Bob, If RMM simply issued a RACROUTE under the hsm ACEE, (and we know hsm
is trusted), hsm would be authorized to release ANY volume that happened
to be defined to hsm at the time. We have seen situations where hsm
information and reality get out of synch. so we have to avoid hsm
releasing
I actually look after the change management software and am trying to
Ahh well, I will make sure all the opts are abbreviated and recommend to
our programmers that they use the CBL statement in their source for any
extra options they might want to add.
As an ex-change management person, I
Rick Fochtman wrote (drifting slightly off topic):
While I can't speak for reverse order with respect to
catalog entries,
it makes a HUGE difference in deleting PDS members.
Jan MOEYERSONS wrote:
I actually look after the change management software and am trying to
Ahh well, I will make sure all the opts are abbreviated and recommend to
our programmers that they use the CBL statement in their source for any
extra options they might want to add.
As an
From: Chris Mason I seem to remember SPOOL meant Simultaneous Peripheral
Operations On Line
I think we all acknowledge that SPOOL was contrived
to mean Simultaneous Peripheral Operations On Line.
The doubt expressed within this thread relates to whether
anyone ever really thought of it as an
I thought maybe someone out there might know the answer or I'm just
venting...
Every year we order a new serverpac this year we just got done
installing z/OS 18.8 on our lab for a roll out in 2007. During the ordering
process which I did I asked IBM could we order GDPSXRC and WD4Z.
On 13 Dec 2006 16:46:50 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Charles Mills)
wrote:
I don't think so (but I'm not a patent attorney). If you can put your hand
on a Bible and swear that you did not think you were infringing, then it's
not willful infringement, AFAIK.
So you don't go to jail - but you do need
On 13 Dec 2006 21:08:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Mason)
wrote:
That being said, only the gray beards in the list are going to be
authorities on this one - of course, you could be one.
My beard is still a bit gray - but is close to white.
In a recent note, Chris Mason said:
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:52:00 +0100
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/bookmgr/pictures/iea2a660.p1z.gif
quote
For a good example of how your primary mode programs can pass parameters,
consider the way the system uses a register to pass
In a recent note, Robert Bardos said:
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:49:56 +0100
Wouldn't it make sense then if ISPF allowed us to sort member
lists in reverse order? I thought and in fact it does. A quick
test doing a sort id name d on a PDS being used by a bunch of
team members
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
CoBOL doesn't fit the standard acronym
My memory is failing me on this one.
I thought it was:
Common
Oriented
Business
Operating
Language
So, you're saying:
COmmon
Business
Operating
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 15:19 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
2. If you think the PTO will let you patent anything at all with no serious
examination, I can tell you from personal experience that it ain't so.
From Wikipedia:
===
U.S. Patent 6,368,227 entitled Method of Swinging on a Swing was
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills
[ snip ]
I say we should not throw out the baby of software patents
with the bath water of protection for inventors -- of any type.
Two more things:
1. Disclaimer: I'm not totally
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought maybe someone out there might know the answer or I'm just
venting...
Every year we order a new serverpac this year we just got done
installing z/OS 18.8 on our lab for a roll out in 2007. During the ordering
process which I did I asked IBM could we
Since this thread hasn't drifted far enough off-topic, I'll just point out
that, according to wikipedia, SPOOL is a backronym. (or bacronym)
A backronym is created when one constructs a phrase that has, as its
acronym, an existing short word. There are both official and generally
serious, as
In a message dated 12/14/2006 8:18:37 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very new -- works on z/OS 1.8; fails with too many sort fields
on 1.6.
Maybe it's just the syntax. Can sort on any displayed field Ascending is
default, Descending has been there since day
We are at z/OS 1.6. Most of our catalogs date from the deep, dark past
of MVS 4.3. In effect, they all have IMBED. I know that IBM has
deprecated IMBED, but that datasets (including catalogs) which have it
will still be usable. This appears to be true even in z/OS 1.8. Is it
worth the effort to
John -
Thanks for replying. I thought there was a SOD sorry I must of
imagined it. But when it comes to WD4Z formerly WSED it has 4 components
that need to be SMP/E installed for the product to work
FMIDS(H001600,H002600,HEDS500,HCMA601). I would think these FMIDS could
come via serverpac
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:15:50 -0600, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are at z/OS 1.6. Most of our catalogs date from the deep, dark past
of MVS 4.3. In effect, they all have IMBED. I know that IBM has
deprecated IMBED, but that datasets (including catalogs) which have it
will still be
John,
I'm just finishing up this same exercise. We're using the TREX tool from
Dinosoft. Please contact me offlist and I'll give you the details. Not as
bad as you might think.
Jimmy
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
We are at z/OS 1.6. Most of our catalogs date from the deep,
dark past of MVS 4.3. In effect, they all have IMBED. I know
that IBM has deprecated IMBED, but that datasets (including
catalogs) which
One irony. IBM licensed PSI to run z/OS on a Designated Machine and now
they are suing them for running z/OS on that machine.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy Wagner
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ICF catalogs with IMBED
John,
I'm just finishing up this same exercise. We're using the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil Sidler
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: More on Law Suit
One irony. IBM licensed PSI to run z/OS on a Designated
Machine and now
Robert Bardos wrote:
Rick Fochtman wrote (drifting slightly off topic):
While I can't speak for reverse order with respect to
catalog entries,
it makes a HUGE difference in deleting PDS members.
Are you certain about that?
My understanding was that IBM licensed PSI to run z/OS on a designated
real IBM mainframe.
John P Baker
Software Engineer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Sidler
Sent: Thursday, December
In a recent note, Ed Finnell said:
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:49:59 EST
In a message dated 12/14/2006 8:18:37 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very new -- works on z/OS 1.8; fails with too many sort fields
on 1.6.
Maybe it's just the syntax. Can sort on
-snip
We are at z/OS 1.6. Most of our catalogs date from the deep, dark past
of MVS 4.3. In effect, they all have IMBED. I know that IBM has
deprecated IMBED, but that datasets (including catalogs) which have it
will still be usable. This
Even the acronym finder isn't quite sure..but does agree with
most. I seem to remember Output back in my earlier ops daze.
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?Acronym=spoolstring=exact
J R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
12/14/2006
In a message dated 12/14/2006 9:54:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Note the revision bar. My experiment confirms. Perhaps you
were benefitting from a local mod.
Well semi-hemi-demi. The A and D were added in 1.8 prior to that the A or D
was determined by
I don't know if Dino Software is still doing this or not, but at one point they
were allowing free use of TREX to clean up imbed replicate.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006
On the other hand if change control changes code in any way they become
responsible for the results.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/14/2006
04:31:46 AM:
As an ex-change management person, I have to recommend you do not do
that
and indeed that you prohibit
If I have a windows directory containing hundreds of files that all have the
same file extension eg filname.DEF, how can I drop the file extension and
get them into a pds on the mainframe.
Jim McAlpine
--
For IBM-MAIN
I have been asked to run several CATALOG / VVDS DIAGNOSE on the production
LPAR. I am hesitant because I am not sure if there would be an impact. Below
is my jcl. Would there be any problems ?
//DIAGNOS EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
- snip -
If I have a windows directory containing hundreds of files that all have the
same file extension eg filname.DEF, how can I drop the file extension and
get them into a pds on the mainframe.
- snip -
What about:
1. step
DOS command:
rename *.DEF *.
2. step
ftp with
That'll do nicely thanks.
Jim McAlpine
On 12/14/06, TISLER Zaromil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- snip -
If I have a windows directory containing hundreds of files that all have
the
same file extension eg filname.DEF, how can I drop the file extension and
get them into a pds on the
IBMLink users may find this information (from a recent post to CICS-L)
to be of interest ...
Over the past month or so, there have been many posts in this forum
about not being able to access IBMLink.
I have been involved in some meetings about availability, and wanted
to share the current
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:52:38 -0500, John P Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are you certain about that?
My understanding was that IBM licensed PSI to run z/OS on a designated
real IBM mainframe.
No, not certain. But I thought that I had heard somewhere that the machine
L.L.Bean was testing with
willie bunter wrote:
I have been asked to run several CATALOG / VVDS DIAGNOSE on the production
LPAR. I am hesitant because I am not sure if there would be an impact. Below
is my jcl. Would there be any problems ?
//DIAGNOS EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
John Chase replied to my defense of software patents, and my mention that I
had a software patent pending, with What does a patent do for your software
'invention' that copyright does not? I.e., why is copyright not
sufficient?
Since the IBM-PSI thread had drifted so much, I decided to start a
C: ren *.ext *.
and then FTP.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: moving files with file extensions from windows to mainframe
If I
The fact that one or more (non-software) patents was ridiculous (and then
corrected) is not an argument that all software patents should be
disallowed.
It would be like pointing to a ridiculous result from one Windows computer
and saying it was an argument for getting rid of mainframes.
I can
Dino Software has the free offer on their website. Go to the following
URL and page down to the bottom of the page:
http://www.dino-software.com/downloads/pdf/IMBEDDetails.pdf
John Ayon
z/OS Server Technology - Technology Specialist
Thanks Rick,
I ran the job. The first part gave a return code of 0 but the second part
was bypassed. I checked the message but I cannot figure it out. Can you spot
my error?
DIAGNOSE -
ICFCATALOG -
It is hunting for a dataset, not a DD-stmt. (COMPAREDS, not COMPAREDD).
David Mueller | Systems Programmer | DMS/EITS
Phone: 850-414-9134 (Rm 107 SRC) | Fax: 850-921-8343
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
willie bunter
but the second part was bypassed.
DIAGNOSE VVDS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: What does a patent do that copyright does not?
/snip/
The invention is in the field of the
Willie,
I have run this many times, and there is no impact as far as the system usage
of the catalog goes.
Depending on the errors the DIAG finds, it could be a rather long listing.
But I run it all the time.
Lizette Koehler
We currently have 10 Sun/STK 9840 tape drives, each attached to its own ESCON
CHPID.
I'm trying to decide whether to acquire the IBM 3590 configuration described
below versus a similar number of FICON-attached STK 9840C drives, switched two
or three per FICON CHPID. Of course, the Sun/STK rep
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
or the changed bit was reset and hsm thought that the dsn had
not changed and then reconnected?
Opened a PMR with DFSMShsm, and among other things they explained how
hsm determines a dataset's
There was a time when IBM had language in the license agreement that allowed
the license to be transferred to another computer. What some within IBM
viewed as a loophole was changed. However, the agreements in place could
not be unilaterally changed by IBM.
IF PSI had such an agreement in place
Public key cryptography was one of my inspirations. Discussion of cancelled
credit cards here http://cikeep.com/faq.htm.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jeffrey D. Smith
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:18 AM
To:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:50:35 -0600, Tom Moulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a time when IBM had language in the license agreement that allowed
the license to be transferred to another computer. What some within IBM
viewed as a loophole was changed. However, the agreements in place could
John,
These DFSMSdss dumps were not from AUTODUMP, were they? Because if they
were, the DUMPCLASS could have the RESET keyword in its definition.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday,
Just for fun, can you post the dump and restore JCL from your test?
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM Missing Member
Well, this forum is not the right place to sell my invention, but the
difference is that you might presumably be willing to share your name and
key with a wide circle of friends, and if you had had the malicious
foresight to buy it under an assumed name, then you could freely share it on
a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Just for fun, can you post the dump and restore JCL from your test?
Dump:
//STEP001 EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=8192K
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:33:45 +, Jim McAlpine wrote:
That'll do nicely thanks.
Jim McAlpine
You'll still have to aware of any files with names greater than 8
characters. PDS's still won't support long file names.
--
For
-Original Message-
If I have a windows directory containing hundreds of files that all have
the
same file extension eg filname.DEF, how can I drop the file extension and
get them into a pds on the mainframe.
If you don't want to have to rename any of the files on your PC, you could
As those checkin kiosks at airports show, if you have a crdit card number,
you have the name of the person to whom the card was issued. By law and
at great expense, issuers verify that the information on the application
for a credit card represents a real person. By adding that name to the
A while back Wintel wanted to sell the idea of having software look up
a unique number on a computer chip.People complained about privacy
issues.
But the big problem for me is the way Windows is designed to make it
very difficult to replace hardware or to turn tested backup machines
into the
On 14 Dec 2006 10:07:24 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Sidler)
wrote:
The ICA is part of the filing. The language is such that another machine
may be used temporarily if the designated machine is inoperable. I supposed
if you make the designated machine inoperable (unplug it?) you could run the
Hallo To all
I am having a Dickens' of a time trying to solve this problem. DFHSM is
trying to recycle a tape and it cannot read it because of datachecks. I
performed a CANCEL REQUEST and got it out of the system. However, I was told
that DFHSM will try again to recycle that damaged
I received this mail yesterday.
Hello everyone,
My name is Lynn, I am Don's daughter.
I regret to inform everyone that my father passed away in his sleep
this weekend.
I can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please put Don in the subject
Lynn Clements
I first
The syntax for MARKFULL is in the DELVOL section of the HSM Storage
Administration Reference manual. But my manual says that this makes
the tape eligible for recycling which seems redundant since it is
already being recycled (unsuccessfully).
I think what you really want is RECYCLE with EXECUTE
This isn't the PC world, we might care about the data on this tape. You
didn't say if this is a backup or migration volume.
All the IBM manuals you should ever need are at:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/
If you have a TAPECOPY of this tape, then TAPEREPL may be
Sorry... we ran out of brochures for the following two products at CMG
in Reno. For those that stopped by, you can download and print them
from the links below.
TCP Problem Finder pdf brochure (tool for easier problem determination)
can be downloaded and printed from here
Hello,
I have the following questions about getting the Prod
LPAR to access the IODF from the Test LPAR.
I did all the needed work on the Test LPAR and the
activation of IODF11 completed without any issues.
Now I want to use this same IODF11 which has all the
needed elements in it for both the
We are having a strange and sporadic abend in some ISV code. So far
all we've got is the IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP. I've set a SLP to get more.
The PSW points to a perfectly valid ST R7,7 instruction.
The strange thing to me is an ILC of 6. How can I get 6 from a 2 bit
field?
We just
Can you verify that instruction? ST R7,7 (5077) would certainly cause
an S0C4.
Larry Crilley
Dino Software, Corp.
http://www.dino-software.com/
412.734.2853
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday,
We have 'SYSHCD' which is located in a shared UCAT, so our IODF's are
similar to 'SYSHCD.IODFxx'.
Steve Horein
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sorry, its an LAR1,82
The ST R7,7 is the tail of a SSM earlier in the module that SYSVIEW
didn't recognize for me. I'm confused sometimes :)
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Programmer(509) 335-7359
Information Technology
Gibney, Dave wrote:
We are having a strange and sporadic abend in some ISV code. So far
all we've got is the IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP. I've set a SLP to get more.
The PSW points to a perfectly valid ST R7,7 instruction.
There is nothing valid about a ST R7,7 instruction;
that says store the
Yah, I had the run instruction from an earlier memory.
But from PoPs Section 6.1.4:
The instruction-length code (ILC) occupies two bit positions and
provides
the length of the last instruction executed.
And:
For supervisor-call and program interruptions, a nonzero ILC
identifies
I think you are still confused. :) An LA instruction can not program
check.
Chuck Arney
illustro Systems International, LLC
http://www.illustro.com
Access 3270 data from anywhere with z/XML-Host
Access 3270 apps from the web with z/Web-Host
Access CMS minidisks from z/OS or z/VSE with CMSACCess
Don Marquardt was the most prolific creator of buttons at SHARE,
and while there was a small charge for the buttons, what little
profit Don made over just the production costs, was donated to
good charities, and, in a few cases, anon flowers were delivered to
SHARE HQ Staff.
His buttons, with
That's my point. I get an 0c1 with the PSW pointing to a valid
instruction.
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=0C1 REASON CODE=0001
TIME=19.25.42 SEQ=09077 CPU= ASID=0088
PSW AT TIME OF ERROR 078D2000 800791C6 ILC 6 INTC 01
ACTIVE LOAD MODULE
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:41:47 -0800, Howard Rifkind wrote:
Hello,
I have the following questions about getting the Prod
LPAR to access the IODF from the Test LPAR.
I did all the needed work on the Test LPAR and the
activation of IODF11 completed without any issues.
Now I want to use this same
In a message dated 12/14/2006 2:57:41 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is nothing valid about a ST R7,7 instruction;
that says store the contents of R7 into location 7
of memory; this is protected storage; and it is an
odd address.
All true, except the OP
In a message dated 12/14/2006 3:08:43 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For supervisor-call and program interruptions, a nonzero ILC
identifies in halfwords the length of the instruction that was last
executed.
When the ILC's two bits are both ones, this means that a
1) If the psw points just beyond the last instruction and
2) noting that X'C1' is not valid op code
the a B or J to offset X'200' causes an 0C1
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/14/2006
04:15:29 PM:
That's my point. I get an 0c1 with the PSW pointing to a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S0C1 with ILC 6
snip
You can get a S0C1 (PIC 1) with ILC 6 if the prior instruction that
executed
Latest update on my PMR:
DFSMSdss is WAD. The change bits are reset on physical RESTOREs
(i.e., RESTORE FULL and RESTORE TRACKS), but not on logical RESTOREs
(i.e., RESTORE DATASET). What this means is that RESTORE FULL does NOT
create a true and correct copy of the source volume that was
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:15:29 -0800, Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's my point. I get an 0c1 with the PSW pointing to a valid
instruction.
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=0C1 REASON CODE=0001
TIME=19.25.42 SEQ=09077 CPU= ASID=0088
PSW AT TIME OF ERROR 078D2000 800791C6 ILC
Well, there you go.
R12 is your base for the BNZ 496(,R12).
Adding the value in R12 to 496 (x'1FE0') yields: 78FD0 + 1F0 = 791C0.
So you would branch there. The code at 791C0 is C1F050104120. C1 would be
ILC 6.
You get this abend when you take the BNZ.
Larry Crilley
Dino Software, Corp.
In a message dated 12/14/2006 3:11:12 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An LA instruction can not program check.
It can not produce an interrupt when it is executed, but it can appear to
have done so. I produced a S0C4 by trying to execute an LA instruction in
I guess it's been to long staring at this, I was thinking the ILC in
IEA995I was hex, not decimal.
The ISV has all we have until the SLP trips.
Thanks for the correction of my thinking.
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Programmer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Crilley
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S0C1 with ILC 6
Well, there you go.
R12 is your base for the BNZ 496(,R12).
Adding
Or someone code something like: B *+2 and not B *+4.
Larry Crilley
Dino Software, Corp.
http://www.dino-software.com/
412.734.2853
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:32 PM
To:
Gibney, Dave wrote:
That's my point. I get an 0c1 with the PSW pointing to a valid
instruction.
SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=0C1 REASON CODE=0001
TIME=19.25.42 SEQ=09077 CPU= ASID=0088
PSW AT TIME OF ERROR 078D2000 800791C6 ILC 6 INTC 01
In a message dated 12/14/2006 3:16:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
01FE BNZ496(,R12) 4770 C1F0
Several other posts have explained what went wrong. I will add a little
more: you have messed up your base register and/or local
Since Don was always badge #1 I've written to Smith-Bucklin / SHARE HQ
to propose that hs number be retired. In these days of electronic
registration probably nothing more than symbolic, but Don was one reason I
stayed with SHARE in the early days; he made it great for a newcomer, and
he was
No twelve is correct. It contains the entry address.
It appears that backing up a little further:
000751B2 01F2 LAR0,4 4100 0004
000751B6 01F6 L R15,12(R15,) 58FF 000C
000751BA 01FA BALR R14,R15
Howard,
As already noted, your IODF needs to be cataloged to PROD only for
dynamic activations or to use as input for HCD work on PROD (and you can
do that from the TEST system). You can IPL with it without it having to
be cataloged (you will receive a warning message that dynamic activation
is
Twelve may be correct, but that BNZ 496(,R12) is not. That is the
instruction causing the problem.
Larry Crilley
Dino Software, Corp.
http://www.dino-software.com/
412.734.2853
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Gibney, Dave
Granted, and we'll tell the ISV. While they're mulling it, I was
wondering how non-zero comes back from CEEBPIRA and see if we can stop
that.
The ISV seems to have a serious coding problem :)
Or it's some other wild branch that just happens to land here :(
Dave Gibney
No, and I just read it a few hours ago in an attempt to help you. That
DEFAULT behavior WAS NOT documented.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:26 PM
To:
A further thought, it might be intentional. This particular ISV has a
nasty habit of using 0C1 for debugging and as a response to unexpected
circumstances. Usually, there's at least an eyecatcher.
The ISV seems to have a serious coding problem :)
Or it's some other wild branch that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S0C1 with ILC 6
A further thought, it might be intentional. This
particular ISV has a
no wonder you are not naming them! An ugly way to catch a bad return code
and an ugly way to abend a program. I have come to like EX 0,*, though it
requires a base register.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 12/14/2006
05:14:02 PM:
A further thought, it might
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk Talman
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: S0C1 with ILC 6
no wonder you are not naming them! An ugly way to catch a
bad return code
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
