-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 6:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
Ever wonder how much money IBM is paying to Fujitsu for
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Van Dalsen, Herbie
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 11:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
SNIP
Well here is my $0.05 worth...
How long did
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Cole
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 4:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: T3 Sues IBM To Break its Mainframe Monopoly
As Ralph Johnson noted in his post to the FLEX-ES listserv,
The mainframe has stood its ground - despite potshots from the camps of
widely distributed technology. Now recent studies confirm that the
resurgence of the mainframe is based on what we knew all along: Its
continued value and longevity as the ultimate IT asset. Don't let your
management be swayed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of willie bunter
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: DFHSM - URGENT HELP
Good Day,
A files which was migrated by DFHSM (MIGRAT2)was uncataloged in error
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Bolan
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 5:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLink's unavailability
Ok. Just a thought. I am not responsible in any way for IBMLINK. I
don't
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: latest ibmlink news (still not working, shock and surprise)
-Original Message-
From: IBM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Peplinski
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SV: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:20:36 +0100, Thomas Berg [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL
Is IBM Main down?
This is a test message. If this had been a real message, then various of
the members could argue as to whether or not this message contained any
intelligence.
Alas, this is only a test message, similar to a sharp stick, with which
to poke the IBM Main server to see if it will
15
minutes after contacting the BAMA EDU help desk.
Darren's retirement ripples being felt?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 6:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/08/2007
06:23:58 PM:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 6:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
Thompson, Steve wrote:
You did say dedicated. And it certainly appears to me
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CSA 'above the bar'
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 11/08/2007
12:24:52 PM:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pinnacle
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Bruce Black passed away
SNIP
For at least 10 years before that, Bruce was easily the most active
poster
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Berg
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: COBOL COPY statement w REPLACING...
..just for my obscene curiosity:
What IDIOT designed the COBOL COPY
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLink down again second time today SEV1 Ticket# 33639291
IBMLink is down for the second time today and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Postpischil
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 Features summary
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
The word Engineer is in my title as well.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PL/S ??
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 Features summary
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:05:02 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
SNIP
But SDB came
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 Features summary
Thompson, Steve wrote:
Linkedit had a limit built into it that was never
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Santosh Kandi
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: About dispatching process
SNIP
Repressible or Exigent?
Do you have VM or Flex-Es?
Otherwise, it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VARY too many devices offline
snip
Eric:
What would you do with dishonest consultants?
snip
A clue was
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 5:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: tso racf
That way you know the user was safely tucked into ISPF.
Why do we care?
What problem are we
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: VARY too many devices offline
On Oct 23, 2007, at 3:17 AM, Zaromil Tisler wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Santosh Kandi
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 1:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: About dispatching process
Since DISABLED applies to only I/O and External interrupts, if you
dont
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carroll, William
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: tso racf
is there anyway to block or ignore or stop somebody from entering a
command on the command
https://www-304.ibm.com/jct03004c/ibmlink/link2/servicelink/servicelinkP
age.jsp?lc=encc=US ibmlink
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/ Pubs for
z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Norgauer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to read source from a PDS member
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:43:51 -0400, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Barbara Nitz
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Are there tasks that don't play by WLM's rules
Has anyone else experienced this with Direct-Connect or
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 1:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: System z? System z9? eServer zSeries? which?
System z for current z9BC and z9EC machines (replaced System
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 1:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: System z? System z9? eServer zSeries? which?
Arts and Crafts at the Psych ward, Steve? :-)
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ADABAS vs. IMS vs. DB2 Who is faster?
Van Dalsen, Herbie wrote:
[...]
The reason why both(DB2/Adabas) are still
SNIP
Enough said... and this is my last posting, for those that had enough
of this serious talk in a bar.
Anton Britz
SNIP
One can only hope.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anton Britz
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RES: ADABAS vs IMS vs DB2 Who is faster?
Hi,
Jon wants us all to play nicely and I would try and show
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anton Britz
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ADABAS vs IMS vs DB2 Who is faster?
Hi,
Summarized :
a) So you never worked with ADABAS in your life
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Cole
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SLIP sliding away
SNIP
I really don't see that there is a serious problem here. (Or am I still
missing the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rankin, Bob
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: OS/390 V2R4 on Z9
Our production environment is running OS390 V2R4 (9708 PUT). My
management wants to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Walker
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tech Notes - Any body know about them or where they are
hidden?
snip
If the communications server
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Green
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:01 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: JAVA un z/OS
Does anyone have any tuning/performance references/links for Java under
z/OS?
Some tentative
It looks like data wrap. Verify that the source basically lines up in CC
1, 10, 16.
If the data starts look
ing like th
is then you have a dat
a wrap problem.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA142E Operation code not complete on first record
This is the code:
DAIR9900 DS0H
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA142E Operation code not complete on first record
It's 80:
TECH.DITTO.SRCLIB(DITTDAIR) -
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
SNIP
Oddly enough I'd looked already. I wrote the SMS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 7:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PLPA and COMMON PAGESPACE Size
SNIP
We do this so that we don't have to worry about sizing the PLPA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeffrey Deaver
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: FICON tape drive?
Anybody ever seen a stand alone FICON attached 3490 capable tape drive?
Yes, I know
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 1:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FICON tape drive?
SNIP
Well, I got the wrong info. Something bothered me about what I was told
I don't know the manual title, but it sure looks like an OPS/MVS-II
message to me.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Dranes
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 5:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
We just recently installed z/OS 1.8 using ServerPac. We then
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
SNIP
The data set space allocations are not the result of a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ServerPac Installs and dataset allocations
SNIP
Without the APAR numbers, it's a bit hard to say
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 8:01 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is TCBECB supposed to be zero at end of task?
I don't feel a whole lot of need to answer this, as
Does anyone know of a channel attached TCP device that supports 1-8MB
Window size? [The amount of data that can be sent from stack to stack
before having to wait for response.]
Does anyone know how or if this can be changed on a z9's internal
adapters for z/OS?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
--
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Britz, Anton - CO 7th
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 10:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 1401 simulator for OS/360
Hi,
I am still not sure why anybody would want to run an IBM
Ok, I confess, I'm suffering from old age.
I know that there is a way to concatenate n PDSes together, and then
extract a member from this to a sequential file.
Why am I needing this? Well, I have several levels of source libraries
(PROD, TEST, Private) and I need to pull a member from the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 4:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDS to Sequential Question
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:36:28 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
Ok, I confess
So far, I've timed out once, and am still waiting for a response in
login into IBMLink (web).
So before I do the 800 number thing... Anyone else not able to get in?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
---
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 1:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM-Link Down 31AUG07?
SNIP
Except for one anomalous occurrence, I use a 62x160 screensize without
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM-Link Down 31AUG07?
SNIP
Seems the problem is sporadic. Not everyone has it happening.
Good thing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 5:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual Storage implementation
SNIP
This was a problem when I worked with VM/SP and MVS guests 20 years
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual Storage implementation
snip
Very true. Although we act as if we invented it. IIRC, the first
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 converter via /*JOBPARM SYSAFF=
SNIP
But the suggestion to use /*XMIT would work, so that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Adam
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 7:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Each CPU usage
SNIP
Since the conclusion was that they didn't even require a 4-way after the
problem
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark H. Young
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 converter via /*JOBPARM SYSAFF=
In a JES2 MAS (Multi Access SPOOL) environ with two different
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Justice
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 6:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLINK SEV1 ticket # 32902392 ETA 5PM
oh come now, web ibmlink can't possibly be down this much.
SNIP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Using IPCS (full screen) in a UNIX shell?
SNIP
While this is going on, I cannot use my TSO session for
Anyone having problems getting to SIS?
Regards,
Steve Thompson
--
This e-mail message is intended only for the
addressee(s) and contains information that may be
confidential and/or privileged material.
If you are not the intended recipient please notify
the sender by reply e-mail immediately.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Johnny Luo
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 9:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LPA Module Size 80MB impact on system?
Thanks for the answer, Wayne.
I remember that if a module comes
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Berg
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site
SNIP
To add to this slightly OT headed thread: the sun will slowly
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 1:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dataset Recovery issue.
Well, I'm in a pickle. I have no test lpar with this volume (zosct3 and
the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Walker
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 9:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tech Notes - Any body know about them or where they are
hidden?
Yes, it is not terribly well organized.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Wilkie
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 7:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: linklisted load library failing
You may also want to check on the Blksize of the libraries and place the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: linklisted load library failing
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:29:51 -0400, Thompson, Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of esmie moo
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Outsourcing loosing steam?
Just to add my 2 cents. Who is running the computer systems for LAX?
My
The subject basically covers the question.
This came up when it was pointed out to IBM support that a certain item
was missing in their doc. The next thing I know is, rather than updating
the doc, they decided to publish the deficiency in the Tech Notes area.
I'd never heard of it.
How many of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary DiPillo
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tech Notes - Any body know about them or where they are
hidden?
Could this be it?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of James Chappell
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 3:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tech Notes - Any body know about them or where they are
hidden?
How about...
Techdocs - the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark House
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SERVICELINK @ IBMLink 2.5 hours still can't logon
Okay,
Give me the 3270 version back! Three calls to
I am doing some work using SDSF. I have a single spool file of about 1M
records.
I have done a max down and got there. Now I do a find prev for a
non-quoted string. 15 minutes later the TSO session is still clocking,
it has used (per SDSF) more than 4 CPU minutes and has done enough I/Os
to have
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CICS Guy
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 8:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Are things that slow?
Seems like there's not much going on for a Friday.
SNIP
I was rather interested this AM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Wood
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 5:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Another why did they do it this way? question - SMF time
stamps
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:10:43 -0500, McKown,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLINK and missing ETR records (13 minutes to report an
issue)
Hi,
We have also reported it failing
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA Sues Rocket Software
CA for suing. Just another (IMO) episode in CA's history of poor
customer
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How to fine IBMLINK
SNIP
Wow, I thought we had a real legal thing going here, How we could Fine
IBMLINK.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 7:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: FW: Re: IBMLink down
FYI
SNIPAGE
Due to the IBMLINK/ServiceLink Web outages over the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Green
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: So, when does 3900 equal 33...?
Read on...
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2164958,00.asp
SNIP
rant
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 9:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Poll - Distance between Data Center and DR
SNIP
I have been trying to determine this in a generic way.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ken Porowski
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How old are you?
Did the poll close already, I voted then passed around the link but
everyone else here
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 10:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBMLink SEV 1 OUTAGE AGAIN!!! #32644395
I thought you might want to know that this is becoming a bone of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: web IBMLINK down again - so what ?
Robert Justice wrote:
and I won't say the other comment, I promise.
Out of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: web IBMLINK down again -SEV1 32656350
SNIP
Perhaps the time is coming for influential customers to start
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 11:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: web IBMLINK down again -SEV1 32656350
I think I will copy Mr. Fyffe and inquire if this means that all
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sabo, Frank
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 7:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Upgrading the processor
Hello everyone,
I have a question to ask of the group.=20
I currently have an IBM7060
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richbourg, Claude
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Upgrading the processor
I used to work with an H50. The three models are:
The Multiprise 3000 models
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sabo, Frank
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Upgrading the processor
Steve,
The machine that we are running on is a 7060 H75 with 210 MIPS.
SNIP
Yeah,
He's dead Jim.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
I decided to take a bit of action. Here is the email I sent to Mr.
Palmisano:
-
For years the mainframe was THE machine to have because it worked. Lots
of effort went into that, one of the things being that from release to
release the quality (RAS) had to improve for hardware as well as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Andrews
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: KEY8 CSA: Pro/JCL and Info/XE
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 15:39 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
A V=R (ADDRSPC=REAL)
From time to time I get postings from IBM-Main that only contain a block
of something like the following:
V2UgdXNlIGEgc2luZ2xlIENPQk9MLVNvdXJjZWNvZGUgKG1vc3RseSBzdWJwcm9ncmFtcykg
Zm9y
IG11bHRpcGxlIHVzZSB0byANCmF2b2lkIHJlZHVuZGFuY3kgKEJhdGNoLCBDSUNTLCBQQyku
DQpT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 7:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: How much do you value Share ( Was Spam from SHARE)
Listers -
I must now put my two cents in.
How much
501 - 600 of 953 matches
Mail list logo
