On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:27:11 -0500, Cwi Jeret cwi_je...@yahoo.com wrote:
Given the following working configuration -
snipped
Now I want to let LPAR B work with the same IODF-IOCDS configuration
on an seperate Disk device with the same addresses !
( Chpid and CU 300 CUAD 1 - left as is ) like
Greetings!
Sysplex, monoplex, same/different CEC? What kind of storage controller, what
kind of disk? Your drawing looks like the basics for a 3990 mod 6, is it? How
do you have your paths defined? What about the access list?
Are you just trying to get around building another IODF?
Hi all,
I'm also trying to do this install, and have followed the Read Me up to the
same point as the original poster, however, I'm, getting a different issue
(From
OMVS under TSO - z/os 1.9):-
£ export PATH=/usr/lpp/java/Jv.r{_64}/J6.0_64/bin:£PATH
£ export
G'day,
I searched the archive for this, but didn't find exact info, so I'm adding this
for
the archive.
if your VOLCAT fills up you'll get:
*IEC361I CATALOG SYS1.VOLCAT.VGENERAL (DATA) HAS REACHED 82% OF
THE MAXIMUM EXTENTS
To Split VOLCAT move tapes 3n to another VOLCAT do:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:42:25 -0500, Frank Swarbrick fswarbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone out there use ICSF (Integrated Cryptographic Service Facility) for
encryption between self and Visa/Mastercard/ATMs? I'm specifically curious
about how PIN mailer processing is done. (If it is done!) We
Hi John,
Yes, I did notice that.
Checking the jcl the first reference to the dataset in question is
//M4OLD DD DSN=HLQ.PUBLIC.MASTER,DISP=(OLD,PASS,CATLG),
// UNIT=ETAPE,EXPDT=99000
The second reference is a Icegener
//COPY.SYSUT2 DD DSN=HLQ.PUBLIC.MASTER,DISP=(OLD,KEEP)
One
Hi,
Iam trying to execute an IEBEDIT JCL on a JOB which is containing the PROC's
and CTLCARDS. I want to skip the particular steps in this JCL .But when I
execute this IEBEDIT jcl on the JOB which contains information like INCLUDE
MEMBER=mem.name ... are not produced in the output.
I am
Vince Getgood wrote:
Hi all,
I'm also trying to do this install, and have followed the Read Me up to the
same point as the original poster, however, I'm, getting a different issue
(From
OMVS under TSO - z/os 1.9):-
£ export PATH=/usr/lpp/java/Jv.r{_64}/J6.0_64/bin:£PATH
£
G'DAY,
I would like to test the contents of a physical volume backup. If I perform a
physical restore onto another spare volume would this cause any problems? I
have done this in the past and I have not encountered any difficulties. Just to
be sure I thought I would check with you all. The
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Vince Getgood wrote:
. . .
Above 2G : 0M (64-bit MEMLIMIT)
Any thoughts / ideas / suggestions?
Memlimit cannot be 0M for the 64Bbit JDK.
Indeed, unlike REGION=0M which requests
Thanks to all that responded.
It appears that no one has experienced the same or had tried zipping
data larger than 2Gb.
The business purpose is to reduce data transmission time for data sent
to feed our data warehouse application.
What is of concern is INFOZIP job ended with RC=0 when it didn't
I have site A connected to site B and site A connected to site C and there
is not a connection from site B to C. Site A is production site B is a
vendor provided DR site currently backing up to. And site C will be our
new DR site we want to backup to B and C until we test C then site B will
David,
The second step seems to be a proc over ride statement. What does the
SYSUT2 DD statement look like in the COPY Proc?
I would think that if there were an issue with CA1 then you would have more
than one tape dataset getting expired and scratched like this. It is more
likely that the
On Wednesday 03 June 2009, Vikesh Bhoola wrote:
We would have liked INFOZIP to work for files 2Gb as it appears to
be quicker than the jar method.
I guess the best free working solution is the jar function. It takes
a bit longer, but it does the job.
Our windows zip product successfully
When I grew up in the mainframe world, UNIX was
considered to be the enemy. But I was working for
IBM, and UNIX products were competitors, so that's
kind of an expected perspective.
Today, z/OS provides a rich set of UNIX services,
including HFS/zFS files, a shell, a UNIX kernel,
and more, to
Frank,
Looks like there are two methods:
* roll your own
* DKMS
ICSF doesn't have an API that does 'generate pin mailer and print
securely' which of course would be pretty cool but is a little outside
the box as it relates to what ICSF typically does.
Roll your own
* CSNBPGN to generate
I hear you, Steve. I'm a 50-something mainframe systems programmer and
still work on the big iron. But I also have been playing with Linux
since it came on 36 floppy disks and to install you had to create ram
disks. Just getting it to boot was a major success. In the early 90's I
had Red Hat
Lizette,
The sysut2 in the proc is
//SYSUT2 DD DISP=(NEW,KEEP,DELETE)
I wholeheartedly agree that if this were a CA1 problem we would be talking
about multiple tapes. However as is usually the case, unless I can prove to the
user that we didn't scratch his file, it will be our fault. I
I asked this question to an IBM'er who does z/OS release level stress
testing this past weekend in at a family party in Orange County NY. He
works in the Poughkeepsie Labs and he admitted customer adoption of
Unix systems services is slow, although he said they use it
internally! Seems your point
I never try to convince a bigot of anything. Cf: Matthew 7:6.
Oracle has stablized their z/OS offering at the 10.2 level.
I know nothing of Sybase on z/OS.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
Or you could head down the path of using a vendor zip. I did a quick
check.. PKZIP supports compression of files over 9 exebytes in size. I am
sure that there are others as well.
Rob Schramm
Sirius Computer Solutions
--
For
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:46:06 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
Vince Getgood wrote:
. . .
Above 2G : 0M (64-bit MEMLIMIT)
Any thoughts / ideas / suggestions?
Memlimit cannot
Don't you just LOVE consistency?
As I'm working in a test LPAR, I changed SMFPRMxx to MEMLIMIT=1T, and
now Marks rexx now shows: -
V I R T U A LS T O R A G EU S A G E
---
It's just a light-weight variation on an old theme that what's known, no
matter how oppressive, often feels safer/more_comfortable than the unknown .
I myself have fun with *all* of them: mvs, unix, linux, windows, and os X
/s/ tuco bonno;
graduate, college of conflict management;
University of
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:22:52 -0500, Vince Getgood
vincent.getg...@xchanging.com wrote:
Don't you just LOVE consistency?
As I'm working in a test LPAR, I changed SMFPRMxx to MEMLIMIT=1T, and
now Marks rexx now shows: -
V I R T U A LS T O R A G EU S A G E
John
Is it possible to get contact information for your customer that successfully
set this up?
There's no point. When I said we, I was supporting the principle that it was
a joint effort given that the nature of the engagement was best efforts
rather than performance. However I have been
Too bad your target host is not z/os. If it were, you could use native TCP/IP
compression which is pretty darned good.
You specify TYPE E MODE C (in that order). You may or may not achieve 90%
compression but I'd bet you would get a better overall elapsed time.
-Original Message-
Can't speak to SYBASE. ORACLE v. DB2 ... Take your pick. Both will do
the job well, and both have flavors that run on many platforms (a not
necessarily congruent list).
HTH,
snip
Well, to put a bit of perspective on it. DB2 is a crap database that
is pushed
by IBM. Compared to Sybase and
This is somewhat off-topic, but if you don't have memory constraint issues
in your Java apps ( 1.5GB heap), you are probably better off running the
31-bit version of Java 6.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 06:41 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
So what's the hangup about z/OS UNIX?
Maybe the fact that for so much of its existence it was such a POS ?.
The initial iterations were bloody abysmal - poorly conceived, poorly
implemented and bloody near useless.
This have improved
Michael Sullivan wrote:
I asked this question to an IBM'er who does z/OS release level stress
testing this past weekend in at a family party in Orange County NY. He
works in the Poughkeepsie Labs and he admitted customer adoption of
Unix systems services is slow, although he said they use it
Mark,
Setting up and using a custom translate table is not only possible, but
fairly easy to do. I just went through the exercise about a week ago.
If you go down the path of a custom translate table, you can contact me
off-list and I can give you the steps you need to go through.
Rex
It appears that TSM 6.1 for z/OS has not been released and IBM is currently
evaluating whether or not to ever release it.
Anyone running TSM on z/OS might want to contact their Tivoli Storage
Manager sales or technical sales rep to get your voice heard on this topic.
Try creating GDG(+1) from z/OS Unix. Note that using the 'cp' command
generates two SMF 15 records - can't DSN trigger using it. Find something
else that works with GDGs. I'll wait.
While I'm in the shell, I can't use split screen. 13.11 and 3.17 don't
have all the capabilities of the
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Rob Lister rob.lis...@aciworldwide.comwrote:
Hi Folks,
Certainly don't want to start a mine-is-bigger-than-yours debate, but Could
any DB2 DBA help me (I hope) riddicule the following comment?
Rob, you may be much better off asking the question on th DB2-L
Don't you hate it when Shane is so reluctant to express his true feelings?
G,D,R
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems Services Division
Computer Network Operations
Phone: (703) 450-3156
Fax:(703) 450-3197
A veteran is someone who, at one point in his life wrote
IMO, there are two sides to z/OS Unix adoption story:
1) I think that z/OS Unix literacy amongst z/OS sysprogs is actually
improving. Between 06 and 08 we taught a SHARE lab z/OS Tomcat in an
hour and there was a big improvement in the attendees' comfort with z/OS
Unix in that time.
2)
I don't see this as a DB2 issue. I hear the same kind of thing about other
products: Mine is better than yours because I know so.
About the only thing I can suggest is to smile and say Yes, grasshopper*. :-)
Seriously, it's probably better that he somehow learn on his own that the
technical
Rob,
While I can't speak to the Oracle vs DB2 issue you are asking about,
other than to echo what others have said, that being they are both very
good DBMSs, I have a different request.
While the language you used in your quote from your coworker doesn't
offend me, it really bothered out
Developing a product under z/os UNIX raises the complexity but just does not
add that much value.
Using a ZFS/HFS file over a z/os dataset is just a matter of personal
preference by the developers but can be a huge PITA for us support folks.
We ask why we have to have two completely
You can change your SMFPRMxx to include SUBSYS(OMVS,EXITS(...,...)
and leave out IEFUSI. Then SET SMF=xx.
In the SMFPRM that I'm using, I have: -
SUBSYS(OMVS,NOTYPE(4,5,19,20,40,62,63,65:69,99)
NOEXITS,INTERVAL(01),DETAIL)
So IEFUSI isn't affecting OMVS, right?
Shouldn't I be
Hi,
With regard to Iam trying to execute an IEBEDIT JCL on a JOB which is
containing the PROC's and CTLCARDS. I want to skip the particular steps in
this JCL .But when I execute this IEBEDIT jcl on the JOB which contains
information like INCLUDE MEMBER=mem.name ... are not produced in the
output.
Hey Dave,
Yeah, since I would assume that SYSUT2 is output, it should update the TMC
and with no EXPDT=99000 I would image TMS would update it to zeros. Seems
like they have the EXPDT=99000 on the wrong step because the first one
seems to have read the tape while the other step wrote to it.
Yes, It works. Change the Device configuration.
2009/6/3 Cwi Jeret cwi_je...@yahoo.com
Hello,
My question is :
Given the following working configuration -
++
| LPAR A | LPAR B |
+--++--++---+
|chpid 23|
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:58:59 -0400, Rob Schramm
rob.schr...@siriuscom.com wrote:
Frank,
Looks like there are two methods:
* roll your own
* DKMS
ICSF doesn't have an API that does 'generate pin mailer and print
securely' which of course would be pretty cool but is a little outside
the box as
snip
If I perform a physical restore onto another spare volume would this
cause any problems?
unsnip
Other than destroying the contents of VESPR1 with JDE0P1's data, you
should be good to go. Since you're not changing the VOLSER, VSAM and SMS
may be problematic but JDE0P1's data will be
PKZIP supports compression of files over 9 exebytes in size.
We went from PKZIP to ZIP/390, because of cost and support issues.
ZIP/390 comes from DATA21 (www.data21.com).
Both companies support lines are only open 9-5, M-F (local time).
DATA21 is in California, and PKZIP is in Phili (I
Hi Jack,
That is correct, jcl has been running for years not has not been changed.
I am currently running a TMS Audit, per Lizette's suggestion. Perhaps that will
shed some light on the subject.
Dave O'Brien
NIH Contractor
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Schwarz, Barry A pisze:
IND$FILE works with real hard-wired 3270s, not 3270 emulators??
When I excluded anything modern, that included PCs.
I think this is not true. It must be some nightmare, maybe a vision of
mainframer's hell...
PC is not very modern. It was invented in 1980 or 1981.
There's always some people afraid of change. Nothing can be done to fix
that.
I've been happily using IBM's mainframe Unix (for a lack of a better term)
since OE first came out. Ignorant of so-called true Unix, I was eager
to learn all I could about IBM's offering. Good stuff that keeps
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN.
Part of the problem is administrative. Some shops provide no OMVS
segment or user file system space by default to programmers. You have
to ask for and justify it.
Part of the problem is, indeed, the unavailability of the commonly used
GNU tools (again, you need the
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:53:04 -0500, Vince Getgood
vincent.getg...@xchanging.com wrote:
You can change your SMFPRMxx to include SUBSYS(OMVS,EXITS(...,...)
and leave out IEFUSI. Then SET SMF=xx.
In the SMFPRM that I'm using, I have: -
SUBSYS(OMVS,NOTYPE(4,5,19,20,40,62,63,65:69,99)
Right Peter,
And with Linux running right next door on the same CEC why bother with
OE? I don't think they can share DASD but FTP would be real fast.
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com
502-495-5000 x7011
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I know a few of you helped me in the Past with this question Thankx ( If I
forgot)
But let me reiterate for a Common Storage Address
The GDA would have storage thats was already allocated while using VSMLOC would
tell if the storage address was obtained through GETMAIN/STORAGE macro
Unless, of course, that physical volume has any striped datasets or datasets
with extents on other volumes. If so, then you need all of the volumes involved
and the backups have to be at a point of consistency (all the affected datasets
closed and not in use).
-Original Message-
Hello everyone. I have some datasets on ML2 that have long since been
uncataloged that I need to recall. I've loked for ways to either recatalog
then recall them or recall and recatalog them, but no luckthere yet.
Thanks.
--
Two questions about CTRACE
1) Trying to see the trace via IPCS and I get
ITT10013I The CTRACE subcommand does not support formatting for
COMP(SYSTCPDA)
If I do CTRACE QUERY, I get SYSTCPDA and SYSTCPIP as components
adn they have our stack as the subsys name. I really thing
How do you know they're still on the ML2 tape?
Were these datasets backed up by DFHSM before migration? If so, could
you try a recover of the backup instead of a recall of the migrate?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf
DEF NVSAM(NAME('original.dsn') DEVT(3390) VOL(MIGRAT))
Then issue hrecall
snip
Hello everyone. I have some datasets on ML2 that have long since been
uncataloged that I need to recall. I've loked for ways to either
recatalog
then recall them or recall and recatalog them, but no luckthere yet.
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:43:42 -0500, Bob Molerio bobmole...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that TSM 6.1 for z/OS has not been released and IBM is currently
evaluating whether or not to ever release it.
Anyone running TSM on z/OS might want to contact their Tivoli Storage
Manager sales or technical
AFAIK, IEBEDIT has never been updated to recognize the INCLUDE
statement. Have you considered opening a PMR on this issue?
--
Rick
--
Remember that if you’re not the lead dog, the view never changes.
SUBSCRIBE vignesh wrote:
Hi,
Iam trying to execute an IEBEDIT JCL on a JOB which is
I think you use RECOVER rather than RECALL when it is not cataloged.
Lizette
Hello everyone. I have some datasets on ML2 that have long since been
uncataloged that I need to recall. I've loked for ways to either recatalog
then recall them or recall and recatalog them, but no luckthere yet.
If you tried to recat them to MIGRAT2 and they don't recall, then you'll
need to check the MCDS to see if HSM knows about them- probably not. If
you know the tape that they were migrated to and it hasn't been recycled
you could build a MCDS entry but you'll have to want this data very badly.
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:12:12 -0500, Howard Whitehead
hwhiteh...@statesman.com wrote:
Hello everyone. I have some datasets on ML2 that have long since been
uncataloged that I need to recall. I've loked for ways to either recatalog
then recall them or recall and recatalog them, but no luckthere
IBM documentation at
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/index.jsp does not
support the statement that TSM 6.1 will not be available for z/OS, for the
client, at least.
The IBM® Tivoli® Storage Manager for z/OS® UNIX® System Services
Backup-Archive Client 6.1 is available.
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:41:53 -0600, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com
wrote:
...They seem to regard UNIX on z/OS as an abomination.)
I'd like to understand this visceral reaction, with an
eye to seeing what can be done to moderate it down to at
least a level of skepticism (OK, what can this
I didn't know you COULD recat to MIGRAT2. Could I trouble you for some
sample code for that to save me some time?
I tried the RECOVER command but I got an ARC1128 BACKUP/DUMP COPY DOES NOT
EXIST.
Thanks all.
--
For IBM-MAIN
If you tried to recat them to MIGRAT2 and they don't recall, then you'll
need to check the MCDS to see if HSM knows about them- probably not. If
you know the tape that they were migrated to and it hasn't been recycled
you could build a MCDS entry but you'll have to want this data very
badly.
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:53:49 -0400, Steven Conway
steven_con...@freddiemac.com wrote:
IBM documentation at
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6/index.jsp does not
support the statement that TSM 6.1 will not be available for z/OS, for the
client, at least.
The IBM® Tivoli®
we had the same java 'fatal' storage error for almost a year when we first went
to z/os 1.9. It happened with all releases of java - 1.4, 1.5, 1.6.
No one seemed to know how to fix it although I suspected that IEFUSI was the
cause, I could not prove it to those responsible for the exit.
And we
The onl copy I have is the tape ML2. As far as I can tell, my MCDS data is
good, it's just that the data set has been uncataloged for a very long time
so HSM on't allow the recall. I'm trying to research recating to MIGRAT2
but so far I'm strikin' out.
Thanks,
Howard
Thanks for the info.
The last time I used the product, you didn't.
And, it wasn't on the horizon.
But, that was 2 years ago.
One more reason to select ZIP/390 over PKZIP.
How are you on file size limits?
--Original Message--
From: supp...@data21.com
Sender: David L. Kennedy
To: (yahoo)
Howard,
I am not sure how you would catalog a volser of MIGRAT2 which is 7 chars. The
VSAM Define seems to only allow for 6 chars.
Maybe somebody on the list can figure this out.
Lizette
The onl copy I have is the tape ML2. As far as I can tell, my MCDS data is
good, it's just that the
See my previous post: MIGRAT/MIGRAT2 is a display convention. Catalog to
volser MIGRAT. HSM will figure it out.
DEF NVSAM(NAME('original.dsn') DEVT(3390) VOL(MIGRAT))
Then issue hrecall
snip
The onl copy I have is the tape ML2. As far as I can tell, my MCDS
data is
good, it's just that the
FWIW, if you run java via the JZOS Batch launcher with the LOGLVL='+D'
option, it will print out the requested vs actual
below-line/above-line/above-bar storage from the LDA.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
--
For IBM-MAIN
I am not sure how you would catalog a volser of MIGRAT2 which is 7 chars.
The VSAM Define seems to only allow for 6 chars.
That's because the OS only allows 6 chars for a volser (tape or disk).
Maybe somebody on the list can figure this out.
It's not a VSAM restriction, unless you call an OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Klein, Kenneth
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why are z/OS people so reluctant to use z/OS UNIX?
Right Peter,
And with Linux
MIGRAT2 is code speak for catalogued to volser MIGRAT on a TAPE unit as
opposed to a DASD unit.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
Thanks for the info. I had missed it before. I also found something in the
HSM Stg Admin Guide 5.1.9 Case 9...reestablish access to Previously Deleted
Migrated Data Sets (No Backup Exists, ML2 Only). You nd this may have me on
the right track. I'll update with what happens.
Thanks all!
Howard
snip
I am not sure how you would catalog a volser of MIGRAT2 which is 7 chars
unsnip
That was my fault. You only catalog the migrat, I put the migrat2 to
indicate it was ml2 BUT it's only a display.
Howard seems sure that the file exists on ML2 and I really hope that he
knows that for sure
That's the client that used to backup files from the OMVS environment. The TSM
server up to 6.1 runs under zOS as one of the supported platforms. TSM V6.1
server has not been announced for zOS. We were told that V5.5 is going to be
the last release of TSM for zOS.
Mark Jacobs
-Original
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 06/03/2009
12:23:57 PM:
Two questions about CTRACE
1) Trying to see the trace via IPCS and I get
ITT10013I The CTRACE subcommand does not support formatting for
COMP(SYSTCPDA)
If I do CTRACE QUERY, I get
For MIGRAT2, wouldn't you specify DEVT() having as the device
type used for HSM ML2 media rather than specifying 3390?
Terry Traylor
charlesSCHWAB
TIS Mainframe Storage Management
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg
(602) 977-5154
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi all -
Does anyone know if there is a way, using CLASS(PROGRAM) in RACF (z/OS V1R8
and higher) to define all accesses to a given program??
That is:
RDEF PROGRAM(PGMNAME) UACC(NONE) ADDMEM(LIBNAME/VOLUME/NOPADCHK)
will deny access to LIBNAME(PGMNAME) but only if LIBNAME is on VOLUME.
Mark and Bruno, thanks for the clarification. I missed it that the
server, not the client, was in question here.
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems Services Division
Computer Network Operations
Phone: (703) 450-3156
Fax:(703) 450-3197
A veteran is someone who,
I am using codepage 1047, but for some reason the left and right brackets are
showing as blanks in ISPF. Intrestingly hey show up just fine in OMVS.
Here is a REXX EXEC that I use to show me my current code page:
address ispexec vget (ztermcid) shared
say current encoding is ztermcid
exit
AFAIK either will work.
snip
For MIGRAT2, wouldn't you specify DEVT() having as the device
type used for HSM ML2 media rather than specifying 3390?
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
MIGRAT2 is code speak for catalogued to volser MIGRAT on a TAPE unit as
opposed to a DASD unit.
Unfortunately, as you saw from the responses, not all of us speak the same
code.
A more specific response may have been more helpful (I mean that in the nicest
possible way).
(8-{]}
-
Too busy
It is true that MIGRAT2 can also be on as DASD device.
Terry Traylor
charlesSCHWAB
TIS Mainframe Storage Management
Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg
(602) 977-5154
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday,
Frank,
Is your emulator using the same code page as the host?
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/SIM/simplist.htm
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:28:27 -0500
From: fswarbr...@gmail.com
Subject: strange
It is true that MIGRAT2 can also be on as DASD device.
Yes, but.
MIGRAT2, by itself, is meaningless since volsers can only be 6 bytes long.
A detailed description would have helped.
PS: The first shop that I worked with HSM in had ML1 ML2 both on disk.
And, that was back when DISK was
The exec works!!
This is what we are using and there are no open issues with
translations.
current encoding is 00037
Ken Klein
Sr. Systems Programmer
kenneth.kl...@kyfb.com
502-495-5000 x7011
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
We have intermittently began seeing these messages in the log, followed by
the 'all clear now' one.
*ISG368E THE CONCURRENT UNAUTHORIZED REQUEST COUNT FOR ASID 0122 44
HAS EXCEEDED THE 80 PERCENT THRESHOLD OF THE SYSTEM-WIDE MAXIMUM,
16384
I have spent some time sifting thru enque reports and
Have you issued a D GRS,A command and reviewed that.
Lizette
We have intermittently began seeing these messages in the log, followed by
the 'all clear now' one.
*ISG368E THE CONCURRENT UNAUTHORIZED REQUEST COUNT FOR ASID 0122 44
HAS EXCEEDED THE 80 PERCENT THRESHOLD OF THE SYSTEM-WIDE
Oops, I meant a D GRS,RES=(*,*) and see what all you have out there?
Probably could use ENQ in ISRDDN as well.
Lizette
Have you issued a D GRS,A command and reviewed that.
Lizette
We have intermittently began seeing these messages in the log, followed by
the 'all clear now' one.
Oops, I meant a D GRS,RES=(*,*) and see what all you have out there?
Probably could use ENQ in ISRDDN as well.
Also, and this requires preparation, you could have ENQ conflict
reporting/collection set up under RMF and look up in post-processing.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:28:27 -0500, Frank Swarbrick fswarbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using codepage 1047, but for some reason the left and right brackets are
showing as blanks in ISPF. Intrestingly hey show up just fine in OMVS.
Here is a REXX EXEC that I use to show me my current code page:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:34:52 -0500, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
FWIW, if you run java via the JZOS Batch launcher with the LOGLVL='+D'
option, it will print out the requested vs actual
below-line/above-line/above-bar storage from the LDA.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
In which case
Does this look right? The check gets a rc 4. I combined the KDSJ1APP job
from the tape (line 340002) and the sourceids from the memo to users
extension (lines 345102-346202) and the smppunch output from a report
errorsysmods (lines 348902-350702).
//KQKTEMPS JOB (3356,277),'KLEIN,
The comments of your coworker are simply irrational rant for which no rational
answer would suffice. Tell him to calm down tell what exactly his problem is
with regard to DB2. That might be something that can be rationally discussed.
IBM's Roger Miller once mentioned a quote from some book by
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
