ailable, ISTINCLM.
If you do decide to use LU type 1 with a mode table entry such as "SCS" and
the system running CICS is not the same one running the TN3270E server, you
may want to improve flow by taking care of the "pacing" values. This is where
your "private" mode
t the "TELNET device code" can be specified with or without the
leading "IBM-". RFC 2355 is unambiguous: the leading "IBM-" is required.
Clearly the TN3270 server logic inserts the leading "IBM-" if may have
been "carelessly" omitted!
Chris Ma
nvolving the Communications Server IP component are
very often asked on the IBMTCP-L list for preference. I'm afraid I can't recall
whether or not you participate there - getting old ...
Chris Mason
On Thu, 14 May 2009 15:05:45 -0500, Laine, Rogers
wrote:
>From an Attachmate E
ou should take a VTAM buffer trace
at the same time so that we can see whether or not a request is sent from
TSO but does not appear "on the wire".
Chris Mason
[1] For practice with questions in English, you should visit Northern Ireland,
so
you should. In Northern Ireland the
- by many blue moons.
Is there some subtlety I missed here caused by my long neglect of the use of
MVS Utilities - or have so many alternatives cropped up in the "good times"
packaged with "must-have" products that folk have forgotten about the
original "at no extra co
liberately not using HPR because of the
eventual VSE system. I see that VTAM on VSE 4.2 is also - still - 4.2 and has
no HPR support, which explains why you were testing your configurations
without HPR. I needed to check because that's an enhancement that is
long overdue!
Chris Mason
ize of 1498.
Have you had any success with looking for the "MAXDATA" value with other
types of "cross-domain" connections?
Chris Mason
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:59:51 +0200, Norbert Alfred Müller
wrote:
>Hi Chris!
>
>tests are ongoing , but here some results:
>
&
and - although I didn't
quite follow the reasoning.
DWACT=YES is a very handy way not to have to enter a VARY NET,DIAL
command in the case of connections between APPN nodes which use switched
procedures.
Chris Mason
[1] This isn't strictly logical since, to the reque
estimate of the delays.
In case this is problem with VTAM buffers, you can post the D NET,BFRUSE
output before and after your TSO logon attempt on both systems. Note that
only type 2.1 connections using switched procedures - which uniquely
distinguishes your problem case(s) from the others - use th
hile I'm here again, I may as well add that you might be able to survive with
the default values for the related VTAM definitions but you should be *aware*
that you are relying on those related VTAM definitions even if the default
values work with your configuration.
Chris Mason
On Tue, 21
pendix. In Appendix D, "Using HCD", of the Communications Server IP
Configuration Guide you will see a discussion of how to define your
HiperSockets to the "hardware" - and only that as far as I can see with a
quick glance! I have never had actually to do this so I might have
pport can offer you
something you can be persuaded you really need to use in this environment,
then maybe you can be persuaded to continue with NetSpy - or use some
more up-to-date products, possibly in its stead
Chris Mason
[1] "The 'B.M.T.' sandwich at Subway was originally
Bill
I was skipping this topic as one having been raised suspiciously close to April
1st. However I spotted the text of your post in my daily digest and so I'm
yielding to the temptation to mention that expression of absolute
justice "Hoist with your own petard!".
Chris Mason
Subarea to APPN Migration: VTAM and APPN
Implementation, SG24-4656-01:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg244656.html
Chris Mason
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:47:28 -0500, Rabbe, Luke
wrote:
>We currently have a VTAM network that includes 1 network node and 7 end
>nodes that use the same
c=DA400&uid=swg27011275&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-
8&lang=en&rss=ct852other
Chris Mason
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GE
et INACTTIME 0 for the benefit of the
*client* connection?
Reviewing the replies yet again, CWCID I see that Dennis Roach was tring to
tell us all precisely that the problem was the *client* connection - perhaps
with insufficient emphasis - and with the "firewall" red herring th
MVS matters, undertook a day or two later
to investigate why the COBOL program had been so slow. His technique was
to interrupt the program at regular intervals in order to see what it was doing
-
I forget precisely how this was done.
It was only now discovered what the Assembler subroutines in
lavour of
CHPID seem to be being added from time to time to that "Technote" I
referenced. You will, of course, attract some anti-SNA bigots with an appeal
such as this. Be sure that any advice given has documentation from IBM
behind rather than simply being a warped opinion.
Chris Mas
to have posted this problem - the significance of
the PORT statement list is very poorly understood -largely down to very poor
documentation from its very beginning!
Chris Mason
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:35:05 +0200, גדי בן
אבי wrote:
>Thanks
>
>That worked ok, I trouble bec
with
the single statement:
DELETE PORT 2000 UDP IOASRV
QED
Chris Mason
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:58:43 +0200, גדי בן
אבי wrote:
>Thanks
>
>
>Now that I know what the problem is, is there a way to remove the extra
port reservation using an obey file?
>
>TIA
>
&g
lt - not registered with IANA by the
way - port number was 2000.
Chris Mason
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:45:54 +0200, גדי בן
אבי wrote:
>HI,
>
>
>
>If Issue the D TCPIP,NETSTAT,PORTL command I get:
>
>EZZ2500I NETSTAT CS V1R9 TCPIP 252
address space starts initially. It is because the relevant port
is
not found to be in the correct state that the address space is cancelled and
restarted subsequently.
Chris Mason
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:19:33 +0200, גדי בן
אבי wrote:
>HI,
>
>We just cut over to z/OS 1.9.
>
ight which related to
the
LPAR of concern.
Well, that's a "Friday" observation!
Chris Mason
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:14:46 -0400, George Rodriguez
wrote:
>Yesterday, the system started displaying the following messages on
SYSLOG for z/os v1.4:
$HASP9212 MVS NOT DISPATCHING
ll which can involve a
name server. Then DB2 checks that everything ties up as some sort of
assurance that the proper instance of DB2 has been identified - or something
like that. In any case just changing the "primary interface" because you
imagine a revised design makes another add
man - or woman - the redbook projects.
They are not written by development shop authors.
Incidentally, it would appear that, when a "hardware" address is understood to
be a port used for the OSAENTA function, it changes its type from "DATA"
to "TRACE" as well as changing
laining how you resolved
the problem described in the earlier thread. List archives are so much richer
when there are solutions as well as problems posted in the list!
Chris Mason
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acce
uld change from RESET to ACTIVE? Perhaps
someone who has already used the OSAENTA function can clarify this point.
Incidentally 3: "BOOK"! There's a bit of a VSE flavour about that isn't there?
Chris Mason
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:35:16 -0600, Stuart Willis
wrote:
>I
the other
application" did not "direct you to this section."
Chris Mason
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:33:16 -0500, August Carideo
wrote:
>I meant any help
>sorry
>
>
>
> August Carideo
> VON.COM>
John
The reason for the difference in the secondary receive maximum Request Unit
size is that the channel-attached, "A", controller had a maximum, 1536,
imposed by the hardware (microcode) whereas the "line"-attached, "C",
controller did not.
Chris Mason
On W
services field:
the
X'80' bit in the second byte *and* the X'03' in the penultimate byte. Thus a
private mode table entry - in a private mode table I would expect and hope -
is not actually necessary.
Nevertheless, if you would be so kind as to post the source of your mod
bitually used, hence LOGMODE=D4C32XX3. Had you used the default
format, PL1, you would have had to enter LOGMODE(D4C32XX3).
Chris Mason
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:57:37 -0500, Mark Pace
wrote:
>*>TerminalTypeString=IBM-DYNAMIC*
>
>Thank you for that!
>
>On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9
lects an attempt to activate presumably - if I
dare to assume anything after this episode! - any interface as an excuse to
complain about the IUTSAMEH interface definition lacking an address defined
in the HOME list.
I'm sorry for all the fuss.
Chris Mason
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:13:42 -0
ature port QDIO definitions.
If you are still confused or it still doesn't work, please post again with
relevant
definitions.
Also I'm sure we'd all appreciate full stops and capital letters where
appropriate. I had to annotate you last post before - thinking - I had
understood it!
Ch
rtition-Query and, as I said, any emulator you were tempted
to use these days should contain this support.
Getting back to the topic in hand, I've bee assisting a customer recently
using "Extra" and we couldn't get away from the rows and columns implied by
the standard 3278
twork guys".
Chris Mason
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:02:33 +0100, Barbara Nitz
wrote:
>>Just out of curiosity, what do you normally see in columns 143 through
>>160? Is it mostly just a lot of black (background)? Or do some
>>products/displays you use actually put something u
the IP applications rather than a node in the network performing routing - as
are OSA features.
Chris Mason
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:25:36 -0600, Ward, Mike S
wrote:
>Hello all, in a CISCO router the interfaces can have multiple IP
addresses by telling the IOS that it is a second
ng IP addresses was very
successful so it's worth the effort to be clear.
Chris Mason
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
on to which Ed was referring!
Chris Mason
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:22:29 -, Stuart Willis
wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have proved (I think) that the OSA dose have a Home address.
>
>Output from the TCPIP proc with a Home address all I
name of the DEVICE statement and the name of
the LINK statement do not "occupy the same name space". Thus the same
name can be used for both the DEVICE and LINK statements in a pair.
Thanks again for your help.
Chris Mason
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:55:24 -0600, Martin Kline
wrote:
>>
you have not defined such a pair of statements and you have no entry in
the HOME list with the link name EZASAMEMVS, then you do qualify for this
test.
I'm sorry to be so specific but I'm trying to cover all the bases.
Thanks very much.
Chris Mason
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:13:00 -0
4:
DEVICE IUTSAMEH MPCPTP AUTORESTART
LINK linkname MPCPTP IUTSAMEH
where linkname is EZASAMEMVS if defined because DYNAMICXCF was specified.
Go and have a look in your CS IP PROFILE data set for DYNAMICXCF.
Chris Mason
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:11:04 -0600, Martin Kline
wrote:
>>If there
SNA NJE and perhaps use an Enterprise extender
logical link over the IP network, post again and perhaps someone will be able
to assist. It's handy that your VTAMs are enabled for APPN.
Chris Mason
[1] I checked on what the Google digest had to say about Arju and followed
up on two recent
fault values to be used in case the values are not specified on the GROUP
statement.
"Along with NODETYPE=NN" is just wrong. What is correct is that the
NODETYPE start option must be specified - definitely along with HPR=RTP
although this is the default - but the value can be EN as we
you - or your SMP colleague - should have this APAR
documentation to hand.
Chris Mason
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:16:18 -0600, Stuart Willis
wrote:
>Hi All
>
>We have a new Z9 Processor I have 2 ZOS systems working under VM using
>OSA's no problem. I'm now setting up a
l system programmers needing a bit of
help to get them started with their own efforts.
Chris Mason
P.S. "Assembler Question" is a rather weak thread title[1] and, as may have
been predicted, it has allowed enormous "drift". The main "branch" appears to
have bec
nning of the adjacent SSCP list initially - the
distinction
is a bit subtle!
Chris Mason
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:10:37 -0600, Ron Wells
wrote:
>well---so far so good...no drop outs as yet...but day/week not over...lol
>
>
>thanks again Chris
ral directory servers using the
CDSERVR=YES start option. If CDSERVR=YES, the CDSREFER start option
should not be specified.
[10] If you have a small network, you may want to operate without the APPN
data bases in which case you would specify INITDB=NONE.
-
Chris Mason
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:19
RVR. Thus the
following is suggested:
- remove obsolete application major node members from VTAMLST
- insert GROUP REGISTER=NO following VBUILD=APPL in those that remain
- possibly look for the opportunity to replace massive lists of APPL statements
with identical operands with a model statemen
rected you yourself as the 3rd "hit" .
Indeed, if you had "Googled" with the full string "IGGN504A SPECIFY UNIT FOR
CATALOG.Z19.MASTER ON Z9SYS1", it would have been the *only* "hit"!
Chris Mason
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:31:48 -0600, Fred Hoffman
wrote:
&
should have been defined much, much more closely in terms of how
VTAM behaving as an SSCP supported the LOGOFF command.
The manual which actually offers help in "knowing what's going on" with
respect to USS flows is the z/OS CS SNA Diagnosis Vol 1, specifically Figure
119.
Chris
Need I say more?
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:48:11 -0500, Howard Rifkind
wrote:
>I have the following entry in my USSTAB:
P39TMMVS USSCMD CMD=P39TMMVS,REP=LOGON,FORMAT=BAL
USSPARM PARM=APPLID,DEFAULT=TMONMVS
When I key in P39TMMVS we are really getting TMONMVS as the executable.
W
Lizette
If REP is not coded, it takes the value of PARM. (That is, the user-entered
parameter is used as entered.)
Chris Mason
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:22:45 -0500, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>Howard,
>
>I do not know if this will help, but in our USS tab we code TMON this way
&
r. Incidentally, there is logically a similar SSCP-
LU session running between VTAM and LU "TMONMVS" supported by program x.
It's important to have this picture clearly in mind when working out what
influence a mode table entry specified in the USS table set of entries might
have in
r subroutine a separately assembled CSECT for linkage
editing where needed, you'd be in trouble!
Chris Mason
P.S. It was the need to explain the sign half-bytes fully that took my
attention in Don's post, caused me to subscribe to ASSEMBLER-LIST and
provide my observation on the topic
raging in another
part of the country, the part where my co-workers had been before the war.
Chris Mason
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:30:18 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe
wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:46:15 -0600, Chris Mason
> wrote:
>
>>...
>>To which "product doc"
c world off its feet - documentation and presenters giving examples of
how to associate SNA APPN COS names with server ports which/who said
#INTER should be associated with port 23, TELNET, and, of course, #BATCH
should be associated with port 21, FTP. "Rubbish"!!! Port 21 also
check the
basics in the SNA Programming manual and the VTAM APPC API in the SNA
Programmer's LU 6.2 Guide and SNA Programmer's LU 6.2 Reference manuals.
I couldn't find how VTAM builds the presumably RACROUTE call but you may
have better luck! I'd be inclined to take it on trust
"level 20" as recently as 2004.
Are all RFCs older than 5 years "obsolete"?
> ... no longer part of the product doc package)
To which "product doc" package would you be referring?
Chris Mason
[1] Which, when it was called "Systems Network Architecture Reference
Sum
arch on the manual number on any IBM web site page
which leads you to a very common style of page for accessing manuals such
as redbooks.
Chris Mason
[1] Beware the rather off-putting effect that the first page is blank except
for
the number 1 in the bottom right!
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:50:09 -060
ommand, I note that it is possible to specify the TP-name on
the command. Isn't this the equivalent of specifying a bogus port number with
the TELNET command? I believe I may have got closer to your requirement
than I expected when I started this post!
Chris Mason
[1] Using the terminol
were composed back in 2001 and which - I am obliged to believe! - was true
at the time, probably at the OS/390 V2R10 level of Communications Server.
Chris Mason
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:07:37 -0600, Rabbe, Luke
wrote:
>I guess I don't know the complete effect of setting this value.
0 manual - you would have been successful
in finding the message explanation Jim McAlpine presented for you without
having to take all the trouble to compose a couple of posts for us all to
puzzle
over!
Chris Mason
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:43:31 -
". How short some memories are!
Or is this yet another manifestation of folk memory having been lost because
those who would have remembered have been "let go" and those who
supposedly took their place just haven't had the education in depth which
harks back to the "
minimum of CDRSC statements, you don't need to worry
about USS commands.
Chris Mason
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:12:35 +0200, Itschak Mugzach
wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>You answers are just exectly what I was looking for. I RTFMed a little as
>well and have my ideas. For example, I loo
any vtam
application. Assume that LOG APPL will accept netname.applid as P1...
Translation: I believe that the two organizations want to connect their CICS
systems for limited functions. I believe that they do not want to allow any
end-user LU to logon to any application LU where the USS command
n't considered before!
Note that, by coding alternative USS LOGON (and LOGOFF) commands, you do
not prevent use of the default commands. It's a bit like ISTINCLM and the
MODETAB operand.
Chris Mason
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:53:37 -0500, Tony Harminc
wrote:
>2009/1/13 Itschak Mugz
d as a
CDRSC within VTAMB and thus is allowed to have a session with CICSB given
that CICSB has a CDRSC definition within VTAMA.
Chris Mason
[1] Not a lot of people remember that!
[2]
Specifies whether the host CDRM is authorized to dynamically define CDRSC
representations of cross-domain or
OGON APPLID could be prevented by some
particular coding of the USS table. It can't!
Chris Mason
[1] There are others historically but very, very unlikely today.
[2] Post again if you need help with this. Essentially, it's in the definition
of
the CDRM statements.
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009
opers weren't clever enough to make it the default when a model APPL
statement is used and AUTH=TSO is specified.
Chris Mason
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:37:18 +, Ted MacNEIL
wrote:
>>F TSO,USERMAX=500 (for example)
>
>>It will change the amount. But you need to change the VT
upt request is generated for the
processor.
So I hope that answers the question "... exactly how would you go about
doing this ?"
Chris Mason
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:35:08 -0600, Joe D'Alessandro
wrote:
>The Support Element manual for the z9 System describes the External
&
he APAR text actually means.
Alternatively, if you have some difficulty with IBM support, simply try sending
in a Reader's Comment Form saying that the manual - whichever version of
the HMC Guide is appropriate for your system - doesn't describe what the
APAR suggests it should.
C
ou prefer SNA or CTC, we can perhaps
help you further - and perhaps worry a bit more about userids!
Chris Mason
[1] In days gone by, there was also binary synchronous communication (BSC)
as an NJE transport. Unless you happen to have typically a 2701 control unit -
of blessed memory - connected
and let us all
know - you can't break anything! If the redbook authors had had an ounce of
a spirit of adventure about them - all 8 of them! - they would have covered
this entirely practical issue.
Chris Mason
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:16:33 -0500, Jerry Fuchs
wrote:
>We are FINALLY
use of a 4K machine. In order to support a 1287 on
an 8K Model 30 without disks, it was either work with these I/O routines or
adapt a 4K card-based operating system (the 1231 Support Package - or
some such name) to handle the special requirements of the 1287 optical
character (hand-written num
now where the trap is going.
That's where the merit is.
Incidentally, I'm encouraged to note that, while this discussion has dragged on
as so many threads do, we are still precisely addressing the OP's original
concern!
Chris Mason
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:40:55 -0600, Patrick O'
need a
reading of the relevant RFC to sort out. That way we can work out what all
this "sending" to an SNMP agent is about!
Chris Mason
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:29:56 -0500, Don Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
wrote:
>> On T
manner. However sending notifications to the SNMP agent just doesn't fit!!!
So, like you, I'm going to have to read up on these "super-traps" in order to
see what they're all about.
Chris Mason
[1] Also in the days when I taught SNMP on TCP/IP for MVS, I assisted with
ontrarily, I cannot recall any exchanges where we did not see eye-to-eye!
Regarding "improved": it seems I made the usual mistake of assuming that
whatever was newer was also better!
Regarding "quick-and-dirty" in reference to CNMSMSGT: the compounded
adjective referred
Were CNMSMSGT to use the API to the SNMP
agent, then it would be in line with SNMP architecture.
However CNMSMSGT may precisely perform the job you want done.
Chris Mason
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:09:47 -0600, Henrique Seganfredo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello folks,
>
>I have
to attach to a 3271 or 3172 - all devices from the early 1970s - while you
need something like a 3278 to attach to a 3174 - devices from the later 1970s.
Chris Mason
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:55:48 -0500, Jerry Fuchs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am trying to gen two 2074 control
> ... Germany and Japan had navies. What do you think they would have done
with them had the US navy not taken them on, once they had conquered
England?
They'd be fully occupied trying to deal with Scotland, Wales and Northern
Ireland of course!
Chr
Ram
This looks like the sort of question that should be posed in the IMS-L list.
You can join the list by using the "Join or Leave IMS-L" prompt on the
following page:
http://imslistserv.bmc.com/scripts/wa-BMC.exe?A0=IMS-L
Chris Mason
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:49:23 -0500, Ram Bala
way - or having to
use low bandwidth networking - than an operator in the "glass-house".
Did I miss something?
Chris Mason
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:19:05 -0500, Ken Porowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anyone have experience using an OSA-ICC attached Console over a long
>distan
ges and Codes manual but there were none of these in
the MVS System Codes. It turns out that code 999 as reported in the MVS
System Codes manual refers to the IPCS component - nothing whatsoever to
do with any old product like ISPF. Ho-hum!
Chris Mason
[1] The late actor Ian Richardson played th
s all about not just
guessing! In fact, it looks like the guess in this post it may have been a good
guess - or alternatively, this Holmes just hadn't bothered to explain to the
attendant Watsons that he actually had scrutinised the evidence and found
the third bullet!
"RACF", &q
it's
all
about liberty! - to add a question mark to the subject.
-
[1] Wikipedia URLs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shosse_Entuziastov
Actually, I should update this entry pointing out how the associated street
name relates to the station murals.
Ch
able to boasting how many hectares of grain
had been harvested, proclaimed proudly how many kilometres of copper wire
were present in the machine. I believe he mentioned that the people
responsible were from the Urals. This was back in 1975.
Chris Mason
[1] The Ministry of Instrumentation Tec
eter. I hope someone who knows for sure can confirm or correct this
guess.
Well, welcome to a path to becoming a VTAM specialist. There are fewer and
fewer these days.
Chris Mason
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:01:16 +0200, Michael Knigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SOFTWARE.DE> wrote:
>All,
>
>
enty of other "hits" - an amazing
150!
>From time to time I work with a customer who accesses an LDAP server from
some WebSphere applications so what you want to do is certainly done.
Chris Mason
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:16:29 +0100, Andy Robertson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
set can be specified in
a number of ways, including as SYS1.TCPPARMS(TCPDATA). The way to refer
to the data set generically is to use the original name used by TCP/IP for VM,
the product from which CP/IP for MVS was derived which, in turn became the
Communications Server IP component.
Chris Maso
ation Guide under "Managing the
resolver address space".
Chris Mason
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:09:55 +0100, Jacky Bright
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is it possible to change NSINTERADDR dynamically without IPL ? How can we
>achieve that ?
>
>I have to chang
quot; for "it's" and vice versa. I'd better do
some
beam casting!
Chris Mason
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:44:27 -0500, Chris Mason
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think your in trouble ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
PPENDIX1.3.1 Machine Code we find
"Print--Then Act "
and in the table of codes in APPENDIX1.3.2 ISO/ANSI we find
"Action before Printing a Line"
So now I'm happy - but I suspect you will not be!
Chris Mason
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:43:58 -0500, John McKown <[EMAI
o the job swiftly - or is
this yet another case of a vital member of the team having been "let go"?
Chris Mason
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:24:06 -0500, Cebell, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Years ago we had VTAM Systems Programmer who attended to this
>discipline.
>
&
Enterprise Extender, well, actually
just "ee".
Chris Mason
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:21:32 -0500, Hal Merritt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is not really a jes2 subject. Rather, one of telecommunications.
>Half duplex is less expensive and will work ok if the vast majority o
lot of the "protocol overhead" of
running Enterprise Extender. If it's efficiency you are after, this is surely
the
way to go!
Chris Mason
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:04:19 -0400, Carroll, William
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am not very versed in jes2. I can not seem
sing from one VTAM Interchange Node (ICN) to another ICN (over all
the virtual routes defined between the two subarea nodes) and that TG
number 254 will be used as a description within APPN mechanisms for a TG
passing irrevocably into the subarea network masquerading as a virtual APPN
End Node.
Chr
ated on
the web there is Chapter 10. Logmode and COS Resolution in a Mixed Network
in Jerzy Buczak's SG24-4656-01.
Chris Mason
[1] I was going to include RU sizes on the basis that these are values in
the "TS Usage" fields alongside the pacing values. However, this would imply
r
your
thinking at the time you were composing your first post in this thread and that
you now know from where that previously troublesome 21 comes, namely
section 4.2.3 Transmission Groups in SG24-3669.
Chris Mason
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:54:17 -0500, Martin Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hat be?" was usually "Why can a session be established
A to B when it doesn't work B to A?".
Chris Mason
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:03:47 -0500, Patrick O'Keefe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 11:27:40 -0500, Chris Mason
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
801 - 900 of 1722 matches
Mail list logo
