> On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, my company REQUIRES that any replies include everything in the
> past. Too many people were taking things out of context and replying to them
> and CC'ing others. Then the others would then get involved
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:47:10 -0500, Bill Woodger wrote:
>
>As to having a bit of diagnostic code just before your table, just pretend it
>is data. After all, any hll calling the table is going to pretend your table
>is code.
>
I believe C supports initializable external data objects, both
What the top-posting vs. bottom-posting folks don't seem to recognize is
that both have their uses.
In a business conversation, a thread may go thru 20 exchanges, and then
someone new gets added. That person is going to be completely lost without
the history to follow up on, and the existing
Can you be specific about where the hll programs come in to it, and why/how
marking it non-executable would help with that? If you just make it
non-executable there'll be an Sx06 abend won't there?
As to having a bit of diagnostic code just before your table, just pretend it
is data. After
I presume your colleagues are using SDSF to peruse OPERLIB. Have
they tried to FILTER for just the system of interest?
At 11:19 AM 8/19/2016, you wrote:
We run both SYSLOG and OPERLOG. We archive both in daily GDGs in the
generating sysplex that eventually migrate. I personally use OPERLOG
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:53:10 -0400, Charles Mills wrote:
>> And what about dumps?
>
>Operating systems have magic tricks up their sleeves.
>
>> One motivation was to protect intellectual property
>
>Risking topic drift there but a major motivation is security. ...
Same here - We tried the integrated route and then separated again. Management
philosophies are too different between the stacks.
Jerry Whitteridge
Manager Mainframe Systems & Storage
Albertsons - Safeway Inc.
925 738 9443
Corporate Tieline - 89443
If you feel in control
you just aren't going
Mainframe FICON and switches are separate from network and open systems. By
design. ;-)
.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-302-7535 Office
robin...@sce.com
-Original Message-
From:
On 08/19/2016 02:55 PM, Andy Higgins wrote:
If I had to guess (and I do) I'd say the complaint (RC8 RSN3A?) is due to the
trailing blanks in the pattern. The example in the book has a pattern with no
trailing blanks.
hth
Andy
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:54:15 -0400, Steve Thompson
Do these chpids connect to any fiber switches not controlled by you? I got
called very early one morning due to a bunch of channel errors. At the data
center where I worked, fiber switches were not owned by our group. The
brainiacs who did own responsibility for the switch decided to take
Did you determine what the problem was?
My input would have been to compare Syncsort default parameters in case someone
forgot to migrate them to the new release.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
SMF type 26 (job purge) has the submitting user ID - but _not_ task
identification (job name/job id/reader time). We have for some reason jobs
submitted by the scheduler which run IEBEDIT to "submit" another job and that
job in turn "submits" another - all with user ID propagation. They are
Lionel fumble fingered http://www.lbdsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lionel B Dyck
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 2:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: PDSEGEN Update - V4.0
I've made a number of
I see and understand some people's desire to directly allocate in KB, MB, GB
(or, coming soon to an array near you, probably TB, and PB).
What I like about AVGREC is the ability to allocate in _records_, eliminating
tedious space calculations when I have a good estimate of the size of a
I've made a number of usability enhancements that will make this ISPF
application even better. Download it at www.lbdsfotware.com
If you haven't tried using PDSE Version 2 Member Generations because you're
not sure how to access them (because ISPF is very non-intuitive and you
don't have a
Hi John,
I don't think that you "need" to IPL in order to implement this change.
You can try changing the VTAMLST definition for the LU named A03AT001.
I am not sure if this is an APPPL definition or NOT. Once changed in VTAMLST,
you can try a V
Hi Elardus,
We are using NVAS. I agree that EMSMODE is an NVAS logmode table.
No IEV043* messages.
I shall get the ops to bounce the Development LPAR on the W/E.
Best regards,
Jon Bathmaker
On 8/19/2016 8:37 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Jon Bathmaker wrote:
I am a VTAM usedtobe (in
If I had to guess (and I do) I'd say the complaint (RC8 RSN3A?) is due to the
trailing blanks in the pattern. The example in the book has a pattern with no
trailing blanks.
hth
Andy
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:54:15 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
>I am having a problem with
We currently have HVCOMMON set to 132G. We had to do this for DB2. When DB2
starts up it looks to see how much high common is defined.
Thanks..
Paul Feller
AGT Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
I am having a problem with IEATDUMP. I am trying to use I've
read the manuals. I've searched the manuals.
If I understand correctly, resolves to nnn such as 001, 002, etc.
So why is the system complaining about this construct (at
execution time, not during assembly):
DC
> If it has executable code, then it has to be RENT.
Why? Otherwise every (dumb) user gets his own copy?
> Remember Heinlein -- The reason we can't make things foolproof is because
> fools are so ingenious (or something very close to that).
I always say that if you make it foolproof nature
I usually top post because I don't know how to make Outlook.com do otherwise.
That being said, I kind of disagree with what you said about judicious snipping
"defeating the benefit" of bottom posting. In fact it enhances it, as it
allows the reader to first browse the quoted message and then
On 08/19/2016 11:41 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Why NOREUS
Ah! In other words, because the table is modified by its users. I pictured a
read-only table.
BTW, I like @Woodger's idea of solving the problem by giving it an executable
entry point that does WTO 'WTF do you think you're
On 08/19/2016 11:35 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:40:38 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
I am working on a problem where I have a loadable table. So far I
have specified NOREUS, OL (Load Only).
In my hazy memory going back into the '70s, I thought there was a
way to mark a
* One time, this guy handed me a picture of him, he said "Here's a picture
of me when I was younger." Every picture is of you when you were younger.
"Here's a picture of me when I'm older." "You son-of-a-bitch! How'd you pull
that off? Lemme see that camera... What's it look like? "
Unfortunately, my company REQUIRES that any replies include everything
in the past. Too many people were taking things out of context and
replying to them and CC'ing others. Then the others would then get
involved because they thought the original poster was in the wrong.
So, the rule came
DASD data sets can have various retention periods (or expiration dates), either
by SMS Data Class or JCL. In CA Disk you can use the DSCL EXPIRE command to
remove DASD data sets which are past their retention date.
There is likely a DFSMShsm (or maybe DFDMSdss) equivalent is for this, and
What do you specify for HVCOMMON= in IEASYSxx?
Are you letting it default to 64GB?
Do you have applications using above-the-bar common? How much?
Thanks,
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
I'm with Skip here. And while we're at it, why do companies/people still insist
on putting out these idiotic "legal notices" which seem to hold no relevance in
law anywhere, or any relevance to anything.
It's just 'noise'! (And clutters up emails!)
ALH
-Original Message-
We run both SYSLOG and OPERLOG. We archive both in daily GDGs in the generating
sysplex that eventually migrate. I personally use OPERLOG almost exclusively,
but in practice, during 20 years of parallel sysplex, I have had to deal with
very few cross-member problems. Some of my colleagues are
Amen to that.
The days of dial-up lines and 5MB hard drives are long past. Time is precious;
megabits, megabytes and arcane rules are not.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday,
As a top-poster, I routinely delete all legal notices. Those are someone else's
problem. I also delete the IBM-Main boiler plate (unless I forget). I do not
attempt to decide what's relevant and what's not. Again, someone else's
problem. I also try to reply to the latest post in a thread even
> And what about dumps?
Operating systems have magic tricks up their sleeves.
> One motivation was to protect intellectual property
Risking topic drift there but a major motivation is security. When you read
about various vulnerabilities, what is the phase you see again and again?
Buffer
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe_ID=93288
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
> Why NOREUS
Ah! In other words, because the table is modified by its users. I pictured a
read-only table.
BTW, I like @Woodger's idea of solving the problem by giving it an executable
entry point that does WTO 'WTF do you think you're doing?'/ABEND U911. Trivial
to do and a great,
W dniu 2016-08-19 o 16:51, Jousma, David pisze:
It was missing from my 2.2 Serverpac. I added the DDDEF manually when I came
across this PTF.
It seems someone forgot about SHZCINC directory, that's why PTF was issued.
Now we have elements, but not a DDDEF, maybe someone forgot to create
On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:40:38 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
>I am working on a problem where I have a loadable table. So far I
>have specified NOREUS, OL (Load Only).
>
>In my hazy memory going back into the '70s, I thought there was a
>way to mark a module NX (not executable) without having to
On 8/18/2016 9:36 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
No offense but I remember you differently from a SHARE conference 20??? years
ago in Chicago.
You look younger, and I guess thats good.
Back then, I was still playing in rock bands and I had long hair down
the middle of my back.
If I somehow look
If you do a STORAGE OBTAIN and build a data structure, or tables,
arrays or whatever, is that storage effectively NOREUS, REUS or RENT?
Now, if you specify IDENTIFY (if I remember this correctly) you
now make your area available to any program that can do a LOAD
for the name you used. Now
It was missing from my 2.2 Serverpac. I added the DDDEF manually when I came
across this PTF.
_
Dave Jousma
Manager Mainframe Engineering, Assistant Vice President
david.jou...@53.com
1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546
What makes it even more fun is when some of us top post and others bottom post
- like I'm doing here. :-)
If I do post something to a chain that has any length to it, I try to follow
the convention of the chain as well as deleting irrelevant information.
Rex
-Original Message-
On 2016-08-19 09:11, David Boyes wrote:
include ONLY the relevant portion of the note you’re replying to. It focuses
your reply on the important part of what you’re trying to say.
We don’t need to see 11 copies of the required disclaimers, etc.
What David said. And BTW, doing so more or less
In general, we add a DDDEF for SMPPARM to every SMP/E ZONE we utilize. That
DDDEF points to a data set with our customized GIMDDALC member. Then we don't
have to worry about SYSUTn, SMPWRKn, SMPTLIB, or any of the DDNAMEs that are
used for SYSOUT(*). That way, if one of those DDDEFs is
>So anyone have any ideas how to avoid the HLL programmer doing a
>CALL and executing data?
>
What is really the issue? It's going to get picked up in program testing if
someone does it.
If an HLL program attempts to CALL and instead you make the table otherwise
unavailable it is just going to
Looks like LET(0) will mark it NX if you can force some sort of warning. What
do you get for an unsupported option? PARM='LET(0),FOO'
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, August 19,
Only Forever is valid for DASD datasets, otherwise ignored. Valid for
Tape datasets.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Paul Schuster wrote:
> At what point in time does the 'expiration date' of a data set get written
> to its catalog entry?
>
> It seems you can allocate
On 8/18/2016 8:50 PM, jerrysconsult...@gmail.com wrote:
With my meager SMPE knowledge I am confused about when to use zonecopy vs
zonemerge vs zoneexport/zoneimport to rename and move the global CSI and to
rename the distribution CSI.
Could some kind soul please point me in the right
W dniu 2016-08-19 o 15:41, John Eells pisze:
R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2016-08-19 o 14:28, Pfister, Nathan pisze:
The dataset, SHZCINC, was added in z/OS 2.1 I believe. It is for zEDC.
The DDDEF should point to /usr/lpp/hzc/include/IBM/
See:
Not the answer to the question you asked but why NOREUS? How does that help?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 9:41 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: How Does
R.S. wrote:
W dniu 2016-08-19 o 14:28, Pfister, Nathan pisze:
The dataset, SHZCINC, was added in z/OS 2.1 I believe. It is for zEDC.
The DDDEF should point to /usr/lpp/hzc/include/IBM/
See:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.e0zm100/at3genf.htm
Thank
I am working on a problem where I have a loadable table. So far I
have specified NOREUS, OL (Load Only).
In my hazy memory going back into the '70s, I thought there was a
way to mark a module NX (not executable) without having to
specify an unresolvable reference while not using LET.
What I
On 8/18/2016 10:44 AM, b...@jndata.dk wrote:
Hi'
We had same issue (SSL mandatory) with SMP/E Receive Order jobs this week and
we have corrected our jobs to recommend FTP option, so now we gets a new FTP
problem:
EZA1701I >>> RETR /2016081863489/PROD/GIMPAF.XML
SC2035
W dniu 2016-08-19 o 14:28, Pfister, Nathan pisze:
The dataset, SHZCINC, was added in z/OS 2.1 I believe. It is for zEDC.
The DDDEF should point to /usr/lpp/hzc/include/IBM/
See:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.e0zm100/at3genf.htm
Thank you.
I found
>>... Personally, I hate bottom-posting, but the
>>majority here seem to be in favor of it, so I comply. I don't
> >bottom-post except on listservs.
>I go a somewhat different way: I trim all the material to which I'm not
>directly replying, especially .sigs, disclaimers, and legal
SMPJHOME can also be used " To support the HTTPS communications with the IBM
Automated Delivery Request server..." ( from SMP/e User's Guide).
Al Nims
Systems Admin/Programmer 3
UFIT
University of Florida
(352) 273-1298
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Exactly /usr/lpp/hzc/include/IBM/
I've also checked in some PMR before applying in my systems.
---
*Lucas Rosalen*
Emails: rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / *lrosa...@pl.ibm.com
Jon Bathmaker wrote:
>I am a VTAM usedtobe (in 1995) trying to get VTAM to load a new logmode table,
>EMSMODE, into its tiny little mind so that I can use a 62x160 screen. I have
>been able to get it to load the table to my active session with the following
>command:
>F
On 8/18/2016 1:14 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
... Of course, the presence of DDDEF entries for SMPWRKn in the
global zone causes no harm, but they will never be used.
Will they be allocated even if never used? Will there be
consequences of an allocation failure?
The SMPWRKn DDDEF entries in
On 8/18/2016 10:57 AM, R.S. wrote:
It's worse, when you *sometimes* need a dataset which has no entry.
This is the case for SMPJHOME. According to documentation it is used
during ACCEPT, but mentioned neither in sample nor in
"ServerPac-delivered" CSI.
From the SMP/E Commands book, the ACCEPT
The dataset, SHZCINC, was added in z/OS 2.1 I believe. It is for zEDC.
The DDDEF should point to /usr/lpp/hzc/include/IBM/
See:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.e0zm100/at3genf.htm
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
This is PTF for z/OS 2.2 (only)
APPLY fails with the following message:
ALLOCATION FAILED FOR SHZCINC BECAUSE THERE IS NO DD or DDDEF
(wording changed a little)
I checked - Indeed, I don't have DDDEF named SHZCINC.
I'm pretty sure no one deleted it since the system is just installed
from
We do this for the most part. We do run IEAMDBLD to offload daily syslog to
GDG for audit/diagnostic purposes. We do keep 1 days worth of syslog on spool
however, because we have many users that use ROSCOE to view syslog. I don't
believe it knows anything about OPERLOG. We also have a
... and also messages after JES2 ended and SYSLOG was closed.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Anthony Thompson
Sent: 19 August, 2016 8:40
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OPERLOG vs SYSLOG
More
???
Using HOD.
On 8/18/2016 9:44 PM, Rob Schramm wrote:
Tn3270?
Rob Schramm
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016, 6:37 PM Jon Bathmaker <
jon.bathma...@sys1consulting.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am a VTAM usedtobe (in 1995) trying to get VTAM to load a new logmode
table, EMSMODE, into its tiny little mind so that I
More significant for us was the ability to look at any system's log via SDSF
from any other system in the 'plex (we're not MASPOOL). Also the ability to
diagnose IPL errors from another system by being able to scroll through and
eyeball the problem system's IPL messages prior to its JES
65 matches
Mail list logo