PRINTER CMD DUMP 0.20;BASE3' command as:
'SILENTLY PER DIAG 58 PRINTER CMD DUMP 0.20;BASE3'
instead. It is in the z/VM 5.1 CP Commands and Utilities documentation.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
efficient method of programming.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
, NY.
...snipped...
If anyone would like me to register them for the session please either call
or email me and I'll get you signed up. Thanks. I'm looking forward to
seeing you at this event.
You didn't say who signed it -- Darl McBride, maybe?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
person the ability to produce a listing instead of
trying to order a (one-time pricey) manual then I say more power to IBM for
seeing where the customer problems were and being creative at circumventing
them.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:31:36 -0600, Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Schmidt) writes:
For zSeries to do it you would either be looking at creative use of MIDAW
to read/write the 1M pages from/to existing DASD (with less-then-ideal
performance) or you would be looking at new
page size. (Which appeared
near the time that the SYMBOL-2R was being modified (again) along similar
lines, but again that memory is too vague to be trusted it seems.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN
and the work he did.
Is Darren the cover photo or the centerfold?
g,dr
Seriously, a discussion of ibm-main should start and end with Darren.
Hats off to you, dude!
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
PROC? (Do you allow compiles via CICS or something?)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
want to improve the that performance, block the output files
and avoid the EXCP doubling.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
compile option as
you (and I) suspected.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
(of everything) first!
(When you're already in a hole there's not always a need to keep on
diggin'.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
enough to cover
this invention.
I'd say this one ought to do it:
http://www.usd.edu/~bwjames/humor/ms/zerosNone.html
(It originally appeared in Madison's own The Onion but I couldn't
immediately find it on their web site.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 13:33:08 -0500, Tom Schmidt wrote:
(It originally appeared in Madison's own The Onion but I couldn't
immediately find it on their web site.)
Ah! They went to school with Vice President Dan Mr. Potatoe Quayle*:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/29130
--
Tom Schmidt
also
has its similar alternative.
LBI is limited to tapes, not DASD. (Too bad - I would like to see the 3390
geometry disposed of at long last. 3390's track length is getting
cramped.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:29:19 -0400, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IDCAMS and DF/SORT support for LBI
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:21:22 -0500, Tom Schmidt misspoke:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:29:19 -0400, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:37:15 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
One of the chairs said that it was less than 2,000.
Do you hear furniture talking often, or was that the only time it has
happened to you?
--
Tom
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:10:41 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:37:15 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
One of the chairs said that it was less than 2,000
work location has contract requirements that ALL software must
be installed via SMP/E (if SMP/E is at all an option). Software that is
not available via SMP/E is generally not allowed here.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
Exactly right. Back in the good old days when real sysprogs were cowboys
and COBOL programmers ran away, scared (and scarred).
*smirk*
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:50:56 -0400, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
You are thinking back to the days when UCC1 zapped IBM O/C/EOV
believer in the entire Health Checker implementation from IBM, but
there are bits and pieces that make sense. This is one.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(I'm also not a believer in best practices since I have seen it used too
many times to stifle innovation and growth. The term your
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:07:49 -0400, Daniel A. McLaughlin wrote:
Scully, Muldar, report for an X-files investigation
Sorry, Scully and Mulder have been ab-duck-ted.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
that into the controllers in the field.
I really would have liked the tape encryption announcement much better if
IBM would have retrofitted it into existing (or even new model) 3490s. I
wonder how many lost tape incidents with banks have happened with 3590
tapes vs. 3490 tapes?
--
Tom Schmidt
processors have to do the work). Too bad
that wasn't offloaded to zIIPs/zAAPs/zEEPs (Enhanced Encryption
Processor - I just made that up) to generalize the support somehow.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
copies - especially sensitive system volumes - and then
not be able to restore under dire circumstances.
Surely that's an issue raised and cured before now... ???
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
, it dies philosophy?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu
for big central (to date). They gouge for big CPU but
don't charge for memory size. (IBM could probably reduce the monthly
maintenance changes for memory IMHO, but that's my quibble.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM
be snubbing Ed all week. Please let me know if you are
here because its always a shame to be snubbed unintentionally.
--
Tom Schmidt
Baltimore, MD (this week)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
managers and executives for customers instead? THAT would be a
worthwhile goal!)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
CATALOG.PRD25
The IEC161I messages tells you what you need to know:
The file was open to another ACB and the file specified SHROPTIONS(2).
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
month - at SHARE.
Be there.
(Couldn't resist!)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(I plan to be there)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
the master catalog between the 2 LPARs? Then you
wouldn't have this he said-she said game between your 2 existing master
catalogs and the remainder of your problem would be simple. (Sysplex it.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
point that's a more of a curse than a help.)
zSeries with z/OS can be so stable it literally runs itself, apparently.
(But I certainly hope IBM doesn't start marketing that concept.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:05:02 EDT, Ed Finnell wrote:
Old what's her name also, but haven't heard from her since the tape
problems?
Old? OLD
(Maybe we're thinking of two different people.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
.
Didn't he return to the planet Krypton for a few years?
Have you tried using the Bat signal, Ryan?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
).
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
but not on the 1.7
LPAR.) That would account for the lack of reserve activity.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
.
(Now I get to reinstall since it won't boot due to the damage Windoze did
to its SYSTEM/CONFIG directory.)
It is a baad idea on pretty much any system that you need.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
there.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
? (1994 maybe?) Or just plain old CRS yesterday?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
, the drawings in the patent
reference IND$FILE, IEBGENER, etc...
Just thought that was interesting...
Hmmm... it looks like a whole lot of prior art to me. A WHOLE lot.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
something
else at PSI.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
From: Victor Gil
Subject: Re: SSI experience
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:09:46 -0500
Ed,
My tests indicate that DYNALLOC is in fact colliding on SYSZTIOT with the
SSI Open/Close logic. Could you elaborate a bit on how exactly your BPAM
.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:56:59 -0700, Ruegsegger, Jeff wrote:
AMBLIST only lists PLPA...In the case where you are searching for what
is being executed, if it is an MLPA module AMBLIST LISTLPA wont work.
As sent from prior posts the search order is FLPA, MLPA, and finally
LPA
for
OPERLOG. That might also give you a method of extracting history data...
although I haven't spent much time pondering that approach yet.
Either way I wouldn't mess with 3270 emulation at this point in SNA's
life. Let SNA face its ultimate end with some dignity.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
usage.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
, if not decades. Dice.com is
another source, as well as Monster.com and the list goes on and on.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(one such coder who knows of plenty of others out there, lurking.)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
unimpressed.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(no where near retirement age - I've got a good decade-and-a-half at
least!)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
advocate use of zLinux for the purpose of mopping
up 'excess' MSUs but then again this mess is due more to the burdensome
software charges than anything else (as far as I've been able to see in my
customer-world experience).
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(zLinux doesn't REQUIRE the use
On Fri, 5 May 2006 12:40:28 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Tom Schmidt wrote:
Ed Jaffe wrote:
I don't get it! Is this soaker some sort of stand-alone IPLable
program you've written? Or do you need to IPL z/OS to run it? If the
latter case, how does it keep your z/OS VWLC peak from reaching 32 MSU
! That was a lost
opportunity if there ever was one.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Wed, 3 May 2006 17:00:16 -0500, Victor Gil wrote:
I was thinking of doing dynalloc in the subtask attached by Open. Why? Any
sort of ENQ I should be aware of? I've seen products that parse the SUBSYS
dd and perform
to determine the file DSORG. For
each DSORG there will be a correspondent server routine to perform
requested I/O.
Victor,
You aren't planning on (or needing to be) doing dynamic allocation within
the SSI Open/Close routines, are you?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
The HiperBatch components are part of the z/OS license ('free').
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(about 15+ years ago my then-organization assisted IBM in finding the bugs
in the VSAM portion of HiperBatch... but what are 20-30 APARs among
friends? The 'seamless' transition over the 2GB
reports laud the number of mainframe MIPS
shipped (but not necessarily the number of mainframes themselves).
Mainframes are the mass transit of computing. (Everybody's on an
increasingly larger bus these days.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
; once the operator
gets out of range the screen automatically locks (but you can still see
what is on the screen) so keyboard input is prohibited without the screen
saver password.
If you (or anyone) uses it, please post the outcome.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
Victor,
So does it work now?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Mon, 1 May 2006 14:02:06 -0500, Victor Gil wrote:
Auch! This must be
MVC SSOBRETN,=A(SSRTOK)
Thanks a lot, Binyamin!
On Mon, 1 May 2006 13:57:22 -0500, Victor Gil wrote:
MVC SSOBRETN,=Y(SSRTOK)
On Mon, 1 May 2006 21:05
). You'll be fine then.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu
to fill in your I/O routine address on your way by, by the
way. Otherwise the first GET/PUT will bring up your next S0C1/S0C4. (I'd
expect an S0C1 - branch to low-storage - without a GET/PUT routine.)
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:45:58 -0500, Tom Schmidt wrote:
The field is right where
with multiple Linux instances and it can scale up
(or down) very quickly. Ideal for what you seem to be looking at.
You only need one (or perhaps two, for a test z/VM) LPARs to get the
concept up off of the ground and running smoothly.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
as
designed (BAD). They do it sometimes but they really try hard to avoid
it.
(I am fairly certain this topic has been discussed to death here several
years ago.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:35:56 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
On Apr 19, 2006, at 10:19 PM, Tom Schmidt wrote:
Ed,
I suspect that the reason for the rejected support was the fear
that they would/could add an impediment to system growth (and an
impediment to a mainframe sale). If they provided
... you get the drill.
We got a boatload of CPU cycles back in the process, of course.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(Lest anyone think that couldn't happen at their site -- wanna bet?)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
you can probably write what you need in REXX and use the REXX pipe stage to
drive it inline (intercepting and manipulating output data via the SUBSYS
DD statement). Chapter 3 introduces the fittings and how you can define
rather complex filters as fittings to address needs such as yours.
--
Tom
will more than make up for it, but some folks had issues with
that.)
Hopefully someone authoritative from IBM will answer your questions.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
screening on the same TCB? Is there a de facto method
that vendors use similar to the one used for front-ending SVC's?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
maintenance from the vendors beyond old tapes.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:50:44 -0500, Steve Arnett wrote:
Tom,
I was not picking on you. I was trying to get the thread back on
track. I was curious about the correct answer to the question and did
not feel that the thread
several folks were pointing you at the possibility of an
OPEN SVC intercept?)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 12:56:38 -0400, Gil, Victor x28091 wrote:
I am probably missing something obvious -
When setting up a subsystem, how do I tell the system to call a custom
function to Allocate
addressing this scenario.
Thank you,
BK Kosmach
412 433 1639
Was that level of MVS Y2K compliant? I don't believe it was (and I'm sure
it wasn't certified as such).
I'd expect you have licensing issues with IBM... can't help you there.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
years past y2K that he is not concerned with that and if he is presently
running ESA on another box then he has the license.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Support
fits for ESA/370 hardware.
September 5, 1990 was the announcement date for MVS/DFP 3.3.0.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
be able to connect to any 3390 models larger than a mod 3 but your VM
(s) can emulate a lot of little disks, I suppose.
Your next trick will be to access the tape data that (presumably) you are
resurrecting this software for... good luck with that!
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
months in order to pass on current
information. Given that, and especially given IBM's considerable web sites
I would have to say that they are generally doing better than they ever
did.
I would, of course, like to see IBM do even more. But Ed's out of line
(and out of touch) on this subject.
--
Tom
them. You generally pay more to the guy
with the answers. (That's a key premise behind consulting anyway. Right
answers are usually worth more, but sometimes it is a function of
presentation and not content so much. That is a key premise of
marketing.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
the world.)
The PL/X genealogy included PL/S and PL/AS, but not PL/C.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
was not properly initialized/setup. My
other suggestions (above) should be considered once you get past that
failure (by inserting the '0' where appropriate).
(Free advice - worth at least what you paid for it.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
value of now that would NOT include his version of CICS
(CICS 220). His level of CICS precludes threadsafe processing by several
releases. (It might even preceed the TRUE processing I previously
mentioned, I'm not sure.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:54:44 -0600, Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:13:57 -0500, Gil, Victor x28091 wrote:
Good afternoon, IBM-MAIN
We'd like to be able to prevent certain confidential fields in
production
files from being revealed to unauthorized users while still allowing
access
that if you are looking for help justifying the
expense). But if you are determined to write your own subsystem, knock
yourself out. (It is fun.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
they expect where
they expect it?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu
issue?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm
by/for the CBTTAPE community. Some
of the better vendors will, no doubt, support it. Others probably not.
Wider usage may push them into supporting it. (By support I mean
allowing for its usage within their products.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
Report Broker.)
Larry,
You want to offload the sysouts to a non-MVS system then, correct?
(Wild guess is that your boss would prefer something free or nearly so,
like maybe a Linux solution?)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM
JCL
for Command Execution subheading SYSTSIN DD Statement.
(You can have any color car you want as long as you only want black - H.
Ford)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:50:39 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Chase, John wrote:
Ever hear of the Internet?
John,
Yea and its a pretty big place isn't it?
Ed
But not endless:
http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
Jon,
JES2 or JES3?
How many syslog records does the site produce on an average week?
How many syslog records does the site produce in its busiest week?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
on
each line.
* V=V jobs, virtual=real (V=R) tasks, and V=R attached transaction programs
(ATX) created by the START command. One entry appears on each line.
I would expect (but haven't spent any more of my time to confirm) that ATX
is the current nomenclature for APPC transactions.
--
Tom Schmidt
REALLY growl, right?
Meet them halfway with NFS and if either side breaks the standard they need
to get it fixed. Simple enough for management to understand.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
that
every SMP/E process has all of the appropriate SMPLOG files available for
review?
Failing all of that... is your resume up-to-date and offline?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
(Yes, I have been asked those questions by auditor(s) before
are not very timely ... a lot
of RACF databases can become corrupted between the idea and the
implementation.
Maybe the APAR should be appealed to get a code change rather than a doc
change? (Oh yeah, like the RACF people are gonna let that happen!)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
value. Whether the underlying software supports that maximum value is
another question.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
/4021093.stm as an example).
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http
(or lowered the bar) to 3
character acronyms to give them a dose of their own medicine (and to show
how silly they are being).
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
the
first zAAPs in production. Tim has discussed this on the list before.)
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:56:58 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:36:57 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Timothy Sipples wrote:
I know of one customer that's been in production on z/OS 1.6 since
September 1, 2004. (Maybe they read this list.)
That's 23 days
that formula gives Sept 2006 as EOS (announcement) for z/OS 1.6.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
in
the DCB on the DD card vs coding BLKSIZE=0 by itself as a parameter of the
DD.
mass snippage from this point
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
and another common area above-the-line. The
nucleus itself straddles the line (some of the nucleus is below and the
rest is above).
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
exceed 4G although in theory each address space can have a max size of 2G?
No, see above. The max size of all the address spaces is currently limited
to approximately 1 TB.
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
201 - 300 of 374 matches
Mail list logo
