesting position. The bad news is that it might
become even harder to explain to anyone exactly what it is we do and why
we do things the way we do. And why you should be paid so
Twenty-odd years ago, when I was still on the Applications side, I
interviewed for one job at which programmers were given the option to
code in COBOL, PL/I or C. I asked, What about Assembler? The
interviewer replied, Anybody who even thinks about Assembler ought to
be taken out and shot!
'Tradurre è impossibile, ma necessario'. Not, finally, at all roughly:
translation is impossible, but necessary.
On the other hand, the standard Italian characterization of translators is
'Traduttore, Traditore', which becomes, accurately but not at all memorably,
'Translator, traitor' in
At 11:15 AM 6/28/2006 -0400, you wrote:
Have you looked into the IBM Scholars program? They are working with
Universities to generate interest in the mainframe. There does seem to
be a good deal of interest from the schools and from the students, they
just need to know that we are here and
47 and I only want/need 3 more years to get my son out of college. After that,
I'm going to sit at home, eat chocolate, and get fat!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/28/2006 11:40:54 AM
63 ditto.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 06/28/2006
11:32:21 AM:
I'm 47 and will be
Basicaly yes. Just make a copy but use one of the other configuration
names and make your changes to that. Then set the updated file to be the
one used the next time the interface is loaded.
Bill Bishop
Specialist
Toyota Motor Engineering Manufacturing North America, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. That led me what I wanted.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 8:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z Pretty Picture
In a message dated 6/28/2006 10:29:08 A.M. Central
I learned my Data Processing from a local Vocational school, 25+ years
ago. Fortran, assembler, RPG, and COBOL. Today they only teach PC
technology. :(
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax:
Hey, I'm 23 and an Assembler geek in the mainframe programming world. I
don't even want to count the years til I retire :-). And yes, there is
a growing resurgence of interest in mainframes, albeit it's a s l o
w one. I am the PM of the zNextGen project at SHARE and we have over
125 members
I recently became aware of the IBM Education Assistant, which provides
online education on various topics. The z/OS topics are at
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/ieduasst/stgv1r0/index.jsp
There are courses on a lot of basic z/OS topics, such as concepts,
networking, application
Hi Everyone:
We are having a situation that i can not understand. Using RMF we have a
started class that have been having CPU contention. Checking in rmf, I
found that the primary reason for the delay its itself, I couldn't
understand whats its really means. This is what RMF says:
Job:
You aren't looking too closely, then. The numbers may be small, but there
are MF assembler programmers younger than I am (just turned 44).
In fact, my company just hired at least one graduate from Northern Illinois'
program.
Later,
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 02:04, David Shein wrote:
Does anyone know of a program that will search a set of MVS data
sets for a member and/or text within a member?
I am looking for something that can run in batch and search
a large number of data sets in a single operation.
Does the
I'm 37, and I'd love to be an assembler wizard. Call me crazy, but I think
that would be really cool (reference my previous posts regarding TCBs,
etc.) But, at this point it has to be essentially self-directed, because
we have a gentleman here who is very good, ex-IBMer (started right after
Don't forget that IPOUPDTE is now CPPUPDTE (it supports PDSEs).
And, yes, it still needs that $$$COIBM member.
Later,
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
http://www.mrmullins.big-bear-city.ca.us/
http://www.the-bus-stops-here.org/
German is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Allocation Error
Hi, All,
Anybody have an idea what this means:
Individual General Device
Some years back I was working for Programart in their Houston office. Mgr
of the group had the ok to expand the number of developers. He had the
bright idea to hire a recent college grad and we were all supposed to help
mentor and bring this newbie along. One of the candidates, a recent
Even in a 66% loaded system, the odds are a task will wake up and ask
for the CPU when it just happens to be running another task. The delay
is just enough to be noticed, but usually not enough to make any
difference.
For your case, perhaps a mother task kicks off a daughter task and
daughter
First time I've ever heard of a company blacklisting an entire country.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
In a message dated 6/28/2006 11:46:52 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could be Analysis continues along that line (some tape drives are
rather tired)
Guess EREP is next place to look to see what's happening. If the box didn't
phone home guess it could
In case anyone wants to know, BTAM does work under ZOS 1.7 . We have just
converted and have had no problems.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Try the Scholars site. I believe that you can solicit resumes from
there.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Shein
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:47 AM
To:
I hope your son is studying mainframe technology at one of the many
institutions that are now teaching 'dinosaur' subjects!
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Pinion
Mike, We believe that what you describe is the correct information. REINIT
should remove the intercepts.
We will be updating the redbook to include more detailed information on
how to do this with the different releases. Right now we have multiple
conversions in progress using IBM conversion
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
