>Much of this thread is, as usual, uninformed and even radically
ignorant.
>Those who find the syntax of COND= uncongenial are---and have for many
years
>now been---free to use that of IF-THEN-ELSE instead. (Since it inverts
the
>conventions of COND=, one or the other will presumably please
ev
-- snip --
Seems like it got confused with an imbedded data area and started
disassembling "instructions" at odd addresses.
-- snip --
The plague of every disassembler.
There are some disassemblers that allow you to specify which area is data
(non-code), and specify base registers ...
But, for t
John Case writes:
>Does anybody have an alternate means to obtain renewals of digital
>certificates for IBM Information Exchange aka G International aka GXS
>aka whatever they call themselves nowadays?
IBM withdrew (announcement letter 905-142) the EDI products and services
that would use the two
>>I think Harry's point is that although IBM provides OCO
>>changes to Linux so that it will run on System Z, one cannot
>>order from IBM a version of Linux for System Z. One must
>>order from one of the standard Linux distributors, Red hat,
>>Suse, etc.
>You can't? I'd always assumed it was plainl
You might not want to hear this - America is the most litigious country
on the planet.
I gave a talk to the Theosophical Society on Beliefs, and why America is
at is is. It is only 3 pages, and you might find it fascinating to
read. I lived in the US for quite a few years in the 70's, and me
On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:40 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
This is a big announcement with a long name to go with it: IBM
Integrated
Removable Media Manager for the Enterprise on System z V1.1. Call
it IRMM
for short, and it's yet another expansion of the mainframe software
portfolio.
IRMM helps y
Tom
In other words strictly digital.
I recall last year passing 100 and asking whether or not I would still be
needed or fed.
Chris Mason
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Marchant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:44 PM
S
On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:49 PM, Robert Justice wrote:
A few executives spending 20+ years in the slammer will bring a
screeching
halt to such crookedness.
John P Baker
agreed, but a few executives need to spend 20+ years in prison for
other things too, might also stop some of this corporate
Doug
When you have a "director for litigation"[1], you have someone who has to
occupy his time somehow.
Is this a normal post in companies residing in the land from sea to shining
sea?
Chris Mason
[1] "... said Gary Brown, CA's director of litigation" from the original
article http://tiny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Host - zos1.8 TN3270 is running as independent task from TCPIP.
We are having connection difficulties from J2EE application hosted on
a SUN Solaris Server. My basic question is how can I test the TN3270
SSL configuration. Currently when we telnet to the host port from
Let's remember where Sandy Kumar is right now.
At 09:49 PM 8/8/2007, you wrote:
A few executives spending 20+ years in the slammer will bring a screeching
halt to such crookedness.
John P Baker
agreed, but a few executives need to spend 20+ years in prison for
other things too, might al
A few executives spending 20+ years in the slammer will bring a screeching
halt to such crookedness.
John P Baker
agreed, but a few executives need to spend 20+ years in prison for other
things too, might also stop some of this corporate greed
---
I take no position on whether CA has a case or not.
However, your proposal to address the problem of frivolous lawsuits doesn't
go far enough.
If it is determined that a lawsuit was filed in order to stifle competition
then not only should civil damages apply, but criminal extortion and
conspirac
Much of this thread is, as usual, uninformed and even radically ignorant.
Those who find the syntax of COND= uncongenial are---and have for many years
now been---free to use that of IF-THEN-ELSE instead. (Since it inverts the
conventions of COND=, one or the other will presumably please everyo
The easy way to stop that nonsense is when it is proven that the case is a
crock, is to make the losers in the case pay the winner's legal fees
multiplied by a factor of oh, I don't know, 10 sounds good, that will stop
the frivilous lawsuits.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Fuerst"
The problem here is that CA has deservedly gained a reputation for
being litigious even when they had absolutely no case. I had signed
UCC contracts they refused to recognize, and they threatened to sue
the company I was with over us "stealing" their software. Like an
insurance case, our attor
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:08:17 -0400, Craddock, Chris
...
Wee... not so fast there pardner! Let's not forget there are
storage protection attributes. Rexx runs in whatever PSW key it gets
called in and it has no way to deal with either the protection key, or
the fetc
.
And this thread has gone so far off the edge... that we really care ?
No offense, Folks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 7:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Distance between
On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Ken Gunther wrote:
Plus if I take my personal automobile to a DR test I get paid for
mileage.
Ken G.
Ken:
Not all the time. At one place I worked they would only give you the
money *IF* you had a checking account at the bank that had the DR te
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 17:08:17 -0400, Craddock, Chris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>Wee... not so fast there pardner! Let's not forget there are
>storage protection attributes. Rexx runs in whatever PSW key it gets
>called in and it has no way to deal with either the protection key, or
>t
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA Sues Rocket Software
CA for suing. Just another (IMO) episode in CA's history of poor
customer rela
On Aug 8, 2007, at 4:08 PM, McKown, John wrote:
--SNIP-
However, if CA in all good faith truly believes (for whatever reason)
that Rocket Software has improperly acquired their source code, then
they must do something. For all we know, CA __may__ have ap
Allan ... Folks (Et Al),
If I may .. especially in light of present world 'companies' and or
the professional world as we (or definitely ... I) know it .. CA might
have gained a poor reputation with the 'user' (e.g. client) community
... but that said ... in all honesty ... they did treat us (e.
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:57:32 -0500 "Staller, Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>I am saying Rocket Software is (most likely) more highly regarded than
:>CA
:>on this list! The individual CA contributors notwithstanding, CA has
:>IMO a deservedly poor reputation with regards to customer relations
... as long as code listings were not taken.
Not listing - but actual source code
Direct from the web site - sounds like the *may* not have coded from
memory. - Your right - the courts will decide.
They allegedly downloaded source code from CA's DB2 software tools onto
their own electroni
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 16:17:50 -0500 "Staller, Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>CA is suing because someone *might* have re-coded an interface for
:>Rocket,
:>initially coded while in the employ of CA. This is (IMO) perfectly legal
:>as long as code listings were not taken. i.e. I've done this bef
Come on folks - CA like any company has an obligation to protect its
assets. I don't know if their suit is valid or not and will not comment
on
the merits of the suit. However CA would be doing a disservice to its
share holders if they did not pursue any/all actions to protect this
intellectua
Also ref. Apple v. Microsoft
Ref: SCO vs. IBM
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/arch
Come on folks - CA like any company has an obligation to protect its
assets. I don't know if their suit is valid or not and will not comment on
the merits of the suit. However CA would be doing a disservice to its
share holders if they did not pursue any/all actions to protect this
intellectual
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 3:58 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CA Sues Rocket Software
>
>
> I am saying Rocket Software is (most likely) more highly r
Mark Z said
> >
> >Bummer... too bad IBM didn't implement a "read only" version of
> >STORAGE for use with sysrexx ...
Pat said
> Actually, it's too bad IBM didn't implement that, period. For
anybody's
> use. Accessing storage is obviously a useful function (or they
> wouldn't have written stora
CA for suing. Just another (IMO) episode in CA's history of poor
customer relations.
I'm not sure I understand you. Or you upset with CA for suing or Rocket
for
the possible infringement of copyrights if the charges are proven in
court?
Tom
I am saying Rocket Software is (most likely) more highly regarded than
CA
on this list! The individual CA contributors notwithstanding, CA has
IMO a deservedly poor reputation with regards to customer relations.
Witness the number of shops that have attempted to eliminate all CA
software.
CA (
...ooops..forgot to say this in the first posting.
Dr. Brian Wade will be presenting "Virtualization Basics" on
the Aug 14. Live Virtual Class.
Regards,
Pam C
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
s
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:00:13 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>If I don't count my thumbs I'm 77.
>
>3F forever!
First time I saw your reply, I didn't get the joke... 77 octal.
Good one, Shmuel. Thanks for the laugh.
And if I don't count my thumbs, I'm 71. Jack Benny would love it.
--
I'm not sure I understand you. Or you upset with CA for suing or Rocket for
the possible infringement of copyrights if the charges are proven in court?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Wednesday, August
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:34:38 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>
>COND=(0,LE) is always true, so any step with COND=(0,LE) will always be
>skipped. COND codes can only be positive, so zero is always LE any possible
>COND code.
>
Not entirely correct, IIRC. If the step is the first step in
the job
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:16:16 -0500, Mark Zelden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>| The STORAGE external function is not allowed ... due to the
>|potential risk of inadvertently modifying
>| system storage.
>
>Bummer... too bad IBM didn't implement a "read only" version of
>STORAGE for use with sys
So, are you saying that this is not true? Or that the news article is
incorrect? I found this same information on the CA Website.
We have posted other lawsuits on this list before.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
>
> Not a good way to win more friends (or customers) on this list!
>
>
Not a good way to win more friends (or customers) on this list!
CA sues over mainframe software copyright infringement
[Mark Fontecchio, News Writer]
Software giant CA has filed a $200 million lawsuit against Rocket
Software,
claiming the company stole its source code to build IBM DB2 management
CA sues over mainframe software copyright infringement
[Mark Fontecchio, News Writer]
Software giant CA has filed a $200 million lawsuit against Rocket Software,
claiming the company stole its source code to build IBM DB2 management
software.
http://tinyurl.com/yuo3xc
---
Here's info about the next in the series of Live Virtual
Classes (webcasts). The price is right (no charge, no travel).
If you can't get to SHARE or System z Expo, why not try and LVC.
Or even if you can get to the events, listen in to the call, and
then you'll free up a time slot on your confere
On 8 Aug 2007 12:24:31 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>//STEPONE EXEC PROCNAME,COND.PROCSTEPNAME=(0,LE)
That worked for my needs.
>Or to override ALL steps not to run:
>
>//STEPONE EXEC PROCNAME,COND=(0,LE)
Now that's odd - what would that give us to run a proc skipping all
steps?
> -Original Message-
> From: McKown, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 3:25 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Override a proc step
>
> The only way that I have really heard of is to use a very weird COND
>
> //STEP EXEC PROC=MYPROC,COND.STEP=(409
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:21 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Override a proc step
>
>
> Is there an easy way to override a proc step so that it does not r
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard Brazee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 3:21 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Override a proc step
>
> Is there an easy way to override a proc step so that it does not run?
//STEPONE EXEC PROCNAME,COND.PROCSTEPNAME=(0
Is there an easy way to override a proc step so that it does not run?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at h
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:12:38 -0700, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>According to www.weather.com, tomorrow's expected high for San Diego is
>73F and "feels like" 73F while the expected high for San Antonio is 94F
>and "feels like" 99F! Yikes!
>
Ed,
You forgot to change the subject line.
Hello
My name is Robert and I am one of the volunteers who work on the DB2-L
listserv.
First of all I want to thank all those people who have sent their quires and
support during this problem.
There has been a number of set back we have experienced during this outage in
trying to bring up t
Computerworld July 16 had an article about a State of Tennessee data
center built on top of a landfill and below the largest US reservoir
east of the Mississippi - held by an unsafe dam. Parts of the center
are sinking.
Use your brain and do your homework in setting your data center sites.
Of course if we had Doctor Who's TARDIS, then we could just travel back
in time just before the event, collect our data, then scoot back up to
the future timeline (after the data center is rebuilt) and just unload
our data.
Up and running in minutes not days.
Lizette
with the hardware upgrad
Hmmm, looks like everyone should become capacity planners/performance
analysts and attend the Computer Measurement Group conference in San
Diego in December. Conference fee is $1725 ($2025 to include Sunday
Workshops) and that includes breakfast and lunch Tuesday-Friday and PARS
(SCIDS with good f
IBM does not have a Linux distribution. But it does contribute heavily to
the kernel development, at least in the area of Linux for zSeries.
On 8/8/07, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:10 AM, Harry Williams wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:22:46 -0500, Ed Gould
> > <
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:10 AM, Harry Williams wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:22:46 -0500, Ed Gould
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dell to stuff hypervisors in flash memory
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/07/dell_hypervisor_flash/
Sounds to be that this might be doable in IBM's version of Linux
Great,
This was a RECYCLEPERCENT and ML2RECYCLEPERCENT change
from 45% down to 30%.
We recycled HSM.
Thank you all for the information...
--- "Staller, Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alan...what would be he HSM refresh command?
>
>
> There is no mechanism to refresh ARCCMDxx in
> en
Alan...what would be he HSM refresh command?
There is no mechanism to refresh ARCCMDxx in entirety. The only way to
do that is to restart HSM.
The method used is to issue individual HSM commands to accomplish the
same
changes made to ARCCMDxx. E.g. ADDVOL, SETSYS, .
There are *very* few th
Howard
If the parameter you're changing is in a SETSYS command in the ARCCMD00 member
(most are) then just issue that same SETSYS command from either your TSO
session (TSO HSEND SETSYS x) or on the console (F HSM,SETSYS x)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Depending on the nature of the changes (minor or major), you may be able to
change HSM on the fly:
Set up a batch job to execute TSO commands "HSEND" and run this job from a
userID that is authorized in HSM to do this.
For example:
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
Also don't forget to change the parmlib ARCCMD member to make the change
permanent.
From: O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Wed 8/8/2007 12:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Refresh ARCCMD00 Questin...
Howard,
Assuming you are authorized - TSO
Alan...what would be he HSM refresh command?
--- "Staller, Allan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Issue the equivalent HSM command to make the change
> dynamically,
> Restart HSM later (at your convenience) to make
> solidify the change.
>
> /F DFHSM,HSM command goes here
>
> HTH,
>
>
---
Howard,
Assuming you are authorized - TSO HSEND SETSYS PARAMETER(VALUE)
ex. tso hsend setsys backuptasks(3)
else use the format suggested in the other posting.
Yes, you can do this with HSM up.
From: Howard Rifkind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 8/8
In a message dated 8/8/2007 11:37:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No matter how bad things are, they could always be worse...
>>
Looks like survival of the 'most hydrated'. Golf channel said 20 spectators
were treated for heat problems yesterday. Didn't see a t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric Chevalier
>
> On 8 Aug 2007 08:46:13 -0700, Patrick Lyon wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:04 -0500, Anton Britz wrote:
> >
> >>The Conference fees ?
> >>
> >>a) $2100 for the week
> >>b) Hotel fees ... $175 p
Issue the equivalent HSM command to make the change dynamically,
Restart HSM later (at your convenience) to make solidify the change.
/F DFHSM,HSM command goes here
HTH,
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instr
I have to make a change to ARCCMD00 and would like it
to take effect ASAP.
I forgot the command to do this...help
BTW, can I do this while HSM is up and running.
Thanks folks...
Yahoo! oneSearch: Final
Franz, You are most welcome.
One further thought, you might want to consider having a duplex copy of all of
your HSM tapes for the following 2 reasons:
A. If stored off-site, they give you all of your backups and migrated data at
DR.
B. Protects you against loss of data in case of a tape prob
In a message dated 8/8/2007 11:17:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
73F and "feels like" 73F while the expected high for San Antonio is 94F
and "feels like" 99F! Yikes!
>>
Shoot that's just warm. Went to an Interim in Phoenix and Sat. landing in
107 whacked my ta
On 8 Aug 2007 08:46:13 -0700, Patrick Lyon wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:04 -0500, Anton Britz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>The Conference fees ?
>>
>>a) $2100 for the week
>>b) Hotel fees ... $175 per day... Meals not included ($1000)
>>
>
>Try $215 per night for the SHARE conference. Wha
Patrick Lyon wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:04 -0500, Anton Britz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
The Conference fees ?
a) $2100 for the week
b) Hotel fees ... $175 per day... Meals not included ($1000)
Try $215 per night for the SHARE conference. What a deal...
That helps
Of course if we had Doctor Who's TARDIS, then we could just travel back in time
just before the event, collect our data, then scoot back up to the future
timeline (after the data center is rebuilt) and just unload our data.
Up and running in minutes not days.
Lizette
>>>
>>> I have an acre of
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site ( to the moon )
I have an acre of land on
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Finnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:59 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: VSAM REUSE with alternate index
>
> Well what I tried was Delete the CLUSTER(all AIX's go away). Reload with
> BLSR then rebuild the AIX'
Gee. What a crusade. I can understand being concerned, but this sounds
more like an obsession.
While there is a slight risk of ID theft, it would be a -long- stretch.
I daresay it would be far easier to simply ask the IRS:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/06/govt_password_security/
I've b
Hi,
The Market is gradually moving towards Ubuntu/MySql etc and
IBM is still in the mode of :
"Keep it on a Mainframe because we would not do to you what Microsoft is
doing to you... "
Note: Did you see the DELL announcement this week ?
http://direct2dell.com/one2one/archive/2007/08/07/23816.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
> >
> > I have an acre of land on the moon that I am willing to outsource as
a
> > datacenter hotsite.
>
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 11:53:39 -0400, Pinnacle
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Running z/OS V1R8. I've found that when I use CONSOLIDATE on my
DEFRAGs,
>the DEFRAG doesn't work. I had a run this morning where CONSOLIDATE
>actually increased the frag index, and then a subsequent DEFRAG without
>CONSOL
In a message dated 8/8/2007 10:48:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you suggesting that multiple sequential passes of the base cluster is
fast enough with BLSR to be more efficient than an AIX access? I would not
believe that for a NY minute. Well, not without ex
Running z/OS V1R8. I've found that when I use CONSOLIDATE on my DEFRAGs,
the DEFRAG doesn't work. I had a run this morning where CONSOLIDATE
actually increased the frag index, and then a subsequent DEFRAG without
CONSOLIDATE dropped it considerably. Here are the stats with CONSOLIDATE:
ADR2
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Finnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:42 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: VSAM REUSE with alternate index
>
>
> In a message dated 8/8/2007 10:28:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> A
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:40:04 -0500, Anton Britz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The Conference fees ?
>
>a) $2100 for the week
>b) Hotel fees ... $175 per day... Meals not included ($1000)
>
Try $215 per night for the SHARE conference. What a deal...
In a message dated 8/8/2007 10:28:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apparently the REUSE and AIX are mutually exclusive. [One wonders why?]
>>
Very difficult to code? Maybe BLSR is a simpler(faster solution).
** Get a sneak pe
Hi,
The Conference fees ?
a) $2100 for the week
b) Hotel fees ... $175 per day... Meals not included ($1000)
Note:
Why don't they try and negotiate better deals with these hotels.
In San Antonio, Texas you can buy groceries for a year with your $1000.
If you work for Google, you get the best
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 10:26:37 -0500, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:17 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Distance
Thanks to everyone responded.
Apparently the REUSE and AIX are mutually exclusive. [One wonders why?]
This list is the best!
-Victor-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECT
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 10:17 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Distance between primary and DR site ( to the moon )
>
>
> I have an acre of land on the
thank you David for the quick answer
kind regards
Franz Josef Pohlen
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] schrieb:
Yes you could tapecopy then issue a Taperepl command against the original tape.
You would then issue a Delvol command to delete the incorrect tape from HSM control.
Alternatively the
I have an acre of land on the moon that I am willing to outsource as a
datacenter hotsite.
Please inquire within.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the messag
I would recommend running RECYCLE specifying the VOLSER of each of the
unwanted tapes. This updates all CDS entries to point to the new tape volume
and returns them to scratch status. At that point in time the user can
delete those tapes from HSM.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Dis
Maarten Slegtenhorst wrote:
Ken,
Is your car able to reach a velocity of ~6.96 mi/s?
Furthermore, I hope the pay for mileage ( ~230.000 miles ) covers the
fuelcost ;)
Not to mention the cost of the conversion kit to run your engine on
liquid hydrogen and liguid oxygen! :-D
Yes you could tapecopy then issue a Taperepl command against the original tape.
You would then issue a Delvol command to delete the incorrect tape from HSM
control.
Alternatively they could issue a Recycle command against the tape to be deleted
and then issue the Delvol when the Recycle comple
Hi listers,
a customer of me has no tape management, but hsm. He has defined several
backup and migration tapes to hsm and lets hsm decide which tape to
mount volspecific, so far so good. For some time they have defined 2
tapes from the wrong number range to hsm. They want to get them out of
Mark said:
>From the FM:
>| The STORAGE external function is not allowed in both the TSO=YES and
>| TSO=NO environments due to the potential risk of inadvertently
>| modifying system storage.
>Bummer... too bad IBM didn't implement a "read only" version of STORAGE
for use with sysrexx or just
This is the same "lost" tape incident that I had mentioned in an earlier
post. I got that letter from IBM because I worked for them at the Tampa
Information Network site in the early 80s when it was first announced.
As far as credit monitoring goes, Consumer Reports says it's not worth
it as a nor
In a message dated 8/8/2007 9:21:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Applications and DB2 in General. If you are not already a member of
IDUG, basic membership is free and carries a host of exclusive benefits,
including access to these discussion forums.
>>
Don't
Ron,
If you go to the IDUG website www.idug.org there is an explanation of
the problem:
DB2-L update and available alternatives
Despite IDUG's best efforts, the IDUG-sponsored DB2-L remains out of
commission. DB2-L is managed by a provider external to IDUG, and
efforts to expedite the restorati
Bill Wilkie wrote:
>I didn't get a comment back on the suggestion but was given a link to a
search page where you could type the search >argument and retrieve the
correct manual. Here is the link they sent me for z/os 1.7 :
>
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/search_text_z17
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN and RACF-L
Does anybody have an alternate means to obtain renewals of digital
certificates for IBM Information Exchange aka G International aka GXS
aka whatever they call themselves nowadays?
The link given in the GXS FAQ page, https://pki.services.ibm.com and the
link gi
Maarten,
if the vehicle can reach the velocity of 7 mi/s, could Ken not just
coast most of the way therefore making millions of dollars in milage.
Thanks,
Fletch
Ken,
Is your car able to reach a velocity of ~6.96 mi/s?
Furthermore, I hope the pay for mileage ( ~230.000 miles ) covers the
Ken,
Is your car able to reach a velocity of ~6.96 mi/s?
Furthermore, I hope the pay for mileage ( ~230.000 miles ) covers the
fuelcost ;)
--
Maarten Slegtenhorst
Ken wrote:
> Plus if I take my personal automobile to a DR test I get paid
for
> mileage.
>
> Ken G.
Plus if I take my personal automobile to a DR test I get paid for
mileage.
Ken G.
David Boyes wrote:
The Pacific Ocean is nearby, I guess we'll have to build the DR
where?
On the Moon !!
*That* would be a serious DR site !
Well, you have to admit that it does ha
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
