-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: EXECIO
Okay!
I surrender!
It wasn't there, at the time.
We blew the files off the map!
Sorry, but
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: EXECIO
My test was:
1. Two users open the same PDS (note: no E).
2. Select X; Select Y (one for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 10:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question on SDSF/JES2
snippage
z/OS assigns no such attribute. PROTECTED is a JES2 attribute,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 6:43 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question on SDSF/JES2
Thompson, Steve wrote:
I happen to have OPERATOR authority with all my TSO
I have run into a situation. I think I know what caused it, but I'm just
not using the right keyword to find it (in my SDSF manual).
I have a JOB that is running, and in the STatus display (or DA), the
STATUS field has PROT for this JOB.
This means that I can't issue a Cancel (SDSF) for it. AND
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Gilbert Saint-Flour
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 8:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Assembler Question - AMODE=24
snippage
And, almost always, I code BAL/BALR and rarely
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 1:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Crypto-DASD?
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:31:16 +, Eric Bielefeld
eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ivan Warren
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 5:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Assembler Question
Hopefully..
BAL/BALR will still be around.. It's been around since S/360 and it's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ivan Warren
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 6:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Assembler Question
Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
Babbage's Analytical Engine? G
ok.. lemme rephrase
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Gerry Anstey
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: SDSF - so slow!
SNIP
My questions are:
1. Any ideas why SDSF takes appox 90 minutes (12 EXCPs +
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mary Anne Matyaz
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SDSF - so slow!
There is a recent apar for SDSF performance, but it's in the H, O
displays
for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 5:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Z11 - Water cooling?
Without commenting on the actual topic, I can just hear the folks in the
Intel
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Don Russell
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 12:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: /*XEQ /*XMIT question
SNIPPAGE
That's an interesting idea.
At one point I was thinking of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Don Russell
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: /*XEQ /*XMIT question
snip
You mean on the second job card? Good question. :-)
That's why I liked
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HMC screen refresh rate
SNIPAGE
Screen refresh rate is inapplicable
to such displays. Yes, the value is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HMC screen refresh rate
Interesting. I believe myself to be really sensitive to such and have
not
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of David Andrews
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 11:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HMC screen refresh rate
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:25 -0500, Thompson, Steve wrote:
It is a head
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: HMC screen refresh rate
SNIP
All of which seem to point to environmental issues. Have you tried
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: GDG Question
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:22:42 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
Tom Marchant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Roger Bowler
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 6:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: T3 files complaint against IBM
It's good to see that T3 Technologies has not yet given up the struggle
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Betsy Jeffery
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ISPF Edit Macro
I found the culprit.
SNIPPAGE
Well, I have been following this with some interest,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro
I've captured the wisdom of this list over the years on this problem.
Here's my
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro
SNIP
Whenever you get a short message that you don't understand, you should
press
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF Edit Macro
SNIPPAGE
Put this exec in a library and execute it:
/* rexx */
Address ISPEXEC
/*
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 8:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: mvs preemption dispatcher
I have found a web site that references Project SUE. But I think
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: AIX gets 64 bit COBOL but still none for Z/os ...
SNIPPAGE
Assembler is dead (or at least almost
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 2:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: First z/OS 1.9 IPL Problem
I finally figured out the answer to why I wasn't getting any messages
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: First z/OS 1.9 IPL Problem
We are migrating from z/OS 1.7. My test Lpar is not part of the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jerry Fuchs
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Need TN3270e software
We are FINALLY replacing our OLD 3174's with IBM 2074 control units.
The 3270
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of JE Thinnes
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: MVS 4 minute 'outage'
We just experienced a 4 minute 'outage' on our z/OS system. (single
image
z/OS
I have found a web site that references Project SUE. But I think they
will charge for the articles they have:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=800234.807062
http://hopl.murdoch.edu.au/showlanguage.prx?exp=573language=Sue
However, in looking at these, they are discussing a language for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Survey says...
6) Cannot do that here. DLL requires PDSE, and homegrown SDLC systems
here
I have a copy of it somewhere. I was not able to lay my hands on it over
the weekend. Mine is a hard back -- so scanning it will be tough.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of tomas_anderson
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 4:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: the Z/10 and timers.
SNIP
Now, I somewhat understand why. Timing on the z/OS platform is a
critical
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of johnny ying
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: mvs preemption dispatcher
hi,gurus
I searched for weeks,buf can't find more information on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: JES2 Node Name
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Edward Jaffe wrote:
SNIPAGE
this would only confuse me. Let's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: JES2 Node Name
Thompson, Steve wrote:
One more thing to consider: How would GRS determine who
SNIP
TCP/IP DNS names are yet another name choice you get to make. Sysplex
distributor, especially when coupled with Cisco local director, is
supposed to allow you to specify the cluster IP name and get routed to
the image with the best chance of fulfilling your request in the
shortest amount
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of ??? ?? ???
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 5:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Syncsort Oddity
Hi,
=20
I=92ve encountered something in Syncsort, and I=92m looking for an =
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Barry Merrill
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Syncsort Oddity
Use SAS to find the actual physical block size of the two files:
SNIP
And for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Bill George
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 5:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: 3270 screen size with Attachmate Extra!
Does anyone know if it is possible with Attachmate's Extra! (I
George:
I went back into Hummingbird and re-read the Help topics. I thought it
was telling me that the 3270 Interface was EXTRA! - but it was
explaining that it can convert EXTRA! at the level where you are to
Hummingbird's Exceed.
Sorry for the confusion -- I actually use QWS3270 because it has
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 8:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: OCO, documentation, support from IBM-Main, etc. (was Re:
Health Checker questions)
On Tue, 16
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: ISPF and long lines (was: CLIST/REXX Philosophy)
SNIPAGE
Why, why doesn't ISPF edit, as an
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Display Active Users panel (DA)
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
... under MEMLIMIT, I see many address spaces
It is very hard for me to read the posting you sent. However, having
just had a similar situation, you might want to check your DSN against
your ACS rules.
I was attempting to write to tape, but I had a qualifier that was
reserved by SMS to go to DASD - IT OVERRODE the UNIT info.
So you may be
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z10 power problem notification
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 19:52:47 -0500, Jim Mulder wrote:
IBM Mainframe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 6:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.10 and Data Areas
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 12/02/2008
at 11:04 AM, Tom Marchant
Does anyone know where SMP/E lists the End of Service/Life for its
releases?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Thanks. I had searched and scanned in all the places I could think of
and just couldn't find this.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerry Fuchs
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 1:49 PM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 9:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS upgrade
Just a warning.
We just had a problem with some vendor's assembler code running on z/OS
Let me preface this by stating that I have not done any HTML lately, or
Java ever.
I would like to think that is a way to get the scrollable area to be
positioned at the bottom upon initial display of a web page.
So with the PMR/ETR display that we have now (after the back-out of the
postage
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Servicelink view format - was: Re: IBMLink planned outage
When they changed to screen so that you had
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Kelly
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 10:08 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Servicelink view format - was: Re: IBMLink planned outage
I also did a 'feedback'. Whomever IBM has in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Comparing Mainframe and Windows Server CICS Transactions
per kWh
On 30 Oct 2008 07:02:04 -0700,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mauri Kanter
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 7:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ALLOWUSERKEYCSA and key 10
Hi Rob:
Thanks for the answer ... And for MXI ...
I undertand why CICS
Same here in the DFW area for me.
IBMLINK isn't the only thing that's down. z/OS Library pages are also
Down
SNIP
Regards,
Steve Thompson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I have been asked to help an internal customer with a dump problem.
They want to use a SYSABEND DD to get a dump of a job that they have
using above the bar storage (ATB).
Well, I've looked in a few manuals (INIT TUNE, DIAG Tools Srvc, MVS
Diag), and I can't find anything that needs to be set
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Wright
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 3:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSABEND and 64bit
Thompson, Steve wrote:
I have been asked to help an internal customer with a dump
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Munro
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 4:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Calling Assembler module from REXX
Hi
I am trying to help a REXX programmer with a CALL to an
Assembler
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS Documentation - again (was Re: zOS R10)
SNIP
It's funny, because if you look at the discussion on
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Name/tokens
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:57:41 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walt Farrell
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roland Schiradin
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Name/tokens
AFAIR the create/delete/retrieve works fine in Cobol.
Roland
SNIP
ID DIVISION
:
:
:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMS - Delete
ISPF 3.4 (nor IEFBR14) won't work for an SMS controlled data set.
I could be wrong, but I
Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of P S
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OT Comcast Internet Service Limitations
This is indeed OT, not that that stops anyone on this group :-) . The
real
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Fitzgibbon
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:38 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Unbelievable Patent for JCL
You would be surprised what gets through.
SNIP
Not surprised,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 3:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DASD Space Allocation
SNIP
Well, William shouldn't feel alone in this. I've been mucking around
with
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Knigge
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 9:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Debugging Tips
snip
+CEE0374C CONDITION=CEE3201S TOKEN=00030C81 59C3C5C5 954
WHILE
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Itschak Mugzach
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 4:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Do you protect your power switch with a lock?
I was asked by a customer if there is a standard IBM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. Chiampi
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 5:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Cobol on Tandem platforms
Hello,
I have several questions about Cobol programs running on the Tandem
platform.
Try z/OS: DFSMS Macro Instructions for Data Sets
You will probably need to know what was in R15.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-- All opinions expressed by me are my own and may not necessarily
reflect those of my employer. --
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
-Original Message-
From: RACF Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Doc Farmer
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 2:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Numeric TSO Userids
As Bender of Futurama might say, We're Boned!
Sorry, the Wonderful Wizards of HASP decided that
-Original Message-
From: RACF Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thompson, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Numeric TSO Userids
SNIP
If TSS could do it, then why couldn't it be done in a RACF environment?
ISPF shouldn't
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 2:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Terminal SYSIN in TSO Logon Proc
SNIP
SYSIN and SYSPRINT are not used by TSO. I have never seen them
I said this a few days ago. And maybe others are having problems with it
as well.
IF you are using FIREFOX (below V3) and you had clicked on IBM's [IBM
Sign out] link that is at the top right of the pages (at least for me),
their session cookies were NOT being correctly deleted.
IF you are
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLINK
Thanks for the heads-up.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Salt
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 1:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Is this email formatted correctly?
INSERTED INFO: Assuming OUTLOOK does not do any thing more, you email
appears
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 3:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?
I hate to rain on anyone's parade, but all the posts notwithstanding,
the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 4:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM buys PSI
SNIP
But consider the effect on IBM's tech support. Small ISV laboratories
or courseware
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peggy Andrews
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Going unsupported - time to fold?
Management has decided that it is time for the mainframe to go. They've
got
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Going unsupported - time to fold?
SNIP
Got an auditor handy?
SNIP
Sorry, I've got LA on the brain
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 2:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another difference between platforms...
snip
... Blind pursuit of backward compatibility has left us
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 4:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another difference between platforms...
snip
How much existing code would break? Example: PDS uses TTR
Is it just me, or is our favorite reporting tool having problems?
I signed on, got to ETRs, attempted to update one, and now everything I
do says
Bad Request
Your
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: David Caminer (1915-2008)
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:43:08 +0200, Thomas Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 3:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: David Caminer (1915-2008)
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:30:58 -0400, Thompson, Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: We're losing the battle
Craddock, Chris wrote:
SNIP
PC programmers don't have the tools they need to make
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 7:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
Edward Jaffe asks (rhetorically?):
A Linux_for_z
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gabe Torres
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 1:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Retirement
To All on this Listserv,
I will be retiring in short order. I wanted to extend my appreciation
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 4:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Network Time Protocol (NTP) client support question
STP is more dollars than I'll ever talk my site into
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24)
SNIP
Any ideas about another way to do this which
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 10:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Outsourcing dilemma or debacle, you decide...
snip
As to the fact of terrorism it will
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 11:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Outsourcing dilemma or debacle, you decide...
On 12 Jun 2008 09:05:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steven Conway
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Outsourcing dilemma or debacle, you decide...
Howard Brazee asked:
-snip-
Have you worked for companies
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EXCP access methos
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:03:27 -0400, Bob Shannon wrote:
SNIP
I'm naive here. I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3270 Software for Mac
snip
Ok, I am beginning to be a little more intrigued here. How many
mainframe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Knutson, Sam
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 2:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLink login failures Error 500
Must be something in the air today IBMLink is not taking logins right now
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of William H. Blair
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 2:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts)
SNIP
Quotes are supposed to mean as-is.
I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Release 6.1 of IBMLink - AST
SNIP
Thanks, I will open a PMR.You would think something so basic to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Enhanced JCL processor? (and maybe a few other thoughts)
SNIP
2c) All characters after a double dash,
301 - 400 of 953 matches
Mail list logo
