We would like to add more traffic to our OSA card, so we would like to know if
the current card can handle the extra traffic, or if adding another card is the
way to go.
To me it seems that RMF would be the way to go, since we would have historical
data available.
Where is this data collected
Should be pretty simple:
- power up your laptop, FLEX and z/OS
- you should have x3270 on it so start it and log on to TSO then exit to the
READY prompt
- plug in your USB stick which, hopefully, should be recognised by the
underlying Linux system. If not, mount it
- use IND$FILE on x3270 to
Hi,
If I am going to apply ptf to datasets that's in lnklst, after the
application, should I also refresh lnklst besides refreshing lla?
What I mean to refresh lnklst is to define new lnkst, copy current to new
one, activate it, then update job(*) using new defined/activated lnklst? Is
it
Hi all,
Working with Subsystem data sets: LNKLST
XCFAS holds a SYSDSN ENQ on the active LNKLST sets, which has to be
removed to change LNKLST sets. This is a sample procedure using the
SETPROG operator command:
Victor,
If you are only updating the contents of a dataset already in linklist, then a
F LLA,REFRESH is all that is needed(assuming the dataset did not go into more
extents).
The procedure listed below is only needed if you are changing dataset names.
Dave
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:45:07 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:
... HTTP has been
running on mainframes longer than on any other system with the sole
exception of the defunct NeXT operating system.
Really? That's surprising.
--
Tom Marchant
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 04:40:56 -0500, Victor Zhang wrote:
Hi,
If I am going to apply ptf to datasets that's in lnklst, after the
application, should I also refresh lnklst besides refreshing lla?
What I mean to refresh lnklst is to define new lnkst, copy current to new
one, activate it, then update
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I opened an ETR on the IBM LINK. My problem is how do I respond or post a
follow up question? I checked all the options but I did not find anything that
would help me. I even posted a question via the HELP option. So far no news.
Can somebody please advise me
In a message dated 9/4/2008 7:35:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really? That's surprising.
Defunct but not forgotten?
_http://lowendmac.com/orchard/05/next-computer-history.html_
(http://lowendmac.com/orchard/05/next-computer-history.html)
You should have a REVISE button to update the ETR. Though I have not opened
one on IBMLINK itself, so am not 100% sure that would work.
Lizette
Good Morning Gentle Readers,
I opened an ETR on the IBM LINK. My problem is how do I respond or
post a follow up question? I checked all the
I can.
Some that I think reasonably credible charge that IE does not implement
things 100% 'correctly'. That means that code that works perfectly under
IE won't be so perfect under a '100% compliant' browser. That, I am
told, is a key reason why Firefox et al is not widely accepted in
Lizette,
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it out and I got Internal server error.
I will have to call the support line. Hopefully, I am not routed to various
call centers (across the globe) which was the case the last time.
Thanks for your help.
--- On Fri, 9/5/08, Lizette Koehler
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of esmie moo
Lizette,
Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it out and I got
Internal server error.
Happens frequently. Just click the browser's back button and try again;
eventually it'll work.
-jc-
In a message dated 9/4/2008 8:43:40 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IE won't be so perfect under a '100% compliant' browser. That, I am
told, is a key reason why Firefox et al is not widely accepted in
corporateland.
Part II was the IBMLINK question. Deal or No
When I looked at the CPU usage in the Display Active panel from SDSF
for SYSP1 LPAR. it is CPU/L 91/84. The mean CPU/L/Z 91/ 84/ 0 is: Percentage
of time the CPU is busy, MVS, LPAR and ZAAP views.
How can we explain that according to the below RMF values?
1
Hello All-
Without mentioning all of the details that put us in this position, we are
in the process of trying to get CICS TS 2.2 to run under z/OS 1.7 on one
of our LPARS and getting a transaction abend
0C4 in DFHD2D2 with a user abend code of AD2R. I have put on all of the
IBM
Rather than a total refresh of LLA, often F LLA,UPDATE=xx for the
specific library has less impact on performance (construction of the
CSVLLAxx member is an exercise left to the implementer).
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Sipples) writes:
I cannot think of any earthly (or even unearthly) reason why Google Chrome
would not already be 100% compatible with all the HTTP(S) implementations
available on System z. It's a ubiquitous protocol, and HTTP has been
running on mainframes longer than
Martin
Further to my previous post, I'm very puzzled as to how you could have been
setting up those links without appreciating that you were using APPN and that
use of APPN links could be responsible for the unexplained transmission group
numbers. In addition, since you have been establishing
Explain what?
Although starting from common roots, the values are gathered, reduced, and
presented in different ways. Generally, SDSF is a point in time snapshot where
the RMF reports show averages over time.
HTH
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hal Merritt wrote:
Some that I think reasonably credible charge that IE does not implement
things 100% 'correctly'. That means that code that works perfectly under
IE won't be so perfect under a '100% compliant' browser. That, I am
told, is a key reason why Firefox et al is not widely accepted
Personally I think we should have put a lot more effort into TSO and ISPF.
That's just a gut feeling... I can't give specifics. It's just knowing how
good CMS is that makes me feel that way about TSO. (And given that a lot
of my TSO usage is actually inside Batch I could see my Batch
We all know that the PHBs are telling everyone that TSO and ISPF are dead and
that we should all be using some sort of GUI interface - however what I have
found is that the people using the software that I write get WAY more excited
at the ISPF interface functions than the web/java stuff.
Then
Hi,
Two more OEM issues identified one currently unresolved not supporting
z/OS 1.9 with LCCA/PCCA 16M.
#1
DBT V6100 ABEND 0C4 The DBT Group, Inc. http://www.dbtgroup.com
No resolution currently provided
#2
PHOENIX and PREFERENCE GSPCLEAR UTILITY ABEND 0C4 Sum Total Systems
S791010
In a message dated 9/4/2008 11:03:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
using some sort of GUI interface - however what I have found is that the
people using the software that I write get WAY more excited at the ISPF
interface functions than the web/java stuff.
Some
Rob,
Similarly our Mainframe Copy products operate through an ISPF interface. I
used to love all the oohs and aahs when customers realized they could do
stuff in TSO, rather than GUI or thousands of line commands.
Sometimes I think the main enemy of TSO is the default model 2 definition
that
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Finnell) writes:
Some of the ex-IBMers at SHARE claimed a CMS for MVS back in mid-eighties
that was 'shelved' for 'market considerations'
I'm curious. With so much of our application code becoming 31 bit and
residing above the line, what is the big push for even less below-the-line
z/OS storage? I.e. what uses up 24-bit storage now-a-days?
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: An EIN stein.
Maranatha!
John
John McKown wrote:
I'm curious. With so much of our application code becoming 31 bit and
residing above the line, what is the big push for even less below-the-line
z/OS storage? I.e. what uses up 24-bit storage now-a-days?
The issue is real/fixed storage below 16MB. The more work that
I want to browse a UNIX file in ISPF and have the characters display as
ASCII characters, not EBCDIC. I thought I had done this before about half
a decade ago, but I can't seem to find out how I did this. What am I
missing, or is my memory failing me? I'm usually pretty good remembering
Neal Eckhardt wrote:
I want to browse a UNIX file in ISPF and have the characters display as
ASCII characters, not EBCDIC. I thought I had done this before about half
a decade ago, but I can't seem to find out how I did this. What am I
missing, or is my memory failing me? I'm usually pretty
Hi Chris,
snip
Further to my previous post, I'm very puzzled as to how you could have been
setting up those links without appreciating that you were using APPN and that
use of APPN links could be responsible for the unexplained transmission group
numbers. In addition, since you have been
I might have asked the list this question about 3 years ago.
I'm running out of space in my HFS and I was wondering if there is a procedure
to extent it while mounted and running.
If so, could some one give me a 'How To'
Thanks
_
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise,
Look at II13036. It requires that the HFS be unmounted, but maybe you
could use remount to accomplish the same thing.
Jon
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Howard Rifkind wrote:
I might have asked the list this question about 3 years ago.
I'm running out of space in my HFS and I was wondering if there is a
procedure to extent it while mounted and running.
If so, could some one give me a 'How To'
Thanks
_
You can use
Neal Eckhardt wrote:
I want to browse a UNIX file in ISPF and have the characters display as
ASCII characters, not EBCDIC. I thought I had done this before about half
a decade ago, but I can't seem to find out how I did this. What am I
missing, or is my memory failing me? I'm usually pretty
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:48:16 -0400, Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have asked the list this question about 3 years ago.
I'm running out of space in my HFS and I was wondering if there is a
procedure to extent it while mounted and running.
Look for CONFIGHFS in the archives
If you are using z/OS prior to 1.9, you can use some handy shell scripts
that we built for handling the conversion.
Included in these is aobrowse, which can be used from an OMVS session.
See the updated atools package download from:
http://dovetail.com/downloads/jzos/index.html
Kirk Wolf
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Packer) writes:
Personally I think we should have put a lot more effort into TSO and ISPF.
That's just a gut feeling... I can't give
Went into OMVS from ISPF opt. 6.
Tried to execute the following command and got what's below. I don't know why
I'm was restricted from executing the command as I have an OMVS segment with a
uid of 0
# pwd
Hi Ken,
Without directly answering your question, and without mentioning our
details as to what put us in this position, we are currently running
quite a few CICS 2.2 regions under z/OS 1.9, and have not so far seen
any such problem. At least one is a large DB2 system, although running
SAP on
Issue an ls -l /usr/lpp/dfsms/bin/configfs command and see if the execute bit
is on.
Mark Jacobs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Thu 9/4/2008 4:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Extending a currently running (mounted)
Was what is below a cut/paste or did you type it. It looks backwards. Try
doing a ./confighfs -i
It looks like you tried to execute the root directory.
Larry Gray
Large Systems Engineering
Lowe's Companies
336-658-7944
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
cut and paste
Gray, Larry - Larry A [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/4/2008 4:50 PM
Was what is below a cut/paste or did you type it. It looks backwards. Try
doing a ./confighfs -i
It looks like you tried to execute the root directory.
Larry Gray
Large Systems Engineering
Lowe's Companies
results below...
# cd /
# ls -l /usr/lpp/dfsms/bin/confighfs
-rwxr-xr-x 2 ADSMSTC 1 24150 May 13 2004 /usr/lpp/dfsms/bin/configh
fs
I am by a terminal now, so I will cut/paste my personal CONFIGHFS notes:
CONFIGHFS and Adding volumes to an HFS:
To add additional candidate volumes (if secondary already exists)
use IDCAMS:
ALTER
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
somewhat related, I had proposed an advanced technology new kernel
project (i.e. which was the basic theme for the
Thanks Mark. That I'll do it.
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/4/2008 5:28 PM
I am by a terminal now, so I will cut/paste my personal CONFIGHFS notes:
CONFIGHFS and Adding volumes to an HFS:
To add additional candidate volumes (if secondary already exists)
Thanks everyone, I got it. :-)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jürgen Kehr
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 4:24 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Softcopy Reader
Hi,
you may try:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:03:08 -0400, Rob Scott wrote:
We all know that the PHBs are telling everyone that TSO and ISPF are dead and
that we should all be using some sort of GUI interface - however what I have
found is that the people using the software that I write get WAY more excited
at the
Have you read the fine manual called OSA Express Guide and Reference (doc
# SA22-7935-05)?
Chapter 10 has a section on performance data which mentions the RMF
interfaces and then refers you off to the RMF manuals. It also discusses
how to use the HMC to get a quick overview if that's all you
At 16:28 -0500 on 09/04/2008, Mark Zelden wrote about Re: Extending a
currently running (mounted) HFS:
If no secondary exists use CONFIGHFS (need to be superuser):
cd /usr/lpp/dfsms/bin
confighfs -x 100c /dir_of_mntpoint (add 100 cyls)
BINGO. You need to do:
sudo confighfs
Martin
If you have XCFINIT=DEFINE, how do you have VTAM XCF links? Although you
specify XCFINIT as a VTAM start option, this is purely in order to set up the
possibility to have XCF links. The links can be used by either or both of the
components of Communications Server (CS), IP (originally
Hi all,
Is there a way to prevent PCOMM from printing when I logon to host?
I remember there is a setting in .ws file but I can't remember exactly what
it was.
Regards
Victor
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi,
it's not a direct answer to your question, but when the network folk found
it too hard to stop this on one of my sessions (don't know why, something to
do with USSTAB), I just decided to have it print to file rather than a printer.
Naturally, I never print that particular file, and it just
I will be out of the office starting 09/04/2008 and will not return until
09/07/2008.
I will be out of the office Friday, September 5. I will return on Monday,
September 8th. Thanks.
**
The information contained in this communication is confidential, private,
proprietary, or
There is a parameter that has to be put in the init file to set printing
to no. It will take me a bit to find it.
Doug
Peter Bishop wrote:
Hi,
it's not a direct answer to your question, but when the network folk found
it too hard to stop this on one of my sessions (don't know why, something
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 14:33:00 -0400, Neal Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I want to browse a UNIX file in ISPF and have the characters display as
ASCII characters, not EBCDIC.
Neal,
If you are at z/OS 1.9, use ISPF Option 3.17 (UDLIST) and select
EDIT ASCII data
Roger
58 matches
Mail list logo
